Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2026, Vol. 60 Issue (4): 712-722    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.04.004
机械工程     
基于迁移学习的离心压气机气动噪声空间辐射特性预测
刘帅凝(),展旭,刘晨*(),王贵新
哈尔滨工程大学 能源与动力工程学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150001
Prediction of spatial radiation characteristics of aerodynamic noise in centrifugal compressors based on transfer learning
Shuaining LIU(),Xu ZHAN,Chen LIU*(),Guixin WANG
College of Energy and Power Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
 全文: PDF(2961 KB)   HTML
摘要:

针对小样本条件下压气机气动噪声空间辐射特性建模难题,提出基于迁移学习的气动噪声空间辐射特性预测方法. 采用计算流体力学(CFD)与声学边界元法(BEM)耦合的混合计算气动声学(CAA)方法,针对压气机A开展多工况气动噪声数值模拟,并采集试验数据对数值仿真模型精度进行验证. 依托压气机B某工况下目标域大量仿真数据,构建并训练基于随机森林的预训练模型,提取气动噪声空间辐射共性特征;在此基础上,借助压气机A某工况下目标域少量标注数据,对预训练模型实施特征迁移与参数微调,构建适配压气机A的迁移学习模型,实现目标域气动噪声辐射特性精准预测. 研究结果显示,所提迁移学习模型预测精度与稳定性显著优于传统机器学习方法,绝大多数测点总声压级预测误差控制小于3 dB,且在小样本场景下具备良好的鲁棒性与泛化性,能为不同型号压气机气动噪声快速预测提供可靠技术支撑.

关键词: 离心压气机气动噪声空间辐射特性迁移学习随机森林    
Abstract:

A transfer learning-driven aerodynamic noise spatial radiation characteristics prediction method was proposed to address the challenge of modeling the spatial radiation characteristics of compressor aerodynamic noise under small-sample conditions. A hybrid computational aeroacoustics (CAA) approach coupling Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) with the Boundary Element Method (BEM) was adopted to perform multi-condition aerodynamic noise numerical simulation for Compressor A. Simultaneously, multi-measurement-point experimental data were collected to complete accuracy verification of the numerical simulation model. Based on extensive simulation data of the target domain under a specific operating condition for Compressor B, a random forest-based pre-trained model was constructed and trained to extract common features of aerodynamic noise spatial radiation. Using a small amount of labeled data from the target domain under a specific operating condition of Compressor A, feature transfer and parameter fine-tuning were implemented on the pre-trained model to establish a transfer learning model adapted to Compressor A, enabling accurate prediction of aerodynamic noise radiation characteristics. Comparative verification indicated that the proposed transfer learning model exhibited significantly superior prediction accuracy and stability compared to traditional machine learning methods. The prediction error of the overall sound pressure level for most measurement points was controlled within 3 dB, and the model demonstrated excellent robustness and generalization ability under small-sample scenarios, thus providing reliable technical support for the rapid prediction of aerodynamic noise in different types of compressors.

Key words: centrifugal compressor    aerodynamic noise    spatial radiation characteristics    transfer learning    random forest
收稿日期: 2025-05-08 出版日期: 2026-03-19
CLC:  TH 165.3  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52201356).
通讯作者: 刘晨     E-mail: 13654390343@163.com;liuchen_hrbeu@hrbeu.edu.cn
作者简介: 刘帅凝(2000—),男,硕士生,从事故障诊断及气动噪声预测. orcid.org/0009-0007-9043-0344. E-mail:13654390343@163.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章  
刘帅凝
展旭
刘晨
王贵新

引用本文:

刘帅凝,展旭,刘晨,王贵新. 基于迁移学习的离心压气机气动噪声空间辐射特性预测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(4): 712-722.

Shuaining LIU,Xu ZHAN,Chen LIU,Guixin WANG. Prediction of spatial radiation characteristics of aerodynamic noise in centrifugal compressors based on transfer learning. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(4): 712-722.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.04.004        https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2026/V60/I4/712

参数数值
叶轮主叶片数8
叶轮分流叶片数8
扩压器叶片数18
设计转速/(r·min?1)23500
研究转速/(r·min?1)22680
设计压比4.2
表 1  压气机A结构参数与设计运行参数
图 1  压气机各部件网格模型
压气机部件网格数
进口管166320
叶轮单流道436524
扩压器单流道192752
蜗壳698585
表 2  压气机各部件具体网格数
图 2  离心压气机声学模型
图 3  场点网格与声压监测点分布
图 4  压气机性能测试试验台
图 5  离心压气机试验与仿真结果对比
监测点OASPLt/dBOASPLs/dB$\varDelta $/dB
A1140.1135.0?4.9
A2142.1142.6+0.5
A3140.3136.1?4.2
A4141.2139.7?1.5
A5138.8136.3?2.5
平均值140.6138.9?1.7
表 3  基于试验结果与数值仿真结果的总声压级对比
图 6  A1处试验测试与数值仿真结果对比
图 7  T-RF模型主要结构
图 8  声学预测的场点网格[19]
图 9  RF模型的基本结构
参数设置
n_estimators500
max_depthNone
min_samples_split2
min_samples_leaf1
表 4  预训练模型参数
参数数值
叶轮主叶片数8
叶轮分流叶片数8
扩压器叶片数16
设计转速/(r·min?1)39600
设计压比5.2
表 5  压气机B结构参数与设计运行参数
参数设置
n_estimators600
max_depthNone
min_samples_split3
min_samples_leaf1
表 6  迁移学习模型参数
图 10  T-RF模型与RF模型预测结果对比
验证面方法MSEMAERMSE
1T-RF模型1.200.871.09
RF模型1.601.001.26
2T-RF模型1.150.841.07
RF模型1.560.911.25
3T-RF模型0.460.470.68
RF模型0.700.580.83
表 7  T-RF模型与RF模型的预测误差
图 11  数据库压缩至1/2以及1/4时数值仿真结果、T-RF模型预测结果以及两者误差图
验证面评价指标MSEMAERMSE
11/2数据库1.200.871.09
1/4数据库1.560.981.25
表 8  T-RF模型在不同数据集下的预测误差
参数数值
叶轮主叶片数9
叶轮分流叶片数9
扩压器叶片数17
设计转速/(r·min?1)12878
设计压比5.1
表 9  压气机C结构参数与设计运行参数
图 12  T-RF模型在压气机C数据库下预测结果对比
1 ZHAO J, WEI Q, WANG S, et al Progress of ship exhaust gas control technology[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 799: 149437
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149437
2 张静 论“双碳” 背景下我国绿色港口的法制建设[J]. 上海大学学报: 社会科学版, 2024, 41 (6): 137- 148
ZHANG Jing On the legal construction of China’s green ports under the background of “double carbon” goals[J]. Journal of Shanghai University: Social Sciences Edition, 2024, 41 (6): 137- 148
3 WUNDERWALD D, MULLER G, HERTEL A, et al. A200-H - the new Benchmark in signle stage turbocharging [C]// Proceedings of the 29th CIMAC World Congress. Vancouver: CIMAC,2019.
4 任自中 船用大中型高压比增压器技术的发展趋势[J]. 柴油机, 2006, 28 (5): 37- 40
REN Zizhong Technical development of large and medium turbochargers with high compression ratio[J]. Diesel Engine, 2006, 28 (5): 37- 40
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4357.2006.05.010
5 刘晨. 船用涡轮增压器离心压气机气动噪声特性分析 [D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2021.
LIU Chen. Analysis of aerodynamic noise characteristics of marine turbocharger centrifugal compressors [D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2021.
6 刘晨, 曹贻鹏, 孙文剑, 等 基于试验的压气机气动噪声特性分析[J]. 内燃机学报, 2018, 36 (2): 153- 158
LIU Chen, CAO Yipeng, SUN Wenjian, et al Experimental analysis of aerodynamic noise characteristics of a marine diesel engine compressor[J]. Transactions of CSICE, 2018, 36 (2): 153- 158
doi: 10.16236/j.cnki.nrjxb.201802020
7 HUANG R, NI J, WANG Q, et al Experimental and mechanism study of aerodynamic noise emission characteristics from a turbocharger compressor of heavy-duty diesel engine based on full operating range[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15 (14): 11300
doi: 10.3390/su151411300
8 曹晓琳, 丁占铭, 王浩宇, 等 压气机气动噪声影响规律试验研究[J]. 车用发动机, 2023, (4): 16- 20
CAO Xiaolin, DING Zhanming, WANG Haoyu, et al Influence law of compressor aerodynamic noise[J]. Vehicle Engine, 2023, (4): 16- 20
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2222.2023.04.003
9 BROATCH A, GALINDO J, NAVARRO R, et al Numerical and experimental analysis of automotive turbocharger compressor aeroacoustics at different operating conditions[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2016, 61: 245- 255
doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2016.04.003
10 SHAHIN I, ALQARADAWI M, GADALA M, et al On the aero acoustic and internal flows structure in a centrifugal compressor with hub side cavity operating at off design condition[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 60: 68- 83
doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2016.10.031
11 闫国华, 吕锋 基于混合数值方法的压气机离散噪声计算及分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19 (13): 312- 318
YAN Guohua, LV Feng Calculation and analysis of compressor discrete noise based on hybrid numerical method[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19 (13): 312- 318
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2019.13.048
12 LIU C, CAO Y, LIU Y, et al Numerical investigation of marine diesel engine turbocharger compressor tonal noise[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2020, 234 (1): 71- 84
doi: 10.1177/0954407019841808
13 汪林生, 宋丹路, 吕文 基于机器学习的斜流压气机多目标优化[J]. 液压与气动, 2022, 46 (12): 135- 144
WANG Linsheng, SONG Danlu, LV Wen Multi-objective optimization of micro mixed-flow compressor based on machine learning[J]. Chinese Hydraulics and Pneumatics, 2022, 46 (12): 135- 144
doi: 10.11832/j.issn.1000-4858.2022.12.019
14 赵天铭, 柳阳威, 唐雨萌 基于机器学习的压气机叶型优化设计[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2023, 44 (4): 914- 921
ZHAO Tianming, LIU Yangwei, TANG Yumeng Optimization of compressor blade based on machine learning[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2023, 44 (4): 914- 921
15 贾哲宇, 温华兵, 朱军超, 等 基于随机森林方法的柴油机涡轮增压器故障诊断[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2023, 45 (6): 109- 113
JIA Zheyu, WEN Huabing, ZHU Junchao, et al Fault diagnosis of diesel engine turbocharger based on random forest method[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2023, 45 (6): 109- 113
16 杜周, 徐全勇, 宋振寿, 等 基于深度学习的压气机叶型气动特性预测[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38 (9): 2251- 2260
DU Zhou, XU Quanyong, SONG Zhenshou, et al Prediction of aerodynamic characteristics of compressor blade profile based on deep learning[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38 (9): 2251- 2260
doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210741
17 JAGADISH BABU C, SAMUEL M P, DAVIS A, et al Prediction of compressor nominal characteristics of a turboprop engine using artificial neural networks for build standard assessment[J]. International Journal of Turbo and Jet Engines, 2023, 40 (1): 11- 20
doi: 10.1515/tjj-2020-0015
18 ZHANG M, HAO S, HOU A Study on the intelligent modeling of the blade aerodynamic force in compressors based on machine learning[J]. Mathematics, 2021, 9 (5): 476
doi: 10.3390/math9050476
19 展旭, 杜少冉, 刘扬, 等 基于机器学习的离心压气机气动噪声空间辐射特性预测[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2025, 46 (9): 1784- 1792
ZHAN Xu, DU Shaoran, LIU Yang, et al Prediction of spatial radiation characteristics of centrifugal compressor aerodynamic noise based on machine learning[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2025, 46 (9): 1784- 1792
doi: 10.11990/jheu.202405013
20 YANG H B, ZHANG J A, CHEN L L, et al Fault diagnosis of reciprocating compressor based on convolutional neural networks with multisource raw vibration signals[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 2019: 6921975
doi: 10.1155/2019/6921975
21 童靳于, 唐世钰, 郑近德, 等 基于自适应深度残差网络的旋转机械故障诊断方法[J]. 振动与冲击, 2024, 43 (20): 162- 171
TONG Jinyu, TANG Shiyu, ZHENG Jinde, et al A direct fast iterative filtering and adaptive deep residual network based fault diagnosis method for rotating machinery[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2024, 43 (20): 162- 171
doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2024.20.017
22 CHU F, DAI B, LU N, et al Improved fast model migration method for centrifugal compressor based on Bayesian algorithm and Gaussian process model[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2018, 61 (12): 1950- 1958
doi: 10.1007/s11431-017-9320-9
23 吴亚军, 康英伟. 基于深度迁移学习的燃气轮机燃烧室故障预警 [EB/OL] (2024−10−25). https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2024.200.
24 GUO F Y, ZHANG Y C, WANG Y, et al Fault diagnosis of reciprocating compressor valve based on transfer learning convolutional neural network[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 2021: 8891424
doi: 10.1155/2021/8891424
25 苏静雷, 王红军, 王政博, 等 多通道卷积神经网络和迁移学习的燃气轮机转子故障诊断方法[J]. 电子测量与仪器学报, 2023, 37 (3): 132- 140
SU Jinglei, WANG Hongjun, WANG Zhengbo, et al Fault diagnosis method of gas turbine rotor with multi-channel convolutional neural network and transfer learning[J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation, 2023, 37 (3): 132- 140
doi: 10.13382/j.jemi.B2206036
26 BREIMAN L Random forests[J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45 (1): 5- 32
doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
27 KELLER P, DAWOOD M, CHOHAN B S, et al HistoKernel: whole slide image level Maximum Mean Discrepancy kernels for pan-cancer predictive modelling[J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2025, 101: 103491
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2025.103491
28 任超, 阎高伟, 程兰, 等 基于最大均值差异的多模态过程过渡模态识别方法[J]. 浙江大学学报: 工学版, 2021, 55 (3): 563- 570
REN Chao, YAN Gaowei, CHENG Lan, et al Transition mode identification method based on maximum mean discrepancy for multimode process[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2021, 55 (3): 563- 570
doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2021.03.017
[1] 杜凡,王勇,严军,郭红想. 基于跨受试者邻近刺激学习的稳态视觉诱发电位信号识别[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(12): 2472-2482.
[2] 王光明,柏正尧,宋帅,徐月娥. 阿尔茨海默病辅助诊断的多模态数据融合轻量级网络[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(1): 39-48.
[3] 陈珂,张文浩. 基于对比学习的零样本对象谣言检测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2024, 58(9): 1790-1800.
[4] 潘琦,江丙云,陈云. 电动汽车充电桩的气动噪声分析和优化[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2024, 58(4): 799-807.
[5] 周姿含,王叙萌,陈为. 基于迁移学习的交互时序数据可视化生成方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2024, 58(2): 239-246.
[6] 赵蕴龙,赵敏喆,朱文强,查星宇. 基于轻量化迁移学习的云边协同自然语言处理方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2024, 58(12): 2531-2539.
[7] 华夏,王新晴,芮挺,邵发明,王东. 视觉感知的无人机端到端目标跟踪控制技术[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(7): 1464-1472.
[8] 高一聪,王彦坤,费少梅,林琼. 基于迁移学习的机械制图智能评阅方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(5): 856-863, 889.
[9] 付晓峰,牛力. 基于深度卷积和自编码器增强的微表情判别[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(10): 1948-1957.
[10] 陈智超,焦海宁,杨杰,曾华福. 基于改进MobileNet v2的垃圾图像分类算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(8): 1490-1499.
[11] 王琪,谢坤,马严,丛群. 基于日志统计特征的DNS隧道检测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(9): 1753-1760.
[12] 康庄,杨杰,郭濠奇. 基于机器视觉的垃圾自动分类系统设计[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(7): 1272-1280.
[13] 沈宗礼,余建波. 基于迁移学习与深度森林的晶圆图缺陷识别[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(6): 1228-1239.
[14] 付晓峰,牛力,胡卓群,李建军,吴卿. 基于过渡帧概念训练的微表情检测深度网络[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(11): 2128-2137.
[15] 邢江宽,王海鸥,罗坤,白云,樊建人. 预测生物质热解动力学参数的随机森林模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(3): 605-612.