Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2021, Vol. 55 Issue (9): 1714-1724    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2021.09.013
土木工程、水利工程     
钢-UHPC组合结构新型剪力件的抗剪性能
曾丹1(),刘扬1,2,*(),曹磊2
1. 长沙理工大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410114
2. 湖南工业大学 土木工程学院,湖南 株洲 412007
Shear performance of innovative shear connectors in steel-UHPC composite structure
Dan ZENG1(),Yang LIU1,2,*(),Lei CAO2
1. School of Civil Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China
2. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China
 全文: PDF(1572 KB)   HTML
摘要:

为了解决钢-UHPC组合桥面板因UHPC层较薄导致剪力件高度受限、施工难度大、抗剪强度和刚度不足等问题,提出弧形钢筋、栓钉+弧形钢筋2种新型剪力连接方式. 考虑剪力件直径的影响,设计7组共14个推出试件,通过与栓钉剪力件对比分析,研究剪力件的抗剪性能及承载力. 结果表明:3种剪力件的破坏形态及破坏机理、荷载?滑移曲线变化规律区别明显. 弧形钢筋剪力件的延性和刚度均优于另外2种剪力件,且与直径呈线性关系. 基于线性回归分析,给出考虑栓钉周围楔形块对栓钉剪力件抗剪贡献的承载力计算公式、考虑弧形钢筋和其内部UHPC共同抗剪的承载力计算经验公式,计算结果与试验值较吻合.

关键词: 钢-UHPC组合结构弧形钢筋剪力件栓钉+弧形钢筋剪力件推出试验抗剪性能抗剪承载力    
Abstract:

Two innovative shear connector named arc-shaped reinforcement and stud+arc-shaped reinforcement were proposed, in order to solve the problems of limited height of shear connector, difficult construction, insufficient shear strength and stiffness resulted by the thin UHPC layer of steel-UHPC composites bridge deck. Considering shear connector diameter, a total of fourteen push-out specimens for 7 groups were designed, the shear properties and bearing capacity of shear connectors were comparatively analyzed with studs. Experimental results show that the failure patterns and mechanisms, variation law of load-slip curve of the three kinds of shear connectors are quite different. Both the ductility and stiffness of arc-shaped reinforcement shear connectors are better than the other two kinds of shear connectors, which keep linear relation with diameter. Based on the linear regression analysis, the bearing capacity calculation formula of stud, considering the shear contribution of wedge-shaped block around studs, and empirical formula of arc-shaped reinforcement shear connectors, considering the shear strength of arc-shaped steel bar and its internal UHPC strength were given respectively, which were in good agreement with the experimental results.

Key words: steel-UHPC composite structure    arc-shaped reinforcement    stud+arc-shaped reinforcement    push-out test    shear behavior    shear capacity
收稿日期: 2020-10-20 出版日期: 2021-10-20
CLC:  U 443.3  
基金资助: 湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(2019JJ50138);国家自然科学基金资助项目(51908068);湖南省教育厅资助项目(19C0566);湖南省研究生创新基金资助项目(CX20190637)
通讯作者: 刘扬     E-mail: zengdanql@163.com;lyql19807@163.com
作者简介: 曾丹(1990—),女,博士生,从事钢-UHPC组合桥梁结构的理论研究. orcid.org/0000-0001-5635-4500. E-mail: zengdanql@163.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章  
曾丹
刘扬
曹磊

引用本文:

曾丹,刘扬,曹磊. 钢-UHPC组合结构新型剪力件的抗剪性能[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(9): 1714-1724.

Dan ZENG,Yang LIU,Lei CAO. Shear performance of innovative shear connectors in steel-UHPC composite structure. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2021, 55(9): 1714-1724.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2021.09.013        https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2021/V55/I9/1714

图 1  试件设计尺寸
剪力件类型 试件编号 ds/mm du/mm n/个
栓钉 A-1-1 10 2
A-1-2
A-2-1 16 2
A-2-2
弧形钢筋 C-1-1 8 2
C-1-2
C-2-1 10 2
C-2-2
C-3-1 12 2
C-3-2
栓钉+弧形钢筋 C-4-1 10 12 2
C-4-2
C-5-1 16 12 2
C-5-2
表 1  试件设计参数
图 2  弧形钢筋构造细节
图 3  试件施工工艺流程图
部件 材料类型 E/GPa fu/MPa ft/MPa fc/MPa
H型钢 Q345 206 345 - -
UHPC板 UHPC 42.6 - - 167.41
栓钉 ML15 206 345 400 -
弧形钢筋 HRB400 206 400 540 -
表 2  推出试件主要材料参数
图 4  试验加载装置图
图 5  栓钉剪力件破坏形态
图 6  弧形钢筋剪力件破坏形态
图 7  栓钉+弧形钢筋剪力件破坏形态
剪力类型件 试件编号 Pu/kN Pavg/kN δu/mm δavg/mm Dc Dcavg 最终破坏形态
栓钉 A-1-1 430.65 446.06 1.27 1.315 2.248 2.507 一侧栓钉全部剪断,栓钉根部周围UHPC局部压溃
A-1-2 461.47 1.36 2.765
A-2-1 903.42 908.32 1.20 1.215 4.364 3.907 一侧栓钉全部剪断,栓钉根部周围UHPC局部压溃
A-2-2 913.22 1.23 3.451
弧形钢筋 C-1-1 1 290.88 1 168.11 0.56 0.605 2.036 2.179 竖向弧形钢筋下端周围UHPC压溃并脱落
C-1-2 1 045.33 0.65 2.321
C-2-1 1 569.13 1 475.46 0.61 0.645 3.292 3.291 竖向弧形钢筋下端周围UHPC压溃并脱落
C-2-2 1 381.78 0.68 3.290
C-3-1 1 746.05 1 801.26 0.96 0.855 6.194 5.981 竖向弧形钢筋下端周围UHPC压溃并脱落
C-3-2 1 856.47 0.75 5.769 竖向弧形钢筋下端周围UHPC压溃并脱落,
UHPC板上表面开裂
栓钉+弧形钢筋 C-4-1 1 983.47 1 891.69 0.49 0.560 2.000 2.005 竖向弧形钢筋上端处UHPC板顶面开裂
C-4-2 1 799.92 0.63 2.010
C-5-1 2 664.87 2 611.67 058 0.695 3.100 3.108 UHPC板竖向弧形钢筋处顶面和侧面开裂
C-5-2 2 558.47 0.81 3.115
表 3  推出试件主要试验结果
图 8  3种剪力件荷载−滑移曲线
图 9  弧形钢筋剪力件荷载−滑移曲线
图 10  栓钉+弧形钢筋剪力件荷载−滑移曲线
试件编号 文献[21] 文献[17] 本文
Ksm Kavg Ksm Kavg Ksm Kavg
A-1-1 94.4 101.4 73.9 79.45 80.0 87.6
A-1-2 108.3 85.0 95.2
A-2-1 313.7 329.8 298.3 286.9 298.1 296.8
A-2-2 345.9 275.5 295.5
C-1-1 286.1 454.9 228.2 201.2 239.7 212.81
C-1-2 168.8 174.2 185.9
C-2-1 578.6 529.2 400.3 361.8 452.2 401.08
C-2-2 479.8 323.3 349.9
C-3-1 679.9 747.1 580.9 628.9 634.5 669.9
C-3-2 814.2 676.8 705.2
C-4-1 282.5 250.0 251.5 216.3 253.7 223.52
C-4-2 217.4 181.0 193.4
C-5-1 411.2 392.6 419.0 381.0 417.6 386.91
C-5-2 374.0 343.1 356.2
表 4  单个剪切面3种刚度计算方法的比较
图 11  单根弧形钢筋抗剪刚度−直径变化曲线
图 12  3种剪力件单个剪切面抗剪刚度对比
图 13  弧形钢筋直径−延性系数变化曲线
图 14  3种剪力件延性系数对比
图 15  3种剪力件承载力对比
图 16  单根弧形钢筋承载力−直径变化曲线
图 17  预测抗剪承载力与试验测试结果的对比
试件编号 Ptu/kN Vu/kN Vu/Ptu
C-1-1 161.36 147.34 0.91
C-1-2 130.67 1.13
C-2-1 196.14 181.93 0.93
C-2-2 172.72 1.05
C-3-1 218.26 226.31 1.04
C-3-2 232.06 0.98
表 5  单根弧形钢筋剪力件抗剪承载力计算值与试验值
1 SHAO X D, DENG L, AGRAWAL A Innovative steel-UHPC composite bridge girders for long-span bridges[J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13: 981- 989
doi: 10.1007/s11709-019-0531-9
2 薛伟辰, 丁敏, 王骅, 等 单调荷载下栓钉连接件受剪性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2009, 30 (1): 95- 100
XUE Wei-chen, DING Min, WANG Hua, et a1 Experimental studies on behavior of stud shear connectors under monotonic loads[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2009, 30 (1): 95- 100
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6869.2009.01.014
3 杨勇, 陈阳, 蔡军伟, 等 开孔钢板剪力连接件静力性能试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30 (3): 255- 263
YANG Yong, CHEN Yang, CAI Jun-wei, et a1 Experiment on static behavior of perfobond shear connectors[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30 (3): 255- 263
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.03.028
4 李嘉, 杨波, 邵旭东, 等 钢桥面−薄层CRRPC组合结构栓钉连接件抗剪疲劳性能研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2016, 49 (6): 67- 75
LI Jia, YANG Bo, SHAO Xu-dong, et al Research on shear fatigue of studs for composite deck system of steel slab and thin CRRPC layer[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2016, 49 (6): 67- 75
5 AHN J H, LEE C G, WON J H, et al Shear resistance of the perfobond-rib shear connector depending on concrete strength and rib arrangement[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66 (10): 1295- 1307
doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.04.008
6 韩克鹏. 槽钢剪力连接件的性能分析[D]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2010.
HAN Ke-peng. Behavior analysis of channel shear connectors [D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2010.
7 张中育, 李青宁, 姜维山 钢−混凝土组合梁弯筋连接件的抗剪承载力[J]. 四川建筑科学研究, 2013, 39 (3): 4- 7
ZHANG Zhong-yu, LI Qing-ning, JIANG Wei-shan Shear capacity research on bend bar connectors of steel-concrete composite beams[J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2013, 39 (3): 4- 7
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1933.2013.03.002
8 KIM J S, KWARK J, JOH C, et al Headed stud shear connector for thin ultrahigh-performance concrete bridge deck[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2015, 108 (5): 23- 30
9 CAO J H, SHAO X D, DENG L, et al Static and fatigue behavior of short-headed studs embedded in a thin ultrahigh-performance concrete layer[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2017, 22 (5): 04017005
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001031
10 谢宏伟. 钢−超高性能混凝土组合结构大直径栓钉的抗剪性能研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2019
XIE Hong-wei. Research on the shear performance of large stud connector in steel-UHPC composite structures [D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019.
11 邵旭东, 甘屹东, 李嘉, 等 钢−超薄UHPC组合桥面板界面抗剪焊接构造[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31 (11): 91- 101
SHAO Xu-dong, GAN Yi-dong, LI Jia, et al Interfacial shear resistance of welded structure of composite deck system composed of orthotropic deck and ultrathin UHPC layer[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31 (11): 91- 101
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.11.010
12 邵旭东, 方恒, 李文光 钢−超薄UHPC组合桥面板界面抗剪性能研究[J]. 湖南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2016, 43 (5): 49- 56
SHAO Xu-dong, FANG Heng, LI Wen-guang Research on the interfacial shear resistant performance of the composite deck system composed of orthotropic deck; and ultra-thin UHPC Layer[J]. Journal of Hunan University: Natural Sciences, 2016, 43 (5): 49- 56
13 邵旭东, 张瀚文, 李嘉, 等 钢−超薄 UHPC 轻型组合桥面短钢筋连接件抗剪性能研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2020, 53 (1): 39- 51
SHAO Xu-dong, ZHANG Han-wen, LI Jia, et al Research on shear performance of short rebar connectors in steel-ultra thin UHPC lightweight composite deck[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, 53 (1): 39- 51
14 YAN J B, HU H T, WANG T Flexural behaviours of steel-UHPC-steel sandwich beams with J-hook connectors[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2020, 169: 106014
doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106014
15 KIM S H, CHOI K T, PARK S J, et al Experimental shear resistance evaluation of Y-type perfobond rib shear connector[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 82: 1- 18
doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.12.001
16 ZHAO Q, DU Y, PENG Y F, et al Shear performance of short channel connectors in a steel-UHPC composite deck[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2020, 20 (1): 300- 310
doi: 10.1007/s13296-019-00289-1
17 CEN. Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and concrete structures: EN 1994-1-1: 2004 [S]. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2004.
18 张士红, 邵旭东, 黄细军, 等 轻型组合桥面板中小栓钉连接件的静力及疲劳性能[J]. 公路交通科技, 2016, 33 (11): 111- 119
ZHANG Shi-hong, SHAO Xu-dong, HUANG Xi-jun, et al Static and fatigue behaviors of small stud shear connectors for lightweight composite bridge deck[J]. Highway Traffic Science and Technology, 2016, 33 (11): 111- 119
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2016.11.017
19 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 钢结构设计标准: GB 50017—2017[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.
20 LOWE D, DAS R, CLIFTON C Characterization of the splitting behavior of steel-concrete composite beams with shear stud connection[J]. Procedia Materials Science, 2014, 3: 2174- 2179
doi: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.352
21 JSSC. Guidelines for performance-based design of steel-concrete hybrid structures[S]. Tokyo: [s.n.], 2002.
22 肖林. 钢−混组合结构中PBL剪力键的静力及疲劳性能研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2012
XIAO Lin. Study of static and fatigue behavior of PBL shear connectors in steel-concrete composite structure [D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012.
23 邓文琴, 张建东, 刘朵, 等 开孔板和栓钉连接件抗剪性能试验研究及承载力计算[J]. 东南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 48 (3): 463- 469
DENG Wen-qin, ZHANG Jian-dong, LIU Duo, et a1 Experimental behaviors and shear bearing capacity calculation of perfobond rib with head stud connectors[J]. Journal of Southeast University: Natural Science Edition, 2018, 48 (3): 463- 469
24 CSA. Design of steel structures: S16-09 [S]. Mississauga: Canadian Standards Association, 2009.
25 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 钢−混凝土组合桥梁设计规范: GB 50917—2013[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2013.
26 WANG J Q, QI J N, TONG T, et al. Static behavior of large stud shear connectors in steel-UHPC composite structures [J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 178: 534-542.
27 HEGGER J, SEDLACEK G, DOINGHAUS P, et al. Studies on the ductility of shear connectors when using high-strength steel and high-strength concrete [C]// International symposium on Connections between Steel and Concrete. [s.l.]: [s.n.], 2001: 1025-1045.
28 李成君, 周志祥, 黄雅意, 等 装配式组合梁剪力钉抗剪承载力研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30 (3): 264- 270
LI Cheng-jun, ZHOU Zhi-xiang, HUANG Ya-yi, et a1 Research on shear resistance of shear studs in prefabricated composite beam[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30 (3): 264- 270
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.03.029
29 AN L, CEDERWALL K Push-out tests on studs in high strength and normal strength concrete[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1996, 36 (1): 15- 29
doi: 10.1016/0143-974X(94)00036-H
30 PETER D, GORALSKI C, WILL N. Design rules for composite structures with high performance steel and high performance concrete [C]// International Conference on High Performance Materials in Bridges. 2001: 139-149.
31 LUO Y, HOKI K, HAYASHI K, NAKASHIMA M Behavior and strength of headed stud-SFRCC shear connection. I: experimental study[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 142 (2): 4015112
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001363
32 丁敏, 薛伟辰, 王骅 钢−高性能混凝土组合梁栓钉连接件抗剪性能的试验[J]. 工业建筑, 2007, 37 (8): 9- 13
DING Min, XUE Wei-chen, WANG Hua Experiment on stud shear connectors in steel-high performance concrete composite beams[J]. Industrial Construction, 2007, 37 (8): 9- 13
33 胡建华, 叶梅新, 黄琼 PBL剪力连接件承载力试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2006, 19 (6): 65- 72
HU Jian-hua, YE Mei-xin, HUANG Qiong Experiment on bearing capacity of PBL shear connectors[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2006, 19 (6): 65- 72
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2006.06.013
[1] 王威,赵昊田,权超超,宋鸿来,李昱,周毅香. 墙趾可更换竖波钢板剪力墙抗剪承载力[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(8): 1407-1418.
[2] 汪劲丰,张爱平,王文浩. 栓钉高度对栓钉连接件抗剪性能的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(11): 2076-2084.
[3] 丁磊,童根树,张磊. 外露式钢柱脚节点的抗剪性能[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(1): 73-82.
[4] 张正旋, 陈刚, 徐铨彪, 龚顺风, 肖志斌, 刘承斌. 预应力钢绞线超高强混凝土H型桩弯剪性能试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(1): 31-39.
[5] 王强, 金凌志, 曹霞, 吕海波. 活性粉末混凝土梁抗剪性能试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(5): 922-930.
[6] 张忠苗, 刘俊伟, 邹健, 谢志专, 何景愈. 加强型预应力混凝土管桩抗弯剪性能试验研究[J]. J4, 2011, 45(6): 1074-1080.
[7] 赵羽习 金伟良. 锈蚀箍筋混凝土梁的抗剪承载力分析[J]. J4, 2008, 42(1): 19-24.