Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2024, Vol. 58 Issue (2): 304-316    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2024.02.009
计算机技术、通信技术     
引入相量算子和流向算子的天鹰优化算法
周玉1(),裴泽宣1,王培崇2,陈博1
1. 华北水利水电大学 电气工程学院,河南 郑州 450045
2. 河北地质大学 信息工程学院,河北 石家庄 050031
Aquila optimizer based on phasor operator and flow direction operator
Yu ZHOU1(),Zexuan PEI1,Peichong WANG2,Bo CHEN1
1. College of Electrical Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China
2. College of Information Engineering, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
 全文: PDF(1251 KB)   HTML
摘要:

针对天鹰优化算法搜索效率不足,容易陷入局部最优的缺点,提出多策略改进天鹰优化算法(MIAO). 引入广义正态分布优化算法(GNDO),将该算法得出的结果与天鹰优化算法第1阶段得出的结果进行比较,筛选出这2种优化算法下的最优值. 该操作扩大了搜索空间,提高了解的质量. 引入相量算子,将第2阶段变为自适应的非参数优化,提高算法的高维优化能力. 针对天鹰优化算法在迭代后期存在种群多样性降低、局部开发能力不足的问题,在天鹰算法的第3阶段引入流向算子,使信息可以在每个个体间相互传递,提高种群信息的利用率,增强天鹰优化算法的开发性能. 通过对16个测试函数寻优对比分析以及Wilcoxon秩和检验可知,MIAO的寻优能力和收敛速度都有较大的提升. 为了验证MIAO算法的实用性和可行性,采用所提算法求解减速器设计问题,通过实际工程优化问题的实验对比分析可知,MIAO算法在处理现实优化问题上具有一定的优越性.

关键词: 天鹰优化算法广义正态分布优化算法相量算子流向算子测试函数Wilcoxon秩和检验    
Abstract:

A multi-strategy improved aquila optimizer (MIAO) was proposed aiming at the disadvantages of low search efficiency and easy to fall into local optimal value in aquila optimization algorithm. Generalized normal distribution optimizer (GNDO) was added to AO, and the result obtained by GNDO was compared with the result of AO in the first stage. Then the best value under the two algorithms was selected. The search space was expanded and the quality of solution was improved. Phasor operators were used to transform the second phase into an adaptive non-parametric optimization in order to improve the high-dimensional optimization ability of the AO. The flow operator was used in the third stage of AO aiming at the problems of reduced population diversity and insufficient local exploitation at late iterations of the AO. Then the information can be transferred between each individual. The utilization rate of population information was improved, and the local exploitation capability of the AO was enhanced. Comparative analysis and optimization results of 16 test functions and Wilcoxon rank sum test showed that MIAO optimization ability and convergence speed were greatly improved. The MIAO algorithm was used to solve reducer design problem in order to verify the practicality and feasibility of MIAO algorithm. Comparative analysis of practical engineering optimization problems shows that MIAO algorithm has certain advantages in processing realistic optimization problems.

Key words: aquila optimizer    generalized normal distribution optimization algorithm    phasor operator    flow direction operator    test function    Wilcoxon rank sum test
收稿日期: 2023-06-21 出版日期: 2024-01-23
CLC:  TP 301  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(U1504622,31671580);河南省高等学校青年骨干教师培养计划资助项目(2018GGJS079);河北省高等学校科学技术研究资助项目(ZD2020344)
作者简介: 周玉(1979—),男,副教授,从事机器学习、智能计算的研究. orcid.org/0000-0001-9572-0710. E-mail:zhouyu_beijing@126.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章  
周玉
裴泽宣
王培崇
陈博

引用本文:

周玉,裴泽宣,王培崇,陈博. 引入相量算子和流向算子的天鹰优化算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2024, 58(2): 304-316.

Yu ZHOU,Zexuan PEI,Peichong WANG,Bo CHEN. Aquila optimizer based on phasor operator and flow direction operator. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2024, 58(2): 304-316.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2024.02.009        https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2024/V58/I2/304

图 1  $ p\left( {\theta _i^t} \right) $和$ g\left( {\theta _i^t} \right) $的函数行为
图 2  $ W $的变化情况
算法参数参数值算法参数参数值
SOA${f_{\rm{c}}}$2PPSO
U1
V1
PSOC11.494 45FDA$ \varpi $相邻径
流数量
1
C21.494 45
SSAR2[0, 1.0]AOS0.01
ST0.8U0.005 65
$ \beta $1.5
$ \omega $0.005
GNDOMIAOS0.01
表 1  MIAO及其对比算法的参数设置
编号函数维数范围最优值
$ {f_1} $Schwefel2.2130,100[?100,100]0
$ {f_2} $Quartic30,100[?1.28,1.28]0
$ {f_3} $Bohachevsky30,100[?100,100]0
$ {f_4} $Sum-Squares30,100[?5.12,5.12]0
$ {f_5} $Sum-Power30,100[?1,1]0
$ {f_6} $Rastrigin30,100[?5.12,5.12]0
$ {f_7} $Ackley30,100[?32,32]0
$ {f_8} $Griewank30,100[?600,600]0
$ {f_9} $Drop-Wave30,100[?5.12,5.12]?1
$ {f_{10}} $Eggholder30,100[?512,512]?959.6407
$ {f_{11}} $Shekel’s Foxholes2[?65,65]1
$ {f_{12}} $Kowalik4[?5,5]0.0003
$ {f_{13}} $Shekel4[0,10]?10.1532
$ {f_{14}} $Hartman6[0,1]?3.32
$ {f_{15}} $Composition Function 230,100[?100,100]2200
$ {f_{16}} $Composition Function 3
30,100[?100,100]2300
表 2  测试函数
函数算法最优值平均值标准差函数算法最优值平均值标准差
$ {f_1} $SOA0.58033.48192.6799$ {f_5} $SOA3.462 7×10?75.348 9×10?61.334 1×10?7
PSO0.00531.43051.4963PSO1.153 5×10?89.214 3×10?53.662 5×10?6
SSA7.048 8×10?879.411 5×10?608.995 4×10?60SSA5.913 0×10?886.441 5×10?727.014 5×10?72
GNDO23.088129.315416.5622GNDO1.458 1×10?93.578 9×10?72.665 4×10?7
PPSO0.31260.39430.0023PPSO1.088 2×10?81.920 6×10?82.546 1×10?9
FDA53.475660.255811.5469FDA7.905 2×10?1191.481 4×10?1136.541 1×10?113
AO2.297 2×10?752.445 1×10?591.223 6×10?60AO1.251 1×10?1041.546 6×10?883.145 2×10?88
MIAO1.093 0×10?1602.364 1×10?1389.363 7×10?139MIAO2.546 4×10?1934.025 7×10?1602.541 9×10?160
$ {f_2} $SOA0.11202.33343.1452$ {f_6} $SOA2.801715.825520.9482
PSO0.00110.00166.114 6×10?4PSO3.99368.98262.5335
SSA2.561 3×10?40.00200.0014SSA000
GNDO6.79157.22353.6525GNDO320.12411.52168.3251
PPSO0.03480.05020.5233PPSO20.355439.840838.4450
FDA5.206 9×10?42.314 4×10?36.447 0×10?3FDA000
AO9.429 6×10?51.234 5×10?42.333 1×10?6AO000
MIAO1.346×10?76.321 4×10?72.655 3×10?8MIAO000
$ {f_3} $SOA0.45022.22343.5562$ {f_7} $SOA0.00430.27090.3008
PSO9.175 8×10?84.172 4×10?63.012 5×10?6PSO0.00660.45570.5398
SSA02.125 5×10?2811.222 0×10?281SSA8.881 8×10?168.881 8×10?160
GNDO5.5511×10?175.5511×10?171.235 4×10?19GNDO11.204814.71936.9952
PPSO000PPSO0.06550.97960.8023
FDA4.996 0×10?161.247 0×10?113.288 4×10?11FDA 4.440 9×10?154.440 9×10?150
AO000AO8.881 8×10?168.881 8×10?160
MIAO000MIAO8.881 8×10?168.881 8×10?160
$ {f_4} $SOA0.0943.45135.2102$ {f_8} $SOA1.144 5×10?61.59351.4952
PSO0.16341.22472.8542PSO1.063 9×10?53.023 4×10?36.214 2×10?3
SSA3.420 5×10?1634.562 2×10?1446.213 8×10?145SSA000
GNDO887.38902.5872.5569GNDO42.663048.54829.3354
PPSO102.59244.58325.11PPSO0.00110.00573.521 4×10?2
FDA1.063 7×10?822.640 5×10?793.021 1×10?79FDA000
AO3.044 1×10?1523.205 6×10?1396.112 0×10?143AO000
MIAO000MIAO000
表 3  测试函数的结果 (dim=30,$ {f_1} \sim {f_8} $)
函数算法最优值平均值标准差函数算法最优值平均值标准差
$ {f_9} $SOA?0.9750?0.86200.6335$ {f_{15}} $SOA2.300×1032.300 4×1030.6635
PSO?1?0.98080.0235PSO2.300×1032.300×1030
SSA?1?10SSA2.300×1032.300×1030
GNDO?1?0.93620.4655GNDO2.300×1032.300×1032.523 1×10?4
PPSO?1?0.93620.0536PPSO2.300×1032.300×1030
FDA?1?0.93630.0016FDA2.300×1032.300×10311.3250
AO?1?10AO2.300×1032.300×1030
MIAO?1?10MIAO2.300×1032.300×1030
$ {f_{10}} $SOA?954.6222?932.050232.1507$ {f_{16}} $SOA2.450 0×1032.455 5×10323.2264
PSO?66.8437?66.84370PSO2.450 0×1032.450 0×10310.3210
SSA?959.6407?956.62145.6316SSA2.450 0×1032.450 0×1038.1243
GNDO?959.6406?959.64062.547 6×10?5GNDO2.450 0×1032.450 0×10311.2356
PPSO?64.3969?61.65415.3991PPSO2.450 0×1032.450 0×1036.8401
FDA?959.6407?959.64070FDA2.433 5×1032.433 5×10316.3205
AO?959.6405?954.241010.2659AO2.450 0×1032.450 0×1036.0213
MIAO?959.6407?959.64070MIAO2.433 3×1032.433 3×1036.1089
表 4  测试函数的结果 (dim=30,${f_9} , {f_{10}},{f_{15}} \sim {f_{16}}$)
函数算法最优值平均值标准差函数算法最优值平均值标准差
$ {f_{11}} $SOA2.19945.87925.1739$ {f_{13}} $SOA?9.8922?9.39070.4532
PSO12.670512.67050PSO?5.0522?5.05220
SSA2.98212.56311.3330SSA?10.1532?10.15320
GNDO0.9980.9980GNDO?10.1532?10.15320
PPSO12.670512.67050PPSO?5.0877?5.08770
FDA0.9981.99202.3254FDA?10.1532?5.08763.3321
AO0.9980.9980AO?10.1532?10.15270.2140
MIAO0.9980.9980MIAO?10.1532?10.15320
$ {f_{12}} $SOA0.00830.00800.0053$ {f_{14}} $SOA?2.8215?2.65311.1233
PSO6.782 2×10?49.159 4×10?45.735 4×10?4PSO?3.3220?3.11230.023
SSA3.074 9×10?37.012 2×10?34.775 2×10?3SSA?3.3220?3.21560.1543
GNDO3.074 8×10?43.074 9×10?42.324 7×10?4GNDO?3.3219?3.32191.2354×10?5
PPSO5.325 4×10?46.327 7×10?44.325 4×10?4PPSO?3.3220?3.31823.2214×10?4
FDA0.00040.00133.2621×10?3FDA?3.1404?3.07490.6325
AO5.679 0×10?48.994 0×10?43.112 2×10?4AO?3.1037?3.09612.6480
MIAO 3.000 0×10?4 3.078 3×10?49.231 4×10?6MIAO?3.3220?3.28344.6213×10?3
表 5  固定维测试函数
函数算法最优值平均值标准差函数算法最优值平均值标准差
$ {f_1} $SOA86.554294.135220.9621$ {f_6} $SOA0.03411.12362.6557
PSO0.62200.62540.0239PSO157.3364163.636125.3142
SSA3.3646×10?553.3345×10?317.223 4×10?30SSA000
GNDO23.155233.312016.3251GNDO362.36384.2132.6520
PPSO0.74860.89980.3654PPSO258.24274.6561.0320
FDA89.724393.10869.2320FDA000
AO9.466 2×10?788.253×10?758.223 6×10?76AO000
MIAO3.371 6×10?1586.223 7×10?1292.678 4×10?129MIAO000
$ {f_2} $SOA0.13781.23552.6341$ {f_7} $SOA1.223 4×10?44.337 8×10?33.707 1×10?3
PSO0.22010.44360.6520PSO1.87522.03140.6321
SSA7.3240×10?30.00212.3114×10?3SSA8.881 8×10?168.881 8×10?160
GNDO5.64888.06415.6630GNDO11.721713.40945.3241
PPSO1.75922.09000.4354PPSO2.33232.13540.3542
FDA4.487 9×10?45.832 5×10?42.665 2×10?4FDA4.440 9×10?154.440 9×10?150
AO9.782 8×10?53.521 1×10?44.695 7×10?4AO8.881 8×10?168.881 8×10?160
MIAO 1.704 1×10?5 4.122 0×10?4 5.314 2×10?4MIAO 8.881 8×10?16 8.881 8×10?160
$ {f_3} $SOA0.00210.93281.5631$ {f_8} $SOA0.014356.442983.9514
PSO1.913 5×10?93.556 4×10?72.635 7×10?7PSO0.05270.06001.3255e-3
SSA000SSA000
GNDO5.551 1×10?175.551 1×10?172.392 8×10?19GNDO61.113874.351222.2511
PPSO000PPSO0.10390.11730.0062
FDA000FDA000
AO000AO000
MIAO000MIAO000
$ {f_4} $SOA0.01514.15318.3361$ {f_9} $SOA?1?0.98890.1264
PSO66.354885.364251.3260PSO?1?10
SSA7.572 5×10?803.214 6×10?654.012 6×10?65SSA?1?10
GNDO1141.21148.743.2651GNDO?1?0.96320.0023
PPSO180.23210.247.3521PPSO?1?10
FDA3.624 7×10?795.624 4×10?759.214 4×10?75FDA?1?10
AO2.246 3×10?1573.514 4×10?1336.331 4×10?133AO?1?10
MIAO000MIAO?1?10
$ {f_5} $SOA2.460 5×10?60.05530.3662$ {f_{10}} $SOA?957.9990?950.637410.5231
PSO1.887 8×10?81.223 6×10?73.263 1×10?8PSO?66.8437?66.84370
SSA5.341 9×10?1131.324 9×10?502.312 6×10?50SSA?894.3315?888.163443.6612
GNDO1.135 3×10?74.714 2×10?103.256 4×10?10GNDO?959.6406?959.64064.125 0×10?4
PPSO6.154 3×10?96.734 3×10?72.663 4×10?9PPSO?66.0970?65.42111.3325
FDA3.257 8×10?1162.647 6×10?1133.654 2×10?113FDA?959.4607?959.46054.332 1×10?3
AO1.481 3×10?952.794 9×10?293.654 2×10?29AO?959.6407?-959.64043.412 2×10?3
MIAO4.185×10?1784.893 1×10?1521.233 0×10?152MIAO?959.6407?959.64061.256 1×10?3
表 6  测试函数的结果 (dim=100,${{\boldsymbol{f}}_{\boldsymbol{1}}} {\boldsymbol{\sim}} {{\boldsymbol{f}}_{{\boldsymbol{10}}}}$)
函数算法最优值平均值标准差函数算法最优值平均值标准差
$ {f_{15}} $SOA230023004.097 0$ {f_{16}} $SOA2 440.82 47638.4974
PSO2300230013.1361PSO245024508.2315
SSA2300230011.8003SSA245024502.286 9×10?4
GNDO 23002.301 1×1035.5983GNDO 2450 2451.85.8500
PPSO 23002.300 0×1031.1117PPSO 2450 2450.11.7050
FDA 23002.300 8×1036.1601FDA 2433.3 2435.912.1862
AO23002.300 2×1033.4566AO2450 2450.24.5863
MIAO2.293 8×1032.301 6×10311.4552MIAO2 433.32 433.75.2753
表 7  测试函数的结果 (dim=100, $ {f_{15}} , \;{f_{16}} $)
图 3  MIAO及7种对比算法的收敛曲线
函数SOAPSOSSAGNDOPPSOFDAAO
phphphphphphph
$ {f_1} $1.816 5×10?411.826 7×10?411.826 7×10?411.816 5×10?411.826 7×10?411.826 7×10?411.826 7×10?41
$ {f_2} $1.816 5×10?411.826 7×10?413.298 4×10?411.816 5×10?411.826 7×10?413.298 4×10?414.236 2×10?41
$ {f_3} $6.386 4×10?516.386 4×10?51N/A08.745 0×10?51N/A0N/A0N/A0
$ {f_4} $8.745 0×10?518.745 0×10?518.745 0×10?518.745 0×10?518.745 0×10?518.745 0×10?518.745 0×10?51
$ {f_5} $1.826 7×10?411.826 7×10?410.025711.826 7×10?411.826 7×10?411.826 7×10?411.826 7×10?41
$ {f_6} $2.165 0×10?516.340 3×10?51N/A07.235 2×10?516.304 3×10?51N/A0N/A0
$ {f_7} $6.386 4×10?516.340 3×10?51N/A06.386 4×10?516.340 3×10?51N/A0N/A0
$ {f_8} $6.386 4×10?516.340 3×10?51N/A06.386 4×10?516.340 3×10?51N/A0N/A0
$ {f_9} $6.386 4×10?510.368 10N/A0N/A0N/A0N/A0N/A0
$ {f_{10}} $3.226 4×10?416.340 3×10?513.221 4×10?413.226 4×10?416.340 3×10?513.221 4×10?410.02061
$ {f_{11}} $1.333 4×10?811.020 3×10?811.322 4×10?812.355 4×10?1011.333 4×10?411.632 4×10?412.355 4×10?101
$ {f_{12}} $1.205 9×10?1211.210 8×10?1213.469 1×10?811.203 4×10?1211.325 0×10?1214.358 7×10?811.523 4×10?51
$ {f_{13}} $1.826 7×10?412.092 6×10?712.981 6×10?812.836 4×10?811.532 1×10?712.354 1×10?712.364 1×10?61
$ {f_{14}} $1.333 4×10?811.020 3×10?811.020 3×10?811.032 0×10?811.354 2×10?816.352 4×10?612.330 6×10?41
$ {f_{15}} $2.453 2×10?312.442 5×10?312.442 5×10?312.442 5×10?312.442 5×10?312.442 5×10?312.463 0×10?31
$ {f_{16}} $2.453 2×10?312.442 5×10?312.442 5×10?312.442 5×10?312.442 5×10?312.442 5×10?312.442 5×10?31
表 8  Wilcoxon秩和检验结果
图 4  减速器的设计结构
算法变量最优值最小质量/g
$ b $$ {z_1} $$ {z_2} $$ {l_1} $$ {l_2} $$ {d_1} $$ {d_2} $
SOA[21]3.06820.717518.16607.53807.31823.44515.34673384.0246
PSO[22] 3.6000 0.7000 17.0000 8.3000 7.30003.35255.28653054.5907
SSA[23]3.24530.716617.52638.09697.85393.64415.29633295.7734
GNDO3.49090.740317.24828.14808.04663.30885.36883411.4819
PPSO3.60000.700017.000 07.30007.95003.35055.50003179.9491
FDA3.46300.720017.00727.50387.31583.37405.28653148.1579
AO[17]3.48580.700017.39208.19087.35083.27675.30223150.6512
MIAO3.28990.700017.01287.89907.77083.36425.30343024.8417
表 9  减速器设计问题的结果比较
图 5  减速器收敛曲线
1 UMER M, SADIQ S, REEMAH M, et al Face mask detection using deep convolutional neural network and multi-stage image processing[J]. Image and Vision Computing, 2023, 133 (10): 46- 57
2 TIAN J G, HAN D Y, REZA H K, et al Deep learning-based open set multi-source domain adaptation with complementary transferability metric for mechanical fault diagnosis[J]. Neural Networks, 2023, 162 (6): 69- 82
3 JESUS J, RUIZ A, URDA D, et al A freight inspection volume forecasting approach using an aggregation/disaggregation procedure, machine learning and ensemble models[J]. Neurocomputing, 2020, 391: 282- 291
doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.06.109
4 LI C, BAI L, LIU W, et al A multi-task memory network with knowledge adaptation for multimodal demand forecasting[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 131: 103352
doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103352
5 GHAREHCHOPOGH F S, NAMAZI M, EBRAHIMI L, et al Advances in sparrow search algorithm: a comprehensive survey[J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2023, 30: 427- 455
doi: 10.1007/s11831-022-09804-w
6 MUHAMMAD Y, RAJA M A Z, ALTAF M, et al Design of fractional comprehensive learning PSO strategy for optimal power flow problems[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 130: 109638
7 XUE J, SHEN B A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: sparrow search algorithm[J]. Systems Science and Control Engineering, 2020, 8 (1): 22- 34
doi: 10.1080/21642583.2019.1708830
8 MIRJALILI S, LEWIS A The whale optimization algorithm[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 95: 51- 67
doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008
9 LI S N, LI W, TANG J W, et al A new evolving operator selector by using fitness landscape in differential evolution algorithm[J]. Information Sciences, 2023, 624 (8): 709- 731
10 KAHLOUL S, DJAAFAR Z, BOUALEM B, et al A multi-external archive-guided Henry gas solubility optimization algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2022, 109: 104588
doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104588
11 KARAMI H, VALIKHAN A M, FARZIN S Flow direction algorithm (FDA): a novel optimization approach for solving optimization problems[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2021, 156 (4): 23- 39
12 FATEHI M, TOLORI A, ENRICO Z An advanced teaching-learning-based algorithm to solve unconstrained optimization problems[J]. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 2023, 17 (42): 53- 74
13 KUMAR M, ANADA J K, SAPATAPHY S C Socio evolution and learning optimization algorithm: a socio-inspired optimization methodology[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2018, 81: 252- 272
doi: 10.1016/j.future.2017.10.052
14 MOHAMMAD H, SHAHRAKI N, TAGHIAN S, et al An improved grey wolf optimizer for solving engineering problems[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 166: 113917
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113917
15 邓志诚, 孙辉, 赵嘉, 等 方波触发勘探与开发的粒子群优化算法[J]. 自动化学报, 2022, 48 (12): 3042- 3061
DENG Zhicheng, SUN Hui, ZHAO Jia, et al Particle swarm optimization with square wave triggered exploration and exploitation[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2022, 48 (12): 3042- 3061
doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c190842
16 AMIRTEIMOORI A, MAHDAVI I, SOLIMANPUR M, et al A parallel hybrid PSO-GA algorithm for the flexible flow-shop scheduling with transportation[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2022, 173 (5): 125- 143
17 ABUALIGAH L, YOUSRI D, ELAZIZ M A, et al Aquila optimizer: a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2021, 157 (10): 50- 72
18 GHAMEHI M, AKBARI E, RAHIMNEJAD A, et al Phasor particle swarm optimization: a simple and efficient variant of PSO[J]. Soft Computing: A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications, 2019, 23 (19): 1701- 1718
19 BUALIGAH L, YOUSRI D, ELAZIZ M, et al Aquila optimizer: a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2021, 157 (9): 157- 171
20 李玥,穆维松,褚晓泉,等 基于改进量子粒子群的K-means聚类算法及其应用[J]. 控制与决策, 2022, 37 (4): 839- 850
LI Yue, MU Weisong, CHU Xiaoquan, et al K-means clustering algorithm based on improved quantum particle swarm optimization and its application[J]. Control and Decision, 2022, 37 (4): 839- 850
21 EESA A S, HASSAN M M, ARABO W K Letter: application of optimization algorithms to engineering design problems and discrepancies in mathematical formulas[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2023, 11 (5): 23- 64
22 HUANG F Z, WANG L, HE Q An effective co-evolutionary differential evolution for constrained optimization[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2007, 186 (1): 340- 356
[1] 王万良,陈忠馗,吴菲,王铮,俞梦娇. 基于个体预测的动态多目标优化算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2023, 57(11): 2133-2146.
[2] 周传华,操礼春,周家亿,詹凤. 图卷积融合计算时效网络节点重要性评估分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2023, 57(5): 930-938.
[3] 王亚峰,周丽华,陈伟,王丽珍,陈红梅. 异质信息网络的互信息最大化社区搜索[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2023, 57(2): 287-298.
[4] 刘雪娇,宋庆武,夏莹杰. 基于区块链的车联网矩阵计算安全卸载方案[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2023, 57(1): 144-154.
[5] 杨晋生,王浩,高镇,郭朝晖. 基于双RSA累加器的无状态交易验证方案[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2023, 57(1): 178-189.
[6] 付晓峰,牛力. 基于深度卷积和自编码器增强的微表情判别[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(10): 1948-1957.
[7] 陈小波,陈玲,梁书荣,胡煜. 重尾非高斯定位噪声下鲁棒协同目标跟踪[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(5): 967-976.
[8] 杜晓昕,王浩,崔连和,罗金琦,刘岩,张剑飞,王一萍. 基于聚类和探测精英引导的蜻蜓算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(5): 977-986.
[9] 王万良,金雅文,陈嘉诚,李国庆,胡明志,董建杭. 多角色多策略多目标粒子群优化算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(3): 531-541.
[10] 董思含,信俊昌,郝琨,姚钟铭,陈金义. 多区块链环境下的连接查询优化算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(2): 313-321.
[11] 熊国文,张敏,许文鑫. 基于众包模式的两级开闭混合车辆路径优化[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(12): 2397-2408.
[12] 吴敬理,伊国栋,裘乐淼,张树有. 高温混合障碍空间中的移动机器人路径规划[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(10): 1806-1814.
[13] 张则强,许培玉,蒋晋,张裕. 站间操作者不同的并行拆卸线平衡问题优化[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(10): 1795-1805.
[14] 鲁建厦,翟文倩,李嘉丰,易文超,汤洪涛. 基于改进混合蛙跳算法的多约束车辆路径优化[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(2): 259-270.
[15] 程松,邹宗峰. 平面桁架构建的定日镜面形支撑结构优化及实验[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(12): 2310-2320.