Please wait a minute...
Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science)  2026, Vol. 60 Issue (4): 865-875    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.04.018
    
Analysis of influencing factors on travel mode choice based on activity pattern clustering
Xiangcheng SHEN1(),Yilin SUN1,2,*(),Shujie CHEN2
1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2. Polytechnic Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
Download: HTML     PDF(3245KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

The synergistic impact mechanism of residents’ daily activity patterns and spatio-temporal travel factors on their travel mode choice was investigated. Based on travel survey data, the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) method was employed to perform time-slice reconstruction and pattern recognition of individuals’ daily activity patterns, extracting 7 activity pattern characteristics, including the typical Home-Work-Home (HWH) commute pattern. Subsequently, a light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) machine learning model was constructed to predict residents’ travel mode choice, with the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method used to interpret the mechanisms of key influencing factors. The findings revealed the following two key results: 1) Travel distance and duration were the core determinants of mode choice. 2) There was a significant interaction between the HWH pattern and spatio-temporal factors: compared to other groups, HWH commuters showed a lower preference for public transportation for trips under 40 min, yet a stronger preference for electric bicycles for trips between 20 and 40 min. These confirmed the activity pattern type-driven heterogeneity of travel behavior.



Key wordsactivity pattern      travel mode choice      machine learning      commuting activities      DBSCAN clustering     
Received: 23 May 2025      Published: 19 March 2026
CLC:  U 491.1  
Fund:  国家自然科学基金重点项目(52131202);浙江省“尖兵”“领雁”研发攻关计划资助项目(2024C01214).
Corresponding Authors: Yilin SUN     E-mail: 22312303@zju.edu.cn;yilinsun@zju.edu.cn
Cite this article:

Xiangcheng SHEN,Yilin SUN,Shujie CHEN. Analysis of influencing factors on travel mode choice based on activity pattern clustering. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(4): 865-875.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.04.018     OR     https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/Y2026/V60/I4/865


基于活动链聚类的居民出行方式选择影响因素分析

为了揭示居民单日活动链与出行时空要素对其出行方式选择的协同影响机制,基于出行调查数据,采用基于密度的噪声应用空间聚类(DBSCAN)方法对个体单日活动链进行时间切片重构与模式识别,提取出包含典型通勤模式(Home-Work-Home, HWH)在内的7类活动链特征. 在此基础上,构建轻量级梯度提升机(LightGBM)机器学习模型预测居民出行方式选择,并运用SHAP方法解析关键影响因素的作用机理. 研究发现:1)出行距离和时长是影响方式选择的核心决定因素; 2)HWH活动链与时空要素存在显著交互效应,表现为通勤群体在短时长(<40 min)中对公共交通的偏好程度显著低于其他群体,而在20~40 min出行时长区间内对电动自行车表现出更强的选择偏好,证实了活动链类型驱动的出行行为异质性特征.


关键词: 活动链,  出行方式选择,  机器学习,  通勤活动,  DBSCAN聚类 
属性名称示例值
居民ID10279
性别
年龄/岁47
个人月收入/元3200
出行次数2
家庭ID3721
汽车保有量0
电动自行车保有量2
自行车保有量0
Tab.1 Examples of basic information for travel surveys
居民ID出发时间到达时间出行目的出行方式出发X/(°E)出发Y/(°N)到达X/(°E)到达Y/(°N)
1027908:2008:30上班电动自行车120.54228831.373115120.53812531.364591
1027917:2017:30回家电动自行车120.53812531.364591120.54228831.373115
Tab.2 Example of residents’ travel logs
Fig.1 Distribution of individual attributes in travel survey dataset
Fig.2 Reconstruction of individual daily activity chains
居民ID开始时间离开时间活动类型
102792018?09?17 00:002018?09?17 08:20居家
102792018?09?17 08:302018?09?17 17:20工作
102792018?09?17 17:302018?09?17 23:59居家
Tab.3 Sample of daily activity chains
Fig.3 Silhouette coefficient heatmap of activity pattern clustering
Fig.4 Clustering of residents’ single-day activity patterns
Fig.5 Comparison of LightGBM model and benchmark models
Fig.6 Analysis of importance and effects of key influencing factors on travel mode choice based on SHAP values
Fig.7 Synergistic effect of travel distance-HWH (commuting) on travel mode choice
Fig.8 Synergistic effect of travel time-HWH (commuting) on travel mode choice
Fig.9 Synergistic effect of age/income and HWH (commuting) on travel mode choice
[1]   KITAMURA R An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis[J]. Transportation, 1988, 15 (1): 9- 34
doi: 10.1007/bf00167973
[2]   HIDAYATI I, TAN W, YAMU C Conceptualizing mobility inequality: mobility and accessibility for the marginalized[J]. Journal of Planning Literature, 2021, 36 (4): 492- 507
doi: 10.1177/08854122211012898
[3]   DE DIOS ORTÚZAR J, WILLUMSEN L G. Modelling transport [M]. [S.l.]: John Wiley & Sons, 2024.
[4]   ZHOU Y, YUAN Q, YANG C, et al Who you are determines how you travel: clustering human activity patterns with a Markov-chain-based mixture model[J]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2021, 24: 102- 112
doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.03.005
[5]   DHARMOWIJOYO D B E, SUSILO Y O, KARLSTRÖM A Analysing the complexity of day-to-day individual activity-travel patterns using a multidimensional sequence alignment model: a case study in the Bandung Metropolitan Area, Indonesia[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2017, 64: 1- 12
doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.001
[6]   DIANAT A, HAWKINS J, HABIB K N Assessing the impacts of COVID-19 on activity-travel scheduling: a survey in the greater Toronto area[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2022, 162: 296- 314
doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.06.008
[7]   MOECKEL R, HUANG W C, JI J, et al The activity-based model ABIT: modeling 24 hours, 7 days a week[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2024, 78: 499- 506
doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2024.02.062
[8]   XIAO C, TANG J, LEE J J, et al Urban travel chain estimation based on combination of CHMM and LDA model[J]. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2025, 19: e70004
doi: 10.1049/itr2.70004
[9]   VO K D, LAM W H K, LI Z C A mixed-equilibrium model of individual and household activity-travel choices in multimodal transportation networks[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 131: 103337
doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103337
[10]   HUANG L, XIA F, CHEN H, et al Reconstructing human activities via coupling mobile phone data with location-based social networks[J]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2023, 33: 100606
doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100606
[11]   HAFEZI M H, DAISY N S, MILLWARD H, et al Ensemble learning activity scheduler for activity based travel demand models[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 123: 102972
doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.102972
[12]   KHAN N A, HABIB M A Microsimulation of activity generation, activity scheduling and shared travel choices within an activity-based travel demand modelling system[J]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2023, 32: 100590
doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100590
[13]   LI Q, ZOU D, XU Y Combining individual travel behaviour and collective preferences for next location prediction[J]. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 2022, 18 (3): 1754- 1776
doi: 10.1080/23249935.2021.1968066
[14]   王江波, 连芝锐, 冯涛, 等 基于机器学习的时空出行选择行为研究综述与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2024, 43 (8): 1649- 1665
WANG Jiangbo, LIAN Zhirui, FENG Tao, et al A review and outlook of machine learning-based travel choice behavior research[J]. Progress in Geography, 2024, 43 (8): 1649- 1665
[15]   FU X, ZHANG Y, DE DIOS ORTÚZAR J, et al Activity-travel pattern inference based on multi-source big data[J]. Transport Reviews, 2025, 45 (1): 26- 48
doi: 10.1080/01441647.2024.2400341
[16]   FU X, YAO Z, ZHANG Y, et al. Exploring variabilities of multi-week activity-travel patterns: a deep embedded clustering approach [J]. Transportation, 2025: 1–36.
[17]   WANG D, YANG M Gendered mobility and activity pattern: implications for gendered mental health[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2023, 110: 103639
doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103639
[18]   LIU F, GAO Z, JANSSENS D, et al Identifying business activity-travel patterns based on GPS data[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 128: 103136
doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103136
[19]   付晓, 陈梓丹, 黄洁 基于手机信令数据的城市居民非通勤出行群体画像: 以苏州市为例[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42 (10): 1727- 1734
FU Xiao, CHEN Zidan, HUANG Jie Non-work travel group profiles of urban residents based on mobile phone signaling data: a case of Suzhou[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022, 42 (10): 1727- 1734
[20]   HU Y, WEE B V, ETTEMA D Intra-household decisions and the impact of the built environment on activity-travel behavior: a review of the literature[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2023, 106: 103485
doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103485
[21]   ARENTZE T A, TIMMERMANS H J P A need-based model of multi-day, multi-person activity generation[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2009, 43 (2): 251- 265
doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2008.05.007
[22]   WANG S, WU X, CHEN Y Association between perceived transportation disadvantages and opportunity inaccessibility: a social equity study[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2021, 101: 103119
doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103119
[23]   苏州市统计局. 苏州市第七次全国人口普查公报(第四号) [EB/OL]. (2021–05–31) [2025–04–27]. http://tjj.suzhou.gov.cn/sztjj/tjgb/202105/63f291317a62483ba1b6872b64b45b98.shtml.
[24]   YANG C, ZHANG Y, ZHAN X, et al Fusing mobile phone and travel survey data to model urban activity dynamics[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020, 2020: 5321385
doi: 10.1155/2020/5321385
[25]   WANG W, OSARAGI T Generating and understanding human daily activity sequences using Time-Varying Markov Chain models[J]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2024, 34: 100711
doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100711
[26]   LI W, ZHANG Y, CHEN Y, et al Multi-day activity pattern recognition based on semantic embeddings of activity chains[J]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2024, 34: 100682
doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100682
[27]   何艳, 孙轶琳, 赵志健, 等 融合碳激励潜变量的低碳出行方式选择模型[J]. 浙江大学学报: 工学版, 2024, 58 (8): 1628- 1635+1658
HE Yan, SUN Yilin, ZHAO Zhijian, et al Modeling low-carbon travel mode choice by incorporating carbon incentive latent variable[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2024, 58 (8): 1628- 1635+1658
[28]   LUNDBERG S M, LEE S I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions [C]// Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30. Red Hook: Curran Associates Inc., 2017: 4768–4777.
[29]   XIONG J, XU L, WEI Z, et al Identifying, analyzing, and forecasting commuting patterns in urban public Transportation: a review[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 249: 123646
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123646
[1] Qingchang LU,Kangjie YUAN. Nonlinear effects of bike-sharing demands considering spatial heterogeneity[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2025, 59(12): 2576-2584.
[2] Chong WANG,Lizhao DAI,Bin CHEN. Probabilistic model for shear capacity of corroded RC beams based on Gaussian process regression[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2025, 59(11): 2352-2360.
[3] Xinyang LI,Weifeng LIU,Xuning GUO,Yunling LI,Feilin ZHU,Ping’an ZHONG. Complementary characteristics of wind-photovoltaic-hydropower output in basin[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2024, 58(7): 1505-1515.
[4] Pan LI,Bing ZHOU,Tian CHAI,Yuan DENG,Qianxi PAN,Xiaojian WU. Vehicle obstacle avoidance control system considering driving style[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2024, 58(7): 1377-1386.
[5] Yufu HUO,Beihong JIN,Zhaoyi LIAO. Multi-modal information augmented model for micro-video recommendation[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2024, 58(6): 1142-1152.
[6] Su LI,Ze CHEN,Baoyan SONG,Haolin ZHANG. Enterprise composite blockchain construction method for business environment evaluation[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2024, 58(5): 891-899.
[7] Longsen HUANG,Jun FANG,Yunliang ZHOU,Zhicheng GUO. Optimization method of approximate aggregate query based on variational auto-encoder[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2024, 58(5): 931-940.
[8] Yi-cong GAO,Yan-kun WANG,Shao-mei FEI,Qiong LIN. Intelligent proofreading method of engineering drawing based on transfer learning[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2022, 56(5): 856-863, 889.
[9] Peng ZHANG,Zi-du TIAN,Hao WANG. Flight parameter data anomaly detection method based on improved generative adversarial network[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2022, 56(10): 1967-1976.
[10] Fa-ming HUANG,Li-han PAN,Chi YAO,Chuang-bing ZHOU,Qing-hui JIANG,Zhi-lu CHANG. Landslide susceptibility prediction modelling based on semi-supervised machine learning[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2021, 55(9): 1705-1713.
[11] Jia-hao REN,Hai-ou WANG,Jiang-kuan XING,Kun LUO,Jian-ren FAN. Lower-dimensional approximation models of tangential strain rate of turbulent flames[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2021, 55(6): 1128-1134.
[12] You ZHAN,Qiang LI,Xiao-tian MA,Chen-ping WANG,Yan-jun QIU. Macro and micro texture based prediction of pavement surface friction[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2021, 55(4): 684-694.
[13] Yong YU,Jing-yuan XUE,Sheng DAI,Qiang-wei BAO,Gang ZHAO. Quality prediction and process parameter optimization method for machining parts[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2021, 55(3): 441-447.
[14] Qiao-hong CHEN,YI CHEN,Wen-shu Li,Yu-bo JIA. Clothing image classification based on multi-scale SE-Xception[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2020, 54(9): 1727-1735.
[15] Hui-fang WANG,Chen-yu ZHANG. Prediction of voltage stability margin in power system based on extreme gradient boosting algorithm[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2020, 54(3): 606-613.