Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)
浙江大学学报(工学版)
土木工程     
浅埋盾构隧道开挖面失稳发展过程模型试验
唐晓武, 李姣阳, 邹金杰, 赵宇, 甘鹏路, 刘维, 潘乘浪
1. 浙江大学 滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310058； 
2. 中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院,浙江 杭州 310014；
3. 浙江大学 防灾工程研究所,浙江 杭州 310058； 
4. 苏州大学 城市轨道交通学院,江苏 苏州 215131
Model test of evolution of face instability in shallow shield tunnel
TANG Xiao-wu, LI Jiao-yang, ZOU Jin-jie, ZHAO Yu, GAN Peng-lu, LIU Wei, PAN Cheng-lang
1.Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou  310058, China;
2. Power China Huadong Engineering Corporation, Hangzhou, 310014, China; 
3. Institute of Disaster Prevention Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China; 
4. School of Urban Rail Transportation, Soochow University Suzhou, 215131, China
 全文: PDF(4456 KB)   HTML
摘要：

为了研究开挖面支护力、地层变形规律和开挖面失稳发展过程,利用对称性,采用半隧道模型,进行不同支护板后退速率下的4组试验.结果表明,支护板后退速率影响支护力和地层变形数值,而不影响其发展规律.随着支护板位移增大,支护力快速下降到最小值,接着上升到稳定值.相应地,开挖面失稳发展依次经历局部剪切带、闭合剪切带、贯穿剪切带3个阶段.与理论模型的对比发现,机动场模型处于闭合剪切带阶段,得到的支护力更接近于最小支护力；楔形体模型处于贯穿剪切带阶段,得到的支护力更接近于稳定支护力.
Abstract:
Symmetry and semi-tunnel model were introduced to conduct four tests for various back rate of the support panel in order to analyze support pressure on the excavation face, ground deformation and the evolution of the face instability. The back rate of the support panel affects the value of support pressure and ground deformation without affecting their development law. With the increase in the face displacement, the support pressure dropped steeply to the minimum value, then increased to a steady state. Correspondingly, the instability development undergoes localization shear band, closed shear band and throughout shear band. Compared with theoretical models, the kinetic field mode is located in the closed shear band stage, when the support pressure is similar to the minimum value in tests. The wedge mode is located in throughout shear band stage, when the support pressure is similar to the stable value in tests.
出版日期: 2017-05-01
CLC:  TU 41  
基金资助:

国家自然科学青年基金资助项目（51508503）；浙江省自然科学基金资助项目（LY16D020002）；华东勘测设计研究院科技资助项目（K2013-02-30）.
通讯作者: 赵宇(1981—),男,副教授,硕导. ORCID: 0000-0003-0453-1960.      E-mail: zhao_yu@zju.edu.cn
作者简介: 唐晓武(1966—),男,教授,博导,从事环境岩土工程、软黏土力学及地基处理方面等研究. ORCID: 0000-0002-0916-8761. E-mail: tangxiaowu@zju.edu.cn
服务　　
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章　　

引用本文:

唐晓武, 李姣阳, 邹金杰, 赵宇, 甘鹏路, 刘维, 潘乘浪. 浅埋盾构隧道开挖面失稳发展过程模型试验[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2017.05.004.

TANG Xiao-wu, LI Jiao-yang, ZOU Jin-jie, ZHAO Yu, GAN Peng-lu, LIU Wei, PAN Cheng-lang. Model test of evolution of face instability in shallow shield tunnel. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2017.05.004.

参考文献(References)：
［1］ 竺维彬,鞠世健.地铁盾构施工风险源及典型事故的研究［M］.广州：暨南大学出版社,2009.
［2］ MAID L B, HERRENKNECHT M, ANHEUSER L. Mechanised shield tunnelling ［M］. Berlin: ERNST&Sohn,1996.
［3］ LECA E,DORMIEUX L. Upper and lower bound solutions for the stability of shallow circular tunnels in frictional material ［J］. Géotechnique, 1990, 40(4):581-606.
［4］ MOLLON G, DIAS D, SOUBRA A. Face stability analysis of circular tunnels driven by a pressurized shield ［J］. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(1): 215-229.
［5］ HUANG M S, SONG C X. Upper bound stability analysis of plane strain tunnel in non-homogeneous clay ［J］. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 38: 213-223.
［6］ 吕玺林,王浩然,黄茂松.盾构隧道开挖面稳定性极限理论分析［J］.岩土工程学报,2011, 33(1): 57-62.
LV Xi-lin, WANG Hao-ran, HANG Mao-song.Limit theoretical study on face stability of shield tunnels ［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(1): 57-62.
［7］ HORN N. Horizontaler erddruck auf senkrechte abschlussflchen von tunnelr？hren［C］/ /Landeskonferenz der Ungarischen Tiefbauindustrie. German: ［s. n.］,1961: 7-16.
［8］ BROERE W. Tunnel face stability and new CPT applications ［D］. PhD Thesis, Technical University of Delft, 2001.
［9］ ANAGNOSTOU G, KOVARI K. The face stability of slurry-shield-driven tunnels ［J］. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1994, 9(2):165-174.
［10］ 朱伟,秦建设,卢廷浩.砂土中盾构开挖面变形与破坏数值模拟研究［J］.岩土工程学报,2005, 27(8):897-902.
ZHU Wei, QIN Jian-she, LU Ting-hao. Numerical study on face movement and collapse around shield tunnels in sand ［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005,27(8): 897-902.
［11］ 秦建设,虞兴福,钟小春,等.黏土中盾构开挖面变形与破坏数值模拟研究［J］.岩土力学,2007,28(S1):511-515.
QIN Jian-she, YU Xing-fu, ZHONG Xiao-chun, et al. Numerical research on face movement and collapse of shield tunneling in silt ground ［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007,28(S1): 511-515.
［12］ 黄正荣,朱伟,梁精华,等.浅埋砂土中盾构法隧道开挖面极限支护力压力及稳定研究［J］.岩土工程学报,2006,28(11): 2005-2009.
HUANG Zheng-rong, ZHU Wei, LIANG Jing-hua, et al. Study on limit supporting pressure and stabilization of excavation face for shallow shield tunnels in sand ［J］.Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(11): 2005-2009.
［13］ CHAMBON P, CORT’E J F. Shallow tunnels in cohesionless soil: Stability of tunnel face［J］. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(7): 1148-1165.
［14］ MAIR R J, TAYLOR R N. Theme lecture: bored tunneling in the urban environment［C］∥ Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Berlin: Springer,1997:2353-2385.
［15］ 周小文,濮家骝.砂土中隧洞开挖引起的地面沉降试验研究［J］.岩土力学,2002,23(5):1074-1079.
ZHOU Xiao-wen, PU Jia-liu. Centrifuge model test on ground settlement induced by tunneling in sandy soil［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2002, 23(5):1074-1079.
［16］ 李昀,张子新,张冠军.泥水平衡盾构开挖面稳定模型试验研究［J］.岩土工程学报,2007,29(7): 1074-1079.
LI Yun, ZHANG Zi-xin, ZHANG Guan-jun. Laboratory study on face stability mechanism of slurry shields［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007,29(7): 1074-1079.
［17］ 陈仁朋,李君,陈云敏,等.干砂盾构开挖面稳定性模型试验研究［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2011,33(1): 117-122.
CHEN Ren-peng, LI Jun, CHEN Yun-min, et al. Large-scale tests on face stability of shield tunneling in dry cohesionless soil ［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011,33(1): 117-122.
［18］ CHEN R P, LI J,CHEN YM, et.al. Experimental study on face instability of shield tunnel in sand［J］. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 33(1): 12-21.
［19］ KIRSCH A. Experimental investigation of the face stability of shallow tunnels in sand ［J］. Acta Geotechnica, 2010, 5(1): 43-62.
［20］ IDINGER G, AKLIK P, Wu W, et al. Centrifuge model test on the face stability of shallow tunnel ［J］. Acta Geotechnica,2011, 6(2): 105-117.
［21］ WHITE D J, TAKE W A, BOLTON M D. Soil deformation using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry ［J］. Géotechnique, 2003,53(7):619-631.
［22］ NBEL K, WEITBRECHT V. Visualization of localization in grain skeletons with particle image velocimetry ［J］. ASTM Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2002, 30(4): 322-329.
［23］ THIELICKEW, STAMHUIS E J. PIVlab-Towards user-friendly, affordable and accurate digital particle image velocimetry in MATLAB［J］. Journal of Open Research Software, 2014, 2(1): (e30): 1-10.
[1] 孙海超,王文军,凌道盛. 低掺量水泥固化土的力学特性及微观结构[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(3): 530-538.
[2] 赵宇,常胜,郑建靖,凌道盛,梁腾. 离心模拟超重力场下的雨滴运动轨迹分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(3): 491-499.
[3] 潘晓东,周廉默,孙宏磊,蔡袁强,史吏,袁宗浩. 基于粒子图像测速的高含水率软土真空预压试验[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(6): 1078-1085.
[4] 王灿,凌道盛,王恒宇. 软土结构性对基坑开挖及邻近地铁隧道的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(2): 264-274.
[5] 李东黎,晏鄂川,冯斌,蔡袁强. 海底碎屑流对海洋桩的冲击[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(12): 2342-2347.
[6] 朱剑锋,庹秋水,邓温妮,饶春义,刘浩旭. 镁质水泥复合固化剂固化有机质土的抗压强度模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(11): 2168-2174.
[7] 章涵,胡新丽,吴爽爽. 基于傅里叶近似法的S-RM细观损伤过程研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(10): 1955-1965.
[8] 凌道盛,李奖,王文军,胡成宝. 人工制备土的结构性及其对应变局部化的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(9): 1689-1696.
[9] 焦卫国, 詹良通, 兰吉武,陈云敏. 黄土-碎石覆盖层毛细阻滞效应及设计厚度分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(11): 2128-2134.
[10] 陈经浩, 黄建新, 陆胜勇, 李晓东, 严建华. 生活垃圾开放式燃烧炭黑的结构及污染物分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(10): 1849-1854.
[11] 詹良通, 龚标, 兰吉武, 王誉泽, 陈云敏. 黄土中渗滤液的迁移勘察与数值分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(6): 1196-1202.
[12] 涂志斌,黄铭枫,楼文娟. 风浪耦合作用下桥塔基础体系的极限荷载效应[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(5): 813-821.
[13] 张如如,赵云,徐文杰,黄博,凌道盛,韩黎明. 温度作用下机场跑道土基中水气运移规律分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(5): 822-830.
[14] 曾兴, 詹良通, 钟孝乐, 陈云敏. 低渗透黏土中氯离子弥散作用离心模拟相似性[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(2): 241-249.
[15] 郑健,李育超,陈云敏. 底泥固结对污染物运移影响的超重力离心试验模拟[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(1): 8-15.