Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2021, Vol. 55 Issue (11): 2142-2150    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2021.11.015
土木与建筑工程     
富水区隧道渗流场解析解及合理支护参数
赵建平1(),李建武1(),毕林1,程贝贝2
1. 中南大学 资源与安全工程学院，湖南 长沙 410083
2. 三峡基地发展有限公司，湖北 宜昌 443002
Analytical solution of seepage field and reasonable support parameters of tunnel in water rich area
Jian-ping ZHAO1(),Jian-wu LI1(),Lin Bi1,Bei-bei CHENG2
1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
2. Three Gorges Base Development Limited Company, Yichang 443002, China
 全文: PDF(1410 KB)   HTML
摘要：

以复势函数和地下水力学理论为基础，引入双极坐标描述等势线，推导由围岩、注浆圈和初期支护组成的富水地区隧道渗流场解析解，获得隧道注浆前后初期支护外水头的水头差公式. 通过与保角变换法、镜像法和数值模拟计算结果对比，验证所提解析方法的合理性. 通过研究隧道注浆圈、初期支护的渗流参数与初期支护外水头、渗水量及水头差的关系，提出隧道结构合理渗流参数的确定方法. 结果表明：减小初期支护渗透系数或增大初期支护厚度都可致渗水量减小且水头增大；水头差随初期支护渗透系数或厚度增大先增大后减小，当水头差处于峰值时，注浆圈能发挥较大的作用，初期支护外水头可以降至全水头的30%±6%.
关键词： 隧道工程;  复势函数;  双极坐标;  渗流场;  渗流参数    
Abstract:

Based on the theory of complex potential function and groundwater hydraulics, the analytical solution of seepage field of tunnel in water rich area, which is composed of surrounding rock, grouting circle and initial support, was derived by introducing bipolar coordinate to describe equipotential line, and the formula of hydraulic head difference of hydraulic head around initial support before and after grouting was obtained. The rationality of the analytical method was verified, compared with conformal mapping method, image method and numerical simulation results. The determination method of reasonable seepage parameters of tunnel structure was proposed, by studying the relationship between the seepage parameters of grouting circle and initial support and the external hydraulic head, water inflow and hydraulic head difference of initial support. Results show that decreasing the permeability coefficient or increasing the thickness of the initial support can lead to the decrease of water inflow and the increase of hydraulic head. The hydraulic head difference first increases and then decreases with the increase of permeability coefficient or thickness of initial support. When the head difference is at the peak, the grouting circle can play a great role, and the external hydraulic head of the initial support can be reduced to 30%±6% of full hydraulic head.
Key words: tunnel engineering    complex potential function    bipolar coordinate    seepage field    seepage parameter
收稿日期: 2020-12-31 出版日期: 2021-11-05
CLC:  TU 45  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(51104178)；湖南省重点研发计划资助项目(2015SK2086)
作者简介: 赵建平(1977—)，男，副教授，从事地下工程方面的教学和科研工作. orcid.org/0000-0001-5386-0758. E-mail: jpzcsu@csu.edu.cn
服务　　
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章　　
赵建平
李建武
毕林
程贝贝

引用本文:

赵建平,李建武,毕林,程贝贝. 富水区隧道渗流场解析解及合理支护参数[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(11): 2142-2150.

Jian-ping ZHAO,Jian-wu LI,Lin Bi,Bei-bei CHENG. Analytical solution of seepage field and reasonable support parameters of tunnel in water rich area. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2021, 55(11): 2142-2150.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2021.11.015    或    https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2021/V55/I11/2142

图 1  隧道渗流场计算模型
图 2  点源和点汇位置关系
图 3  焦点为z1、z2的双极坐标系
图 4  计算模型中边界处的等势线
图 5  隧道埋深100 m时FLAC3D模型
区域 k/(m·s?1) RS/m
围岩 1.5×10?6 ?
注浆圈 1×10?7 7.25
初期支护 1×10?8 2.25
隧道净空 ? 2.00
表 1  FLAC3D模型中结构几何参数和渗透系数
h/m ΔHP/m ΔHT/m ω/%
10 4.422 0.078 1.317
20 4.429 0.071 0.664
30 4.429 0.071 0.461
40 4.417 0.083 0.414
50 4.440 0.060 0.243
60 4.452 0.049 0.164
70 4.471 0.030 0.086
80 4.435 0.065 0.167
90 4.408 0.092 0.213
100 4.489 0.011 0.024
表 2  FLAC3D模拟结果中拱顶拱底的水头差
图 6  隧道埋深对初期支护外水压力PC的影响
图 7  初期支护渗透系数对初期支护外水压力的影响
图 8  初期支护外水头和初期支护厚度的关系
图 9  渗水量与初期支护厚度的关系
图 10  水头差与初期支护厚度的关系
图 11  初期支护外水头和初期支护渗透系数的关系
图 12  渗水量和初期支护渗透系数的关系
图 13  水头差和初期支护渗透系数的关系
1 VERRUIJT A A complex variable solution for a deforming circular tunnel in elastic half plane[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1997, 21: 77- 89
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199702)21:2<77::AID-NAG857>3.0.CO;2-M
2 MOHAMED E T Circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2003, 18 (1): 49- 55
doi: 10.1016/S0886-7798(02)00102-5
3 KOLYMBAS D, WAGNER P Groundwater ingress to tunnels: the exact analytical solution[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2007, 22 (1): 23- 27
doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2006.02.001
4 PARK K H, ADISORN O, Lee J G Analytical solution for steady-state groundwater inflow into a drained circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer: a revisit[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23 (2): 206- 209
doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2007.02.004
5 HUANGFU M, WANG M S, TAN Z S, et al Analytical solutions for steady seepage into an underwater circular tunnel[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2010, 25 (4): 391- 396
doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2010.02.002
6 杜朝伟, 王梦恕, 谭忠盛 水下隧道渗流场解析解及其应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30 (Suppl.2): 3567- 3573
DU Chao-wei, WANG Meng-shu, TAN Zhong-sheng Analytical solution for the seepage field of subsea tunnel and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30 (Suppl.2): 3567- 3573
7 朱成伟, 应宏伟, 龚晓南. 任意埋深水下隧道渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(11): 1984-1991.
ZHU Cheng-wei, YING Hong-wei, GONG Xiao-nan. Analytical solutions for seepage fields of underwater tunnels with arbitrary burial depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(11): 1984-1991.
8 YING H W, ZHU C W, SHEN H W, et al Semi-analytical solution for groundwater ingress into lined tunnel[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 76 (3): 43- 47
9 朱成伟, 应宏伟, 龚晓南, 等 水下双线平行隧道渗流场解析研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41 (2): 355- 360
ZHU Cheng-wei, YING Hong-wei, GONG Xiao-nan, et al Analytical solutions to seepage field of underwater twin parallel tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41 (2): 355- 360
10 潘以恒, 罗其奇, 周斌, 等 半无限平面含注浆圈深埋隧道渗流场解析研究[J]. 浙江大学学报:工学版, 2018, 52 (6): 1114- 1122
PAN Yi-heng, LUO Qi-qi, ZHOU Bin, et al Analytical study on seepage field of deep tunnel with grouting circle in half plane[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2018, 52 (6): 1114- 1122
11 HARR M E. Groundwater and seepage[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
12 LEI S An analytical solution for steady flow into a tunnel[J]. Ground Water, 1999, 37 (1): 23- 26
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb00953.x
13 张炳强 半无限平面双孔平行隧道渗流场解析研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2017, 39 (1): 125- 131
ZHANG Bing-qiang Analytical solution for seepage field of twin-parallel tunnels in semi-infinite plane[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2017, 39 (1): 125- 131
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2017.01.018
14 王秀英, 谭忠盛 水下隧道复合式衬砌水压特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2015, 52 (1): 89- 97
WANG Xiu-ying, TAN Zhong-sheng Study on the characteristics of water pressure on the composite lining in underwater tunnels[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2015, 52 (1): 89- 97
15 李鹏飞, 张顶立, 赵勇, 等 海底隧道复合衬砌水压力分布规律及合理注浆加固圈参数研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31 (2): 280- 288
LI Peng-fei, ZHANG Ding-li, ZHAO Yong, et al Study of distribution law of water pressure acting on composite lining and reasonable parameters of grouting circle for subsea tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31 (2): 280- 288
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.02.007
16 程林松. 高等渗流力学: 第1版[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2011.
17 张兆夺. 弹性半平面问题解析解的双极坐标和复变函数解法研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2017.
ZHANG Zhao-duo. An analytical study on the half-plane elasticity using the methods of bi-polar coordinates and complex variables[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2017.
18 应宏伟, 朱成伟, 龚晓南 考虑注浆圈作用水下隧道渗流场解析解[J]. 浙江大学学报:工学版, 2016, 50 (6): 1018- 1023
YING Hong-wei, ZHU Cheng-wei, GONG Xiao-nan Analytical solution on seepage field of underwater tunnel considering grouting circle[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2016, 50 (6): 1018- 1023
19 李林毅, 阳军生, 张峥, 等 深埋式中心水沟排水隧道渗流场解析研究[J]. 浙江大学学报:工学版, 2018, 52 (11): 2050- 2057
LI Lin-yi, YANG Jun-sheng, ZHANG Zheng, et al Analytical study of seepage field of deep-buried central ditch drainage tunnel[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2018, 52 (11): 2050- 2057
doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2018.11.002
20 高新强, 艾旭峰, 孔超 高水压富水区裂隙岩体隧道渗流场的特征[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2016, 37 (6): 42- 49
GAO Xin-qiang, AI Xu-feng, KONG Chao Characteristics of seepage field of fractured rock mass tunnel in high water pressure and rich water zone[J]. China Railway Science, 2016, 37 (6): 42- 49
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2016.06.06
[1] 朱宝强,王述红,张泽,王鹏宇,董福瑞. 基于时间序列与DEGWO-SVR模型的隧道变形预测方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(12): 2275-2285.
[2] 潘以恒, 罗其奇, 周斌, 陈建平. 半无限平面含注浆圈深埋隧道渗流场解析研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(6): 1114-1122.
[3] 李林毅, 阳军生, 张峥, 麻彦娜, 张聪, 包德勇. 深埋式中心水沟排水隧道渗流场解析研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(11): 2050-2057.
[4] 高华喜, 闻敏杰, 张斌. 具有圆形隧道的准饱和黏弹性土振动响应[J]. J4, 2013, 47(4): 615-621.