Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2026, Vol. 60 Issue (5): 977-988    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.05.007
交通工程     
网联环境下高速公路收费费率动态定价模型
蒋贤才(),和鑫垚,张馨月
东北林业大学 土木与交通学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150040
Dynamic pricing model for expressway toll rates in connected traffic environment
Xiancai JIANG(),Xinyao HE,Xinyue ZHANG
College of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
 全文: PDF(3273 KB)   HTML
摘要:

时段差异化收费方式忽略了通行效率与运行安全问题,未使道路资源利用效率得到根本提升. 为此以网联交通为背景,提出高速公路收费费率的动态定价模型(DPM-ET). 以车速标准差刻画运行安全,车速及车辆编队体现通行效率,分别构建单因子定价模型、联合定价的多因子动态费率模型. 以提升高速公路道路资源利用效率为目标,采用斯塔克尔伯格价格博弈驱动驾驶者优化驾驶行为,保持车速平稳、统一,提升高速公路交通流的运行安全. 仿真结果表明,DPM-ET相较于基准方案,车道平均速度提升了2.01%~6.74%,速度稳定性提升了5.22%,编队率最高达到0.9. DPM-ET相较于同类定价方案,最优速差异价值(VoOSD)效果提升了4.68~5.37倍,速度稳定性提升了21.17%,车道平均速度提升了5.22%~11.05%. 当编队里程权重参数为0.7、编队规模定价系数为0.6、奖励系数为0.8、指数衰减速率系数为0.67、标准差定价因子上限为3.2时,DPM-ET处于最佳适用状态.

关键词: 智能交通动态定价收费费率斯塔克尔伯格博弈高速公路    
Abstract:

Differentiated tolling at various time periods neglects issues related to traffic efficiency and operational safety, resulting in no fundamental improvement in the utilization efficiency of road resources. To address this gap, a dynamic pricing model for expressway toll rates (DPM-ET) was proposed within the context of connected transportation. Operational safety was characterized by the standard deviation of vehicle speed, while traffic efficiency was reflected through vehicle speed along with vehicle platoon dynamics. Single-factor pricing models were constructed separately, then integrated with pricing to develop a multi-factor dynamic toll rate model. To enhance expressway resource utilization efficiency, Stackelberg price game theory was used to encourage optimized driving behavior, maintain stable and uniform speeds, and improve traffic flow safety. Simulation results show that compared to the benchmark scheme, DPM-ET improves the average lane speed by 2.01%-6.74% and speed stability by 5.22%, and achieves a maximum platooning rate of 0.9. Compared to similar pricing schemes, DPM-ET improves the value of optimal speed difference (VoOSD) by 4.68-5.37 times, speed stability by 21.17%, and the average lane speed by 5.22%-11.05%. DPM-ET achieves its optimal applicability when the platoon mileage weight is 0.7, the platoon size coefficient is 0.6, the reward coefficient is 0.8, the exponential decay rate coefficient is 0.67, and the maximum standard deviation pricing factor is 3.2.

Key words: intelligent transportation    dynamic pricing    toll rate    Stackelberg game    expressway
收稿日期: 2025-09-16 出版日期: 2026-05-06
CLC:  U 491  
基金资助: 黑龙江省自然科学基金资助项目(PL2024E012).
作者简介: 蒋贤才(1974—),男,教授,博士,从事道路交通管理与控制研究. orcid.org/0000-0001-7703-4004. E-mail:jxc023@126.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章  
蒋贤才
和鑫垚
张馨月

引用本文:

蒋贤才,和鑫垚,张馨月. 网联环境下高速公路收费费率动态定价模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(5): 977-988.

Xiancai JIANG,Xinyao HE,Xinyue ZHANG. Dynamic pricing model for expressway toll rates in connected traffic environment. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(5): 977-988.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.05.007        https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2026/V60/I5/977

图 1  网联环境下高速公路收费费率动态定价模型的概念图
图 2  车辆编队场景示意图
图 3  价格博弈机制下的车辆状态选择(车辆速度)
图 4  价格博弈机制下的车辆状态选择(车辆编队)
驾驶者运营方
hclc
hmCd(hm, hc), Ch(hc, hm)Cd(hm, lc), Ch(lc, hm)
lmCd(lm, hc), Ch(hc, lm)Cd(lm, lc), Ch(lc, lm)
表 1  双方策略选择结果
参数数值参数数值
0车道最高限速/(m·s?1)250车道最低限速/(m·s?1)16.67
1车道最高限速/(m·s?1)30.561车道最低限速/(m·s?1)25
2车道最高限速/(m·s?1)33.332车道最低限速/(m·s?1)30.56
最大加速度/(m·s?2)3.0最小加速度(m·s?2)?5
CAV平均时距/s1/2CAV反应时间/s0.1
CHV平均时距/s2/3CHV反应时间/s1.0
低交通流量/(pcu·h?1)1 500中流量/(pcu·h?1)2 000
高交通流量(pcu·h?1)2 500重复次数5
仿真时长/s3 600车辆长度/m5/12
表 2  模型仿真分析参数取值
图 5  编队率随时间变化情况
图 6  各车道车速与车道车辆保有量对比
图 7  不同交通流量下的通行费、通行时间及平均速度偏差对比
图 8  最优速差异价值的数据分布(3种方案)
图 9  加速度的数据分布(3种方案)
图 10  不同方案的平均车速对比(3条车道)
图 11  不同参数组合的目标函数值对比
组别参数数值组别参数数值
1m0.23d10.90
φ10.8d20.85
φ22.0d30.75
φ31.7ζ10.0
2w2.0?h1.3
Δx1000?f1.0
σl3.24nh1.05
k0.67nm1.00
3sα0.7nl0.90
表 3  参数敏感性分析结果
1 QI X, JIANG Z, ZHANG J Low-carbon joint dispatch of integrated energy systems based on differentiated dynamic pricing mechanisms[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2024, 156: 109774
doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109774
2 KONISHI H, MUN S I Carpooling and congestion pricing: HOV and HOT lanes[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2010, 40 (4): 173- 186
doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.03.009
3 ZONG F, ZENG M, LI Y X Congestion pricing for sustainable urban transportation systems considering carbon emissions and travel habits[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024, 101: 105198
doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105198
4 闫晟煜, 赵佳琪, 尤文博, 等 高速公路货车差异化通行费折扣的双层规划模型[J]. 清华大学学报: 自然科学版, 2025, 65 (7): 1347- 1358
YAN Shengyu, ZHAO Jiaqi, YOU Wenbo, et al Bi-level programming model for differentiated toll discounts for expressway trucks[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University: Science and Technology, 2025, 65 (7): 1347- 1358
doi: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.022
5 张惠玲, 王靖帆, 曹一铄, 等. 基于效益-费用的高速公路货车差异化收费双层优化建模[EB/OL]. (2025−04−08)[2025−05−29]. https://doi.org/10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20241380.
6 陈晓昕 基于降本增效的高速公路差异化收费讨论[J]. 中国产经, 2025, (14): 84- 86
CHEN Xiaoxin Discussion on differential tolling for expressway based on cost reduction and efficiency improvement[J]. Chinese Industry and Economy, 2025, (14): 84- 86
7 JI A, RAMEZANI M, LEVINSON D Pricing lane changes[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2023, 149: 104062
doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104062
8 LIN D, LI L, JABARI S E Pay to change lanes: a cooperative lane-changing strategy for connected/automated driving[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2019, 105: 550- 564
doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.06.006
9 SÁNCHEZ J A, MELENDI D, GARCÍA R, et al Distributed and collaborative system to improve traffic conditions using fuzzy logic and V2X communications[J]. Vehicular Communications, 2024, 47: 100746
doi: 10.1016/j.vehcom.2024.100746
10 HALL J D Pareto improvements from Lexus Lanes: the effects of pricing a portion of the lanes on congested highways[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2018, 158: 113- 125
doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.01.003
11 ABUZWIDAH M, ABDEL-ATY M Assessing the impact of express lanes on traffic safety of freeways[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2024, 207: 107718
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107718
12 FARIAS A V, ZHU S, MARDAN A An overview of dynamic pricing toll roads in the United States: pricing algorithms, operation strategies, equity concerns, and funding mechanism[J]. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2024, 17: 101226
doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101226
13 LOMBARDI C, ANNASWAMY A M, PICADO-SANTOS L Dealing with a multiple access congested suburban freeway using a dynamic toll pricing approach[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2023, 72: 791- 798
doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.469
14 武奇生, 席筱利, 王秋才 计重收费数据处理与费率模拟[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2008, 6 (2): 26- 30
WU Qisheng, XI Xiaoli, WANG Qiucai Data processing and rate simulating of loading-based toll collection[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2008, 6 (2): 26- 30
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4747.2008.02.005
15 任英伟, 陆键, 吴守荣, 等 高速公路可变收费评价指标体系[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2009, 7 (1): 17- 21
REN Yingwei, LU Jian, WU Shourong, et al Variable pricing evaluation and the evaluation index system of freeway[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2009, 7 (1): 17- 21
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4747.2009.01.004
16 LAVAL J A, CHO H W, MUÑOZ J C, et al Real-time congestion pricing strategies for toll facilities[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2015, 71: 19- 31
doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.09.015
17 LOU Y, YIN Y, LAVAL J A Optimal dynamic pricing strategies for high-occupancy/toll lanes[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2011, 19 (1): 64- 74
doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2010.03.008
18 LIU A, ZHONG S, SUN D, et al Joint optimal pricing strategy of shared autonomous vehicles and road congestion pricing: a regional accessibility perspective[J]. Cities, 2024, 146: 104742
doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104742
19 GENSER A, KOUVELAS A Dynamic optimal congestion pricing in multi-region urban networks by application of a Multi-Layer-Neural network[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2022, 134: 103485
doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103485
20 JIN J, ZHU X, WU B, et al A dynamic and deadline-oriented road pricing mechanism for urban traffic management[J]. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2022, 27 (1): 91- 102
doi: 10.26599/tst.2020.9010062
21 KANG Q, JING J, WAN Q, et al Modeling and optimization of toll lane selection for connected and automated vehicles at toll plazas[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2024, 636: 129565
doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2024.129565
22 中华人民共和国国务院. 中华人民共和国道路交通安全法实施条例 [EB/OL]. (2017−10−07) [2026−02−07]. https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff8080816f3cbb3c016f40f566c10e23.
23 KONG D, SUN L, CHEN Y Traffic dynamics around freeway merging area with mixed conventional vehicles and connected and autonomous vehicles[J]. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 2022, 33 (10): 2250128
doi: 10.1142/S0129183122501285
24 KONG D, ZHANG X, WANG M, et al Modeling bounded rationality in discretionary lane-changing with the cumulative prospect theory[J]. Transportation Letters, 2025, 17 (10): 1785- 1800
doi: 10.1080/19427867.2025.2495940
25 LIU C, ZHANG C, YU C, et al Joint optimization of longitudinal and lateral locations of autonomous-vehicle-dedicated lanes on expressways[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024, 25 (1): 430- 442
doi: 10.1109/TITS.2023.3306792
26 TEODOROVIĆ D, EDARA P A real-time road pricing system: the case of a two-link parallel network[J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2007, 34 (1): 2- 27
doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2005.02.041
[1] 马莉,王永顺,胡瑶,范磊. 预训练长短时空交错Transformer在交通流预测中的应用[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(4): 669-678.
[2] 何永福,谢世维,于佳禄,陈思宇. 考虑跨层特征融合的抛洒风险车辆检测方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(2): 300-309.
[3] 刘宇轩,刘毅志,廖祝华,邹正标,汤璟昕. 面向动态交通流量预测的自适应图注意Transformer[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(12): 2585-2592.
[4] 李艳波,卜宇,李若尘,武奇生,魏建民,陈俊硕. 基于改进德尔菲-熵权法的高速公路能源评价体系[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(12): 2645-2654.
[5] 赵利英,王占中. 基于时空信息融合的高速公路区域货运量预测模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(10): 2096-2105.
[6] 张海波,王新月,王冬宇,刘富. 车联网中基于三方Stackelberg博弈的动态多媒体定价方案[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2024, 58(9): 1781-1789.
[7] 李劲业,李永强. 融合知识图谱的时空多图卷积交通流量预测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2024, 58(7): 1366-1376.
[8] 张俊杰,马永锋,陈淑燕,邢冠仰,张子煜. 高速公路施工区车队被动换道行为建模与仿真[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2024, 58(2): 381-387.
[9] 孟闯,王慧. 多信息融合的时空图卷积交通流量预测模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2023, 57(8): 1541-1550.
[10] 李立,平振东,徐志刚,汪贵平. 高速公路行车风险路侧感知系统的设备优化布设[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2023, 57(6): 1137-1146.
[11] 王博,张驰,任士鹏,刘昌赫,谢子龙. 基于速度风险势场的高速公路行车风险甄别方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2023, 57(5): 997-1008.
[12] 徐维祥,康楠,徐婷. 基于出行计划数据的最优路径规划方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(8): 1542-1552.
[13] 徐小高,夏莹杰,朱思雨,邝砾. 基于强化学习的多路口可变车道协同控制方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(5): 987-994, 1005.
[14] 张楠,董红召,佘翊妮. 公交专用道条件下公交车辆轨迹的Seq2Seq预测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(8): 1482-1489.
[15] 夏莹杰,欧阳聪宇. 面向高速公路抛洒物检测的动态背景建模方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(7): 1249-1255.