Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)  2024, Vol. 50 Issue (2): 308-316    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2023.12.051
研究论文     
阿维菌素与井冈霉素混配对水稻主要病虫害的防治效果
邵美红1(),程楚1,柯汉云1,黄世文2(),李春寿3()
1.建德市农业技术推广中心, 浙江 杭州 311600
2.中国水稻研究所, 浙江 杭州 311401
3.浙江省农业科学院作物与核技术利用研究所, 浙江 杭州 310021
Control efficiency of avermectin and jinggangmycin mixture on major rice diseases and pests
Meihong SHAO1(),Chu CHENG1,Hanyun KE1,Shiwen HUANG2(),Chunshou LI3()
1.Jiande Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Hangzhou 311600, Zhejiang, China
2.China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 311401, Zhejiang, China
3.Institute of Crops and Nuclear Technology Utilization, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, Zhejiang, China
 全文: PDF(1769 KB)   HTML
摘要:

随着生态和绿色农业建设不断推进,环保型低毒生物农药被广泛研发与利用。针对水稻主要病虫害,本研究探讨了不同有效成分用量阿维菌素和井冈霉素混配剂(以下简称阿?井混配剂)在室内试验和田间试验对水稻主要病虫害的防治效果。结果表明:阿?井混配剂对毒杀水稻纹枯病菌、稻飞虱(白背飞虱和褐飞虱)、二化螟、三化螟、黑尾叶蝉有显著的增效作用。其增效作用可部分中和病原菌和害虫的抗药性,从而延长药剂的使用期。使用阿?井混配剂对稻纵卷叶螟和稻螟蛉的毒杀效果与单独使用阿维菌素时的毒杀效果相当。综上所述,生物农药阿维菌素和井冈霉素混配具有提高对水稻主要病虫害防控能力的潜力,并且属于绿色防治方法,值得大力推广应用。

关键词: 阿维菌素井冈霉素混配防治效果水稻病虫害    
Abstract:

With the continuous advancement of ecological and green agricultural construction, environmentally friendly and low-toxicity biopesticides have been widely developed and utilized. This study investigated the control efficiencies of different active ingredient dosages of avermectin and jinggangmycin (A&J) mixture on major rice diseases and pests via both laboratory tests and field tests. The results revealed significant synergistic effects of the A&J mixture on killing Rhizoctonia solani Kühn, rice planthoppers (Sogatella furcifera and Nilaparvata lugens), Chilo suppressalis, Tryporyza incertulas and Nephotettix bipunctatus. This synergism can partially neutralize the resistance of pathogenic fungus and pests, thereby prolonging the duration of pesticide use. The toxic effects of the A&J mixture on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis and Naranga aenescens were found to be similar to those of avermectin alone. Therefore, the A&J mixture has the potential to improve the prevention and control capacities to major rice diseases and pests, and it is a green prevention and control method that is worthy of widespread promotion and application.

Key words: avermectin    jinggangmycin    mixture    control efficiency    rice    disease and pest
收稿日期: 2023-12-05 出版日期: 2024-04-30
CLC:  S481.9  
基金资助: 浙江省重点研发计划项目(2019C02018);浙江省粮油产业技术项目(浙农科发〔2023〕13号-06)
通讯作者: 黄世文,李春寿     E-mail: hzjdsmh@163.com;hswswh666@126.com;lichunshou@126.com
作者简介: 邵美红(https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7520-1340),E-mail:hzjdsmh@163.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
邵美红
程楚
柯汉云
黄世文
李春寿

引用本文:

邵美红,程楚,柯汉云,黄世文,李春寿. 阿维菌素与井冈霉素混配对水稻主要病虫害的防治效果[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2024, 50(2): 308-316.

Meihong SHAO,Chu CHENG,Hanyun KE,Shiwen HUANG,Chunshou LI. Control efficiency of avermectin and jinggangmycin mixture on major rice diseases and pests. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2024, 50(2): 308-316.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2023.12.051        https://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/Y2024/V50/I2/308

处理

Treatment

2 d4 d6 d

抑制率

Inhibition

rate/%

菌核形成情况

Sclerotium

formation

抑制率

Inhibition

rate/%

菌核形成情况

Sclerotium

formation

抑制率

Inhibition

rate/%

菌核形成情况

Sclerotium

formation

S196.50±1.51B++94.51±0.79B++93.01±1.46C++
S298.01±1.01AB++94.81±1.35B++94.30±1.26BC++
S399.87±0.01A99.24±0.12A97.19±1.23AB++
S499.74±0.12A99.37±0.09A98.78±0.82A++
S599.88±0.02A99.72±0.52A99.33±0.62A++
S625.37±0.11D++++18.82±0.82C++++31.97±1.01D++++
S780.54±2.01C18.82±0.11C+++7.70±0.24E+++
CK0E+++0.00±0.70D++++0.00±0.04F++++
表1  阿•井混配剂对水稻纹枯病菌生长以及菌核形成的抑制效果

处理

Treatment

2 h活力

Viability at 2 h

死亡率 Mortality rate/%

校正死亡率

Corrected mortality rate/%

4 h24 h
S1行动减缓,活力下降60.91±0.27D100.00±0.12A100.00A
S2行动减缓,活力下降93.01±0.37A100.00±0.12A100.00A
S3行动减缓,活力下降78.30±0.14C100.00±0.12A100.00A
S4行动减缓,活力下降79.41±0.36C100.00±0.12A100.00A
S5行动减缓,活力下降79.82±0.18C100.00±0.12A100.00A
S6较活泼0.00±0.64E12.95±0.83B0B
S7行动减缓,活力下降82.91±0.26B100.00±0.12A100.00A
CK较活泼0.00±0.64E0.00±0.12C0B
表2  阿•井混配剂对稻飞虱的毒力比较(第1次试验)

处理

Treatment

2 h活力

Viability at 2 h

18 h死亡率

Mortality

rate at

18 h/%

校正死亡率

Corrected

mortality

rate/%

S8行动减缓,活力下降92.00±0.70C91.05±0.05C
S9行动减缓,活力下降92.00±0.06C91.05±0.00C
S10行动减缓,活力下降92.86±0.18BC92.01±0.01BC
S11行动减缓,活力下降92.68±0.35BC91.81±0.19C
S12行动减缓,活力下降94.87±0.24B94.26±0.26B
S3行动减缓,活力下降97.30±1.12A96.98±0.98A
S7行动减缓,活力下降92.86±0.18BC91.80±0.81C
S6很活泼10.64±0.53D0.00±1.00D
CK1行动减缓,活力下降97.37±0.35A97.06±0.06A
CK很活跃9.14±0.89D0.00±1.00D
表3  阿•井混剂对稻飞虱的毒力比较(第2次试验)

处理

Treatment

0.5 h活力

Viability at 0.5 h

死亡率

Mortality rate/%

18 h18.5 h43 h
S11/3迟钝73.33±0.07C86.67±1.17C86.67±0.25C
S2个别迟钝62.50±0.24D86.67±0.17C93.75±0.33B
S31/5迟钝33.33±0.04E64.29±0.21E92.86±0.44B
S41/3迟钝61.54±0.28D73.33±0.17D80.00±0.08D
S53/5将死,2/5迟钝100.00±0.26A100.00±0.50A100.00±0.42A
S6活泼0.00±0.26F0.00±0.50F0.00±0.42E
S7个别迟钝86.67±0.41B90.52±1.02B92.31±0.58B
CK1活泼0.00±0.26F0.00±0.50F0.00±0.42E
CK活泼0.00±0.26F0.00±0.50F0.00±0.42E
表4  阿•井混配剂对稻纵卷叶螟的毒力测定

处理

Treatment

死亡率 Mortality rate

校正死亡率

Corrected mortality rate

0.5 h18 h
S166.67±0.24E100.00A100.00A
S277.78±0.35C100.00A100.00A
S375.00±0.07D100.00A100.00A
S488.89±0.46B100.00A100.00A
S588.89±0.57B100.00A100.00A
S60.00±0.43F0B0B
S7100.00±0.43A100.00A100.00A
CK10.00±0.43F0B0B
CK0.00±0.43F0B0B
表5  阿•井混配剂对稻螟蛉的毒力测定 (%)

处理

Treatment

稻飞虱 Rice planthoppers

水稻纹枯病校正防效

Corrected control efficiency on rice

sheath blight/%

药前百丛稻飞虱数

Number of rice planthoppers

per 100 bushes before medication

校正防效

Corrected control efficiency/%

6 d13 d20 d6 d13 d20 d
S101 250A87.5±0.189B76.3±0.014C80.6±0.157C37.0±0.171E82.1±0.386B100.0A
S13802A88.1±0.131B92.2±0.186A91.0±0.243B45.5±0.171B100.0±0.114A100.0A
S31 049A94.9±2.376A93.8±0.486A93.1±0.343A51.6±0.271A100.0±0.114A100.0A
S71 231A32.7±0.460C38.7±0.314D43.3±0.457D39.4±0.071D100.0±0.114A100.0A
CK11 081A85.5±0.655B87.3±0.286B89.9±0.143B11.2±0.529F33.0±0.186C100.0A
CK2988A89.3±0.200B88.4±0.386B91.4±0.643AB41.5±0.171C100.0±0.114A100.0A
CK31 057A0.0±1.150D0.0±1.014E0.0±0.757E0.0±0.329G0.0±0.114D0B

处理

Treatment

药后41 d稻穗瘟株防效

Control efficiency of rice blast

per plant (41 d after medication)/%

结实率增幅

Increasing rate of seed

setting rate/%

实际产量

Actual rice yield/

(kg/hm2)

实际产量增幅

Increasing rate of

actual rice yield/%

S1055.8±0.186C5.1±0.371E8 958.5±3.780E9.1±0.386D
S1359.8±0.386B12.0±0.287B9 468.6±6.550B15.3±0.414B
S380.1±0.486A14.8±0.329A9 761.7±18.470A18.8±0.914A
S752.1±0.114D7.8±0.171D8 880.3±8.177F8.1±0.486D
CK135.9±0.214E10.6±0.129C9 201.8±8.519D12.0±0.114C
CK252.5±0.114D14.0±0.529A9 377.6±6.687C14.2±0.314BC
CK30.0±0.614F0.0±0.471F8 214.7±26.601G0.0±0.886E
表6  阿•井混配剂对水稻主要病虫害的防效及对水稻产量的影响
1 刘蓉,赵薇,农向群,等.生物杀虫剂组合在有机水稻种植中的作用效果[J].植物保护,2023,49(3):310-316. DOI:10.16688/j.zwbh.2022165
LIU R, ZHAO W, NONG X Q, et al. Efficacy of combined biological insecticides under rice farming without chemical fertilizers and chemical pesticides[J]. Plant Protection, 2023, 49(3): 310-316. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.16688/j.zwbh.2022165
2 刘潇.生物化学农药发展现状及趋势分析[J].化学工业,2021,39(1):53-58. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-9647.2021.01.010
LIU X. Development status and trend analysis of bioche-mical pesticides[J]. Chemical Industry, 2021, 39(1): 53-58. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9647.2021.01.010
3 张开.微生物农药的研究进展[J].四川蚕业,2021,49(2):10-12. DOI:10.13886/j.cnki.sccy.2021.02.004
ZHANG K. Research progress of microbial pesticides[J]. Sichuan Canye, 2021, 49(2): 10-12. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13886/j.cnki.sccy.2021.02.004
4 王丁,杨雪,刘春雷,等.生物农药研究进展[J].绿色科技,2018(24):179-181. DOI:10.16663/j.cnki.lskj.2018.24.064
WANG D, YANG X, LIU C L, et al. Research progress on biological pesticide[J]. Journal of Green Science and Tech-nology, 2018(24): 179-181. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.16663/j.cnki.lskj.2018.24.064
5 李铭,冯伟,崔玉,等.阿维菌素类药物毒理学研究进展[J].安徽农学通报,2013,19(20):29-32. DOI:10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2013.20.037
LI M, FENG W, CUI Y, et al. Research advances of aver-mectins toxicology[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 19(20): 29-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2013.20.037
6 文莹,张立新.阿维菌素的中国“智”造[J].遗传,2018,40(10):888-899. DOI:10.16288/j.yczz.18-194
WEN Y, ZHANG L X. Avermectins, intelligently made in China[J]. Hereditas, 2018, 40(10): 888-899. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.18-194
7 缑仲轩,和凤,李紫萱,等.阿维菌素研究进展与产业综述[J].中国抗生素杂志,2022,47(11):1139-1148. DOI:10.13461/j.cnki.cja.007429
GOU Z X, HE F, LI Z X, et al. Research advances and the industry of avermectin[J]. Chinese Journal of Antibiotics, 2022, 47(11): 1139-1148. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13461/j.cnki.cja.007429
8 王智烨,徐茜,钱海丰.FDA水解检测井冈霉素的土壤微生物活性效应[J].土壤通报,2007,38(5):1030-1032. DOI:10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2007.05.045
WANG Z Y, XU X, QIAN H F. Effect of jinggangmycin on microbial activities in soil by FDA hydrolysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2007, 38(5): 1030-1032. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2007.05.045
9 罗举,刘宇,龚一飞,等.我国水稻“两迁”害虫越冬情况调查[J].应用昆虫学报,2013,50(1):253-260. DOI:10.7679/j.issn.2095-1353.2013.033
LUO J, LIU Y, GONG Y F, et al. Investigation of the overwintering of three species of rice pest, Nilaparvata lugens, Sogatella furcifera and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2013, 50(1): 253-260. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.7679/j.issn.2095-1353.2013.033
10 钟朝军,戴长庚,毛向华.水稻主要虫害绿色防控技术研究[J].耕作与栽培,2022,42(6):123-124. DOI:10.13605/j.cnki.52-1065/s.2022.06.008
ZHONG C J, DAI C G, MAO X H. Study on green control technology of main pests in rice[J]. Tillage and Cultivation, 2022, 42(6): 123-124. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13605/j.cnki.52-1065/s.2022.06.008
11 TANG Q Y, ZHANG C X. Data processing system (DPS) software with experimental design, statistical analysis and data mining developed for use in entomological research[J]. Insect Science, 2013, 20(2): 254-260. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01519.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01519.x
12 张穗,郭永霞,唐文华,等.井冈霉素A对水稻纹枯病菌的毒力和作用机理研究[J].农药学学报,2001,3(4):31-37. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1008-7303.2001.04.004
ZHANG S, GUO Y X, TANG W H, et al. Studies on the toxicity and mechanism of jinggangmycin A on Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA [in vitro (on PDA) and in vivo (in rice plant)[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2001, 3(4): 31-37. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-7303.2001.04.004
13 李广泽,黄柯程,朱卫锋,等.11%阿维菌素•三氟苯嘧啶悬浮剂防治广东稻区稻飞虱和稻纵卷叶螟的药效试验评价[J].世界农药,2021,43(8):26-32. DOI:10.16201/j.cnki.cn10-1660/tq.2021.08.04
LI G Z, HUANG K C, ZHU W F, et al. Field efficacy of abamectin•triflumezopyrim 11% SC against rice planthoppers and rice leaf folders in Guangdong Province[J]. World Pesticide, 2021, 43(8): 26-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.16201/j.cnki.cn10-1660/tq.2021.08.04
14 袁静,郁季平,陈杰,等.阿维菌素和环氧虫啶混配对水稻褐飞虱的协同杀虫作用[J].农药,2014,53(11):840-841. DOI:10.16820/j.cnki.1006-0413.2014.11.018
YUAN J, YU J P, CHEN J, et al. Synergistic insecticidal effect of the mixture of abamectin and cycloxaprid on Nilaparvata lugens [J]. Agrochemicals, 2014, 53(11): 840-841. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.16820/j.cnki.1006-0413.2014.11.018
15 邹晓阳,谢有福,秦厚国,等.30%虱纹灵防治稻飞虱田间试验[J].江西植保,1995,18(4):14.
ZOU X Y, XIE Y F, QIN H G, et al. Field experiment on the control of rice planthopper with 30% Shiwenling[J]. Jiangxi Plant Protection, 1995, 18(4): 14. (in Chinese)
16 农业部种植业管理司.农业部关于印发《到2020年化肥使用量零增长行动方案》和《到2020年农药使用量零增长行动方案》的通知[EB/OL]. (2015-03-18)[2023-11-01].
Ministry of Agriculture. Department of Crop Management. The notices of the Ministry of Agriculture on the issuance of The Action Plan for Zero Growth of Fertilizer Use by 2020 and The Action Plan for Zero Growth of Pesticide Use by 2020[EB/OL]. (2015-03-18)[2023-11-01]. (in Chinese)
17 张欧,王京安,顾辉,等.湖北省稻飞虱抗药性试验研究[J].湖北植保,2018(5):11-12. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6114.2018.05.005
ZHANG O, WANG J A, GU H, et al. Experimental study on pesticide resistance of rice planthoppers in Hubei Province[J]. Hubei Plant Protection, 2018(5): 11-12. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6114.2018.05.005
18 温玉丛,范凯华,师慈,等.褐飞虱对吡虫啉的田间抗性动态分析[J].南京农业大学学报,2010,33(4):55-58. DOI:10.7685/j.issn.1000-2030.2010.04.010
WEN Y C, FAN K H, SHI C, et al. Dynamics in imidacloprid resistance in field population of Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae)[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2010, 33(4): 55-58. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.7685/j.issn.1000-2030.2010.04.010
19 张穗,许文霞,薛银根,等.郑州郊区水稻纹枯病菌对井冈霉素敏感性的初步研究[J].中国生物防治,1995,11(4):171-173.
ZHANG S, XU W X, XUE Y G, et al. A preliminary study on the sensitivity of rice sheath blight fungi (Rhizoctonia solani) to jinggangmycin in Zhengzhou suburbs[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 1995, 11(4): 171-173. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 那好为,刘瑛涵,赵璐峰,唐建军,胡亮亮,陈欣. 水稻品种间作对甲烷排放的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2024, 50(2): 270-279.
[2] 祁通,汤胜,周静杰,马庆旭,吴良欢. 长期覆膜旱作和施用包膜尿素对水稻产量、氮肥利用率及土壤养分的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2024, 50(1): 109-122.
[3] 温佳,梁喜凤,王永维. 基于改进的DeepLabV3+网络模型的杂交水稻育种父母本语义分割研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2023, 49(6): 893-902.
[4] 曾慧玲,莫祖意,蒲巧贤,王家澍,范凯,李兆伟. 水稻OsSPL3启动子克隆及表达分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2023, 49(3): 319-327.
[5] 杨临泽,寿惠霞. 水稻根系分泌物脱氧麦根酸对根际和根内细菌群落组成的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2023, 49(3): 376-388.
[6] 吕梦琪, Sunghwan JUNG, 麻志宏, 万亮, 孙大伟, 岑海燕. 基于无损力学平台的水稻倒伏表型分析(英文)[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2023, 49(1): 129-140.
[7] 张健男,王依名,张洁净,陈磊,罗金燕,易建平,李斌,安千里. 利用实时荧光定量PCR和数字PCR检测鉴定水稻细菌性条斑病菌[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2023, 49(1): 55-64.
[8] 巩龙达,陈凯,李丹,蔡梅,王京文,张奇春. 复合钝化剂施用水平对镉污染农田土壤的修复效果[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2022, 48(3): 359-368.
[9] 谢鹏尧,富昊伟,唐政,麻志宏,岑海燕. 基于RGB图像的冠层尺度水稻叶瘟病斑检测与抗性评估[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2021, 47(4): 415-428.
[10] 吴伊鑫,黄奇伟,叶木军,梁永超,彭红云. 农药减施条件下追施硅肥对水稻抗逆性及产量的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2021, 47(4): 507-516.
[11] 李宏宇,李坤,杨知. 基于时间序列全极化合成孔径雷达的水稻物候期反演[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2021, 47(3): 404-414.
[12] 刘钰莹,张妍,汪哲远,李廷强. 硝化抑制剂与生物炭配施对水稻土氮素转化及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2021, 47(2): 223-232.
[13] 邹文娴,周于宁,顾思婷,黄涂海,支裕优,孟龙,施加春,陈謇,徐建明. 关键时期淹水对不同土壤上水稻镉累积和转运的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2021, 47(1): 74-88.
[14] 怀燕,陈照明,张耿苗,姜铭北,许剑锋,王强. 水稻侧深施肥技术的氮肥减施效应[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2020, 46(2): 217-224.
[15] 尹华锋, 苏程, 冯存均, 李玉琴, 黄智才, 章孝灿. 基于样本知识挖掘的高分辨率遥感图像水稻种植信息提取方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(6): 765-774.