Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2026, Vol. 60 Issue (8): 1782-1791    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.08.017
计算机技术     
结合边缘辅助与多级特征融合的跨模态语义分割算法
陈广秋(),任天蓉,段锦*(),黄丹丹
长春理工大学 电子信息工程学院,吉林 长春 130022
Cross-modal semantic segmentation algorithm with edge-assisted and multi-level feature fusion
Guangqiu CHEN(),Tianrong REN,Jin DUAN*(),Dandan HUANG
College of Electronic Information Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China
 全文: PDF(6117 KB)   HTML
摘要:

现有跨模态语义分割网络忽略跨模态特征间的互补性和不同尺度特征间的关联性,在复杂光照条件下存在边界模糊、远处小目标分割准确性差的问题,为此提出新的跨模态语义分割算法(EMFFNet). 在编码器中,基于浅层与深层的语义特性差异,设计多尺度注意力融合模块和跨模态特征加权融合模块,分别捕获细节纹理信息和高阶语义信息. 在解码器中,引入通道增强模块和边缘监督策略辅助训练,强化目标边界感知能力. 相比主流算法,EMFFNet在MFNet城市街景数据集上的各项评估指标均为最优,平均准确率和平均交并比分别为76.1%和59.4%. 实验结果表明,在光照变化条件下,EMFFNet能够有效缓解目标边缘模糊问题,提高远处小目标分割精度.

关键词: 多级特征融合边缘辅助监督多尺度注意力跨模态语义分割    
Abstract:

Existing cross-modal semantic segmentation networks ignore the complementarity among cross-modal features and the correlation among features of different scales, resulting in blurred boundaries and poor segmentation accuracy for distant small targets under complex lighting conditions. A new cross-modal semantic segmentation algorithm (EMFFNet) was proposed. In the encoder, based on the different semantic characteristics of shallow and deep layers, a multi-scale attention fusion module and a cross-modal feature weighted fusion module were designed to capture detailed texture information and high-order semantic information, respectively. A channel enhancement module and edge supervision strategy were introduced into the decoder to assist training, and the target boundary perception ability was strengthened. Compared with the mainstream algorithms, EMFFNet achieves the best evaluation metrics on the MFNet urban street view dataset, with mean accuracy and mean intersection-over-union of 76.1% and 59.4%, respectively. Experimental results show that EMFFNet effectively alleviates edge blurring and enhances segmentation accuracy of distant small targets under varying illumination.

Key words: multi-level feature fusion    edge-assisted supervision    multi-scale attention    cross-modality    semantic segmentation
收稿日期: 2025-06-12 出版日期: 2026-07-16
CLC:  TP 391.41  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金重大仪器专项(62127813);吉林省科技发展计划项目(20210203181SF).
通讯作者: 段锦     E-mail: guangqiu_chen@126.com;duanjin@vip.sina.com
作者简介: 陈广秋(1977—),男,副教授,博士,从事图像处理与机器视觉研究. orcid.org/0009-0000-4529-2244. E-mail:guangqiu_chen@126.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章  
陈广秋
任天蓉
段锦
黄丹丹

引用本文:

陈广秋,任天蓉,段锦,黄丹丹. 结合边缘辅助与多级特征融合的跨模态语义分割算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(8): 1782-1791.

Guangqiu CHEN,Tianrong REN,Jin DUAN,Dandan HUANG. Cross-modal semantic segmentation algorithm with edge-assisted and multi-level feature fusion. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(8): 1782-1791.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.08.017        https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2026/V60/I8/1782

图 1  结合边缘辅助和多级特征融合的跨模态语义分割网络架构
图 2  多尺度注意力融合模块
图 3  跨模态特征加权融合模块
图 4  密集连接块
图 5  解码器结构
图 6  边缘辅助监督结构
算法IoU/%mIoU/%
色锥行人车挡曲线自行车护栏车辆凸起
MFNet25.258.99.929.942.90.065.927.739.7
RTFNet29.170.329.845.362.70.087.455.753.2
FuseSeg46.971.722.744.864.66.487.947.954.5
EGFNet48.369.833.842.858.87.087.647.154.8
ABMDRNet47.469.633.145.160.35.187.650.054.8
SFAF-MA45.773.029.545.661.35.588.153.855.5
CSRPNet43.772.328.147.661.48.087.857.156.0
CMX(B2)52.474.830.147.364.78.189.459.458.2
EMFFNet49.275.340.447.765.212.489.755.859.4
表 1  不同算法在MFNet数据集上的交并比
算法Acc/%mAcc/%
色锥行人车挡曲线自行车护栏车辆凸起
MFNet30.367.012.536.253.90.177.230.045.1
RTFNet45.579.338.560.776.80.093.074.763.1
FuseSeg55.881.429.168.478.563.793.166.470.6
EGFNet65.389.048.771.580.633.695.871.172.7
ABMDRNet61.790.044.164.075.731.094.366.269.5
SFAF-MA57.982.537.563.673.942.294.074.469.6
CSRPNet57.387.838.968.578.958.993.571.272.7
EMFFNet60.987.449.872.981.764.395.973.476.1
表 2  不同算法在MFNet数据集上的准确率
算法日间夜间
mAccmIoUmAccmIoU
SegFormer50.643.2
MFNet42.636.141.436.8
RTFNet60.045.860.754.8
FuseSeg62.147.867.354.6
SFAF-MA71.147.068.754.9
EGFNet74.447.368.055.0
CSRPNet72.949.168.255.6
ABMDRNet58.446.768.355.5
CMX70.251.367.457.8
EMFFNet75.656.975.959.7
表 3  不同算法分割日夜间图像的性能对比
算法Np↓/106FLOPs↓/109RF↑/(帧/s?1mIoU↑
Segformer(B2)64.195.715.453.2
MFNet0.78.4468.439.7
EGFNet208.8198.652.954.8
CMX139.9134.383.258.2
EMFFNet135.1109.469.659.4
表 4  模型复杂度和实时性对比结果
算法IoU/%mIoU/%
背景手钻背包灭火器幸存者
MFNet98.8541.1364.2729.9042.9039.70
RTFNet99.027.0774.1751.9370.1160.46
PSTNet98.8553.6069.2070.1250.0368.36
CSRPNet99.2271.6182.0267.8954.1074.97
EMFFNet 99.4185.2083.7173.6777.3883.87
表 5  不同算法在PST900数据集上的交并比
算法Acc/%mAcc/%
背景手钻背包灭火器幸存者
MFNet30.3067.0012.5036.2053.9045.10
RTFNet99.787.7979.9662.3978.5165.69
CSRPNet99.8086.1486.7877.7155.1981.12
EMFFNet99.8290.1087.9385.2683.7089.36
表 6  不同算法在PST900数据集上的准确率
图 7  不同算法在MFNet数据集上的图像分割效果可视化对比
图 8  不同算法分割远处小目标性能的可视化对比
组别基线模型MAFMCFWFmAcc /%mIoU/%
168.954.2
274.957.2
375.357.5
476.159.4
表 7  算法模块消融实验分析
1 ROMERA E, ÁLVAREZ J M, BERGASA L M, et al ERFNet: efficient residual factorized ConvNet for real-time semantic segmentation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2018, 19 (1): 263- 272
doi: 10.1109/TITS.2017.2750080
2 FAN X, WANG X, GAO J, et al. Bi-level learning of task-specific decoders for joint registration and one-shot medical image segmentation [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Seattle: IEEE, 2024: 11726–11735.
3 CHEN H, LUO H, WANG C AfaMamba: adaptive feature aggregation with visual state space model for remote sensing images semantic segmentation[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2025, 18: 8965- 8983
doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2025.3552942
4 张振利, 胡新凯, 李凡, 等 基于CNN和Efficient Transformer的多尺度遥感图像语义分割算法[J]. 浙江大学学报: 工学版, 2025, 59 (4): 778- 786
ZHANG Zhenli, HU Xinkai, LI Fan, et al Semantic segmentation algorithm for multiscale remote sensing images based on CNN and Efficient Transformer[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2025, 59 (4): 778- 786
doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2025.04.013
5 SHELHAMER E, LONG J, DARRELL T Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2017, 39 (4): 640- 651
doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683
6 BADRINARAYANAN V, KENDALL A, CIPOLLA R SegNet: a deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2017, 39 (12): 2481- 2495
doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615
7 RONNEBERGER O, FISCHER P, BROX T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation [C]// Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. [S.l.]: Springer, 2015: 234–241.
8 ZHAO H, SHI J, QI X, et al. Pyramid scene parsing network [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Honolulu. IEEE, 2017: 6230–6239.
9 XIE E, WANG W, YU Z, et al. SegFormer: simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers [EB/OL]. (2021–10–28)[2026–04–28]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.15203.
10 HA Q, WATANABE K, KARASAWA T, et al. MFNet: towards real-time semantic segmentation for autonomous vehicles with multi-spectral scenes [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Vancouver: IEEE, 2017: 5108–5115.
11 SUN Y, ZUO W, LIU M RTFNet: RGB-thermal fusion network for semantic segmentation of urban scenes[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2019, 4 (3): 2576- 2583
doi: 10.1109/LRA.2019.2904733
12 SHIVAKUMAR S S, RODRIGUES N, ZHOU A, et al. PST900: RGB-thermal calibration, dataset and segmentation network [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Paris: IEEE, 2020: 9441–9447.
13 DENG F, FENG H, LIANG M, et al. FEANet: feature-enhanced attention network for RGB-thermal real-time semantic segmentation [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Prague: IEEE, 2021: 4467–4473.
14 ZHANG Q, ZHAO S, LUO Y, et al. ABMDRNet: adaptive-weighted bi-directional modality difference reduction network for RGB-T semantic segmentation [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Nashville: IEEE, 2021: 2633–2642.
15 YI S, CHEN M, LIU X, et al HAFFseg: RGB-Thermal semantic segmentation network with hybrid adaptive feature fusion strategy[J]. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2023, 117: 117027
doi: 10.1016/j.image.2023.117027
16 ZHOU W, DONG S, FANG M, et al CACFNet: cross-modal attention cascaded fusion network for RGB-T urban scene parsing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2024, 9 (1): 1919- 1929
doi: 10.1109/TIV.2023.3314527
17 HE K, ZHANG X, REN S, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Las Vegas: IEEE, 2016: 770–778.
18 BERMAN M, TRIKI A R, BLASCHKO M B. The lovasz-softmax loss: a tractable surrogate for the optimization of the intersection-over-union measure in neural networks [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Salt Lake City: IEEE, 2018: 4413–4421.
19 SUN Y, ZUO W, YUN P, et al FuseSeg: semantic segmentation of urban scenes based on RGB and thermal data fusion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2021, 18 (3): 1000- 1011
doi: 10.1109/TASE.2020.2993143
20 HE X, WANG M, LIU T, et al SFAF-MA: spatial feature aggregation and fusion with modality adaptation for RGB-thermal semantic segmentation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2023, 72: 5012810
doi: 10.1109/tim.2023.3267529
21 ZHOU W, DONG S, XU C, et al Edge-aware guidance fusion network for RGB–thermal scene parsing[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2022, 36 (3): 3571- 3579
doi: 10.1609/aaai.v36i3.20269
22 ZHOU Z, WU S, ZHU G, et al. Channel and spatial relation-propagation network for RGB-thermal semantic segmentation [EB/OL]. (2023–08–24)[2026–04–28]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.12534.
[1] 郭子强,肖璇,陶浩然,王少荣. 全局学习扩展的可见光-红外行人重识别[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(8): 1670-1677.
[2] 张乃洲,赵云超,曹薇,张啸剑. 基于多视图跨模态特征融合的图像描述生成[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(6): 1205-1212.
[3] 李子祥,陆克成,蔡海兵,解伟帅,张广东. 基于触觉仿生技术的黑暗环境混凝土裂缝检测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(5): 915-925.
[4] 武晓春,郭宁. 基于HMARU-net的隧道渗漏水轻量化检测方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(3): 468-477.
[5] 林鹏志,钟铭恩,范康,谭佳威,林志强. 基于跨任务双向特征交互的交通场景感知算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(9): 1784-1792.
[6] 黄文湖,赵邢,谢亮,梁浩然,梁荣华. 基于对比学习的声源定位引导视听分割模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(9): 1803-1813.
[7] 魏新雨,饶蕾,范光宇,陈年生,程松林,杨定裕. 用于无人机遥感图像的高精度实时语义分割网络[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(7): 1411-1420.
[8] 李沈崇,曾新华,林传渠. 基于轴向注意力的多任务自动驾驶环境感知算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(4): 769-777.
[9] 张振利,胡新凯,李凡,冯志成,陈智超. 基于CNN和Efficient Transformer的多尺度遥感图像语义分割算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(4): 778-786.
[10] 顾正宇,赖菲菲,耿辰,王希明,戴亚康. 基于知识引导的缺血性脑卒中梗死区分割方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(4): 814-820.
[11] 杨燕,贾存鹏. 代理注意力下域特征交互的高效图像去雾算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(12): 2527-2538.
[12] 潘嘉威,王淳立,郑秀娟,涂海燕. 基于语义分割的启发式采样路径规划算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(10): 2154-2163.
[13] 李凡,杨杰,冯志成,陈智超,付云骁. 基于图像识别的弓网接触点检测方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2024, 58(9): 1801-1810.
[14] 杨军,张琛. 基于边界点估计与稀疏卷积神经网络的三维点云语义分割[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2024, 58(6): 1121-1132.
[15] 刘毅,陈一丹,高琳,洪姣. 基于多尺度特征融合的轻量化道路提取模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2024, 58(5): 951-959.