Please wait a minute...
工程设计学报  2026, Vol. 33 Issue (3): 456-471    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2026.05.212
优化设计     
基于BNN-ASMA的液压卡瓦平顶牙型优化设计
张骁(),李琴(),黄志强,魏强,陈彤
西南石油大学 机电工程学院,四川 成都 610500
Optimization design of hydraulic slip flat-top tooth profile based on BNN-ASMA
Xiao ZHANG(),Qin LI(),Zhiqiang HUANG,Qiang WEI,Tong CHEN
School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
 全文: PDF(6020 KB)   HTML
摘要:

针对深井钻探液压卡瓦在夹持钻杆过程中易产生应力集中而造成钻杆损伤的问题,提出了一种融合贝叶斯神经网络(Bayesian neural network, BNN)与青蒿素黏菌算法(artemisinin slime mold algorithm, ASMA)的混合优化方法。以液压卡瓦平顶牙型结构为研究对象,首先建立卡瓦牙-钻杆接触模型,通过有限元分析计算卡瓦牙和钻杆的应力分布,并提取初始数据集;在此基础上,通过正交试验筛选敏感参数并进一步扩充样本数据集,用于代理模型训练。随后,利用BNN构建卡瓦牙齿形参数与力学响应的代理模型(决定系数R2>0.95),并结合ASMA进行多目标优化。结果表明,优化后卡瓦牙的最大等效应力从582.96 MPa降至303.53 MPa(降低了47.9%),钻杆的最大等效应力从360.03 MPa降至235.87 MPa(降低了34.5%),卡瓦牙性能显著提升。研究结果为液压卡瓦牙型结构优化提供了高效、可靠的新思路。

关键词: 液压卡瓦平顶牙型贝叶斯神经网络青蒿素黏菌算法应力优化有限元分析    
Abstract:

To address the issue of stress concentration in hydraulic slips during the gripping of drill pipes in deep well drilling, which often leads to drill pipe damage, a hybrid optimization method integrating Bayesian neural network (BNN) and artemisinin slime mold algorithm (ASMA) is proposed. Taking the hydraulic slip with flat-top tooth structure as the research object, a slip tooth-drill pipe contact model was first established, and the stress distribution of the slip tooth and the drill pipe was calculated through finite element analysis to extract the initial dataset. On this basis, orthogonal experiments were conducted to screen sensitive parameters, and the sample dataset was further expanded for surrogate model training. Subsequently, a BNN-based surrogate model was developed to fit the slip tooth profile parameters and mechanical responses (with a determination coefficient of R2>0.95), followed by multi-objective optimization utilizing the ASMA. The results demonstrated that the maximum equivalent stress of the slip tooth was reduced from 582.96 MPa to 303.53 MPa (a reduction of 47.9%), while the maximum equivalent stress of the drill pipe decreased from 360.03 MPa to 235.87 MPa (a decrease of 34.5%), significantly enhancing the performance of the slip tooth. The research results provide an efficient and reliable novel approach for the structural optimization of hydraulic slip tooth profiles.

Key words: hydraulic slip    flat-top tooth profile    Bayesian neural network    artemisinin slime mold algorithm    stress optimization    finite element analysis
收稿日期: 2025-09-30 出版日期: 2026-06-27
CLC:  TE 929  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41902326);四川省科技计划项目(22GJHZ0284)
通讯作者: 李琴     E-mail: 823352806@qq.com;905973416@qq.com
作者简介: 张 骁(1997—),男,硕士生,从事油气装备智能化研究,E-mail: 823352806@qq.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
张骁
李琴
黄志强
魏强
陈彤

引用本文:

张骁, 李琴, 黄志强, 魏强, 陈彤. 基于BNN-ASMA的液压卡瓦平顶牙型优化设计[J]. 工程设计学报, 2026, 33(3): 456-471.

Xiao ZHANG, Qin LI, Zhiqiang HUANG, Qiang WEI, Tong CHEN. Optimization design of hydraulic slip flat-top tooth profile based on BNN-ASMA[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2026, 33(3): 456-471.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2026.05.212        https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/Y2026/V33/I3/456

图1  平顶卡瓦牙的三维模型及齿形参数
图2  卡瓦牙-钻杆接触模型
结构材料密度/(kg/m3)弹性模量/MPa泊松比屈服强度/MPa抗拉强度/MPa
卡瓦牙20CrMnTi7 8602.12×1050.2891 1301 100
卡瓦座42CrMo7 8502.12×1050.2808601 080
钻杆S135钢7 8502.02×1050.3008761 099
表1  卡瓦与钻杆的材料参数
图3  卡瓦牙-钻杆接触模型边界条件设置
网格数量/个

卡瓦牙最大等效

应力/MPa

钻杆最大等效应力/MPa
最大相对误差/%2.973.50
10 609571.48350.45
12 817577.68352.21
16 138582.96360.98
23 258587.14361.62
29 620588.44362.71
表2  网格无关性验证结果
图4  液压卡瓦夹持钻杆的1/3模型
图5  液压卡瓦夹持钻杆模型网格划分
图6  基于不同模型的卡瓦牙和钻杆等效应力分布对比
图7  液压卡瓦夹持钻杆的有限元仿真结果
图8  平顶卡瓦牙齿形参数示意
图9  牙前角对卡瓦牙和钻杆最大等效应力的影响
图10  牙顶宽对卡瓦牙和钻杆最大等效应力的影响
图11  牙高对卡瓦牙和钻杆最大等效应力的影响
序号牙前角/(°)牙顶宽/mm牙高/mm
1201.22.0
2201.43.0
3201.62.5
4251.23.0
5251.42.5
6251.62.0
7301.22.5
8301.42.0
9301.63.0
表3  卡瓦牙齿形参数正交试验方案
序号

卡瓦牙最大等效

应力/MPa

钻杆最大等效

应力/MPa

1560.71560.46
2476.17325.73
3438.97283.20
4667.71392.35
5448.42344.39
6425.12282.28
7474.76300.85
8430.81338.19
9400.24278.77
表4  卡瓦牙齿形参数正交试验结果
序号齿形参数最大等效应力/MPa
牙前角/(°)牙顶宽/mm牙高/mm卡瓦牙钻杆
1028.01.652.90433.54260.98
1127.01.553.10509.25269.50
1230.01.702.80487.12261.03
1326.01.602.70574.03243.02
1430.01.602.60413.02261.19
1522.01.603.00500.46235.57
1632.01.723.20392.84220.26
1728.01.752.80427.25254.40
1829.51.682.95467.64264.86
1927.01.653.05473.39258.39
2030.01.702.90472.64261.36
2131.01.683.10404.37228.60
2229.01.722.85475.45265.79
2327.01.782.95458.15264.61
2428.51.653.15496.87261.93
2530.01.703.05462.14237.75
表5  补充试验方案与结果
图12  剔除异常结果后BNN模型的平均 R2
图13  BNN整体架构
类别特征名称程序计算逻辑
基础变量X1原始输入
X2原始输入
X3原始输入
多项式特征X12X1_sq=X1**2
X22X2_sq=X2**2
X32X3_sq=X3**2
交互特征X1X2X1_X2=X1×X2
X1X3X1_X3=X1×X3
X2X3X2_X3=X2×X3
表6  特征工程策略
图14  BNN代理模型的训练过程及其预测结果
图15  基于BNN-ASMA的卡瓦牙齿形参数优化流程
图16  ASMA优化统计结果
图17  ASMA迭代曲线
图18  不同算法的计算时间对比
图19  不同算法的计算稳定性对比
图20  不同算法的计算成功率对比(性能阈值为505)
图21  不同算法的收敛曲线对比
对比项牙前角/(°)牙顶宽/mm牙高/mm
优化前的初始组合30.001.002.50
正交试验最优组合20.001.602.50
NSGA-III优化组合31.072.091.88
ASMA优化组合33.492.092.90
表7  优化前后卡瓦牙齿形参数对比
图22  优化前后卡瓦牙和钻杆的最大等效应力对比
  
[1] 谢帅, 罗乙凯, 朱祥龙, 等. 旋转下套管装置卡瓦牙结构优化[J]. 重庆科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 26(4): 105-112.
XIE S, LUO Y K, ZHU X L, et al. Optimization of the slip tooth structure of the rotating casing device[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 26(4): 105-112.
[2] 蒋发光, 谢帅, 闫永宏, 等. 顶驱下套管用卡瓦板承载能力分析及卡瓦牙结构优化[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2017(4): 202-205.
JIANG F G, XIE S, YAN Y H, et al. The slip bearing capacity analysis and slip's tooth structure optimization of top drive casing running[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2017(4): 202-205.
[3] 张俊亮, 刘汝福, 李丽云, 等. 整体式卡瓦牙型结构优化及试验研究[J]. 石油机械, 2012, 40(6): 83-86, 97.
ZHANG J L, LIU R F, LI L Y, et al. Optimum design of integral slip tooth profile[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2012, 40(6): 83-86, 97.
[4] LI D X, ZHAO H L, ZHANG S M, et al. Structure optimization of slip by the combination of artificial neural network and genetic algorithm[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 199-200: 1223-1229.
[5] GENG D, ZHANG S M, WANG D G. Inverse deduction of parameters of slip of bridge plug based on RBF neural network model[C]//2011 International Conference on Electric Technology and Civil Engineering. Lushan, Apr. 22-24, 2011.
[6] 李亚飞, 俞易涵, 李展, 等. 基于改进蝠鲼觅食优化算法的配电网储能选址定容研究[J]. 可再生能源, 2025, 43(4): 542-551.
LI Y F, YU Y H, LI Z, et al. Research on site selection and capacity determination of energy storage in distribution network based on improved manta ray foraging optimization algorithm[J]. Renewable Energy Resources, 2025, 43(4): 542-551.
[7] 孙鹏, 罗明武, 孙朝霞, 等. 采用改进杜鹃搜索算法的主动配电网双层分布式风电规划方法[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40(9): 2743-2749.
SUN P, LUO M W, SUN Z X, et al. An improved approach based on cuckoo search algorithm for bi-level distributed wind generation planning in active distribution network[J]. Power System Technology, 2016, 40(9): 2743-2749.
[8] HU G, CHENG M, HOUSSEIN E H, et al. SDO: a novel sled dog-inspired optimizer for solving engineering problems[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2024, 62: 102783.
[9] SUTHA A, TANGARAMVONG S, PYONE E C, et al. Artemisinin slime mold algorithm for large-scale truss optimization under frequency constraints[J]. Structures, 2025, 80: 110045.
[10] 陈晓君, 王秀梅, 沈瑞东, 等. 基于CAE的卡瓦对钻杆造成的咬痕分析[J]. 工业控制计算机, 2014, 27(5): 115-117.
CHEN X J, WANG X M, SHEN R D, et al. Analysis of slip bite-mark on drill-string based on CAE technique[J]. Industrial Control Computer, 2014, 27(5): 115-117.
[11] American Petroleum Institute. Specification for drill pipe: [S]. Washington: API Publishing Services, 2020.
[12] 祝效华, 李金和, 童华. 含卡瓦作业损伤钻柱的适用性评价研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2012, 48(16): 97-101. doi:10.3901/jme.2012.16.097
ZHU X H, LI J H, TONG H. Study on serviceability evaluation of drill-string with slip bite-mark[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 48(16): 97-101.
doi: 10.3901/jme.2012.16.097
[13] 马卫国, 沈如芳, 赵国强, 等. 大负载不压井作业机液压卡瓦结构的优化设计[J]. 石油机械, 2020, 48(8): 69-76.
MA W G, SHEN R F, ZHAO G Q, et al. Structure design of hydraulic slip of heavy-duty snubbing unit[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2020, 48(8): 69-76.
[14] 朱海燕, 刘清友, 莫丽, 等. 钻杆卡瓦牙板齿齿形设计[J]. 石油机械, 2008, 36(11): 68-70.
ZHU H Y, LIU Q Y, MO L, et al. Tooth profile design of drill pipe slip tooth plate[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2008, 36(11): 68-70.
[15] BLUNDELL C, CORNEBISE J, KAVUKCUOGLU K, et al. Weight uncertainty in neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning. Lille, Jul. 6-11, 2015.
[16] AMEUR H, NJAH H, JAMOUSSI S. Merits of Bayesian networks in overcoming small data challenges: a meta-model for handling missing data[J]. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2023, 14(1): 229-251.
[17] POLI R, KENNEDY J, BLACKWELL T. Particle swarm optimization[J]. Swarm Intelligence, 2007, 1(1): 33-57.
[18] MEIDANI K, HEMMASIAN A, MIRJALILI S, et al. Adaptive grey wolf optimizer[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2022, 34(10): 7711-7731.
[19] ZHANG X Q, ZHANG Y Y, MING Z F. Improved dynamic grey wolf optimizer[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2021, 22(6): 877-890.
[20] DEB K, JAIN H. An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, Part I: solving problems with box constraints[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2014, 18(4): 577-601.
[1] 慕锐,赖磊捷. 旋转纳米运动柔性解耦机构的设计与分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2025, 32(6): 822-830.
[2] 张绪亮,史君林,董仁,练章华,查磊,蒋洪波. 175 MPa超高压井口6BX型法兰结构评价及轻量化设计[J]. 工程设计学报, 2025, 32(4): 499-513.
[3] 蔡锦云,刘忠,王罡,赵庆斌,安宁,杜旭伟,李东良,李源周. 基于响应面法的绞磨机辅助拉尾绳装置优化设计[J]. 工程设计学报, 2024, 31(2): 178-187.
[4] 谢超,陈云壮,石光楠,赖磊捷. 正交簧片型大行程柔性球铰设计及柔度分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2023, 30(5): 626-633.
[5] 张涛,王开松,唐威,秦可成,刘阳,石雨豪,邹俊. 电流体泵驱动的柔性弯曲执行器的设计及分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2023, 30(4): 467-475.
[6] 李琴,闫瑞,黄志强,李刚. 电驱可控震源驱动电机匹配设计与优化研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2023, 30(2): 172-181.
[7] 李三平,孙腾佳,袁龙强,吴立国. 气动软体采摘机械手设计及实验研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2022, 29(6): 684-694.
[8] 赵致勃,顾大强,李立新,张靖. 基于接触应力优化的摆线轮修形设计[J]. 工程设计学报, 2022, 29(6): 713-719.
[9] 张正峰,宋小雨,袁晓磊,陈文娟,张伟东. Al/CFRP混合薄壁结构耐撞性能可靠性优化设计[J]. 工程设计学报, 2022, 29(6): 720-730.
[10] 孙光明,王奕苗,万仟,弓堃,汪文津,赵坚. 考虑装配变形的精密机床床身优化设计[J]. 工程设计学报, 2022, 29(3): 318-326.
[11] 丰飞,傅雨晨,范伟,马举. 三角混合两级杠杆微位移放大机构的设计及性能分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2022, 29(2): 161-167.
[12] 陈洪月, 张站立, 吕掌权. 线性压缩机圆柱臂盘簧的设计及性能研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2021, 28(4): 504-510.
[13] 王成军, 李帅. 三关节式软体驱动器的设计及其弯曲性能分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2021, 28(2): 227-234.
[14] 周超, 秦瑞江, 芮晓明. 风载荷作用下V形绝缘子串的力学特性分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2021, 28(1): 95-104.
[15] 黄伟, 徐建, 陆新征, 胡明祎, 廖文杰. 动力装备和建筑楼盖的动力吸振研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2021, 28(1): 25-32.