Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2026, Vol. 60 Issue (9): 2015-2022    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.09.019
土木工程、交通工程     
考虑弯矩-刚度相关性的顶底角钢连接力学模型
李依文1,2(),周志光1,*()
1. 同济大学 土木工程学院,上海 200092
2. 香港理工大学 建筑及环境学院,香港 999077
Mechanical model of top-and-seat angle steel connection considering moment-stiffness dependency
Yiwen LI1,2(),Zhiguang ZHOU1,*()
1. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2. Faculty of Construction and Environment, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China
 全文: PDF(1181 KB)   HTML
摘要:

针对现有理论模型对承载力预测精度不足的问题,提出基于力学基本原理的顶底角钢连接抗拉刚度分析模型. 根据角钢构件截面应力积分和应变能等效原理,建立角钢构件截面抗弯刚度与其所承受弯矩之间的显式函数关系. 基于符合实际受力的“刚架模型”,通过增量迭代法求解该抗拉刚度模型,获得顶底角钢连接的力-位移曲线. 通过与已发表的典型试验数据及传统塑性铰模型进行对比,验证了所提抗拉刚度模型的预测精度和有效性. 所提模型能够高保真地复现角钢连接的完整力-位移骨架曲线,精准捕捉角钢连接弹塑性过渡区的抗拉刚度光滑非线性特性. 相较于传统塑性铰模型,所提模型对极限承载力的预测误差从 23.41% 降低至 6.68%,对屈服荷载的预测误差从43.16%降至31.60%.

关键词: 角钢连接力学模型变刚度弹塑性分析构件模型    
Abstract:

An analytical model for the tensile stiffness of top-and-seat angle steel connections was proposed based on fundamental mechanical principles aiming at the problem of insufficient prediction accuracy of load-bearing capacity. An explicit functional relationship between the bending stiffness of angle-steel cross-section and the corresponding bending moment was established by utilizing stress integration over the angle steel cross-section and the notion of strain energy equivalence. The force-displacement curves of top-and-seat angle steel connections were obtained based on a realistic "frame model" that better reflected the actual stress state by solving this tensile stiffness model through an incremental-iterative approach. The prediction accuracy and effectiveness of the new model were verified compared with typical published experimental data and the conventional plastic hinge model. The proposed model could reproduce the complete force-displacement skeleton curve of the connection with high fidelity, precisely capturing the smooth nonlinear characteristics of tensile stiffness in elasto-plastic transition zone of angle steel connections. The prediction error of the ultimate bearing capacity was reduced from 23.41% to 6.68% by the new model, and the prediction error of the yield load was improved from 43.16% to 31.60% compared with the traditional plastic hinge model.

Key words: angle steel connection    mechanical model    variable stiffness    elasto-plastic analysis    component-based model
收稿日期: 2025-09-11 出版日期: 2026-07-20
CLC:  TP 393  
基金资助: 国家重点研发计划资助项目(2024YFC3015100).
通讯作者: 周志光     E-mail: yi-wen.li@connect.polyu.hk;zgzhou@tongji.edu.cn
作者简介: 李依文(1997—),女,博士生,从事金属疲劳研究. orcid.org/0000-0002-1843-5825. E-mail:yi-wen.li@connect.polyu.hk
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章  
李依文
周志光

引用本文:

李依文,周志光. 考虑弯矩-刚度相关性的顶底角钢连接力学模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(9): 2015-2022.

Yiwen LI,Zhiguang ZHOU. Mechanical model of top-and-seat angle steel connection considering moment-stiffness dependency. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(9): 2015-2022.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.09.019        https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2026/V60/I9/2015

图 1  采用刚架模型简化受拉顶角钢连接
图 2  传统塑性铰模型塑性铰阶段螺栓角钢的简化模型
图 3  角钢两肢腿矩形截面应力-应变分布变化
图 4  双角钢拟静力拉伸试验装置
试件名称角钢截面/mmg1(g2)1)/mmt/mm材料种类
注:1) 试验采用等边角钢.
A90-8-50I90×8508I
A90-9-50II90×9509II
A90-9-50III90×9509III
A90-10-50IV90×105010IV
A90-10-60IV90×106010IV
表 1  试件几何特性
图 5  文献[12]中的角钢材料的应力-应变曲线
图 6  钢材多线性本构模型
图 7  典型角钢连接A90-8-50I加载力-位移曲线的比较
模型名称$ {K}_{0} $/
(kN·mm?1)
$ {\eta }_{{{K}_{0}}} $/%$ {P}_{{\mathrm{y}}} $/kN$ {\eta }_{{{P}_{{\mathrm{y}}}}} $/%$ {P}_{\mathrm{u}} $/kN$ {\eta }_{{{P}_{{\mathrm{u}}}}} $/%$ \text{MAE} $/%
试验模型12.78?308.55?580.15??
新提出的抗
拉刚度模型
8.1835.99406.0531.60541.406.6824.76
Yang模型2.4181.1355.85118.10545.605.9568.39
Astaneh-Asl
模型
13.132.70175.3743.16444.3123.4123.09
表 2  关键性能指标试验值与模型预测值对比
图 8  不同规格和材料角钢连接加载力-位移曲线的比较
1 MAHIN S A Lessons from damage to steel buildings during the northridge earthquake[J]. Engineering Structures, 1998, 20 (4): 261- 270
doi: 10.1016/s0141-0296(97)00032-1
2 吴芸, 彭少民, 张其林 角钢连接钢框架抗震性能试验研究与数值分析[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 33 (11): 1438- 1442
WU Yun, PENG Shaomin, ZHANG Qilin Experimental and numerical studies on seismic behaviors of steel frames with top-seat and double web angel connections[J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 2005, 33 (11): 1438- 1442
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2005.11.004
3 BÉLAND T, BRADLEY C R, NELSON J, et al Experimental parametric characterization of bolted angle connection behavior[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2020, 146 (8): 04020160
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002662
4 柳长江, 顾强 顶底角钢连接节点的低周疲劳性能分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2006, 26 (5): 152- 155
LIU Changjiang, GU Qiang Analysis of low-cycle fatigue behavior of top-seat angle steel connections[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2006, 26 (5): 152- 155
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1301.2006.05.024
5 张逍瑶, 刘永华, 梁娟 顶底角钢连接半刚性梁柱钢节点的滞回性能模拟分析[J]. 世界地震工程, 2015, 31 (3): 86- 93
ZHANG Xiaoyao, LIU Yonghua, LIANG Juan Hysteretic performance simulation analysis of semi-rigid steel beam-column joints with top and seat angle connections[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 31 (3): 86- 93
6 PILUSO V, FAELLA C, RIZZANO G Ultimate behavior of bolted T-stubs – II. model validation[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2001, 127 (6): 694- 704
7 KIM J, GHABOUSSI J, ELNASHAI A S Hysteretic mechanical-informational modeling of bolted steel frame connections[J]. Engineering Structures, 2012, 45: 1- 11
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.014
8 SHEN J, ASTANEH-ASL A Hysteretic behavior of bolted-angle connections[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1999, 51 (3): 201- 218
doi: 10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00030-9
9 HU J W, LEON R T, PARK T Mechanical models for the analysis of bolted T-stub connections under cyclic loads[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 78: 45- 57
doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.05.011
10 袁锐文, 杨蔚彪, 卢雷 顶底角钢连接的初始刚度和极限承载力计算[J]. 建筑结构, 2009, 39 (9): 91- 93
YUAN Ruiwen, YANG Weibiao, LU Lei Calculation of initial stiffness and ultimate bearing capacity of top-and-seat angle connections[J]. Building Structure, 2009, 39 (9): 91- 93
11 蔡小宁, 孟少平, 孙巍巍, 等 顶底角钢连接半刚性钢结构抗震性能数值分析[J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29 (7): 124- 129
CAI Xiaoning, MENG Shaoping, SUN Weiwei, et al Numerical analysis for seismic behavior of semi-rigid steel frames with top-and-seat angles[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29 (7): 124- 129
12 YANG B, TAN K H Robustness of bolted-angle connections against progressive collapse: mechanical modelling of bolted-angle connections under tension[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 57: 153- 168
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.041
13 ASTANEH A, NADER M N, MALIK L Cyclic behavior of double angle connections[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1989, 115 (5): 1101- 1118
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:5(1101)
14 DE STEFANO M, ASTANEH A Axial force-displacement behavior of steel double angles[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1991, 20 (3): 161- 181
doi: 10.1016/0143-974X(91)90030-5
[1] 王骏骋,章世伟. 磁流变减振器力学模型的模糊综合评价方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(5): 1047-1058.
[2] 肖华平,李翰林,刘书海. 水下机械手研究进展[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(1): 99-116.
[3] 汪御飞,李康康,张海彬,陈渊博,王光庆. 基于压电与电磁复合效应的超声振动能量采集方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(6): 1293-1302.
[4] 李仲兴,贾英竹,耿国庆,覃夷旭,杨鑫昌. 基于多方法加权融合的矿用车质心侧偏角估计[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(10): 2106-2114.
[5] 王小龙,吕海峰,黄晋英,刘广璞. 磁流变阻尼器无模型前馈/反馈复合控制[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(5): 873-878.
[6] 高帅领,夏军强,董柏良,周美蓉,侯精明. 雨水口泄流对城市洪涝影响的数学模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(3): 590-597.
[7] 张铁,胡亮亮,邹焱飚. 基于混合遗传算法的机器人改进摩擦模型辨识[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(5): 801-809.
[8] 汤自林,高霄,肖晓晖. 基于模仿学习的变刚度人机协作搬运控制[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(11): 2091-2099.
[9] 张征,张豪,柴灏,吴化平,姜少飞. 变刚度多稳态复合材料结构设计与性能分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(7): 1341-1346.
[10] 陈英龙,闫迪,张增猛,宁大勇,弓永军. 基于水压直驱的软体单元的动静态特性[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(8): 1602-1609.
[11] 吕良,陈虹,宫洵,赵海光,胡云峰. 汽油发动机冷却系统建模与水温控制[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(6): 1119-1129.
[12] 张铁,肖蒙,邹焱飚,肖佳栋. 基于强化学习的机器人曲面恒力跟踪研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(10): 1865-1873.
[13] 傅晓云, 雷磊, 杨钢, 李宝仁. 喷水推进型水下滑翔机的水平翼参数配置及定常运动分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(8): 1499-1508.
[14] 张铁, 梁骁翃. 平面关节型机器人关节力矩的卡尔曼估计[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(5): 951-959.
[15] 郑钰馨, 奚鹰, 卜王辉, 李梦如. RV减速器5自由度纯扭转模型非线性特性分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(11): 2098-2109.