Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2026, Vol. 60 Issue (10): 2153-2164    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.10.008
计算机技术与控制工程     
面向隧道火情处置的烟火异质视觉融合检测
马庆禄1(),王琛1,邱高建1,周志超1,胡松2
1. 重庆交通大学 交通运输学院,重庆 400074
2. 交通运输部公路科学研究院 智能交通运输研究中心,北京 100088
Smoke and fire heterogeneous visual fusion detection for tunnel fire disposal
Qinglu MA1(),Chen WANG1,Gaojian QIU1,Zhichao ZHOU1,Song HU2
1. School of Traffic and Transportation, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
2. Intelligent Transportation Research Center, Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China
 全文: PDF(2685 KB)   HTML
摘要:

初期隧道火灾受光照及结构环境影响,检测效率低且精度差,进而易引发火情处置延误、处置资源错配的问题. 为此,提出融合可见光与红外图像优势的烟火异质视觉检测方法. 针对红外图像,引入融合差分进化的灰狼优化算法优化OTSU阈值分割,并结合最大熵算法提升火焰区域分割精度. 结合隧道场景特征适配YOLO11,引入基于神经注意力机制改造的Swin-Transformer优化主干网络以提升弱特征提取能力. 在特征融合阶段采用轻量化BiFPN适配多尺度烟火特征,引入自适应WIoU损失函数提升模糊边界下的定位精度. 决策层采用加权融合、冲突消解的方式实现双模态协同决策. 实验结果表明:相较于单模态检测,本研究方法平均定位误差至少降低23.55%;与证据理论之类的9种融合算法对比,本研究方法召回率、F1、mAP值分别为92.52%、90.83%、93.47%,效果最优,定位误差波动幅度最小;模型推理速度平均提升14.61%. 研究成果有助于隧道火灾防控,还能提升隧道整体安全管理和应急响应能力.

关键词: 隧道火灾目标检测YOLO11决策级融合最大类间方差法最大熵分割    
Abstract:

A heterogeneous smoke and flame visual detection method integrating visible and infrared images was proposed, in order to address the problems of low detection efficiency, poor accuracy, and consequent delays in fire disposal and misallocation of resources in the early stage of tunnel fires caused by lighting interference and structural environment. For infrared images, an OTSU threshold segmentation optimized by a grey wolf optimizer fused with differential evolution was applied, and the maximum entropy algorithm was combined to improve flame region segmentation accuracy. Considering the tunnel scene characteristics, YOLO11 was adapted, and the backbone network was optimized using a Swin-Transformer modified with a neural attention mechanism to enhance weak feature extraction. During feature fusion, a lightweight BiFPN was employed to adapt to multi-scale smoke and flame features, and an adaptive WIoU loss function was introduced to improve localization accuracy under fuzzy boundaries. At the decision layer, weighted fusion and conflict resolution were used to achieve dual-modal collaborative decision-making. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed method achieved at least a 23.55% reduction in average localization error compared with single-modal detection. Compared with nine fusion algorithms such as evidence theory, the recall, F1, and mAP values of the proposed method reached 92.52%, 90.83%, and 93.47%, respectively, all exceeding those of the compared algorithms, while maintaining the smallest localization error fluctuation. The inference speed of the model increased by an average of 14.61%. The research results not only contribute to tunnel fire prevention and control but also effectively improve overall tunnel safety management and emergency response capability.

Key words: tunnel fire    target detection    YOLO11    decision-level integration    maximum interclass variance method    maximum entropy segmentation
收稿日期: 2025-09-17 出版日期: 2026-07-28
CLC:  U 458.1  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52072054);重庆市交通科技项目(CQJT-CZKJ2025-07);重庆市2025研究生科研创新项目(CYS25535).
作者简介: 马庆禄(1980—),男,教授,工学博士,从事智能交通系统与安全研究. orcid.org/0000-0003-2641-0924. E-mail:qlm@cqjtu.edu.cn
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章  
马庆禄
王琛
邱高建
周志超
胡松

引用本文:

马庆禄,王琛,邱高建,周志超,胡松. 面向隧道火情处置的烟火异质视觉融合检测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(10): 2153-2164.

Qinglu MA,Chen WANG,Gaojian QIU,Zhichao ZHOU,Song HU. Smoke and fire heterogeneous visual fusion detection for tunnel fire disposal. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(10): 2153-2164.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.10.008        https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2026/V60/I10/2153

图 1  Neural Swin Transformer模块
模块现有技术改进创新点
主干注意力机制Swin-TransformerNeural Swin
Transformer
在W-MSA后嵌入无参数神经元空间抑制模块,通过能量函数计算局部显著性,动态抑制冗余神经元响应,增强弱火焰特征表达,无需额外训练参数
边界框损失函数WIoU自适应WIoU引入动态非单调聚焦机制,使损失函数对中等质量预测框赋予更高梯度权重,自适应调节回归强度,而非依赖固定阈值或静态权重
表 1  现有技术与改进技术对比表
图 2  不同分割算法对比结果
组别P/%R/%Dice/%
CannySobelK-means本研究方法CannySobelK-means本研究方法CannySobelK-means本研究方法
175.3176.4774.3683.7376.2277.2473.2682.4475.7676.8573.8083.07
274.2273.1675.8984.2778.1777.9879.1685.4776.1475.4977.4984.86
375.6574.5377.1382.9676.3476.1478.5184.5875.9875.3277.8183.76
477.8776.8674.5485.4377.8576.9375.4483.6577.8676.8974.9884.53
575.4374.3773.6782.8574.8375.5474.0680.4275.1374.9573.8681.61
678.5277.9879.0286.1679.4278.2778.1884.3778.9678.1278.5985.25
表 2  对比实验的火灾检测平均精确率、平均召回率、平均Dice表
图 3  不同变体检测结果
模型NSTBiFPNWIoUP/%R/%
YOLO1182.9382.58
YOLO11-A83.4285.34
YOLO11-B86.5287.77
YOLO11-T91.9389.79
表 3  消融实验表
模型mAP@0.5/%R/%FPS/(帧·s?1)para/106
YOLOv8n86.9687.65433.2
YOLOX-s85.3486.12409.0
YOLOv10n86.9686.65422.3
RT-DETR84.2083.782832.1
YOLOv5s[10]91.2888.944013.9
YOLO11-T91.9389.794212.3
表 4  主流火灾检测模型的性能对比
图 4  单模态与双模态检测结果与定位误差对比
图 5  不同燃烧物的决策融合与单模态检测结果对比
图 6  不同融合方法的精确率对比图
检测方法R/%F1/%mAP/%FPS/(帧·s?1)
可见光83.3482.5983.1640
红外84.7882.4682.3539
投票法85.6384.4586.7333
ADF84.8785.6483.3435
贝叶斯法86.6785.3882.4535
证据理论86.3486.5784.7639
本研究方法92.5290.8393.4742
表 5  融合算法性能对比
1 李雪, 王硕, 艾文森, 等 基于线性自抗扰算法的公路隧道火灾通风控制[J]. 中国公路学报, 2025, 38 (4): 186- 200
LI Xue, WANG Shuo, AI Wensen, et al Fire ventilation control in highway tunnels based on linear active disturbance rejection algorithm[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2025, 38 (4): 186- 200
doi: 10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2025.04.015
2 杨凯博, 钟铭恩, 谭佳威, 等 基于半监督学习的多场景火灾小规模稀薄烟雾检测[J]. 浙江大学学报: 工学版, 2025, 59 (3): 546- 556,565
YANG Kaibo, ZHONG Mingen, TAN Jiawei, et al Small-scale sparse smoke detection in multiple fire scenarios based on semi-supervised learning[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2025, 59 (3): 546- 556,565
doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2025.03.012
3 CHEN X, HOPKINS B, WANG H, et al Wildland fire detection and monitoring using a drone-collected RGB/IR image dataset[J]. IEEE Access, 2022, 10: 121301- 121317
doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3222805
4 QIAO L, LI S, ZHANG Y, et al Early wildfire detection and distance estimation using aerial visible-infrared images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2024, 71 (12): 16695- 16705
doi: 10.1109/tie.2024.3387089
5 WANG G, LI H, XIAO Q, et al Fighting against forest fire: a lightweight real-time detection approach for forest fire based on synthetic images[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2025, 262: 125620
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125620
6 郭润泽, 孙备, 孙晓永, 等 无人机弱光条件下多模态融合目标检测方法[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2025, 46 (1): 338- 350
GUO Runze, SUN Bei, SUN Xiaoyong, et al Multimodal fusion object detection method for UAVs under low light conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2025, 46 (1): 338- 350
7 司海平, 赵文汭, 李婷婷, 等 BDMFuse: 基于红外与可见光图像基础特征和细节特征的多尺度融合[J]. 红外与毫米波学报, 2025, 44 (2): 289- 298
SI Haiping, ZHAO Wenrui, LI Tingting, et al BDMFuse: multi-scale network fusion for infrared and visible images based on base and detail features[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2025, 44 (2): 289- 298
doi: 10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2025.02.016
8 李牧, 何金诚, 杨恒 双分支GAN与注意力机制的火灾隐患检测算法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2024, 60 (14): 228- 239
LI Mu, HE Jincheng, YANG Heng Fire hazard detection algorithm with dual-branch GAN and attention mechanism[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2024, 60 (14): 228- 239
doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2304-0288
9 邓实强, 丁浩, 蒋树屏, 等 基于改进YOLOv5s的公路隧道火灾烟雾智能检测算法[J]. 中国公路学报, 2024, 37 (11): 194- 209
DENG Shiqiang, DING Hao, JIANG Shu Ping, et al Intelligent detection algorithm for fire smoke in highway tunnel based on improved YOLOv5s[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2024, 37 (11): 194- 209
doi: 10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2024.11.015
10 马庆禄, 鲁佳萍, 唐小垚, 等 改进YOLOv5s的公路隧道烟火检测方法[J]. 浙江大学学报: 工学版, 2023, 57 (4): 784- 794,813
MA Qinglu, LU Jiaping, TANG Xiaoyao, et al Improved YOLOv5s flame and smoke detection method in road tunnels[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2023, 57 (4): 784- 794,813
11 常丽, 张雪, 蒋辉, 等 融合YOLOv5s与SRGAN的实时隧道火灾检测[J]. 电子测量与仪器学报, 2022, 36 (8): 223- 230
CHANG Li, ZHANG Xue, JIANG Hui, et al Real-time tunnel fire detection by fusion of YOLOv5s and SRGAN[J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation, 2022, 36 (8): 223- 230
12 彭锐晖, 赖杰, 孙殿星, 等 一种改进YOLOv5算法的伪装目标检测方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2024, 46 (8): 3324- 3333
PENG Ruihui, LAI Jie, SUN Dianxing, et al A camouflaged target detection method with improved YOLOv5 algorithm[J]. Journal of Electronics and Information Technology, 2024, 46 (8): 3324- 3333
doi: 10.11999/JEIT231170
13 LI Y, SU Y, ZENG X, et al Research on multi-sensor fusion indoor fire perception algorithm based on improved TCN[J]. Sensors, 2022, 22 (12): 4550
doi: 10.3390/s22124550
14 程腾, 侯登超, 张强, 等 基于D-S证据理论的多模态结果级融合框架研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45 (10): 1815- 1823
CHENG Teng, HOU Dengchao, ZHANG Qiang, et al Research on multi-modal late fusion framework based on D-S evidence theory[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45 (10): 1815- 1823
doi: 10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2023.10.004
15 姜小刚, 何聪, 姜楠, 等 基于多模型决策融合的苹果产地判别及糖度含量预测[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2024, 44 (10): 2812- 2818
JIANG Xiaogang, HE Cong, JIANG Nan, et al Discrimination of apple origin and prediction of SSC based on multi-model decision fusion[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2024, 44 (10): 2812- 2818
doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)10-2812-07
16 JANA S, SHOME S K Hybrid ensemble based machine learning for smart building fire detection using multi modal sensor data[J]. Fire Technology, 2023, 59 (2): 473- 496
doi: 10.1007/s10694-022-01347-7
17 SONG Y, CAI X, ZHOU X, et al Dynamic hybrid mechanism-based differential evolution algorithm and its application[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 213: 118834
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118834
18 宛明晨, 景月岭, 马乐乐, 等 基于改进D-S证据理论的管廊施工风险评估[J]. 公路, 2024, 69 (8): 274- 280
WAN Mingchen, JING Yueling, MA Lele, et al Risk assessment of utility tunnel construction based on improved D-S evidence theory[J]. Highway, 2024, 69 (8): 274- 280
19 ZHANG Y, CHI M Mask-R-FCN: a deep fusion network for semantic segmentation[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 155753- 155765
doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3012701
20 李文, 叶坤涛, 舒蕾蕾, 等 基于高斯模糊逻辑和ADCSCM的红外与可见光图像融合算法[J]. 红外技术, 2022, 44 (7): 693- 701
LI Wen, YE Kuntao, SHU Leilei, et al Infrared and visible image fusion algorithm based on Gaussian fuzzy logic and adaptive dual-channel spiking cortical model[J]. Infrared Technology, 2022, 44 (7): 693- 701
21 王丽英, 马旭伟, 有泽, 等 基于多元GMM的机载多光谱LiDAR点云空谱联合分类[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2023, 35 (3): 88- 96
WANG Liying, MA Xuwei, YOU Ze, et al Spatial-spectral joint classification of airborne multispectral LiDAR point clouds based on the multivariate GMM[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2023, 35 (3): 88- 96
doi: 10.6046/zrzyyg.2022223
22 DAN M, ZHAO P Motion deblurring and quality enhancement for compressive multimode fiber imaging using sparse Kalman filtering[J]. Optics Express, 2025, 33 (5): 10104- 10120
doi: 10.1364/OE.553718
23 SHEN S, ZHANG T, DONG H, et al ADF-Net: attention-guided deep feature decomposition network for infrared and visible image fusion[J]. IET Image Processing, 2024, 18 (10): 2774- 2787
doi: 10.1049/ipr2.13134
24 DONG Z, YUAN G, HUA Z, et al Diffusion model-based text-guided enhancement network for medical image segmentation[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 249: 123549
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123549
25 LIU S, WANG M, YIN L, et al Two-scale multimodal medical image fusion based on structure preservation[J]. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2022, 15: 803724
doi: 10.3389/fncom.2021.803724
[1] 李珺,丁彬彬,史维娟,杨琳. 基于多尺度特征聚合的航拍图像检测算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(9): 1890-1900.
[2] 邬开俊,郑云琦,魏鼎,袁海翔. 基于YOLOv8s的轻量化航拍图像小目标检测算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(9): 1912-1923.
[3] 柳长源,赵海健,吴海滨,刘佳伟. 面向自动驾驶的轻量化交警手势识别方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(8): 1678-1685.
[4] 董绍江,肖涛,吕振鸣,夏浩然,罗家元,孙世政,张霞,刘超. 基于改进RT-DETR的水下色偏环境中小型生物检测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(7): 1404-1415.
[5] 王平,徐安之,赵洪黎,魏小源,杨富龙. 融合流体自动标注与轻量化YOLOv8n的泥石流实时检测方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(7): 1416-1426.
[6] 吴佰靖,闫光辉,马龙,程文鑫,黄亚宁. 边缘感知和跨尺度特征增强的小目标水漂垃圾检测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(7): 1452-1463.
[7] 于鑫淼,夏楠,江佳鸿,郝子莹,把云胜. 基于多尺度特征相似性匹配的低照度目标检测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(7): 1464-1474.
[8] 于天河,王文龙,刘镛,杨壮壮,侯善冲. 改进的有雾图像中被遮挡车辆及行人识别算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(4): 738-750.
[9] 宋耀莲,彭驰,唐菁敏,赵宣植,虞贵财. 基于融合注意力机制的光学遥感图像小目标检测算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(4): 763-771.
[10] 孟昱煜,孔垂乐,火久元,武泽宇. 重构YOLOv11的无人机小目标检测算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(2): 303-312.
[11] 肖剑,何昕泽,程鸿亮,杨小苑,胡欣. 基于多尺度特征增强的航拍小目标检测算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(1): 19-31.
[12] 包晓安,彭书友,张娜,涂小妹,张庆琪,吴彪. 基于多方位感知深度融合检测头的目标检测算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(1): 32-42.
[13] 董超群,汪战,廖平,谢帅,荣玉杰,周靖淞. 轻量化YOLOv5s-OCG的轨枕裂纹检测算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(9): 1838-1845.
[14] 翟亚红,陈雅玲,徐龙艳,龚玉. 改进YOLOv8s的轻量级无人机航拍小目标检测算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(8): 1708-1717.
[15] 付家瑞,李兆飞,周豪,黄惟. 基于Convnextv2与纹理边缘引导的伪装目标检测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(8): 1718-1726.