Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2018, Vol. 52 Issue (11): 2050-2057    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2018.11.002
土木与水利工程     
深埋式中心水沟排水隧道渗流场解析研究
李林毅1, 阳军生1, 张峥1, 麻彦娜1, 张聪1, 包德勇2
1. 中南大学 土木工程学院, 湖南 长沙 410075;
2. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司, 湖北 武汉 430063
Analytical study of seepage field of deep-buried central ditch drainage tunnel
LI Lin-yi1, YANG Jun-sheng1, ZHANG Zheng1, MA Yan-na1, ZHANG Cong1, BAO De-yong2
1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China;
2. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co. Ltd, Wuhan 430063, China
 全文: PDF(1366 KB)   HTML
摘要:

以镜像法和渗流力学理论为基础,推导半无限平面内深埋式中心水沟排水隧道渗流场及涌水量的解析解.依托深埋式中心水沟排水隧道工程实例,应用FLAC3D有限差分软件建立数值模型,从隧道涌水量、衬砌水压力两方面验证所得解析解的正确性,探究隧道水下埋深、围岩渗透性对衬砌水压力的影响规律.研究结果表明,深埋式中心水沟涌水量大、有效排导能力强,是隧道排水体系的主要排水路径,也是控制隧底水压力的关键;即使在隧道水下埋深较大或围岩渗透性较好的情况下,深埋式中心水沟排水方式仍可以有效降低衬砌水压力,控制隧底水压力,减少因隧底水压力过大导致的病害的发生.

Abstract:

The analytical solution of seepage field and water inflow of tunnel with deep-buried ditch drainage hole in semi-infinite plane was deduced with the method of images and percolation mechanics theory. A numerical model was established by using FLAC3D software based on the engineering example of deep-buried central ditch drainage tunnel. The correctness of the analytical solution was verified from the aspects of tunnel water inflow and lining water pressure. And the influence of the underwater depth of the tunnel and the permeability of the surrounding rock on the water pressure of the lining was further explored. Results showed that deep-buried central ditch was the main drainage path of tunnel drainage system with large discharge and strong effective drainage capacity, and it was also the key to controlling the tunnel bottom water pressure; even if the tunnel was buried deep under water or the surrounding rock permeability was good, the deep-buried central ditch drainage method can effectively reduce the lining water pressure, and control the tunnel bottom water pressure, which can reduce the occurrence of diseases caused by excessive water pressure at the tunnel bottom.

收稿日期: 2018-01-10 出版日期: 2018-11-22
CLC:  U45  
基金资助:

国家重点研发计划资助项目(2016YFC0802500);中南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2018zzts631)

通讯作者: 阳军生,男,教授.     E-mail: jsyang@csu.edu.cn
作者简介: 李林毅(1994-),男,博士生,从事隧道工程研究.orcid.org/0000-0002-3920-1622.E-mail:tunnel_lly@csu.edu.cn
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

李林毅, 阳军生, 张峥, 麻彦娜, 张聪, 包德勇. 深埋式中心水沟排水隧道渗流场解析研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(11): 2050-2057.

LI Lin-yi, YANG Jun-sheng, ZHANG Zheng, MA Yan-na, ZHANG Cong, BAO De-yong. Analytical study of seepage field of deep-buried central ditch drainage tunnel. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2018, 52(11): 2050-2057.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2018.11.002        http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2018/V52/I11/2050

[1] 应宏伟, 朱成伟, 龚晓南. 考虑注浆圈作用水下隧道渗流场解析解[J]. 浙江大学学报:工学版, 2016, 50(6):1018-1023 YING Hong-wei, ZHU Cheng-wei, GONG Xiao-nan. Analytic solution on seepage field of underwater tunnel considering grouting circle[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science, 2016, 50(6):1018-1023
[2] 杜朝伟, 王梦恕, 谭忠盛. 水下隧道渗流场解析解及其应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 27(9):31-34 DU Chao-wei, WANG Meng-shu, TAN Zhong-sheng. Analytic solution for seepage field of subsea tunnel and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 27(9):31-34
[3] 吴金刚, 谭忠盛, 皇甫明. 高水压隧道渗流场分布的复变函数解析解[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2010, 27(9):31-34 WU Jin-gang, TAN Zhong-sheng, HUANG Fu-ming. Analytic solution of complex function to distribution of seepage field of tunnel with high water pressure[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2010, 27(9):31-34
[4] 皇甫明, 谭忠盛, 王梦恕, 等. 暗挖海底隧道渗流量的解析解及其应用[J]. 中国工程科学, 2009, 11(7):66-70 HUANG Fu-ming, TAN Zhong-sheng, WANG Meng-shu, et al. Analytical solutions for water in flow into an underwater tunnel and its application[J]. Engineering Sciences, 2009, 11(7):66-70
[5] 王建宇. 再谈隧道衬砌水压力[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2003, 40(3):5-10 WANG Jian-yu. Once more on hydraulic pressure upon lining[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2003, 40(3):5-10
[6] 王志杰, 何晟亚, 王国栋, 等. 轴对称解析解对马蹄形隧道衬砌水压力及渗透量适用性研究[J]. 武汉大学学报:工学版, 2016, 49(1):54-59 WANG Zhi-jie, HE Cheng-ya, WANG Guo-dong, et al. Study of applicability of an axisymmetric solution for water pressure and seepage flow on lining of horseshoe shaped tunnel[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2016, 49(1):54-59
[7] 王秀英, 王梦恕, 张弥. 计算隧道涌水量及衬砌外水压力的一种简化方法[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2004, 28(1):8-10 WANG Xiu-ying, WANG Meng-shu, ZHANG Mi. A simple method to calculate tunnel discharge and external water pressure on lining[J]. Journal of Northern Jiaotong University, 2004, 28(1):8-10
[8] 张丙强. 半无限平面双孔平行隧道渗流场解析研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2017(1):125-131 ZHANG Bing-qiang. Analytical solution for seepage field of twin-parallel tunnels in semi-infinite plane[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2017(1):125-131
[9] 蒋进. 高压富水地层山岭隧道衬砌受力机制探讨与结构设计[D].重庆:重庆交通大学, 2012:63-71. JIANG Jin. Mountain tunnel lining stress mechanism and structure design in high pressure and rich water stratum[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2012:63-71.
[10] 苗晓岐. 九燕山隧道病害原因分析及整治措施建议[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2003, 2:70-72 MIAO Xiao-qi. Analysis on reason of defects in jiuyanshan tunnel and suggestion of measures for their regulation[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2003, 2:70-72
[11] 姚希磊. 隧道深埋式中心水沟施工技术研究[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2017(6):97-99 YAO Xi-lei. Research on the construction technology for deep-buried ditch in tunnel[J]. Railway Construction Technology, 2017(6):97-99
[12] NAM S W, BOBET A. Liner stresses in deep tunnels below the water table[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2006, 21(6):626-635.
[13] 翟云芳. 渗流力学[M]. 北京:北京石油工业出版社. 2009:25-27.
[14] 郑波, 王建宇, 吴剑. 基于等效渗透系数计算衬砌水压力方法研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2011, 48(6):43-46 ZHENG Bo, WANG Jian-yu, WU Jian. On grey theory to predict tunnel deformation[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2011, 48(6):43-46
[15] 何本国, 张志强, 傅少君, 等. 考虑盲管排水和防水板隔水的隧道支护体系分担水荷载解析解[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015(增2):3936-3947 HE Ben-guo, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, FU Shao-jun, et al. An analytical solution of water loading on tunnel supporting system with drainage of blind tube and isolation effect of waterproof board[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015(Suppl.2):3936-3947
[16] 郑春苗, 贝聂特. 地下水污染物迁移模拟[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2009:191-192.

[1] 吴昌胜, 朱志铎. 不同隧道施工方法引起地层损失率的统计分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(1): 19-30.
[2] 丁智, 王凡勇, 魏新江. 软土双线盾构施工地表变形实测分析与预测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(1): 61-68.
[3] 丁智, 张霄, 周联英, 陈自海. 近距离桥桩与地铁隧道相互影响研究及展望[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(10): 1943-1953.
[4] 罗华, 陈祖煜, 龚国芳, 赵宇, 荆留杰, 王超. 基于现场数据的TBM掘进速率研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(8): 1566-1574.
[5] 潘以恒, 罗其奇, 周斌, 陈建平. 半无限平面含注浆圈深埋隧道渗流场解析研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(6): 1114-1122.
[6] 刘新荣, 刘俊, 黄伦海, 王子娟, 陈红军, 冯艳. 黄土连拱隧道开挖的模型试验与压力拱分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(6): 1140-1149.
[7] 林赉贶, 夏毅敏, 贾连辉, 贺飞, 杨妹, 杨凯. 安装参数与掘进参数对滚刀破岩阻力的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(6): 1209-1215.
[8] 张家奇, 李术才, 张霄, 张庆松, 李鹏, 于海洋. 土石分层介质注浆扩散的试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(5): 914-924.
[9] 张子新, 孙杰, 朱雁飞, 黄昕, 袁玮皓. 深埋排蓄水隧道接缝密封垫防水性能试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(3): 431-439.
[10] 张欣, 张天航, 黄志义, 张驰, 康诚, 吴珂. 分叉隧道分流局部损失特性及流动特征[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(3): 440-445.
[11] 梁荣柱, 宗梦繁, 康成, 吴文兵, 方宇翔, 夏唐代, 程康. 考虑隧道剪切效应的隧道下穿对既有盾构隧道的纵向影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(3): 420-430.
[12] 王超, 龚国芳, 杨华勇, 周建军, 段理文, 张亚坤. NSVR硬岩隧道掘进机刀盘扭矩预测分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(3): 479-486.
[13] 夏毅敏, 钱聪, 李正光, 梅勇兵. 隧道掘进机支撑推进系统振动特性[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(2): 233-239.
[14] 杨春山, 魏立新, 莫海鸿, 何则干. 考虑衬砌变形与接头特征的盾构隧道纵向刚度[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(2): 358-366.
[15] 于洋, 徐长节, 朱陈, 徐倩. 爆孕育过程的微震源事件空间分形行为[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(11): 2175-2181.