Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2026, Vol. 60 Issue (8): 1832-1840    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.08.022
交通工程     
基于自适应神经网络的无信号交叉口车辆无死锁调度算法
刘慧霞1(),王荣景2,高宇轩2,曹猛1,盛苏英1,马友鹏1
1. 南通大学 电气与自动化学院,江苏 南通 226019
2. 南通大学 张謇学院,江苏 南通 226019
Adaptive neural network-based deadlock-free vehicle scheduling algorithm for unsignalized intersections
Huixia LIU1(),Rongjing WANG2,Yuxuan GAO2,Meng CAO1,Suying SHENG1,Youpeng MA1
1. School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
2. School of Zhang Jian, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
 全文: PDF(1670 KB)   HTML
摘要:

借助Petri网模拟车辆在交叉口的通行情况, 提出有效的车辆调度优化算法. 针对交叉口可能出现的死锁现象, 设计死锁检测和修复方法, 保证车辆通行的安全性和可靠性. 基于改进的遗传算法生成BP神经网络的训练数据集和测试数据集, 将注意力机制模块和贝叶斯优化技术融入BP网络模型中, 再利用所构建的高性能自适应神经网络求解无信号交叉口车辆无死锁调度优化问题. 开展对比实验,验证所提算法的性能, 对比算法包括传统智能优化算法(如改进遗传算法、粒子群算法和麻雀搜索算法)、Transformer模型和多智能体强化学习算法. 结果表明,自适应神经网络在求解无信号交叉口车辆无死锁调度优化问题上兼具高效性与优异性.

关键词: 无信号交叉口车辆调度优化死锁自适应神经网络注意力机制贝叶斯优化    
Abstract:

Petri nets were used to simulate intersection traffic, and an effective vehicle scheduling optimization algorithm was subsequently proposed. In response to the potential vehicle deadlock phenomenon, a deadlock detection and recovery method was developed to enhance the safety and reliability of traffic flow. An improved genetic algorithm was employed to generate the training and testing datasets for a BP neural network. Meanwhile, an attention mechanism module and Bayesian optimization technique were integrated into the BP model, resulting in a high-performance adaptive neural network. This neural network was then applied to solve the deadlock-free vehicle scheduling optimization problem of unsignalized intersections. In the experimental validation, the proposed algorithm was compared with not only traditional intelligent optimization algorithms such as the improved genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization, and the sparrow search algorithm, but also the Transformer model and the multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithm. Results show that the adaptive neural network achieves both high efficiency and superior performance in solving the deadlock-free vehicle scheduling optimization problem of unsignalized intersections.

Key words: unsignalized intersections    vehicle scheduling optimization    deadlock    adaptive neural network    attention mechanism    Bayesian optimization
收稿日期: 2025-06-17 出版日期: 2026-07-16
CLC:  TP 301  
基金资助: 江苏省“双创博士”项目(JSSCBS20211103);南通大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目(202410304065Z);江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(SJCX25_2010).
作者简介: 刘慧霞(1979—),女,教授,从事智能交通系统优化控制与调度、智能制造系统建模与控制研究. orcid.org/0000-0001-9280-0096. E-mail:liuhx@ntu.edu.cn
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章  
刘慧霞
王荣景
高宇轩
曹猛
盛苏英
马友鹏

引用本文:

刘慧霞,王荣景,高宇轩,曹猛,盛苏英,马友鹏. 基于自适应神经网络的无信号交叉口车辆无死锁调度算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(8): 1832-1840.

Huixia LIU,Rongjing WANG,Yuxuan GAO,Meng CAO,Suying SHENG,Youpeng MA. Adaptive neural network-based deadlock-free vehicle scheduling algorithm for unsignalized intersections. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(8): 1832-1840.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.08.022        https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2026/V60/I8/1832

图 1  无信号交叉口场景及车辆运动示意图
图 2  双向四车道Petri网模型
图 3  无信号交叉口死锁现象
图 4  基于自适应神经网络的无信号交叉口车辆死锁调度算法流程图
参数数值
路径段数4~6
路段长度/m8(普通段),3.0或5.6(转弯段)
道路总长度/m32~56
车道宽度/m3.6
车辆速度/(m·s?1)4~17
车流量情况/(辆·min?1)15~33(逐实验算例递增)
表 1  仿真环境参数
算例GAPSOSSATransformerMARLSBNN
tt/str/mstt/str/mstt/str/mstt/str/mstt/str/mstt/str/ms
In019.7346.779.6360.7310.0252.088.635.589.925.789.257.30
In0210.8948.4410.5869.7711.0154.1211.575.7410.146.2410.229.26
In0311.6758.3411.2987.8711.4760.3012.976.3711.656.9410.6510.41
In0412.7061.7111.5991.0812.2170.3513.366.4412.008.1010.9110.62
In0513.6270.8812.49110.8812.7277.7915.708.0112.508.7311.2612.21
In0614.0675.0013.47120.7114.1887.4817.348.2715.709.7312.5213.31
In0715.5781.8714.99128.1315.1098.8617.848.5816.689.8213.8813.81
In0816.9390.2116.58141.4116.49106.9918.668.8019.0010.3815.5114.85
In0917.71103.7017.64152.3117.86121.7420.238.8222.8010.3917.5015.65
In1019.11107.7118.72163.8719.03183.8525.599.1726.8410.6817.7018.30
表 2  不同算法下车辆总通行时间与算法耗时
图 5  不同算法在不同车辆数量下的车辆总通行时间和算法耗时
图 6  测试损失随迭代轮数的变化
图 7  不同模型的预测值与实际值对比
1 左志强, 刘正璇, 王一晶 基于车路云一体化的混合交通系统优化控制综述[J]. 控制与决策, 2023, 38 (3): 577- 594
ZUO Zhiqiang, LIU Zhengxuan, WANG Yijing A survey of optimal control for mixed traffic system with vehicle-road-cloud integration[J]. Control and Decision, 2023, 38 (3): 577- 594
2 曹阳 基于模拟退火的交叉口自适应信号控制优化研究[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2018, 16 (1): 49- 55
CAO Yang Optimization of adaptive signal control using simulated annealing algorithm[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2018, 16 (1): 49- 55
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4747.2018.01.008
3 王立夫, 刘一铄, 孔芝, 等 多车道交叉口交通信号与混合车辆轨迹协同优化框架[J]. 控制与决策, 2024, 39 (11): 3567- 3576
WANG Lifu, LIU Yishuo, KONG Zhi, et al Integrated optimization framework for traffic signal and mixed vehicle trajectory at multi-lane intersection[J]. Control and Decision, 2024, 39 (11): 3567- 3576
doi: 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2023.1616
4 MIAO S, LIU H, CAO M, et al. Application of effective transition covers on deadlock control of unsignalized intersection systems [C]// Proceedings of the International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control. Hangzhou: IEEE, 2024: 1–6.
5 WEI Y, NING H, CHEN R, et al. A novel approach to conflict-free vehicle scheduling of unsignalized intersection based on heuristic algorithm [C]// Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Bilbao: IEEE, 2023: 2605–2610.
6 DULERA S, YADAV R, CHATURVEDI M. Graph based conflict-free scheduling of autonomous vehicles at unsignalized intersections [C]// Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks. Bengaluru: IEEE, 2025: 96–101.
7 WANG B, GONG X, WANG Y, et al Coordination for connected and autonomous vehicles at unsignalized intersections: an iterative learning-based collision-free motion planning method[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024, 11 (3): 5439- 5454
doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3306572
8 LI Y, LIU M, YANG Q, et al Collision-free autonomous scheduling at unsignalized intersection using conflict graph tree search[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024, 11 (8): 14563- 14578
doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3342865
9 孙宁, 吴伟豪, 赵风财, 等 基于增强型Dijkstra算法的无信号灯交叉路口智能车辆调度研究[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2022, 39 (1): 188- 193
SUN Ning, WU Weihao, ZHAO Fengcai, et al Vehicle scheduling at unsignalized intersections based on enhanced Dijkstra algorithm[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2022, 39 (1): 188- 193
10 赵幸. 无信号灯交叉路口智能网联车辆多目标协同调度方法研究 [D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2019.
ZHAO Xing. Multi-obejective scheduling for cooperative driving of connected and automated vehicles at non-signalized intersection [D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2019.
11 金立生, 郭柏苍, 谢宪毅, 等 基于行车安全场模型的交叉口车辆控制算法[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2022, 57 (4): 753- 760
JIN Lisheng, GUO Baicang, XIE Xianyi, et al Cooperative control algorithm for vehicle at intersection based on driving safety field model[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57 (4): 753- 760
12 李金龙, 刘伟 基于改进麻雀搜索算法的无信号交叉路口车辆调度优化[J]. 计算机系统应用, 2024, 33 (3): 233- 244
LI Jinlong, LIU Wei Vehicle scheduling optimization at unsignalized intersection based on improved sparrow search algorithm[J]. Computer Systems and Applications, 2024, 33 (3): 233- 244
13 XU H, ZHANG Y, LI L, et al Cooperative driving at unsignalized intersections using tree search[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2020, 21 (11): 4563- 4571
doi: 10.1109/TITS.2019.2940641
14 RAHMANI S, BAGHBANI A, BOUGUILA N, et al Graph neural networks for intelligent transportation systems: a survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2023, 24 (8): 8846- 8885
doi: 10.1109/TITS.2023.3257759
15 SUN Y, XU T, LI J, et al MMH-STA: a macro-micro-hierarchical spatio-temporal attention method for multi-agent trajectory prediction in unsignalized round abouts[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2023, 72 (9): 11237- 11250
doi: 10.1109/TVT.2023.3268373
16 LIU J, HANG P, NA X, et al Cooperative decision-making for CAVs at unsignalized intersections: a MARL approach with attention and hierarchical game priors[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025, 26 (1): 443- 456
doi: 10.1109/TITS.2024.3503092
17 AZADANI M N, BOUKERCHE A A novel multimodal vehicle path prediction method based on temporal convolutional networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23 (12): 25384- 25395
doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3151263
18 SEONG H, JUNG C, LEE S, et al. Learning to drive at unsignalized intersections using attention-based deep reinforcement learning [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference. Indianapolis: IEEE, 2021: 559–566.
19 SHU H, LIU T, MU X, et al Driving tasks transfer using deep reinforcement learning for decision-making of autonomous vehicles in unsignalized intersection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2022, 71 (1): 41- 52
doi: 10.1109/TVT.2021.3121985
20 蒋明智, 吴天昊, 张琳 基于深度强化学习的无信号交叉口车辆协同控制算法[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2022, 20 (2): 14- 24
JIANG Mingzhi, WU Tianhao, ZHANG Lin Deep reinforcement learning based vehicular cooperative control algorithm at signal-free intersection[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2022, 20 (2): 14- 24
21 XING K, ZHOU M, LIU H, et al Optimal Petri-net-based polynomial-complexity deadlock-avoidance policies for automated manufacturing systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 2009, 39 (1): 188- 199
doi: 10.1109/TSMCA.2008.2007947
22 YAO X Evolving artificial neural networks[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1999, 87 (9): 1423- 1447
doi: 10.1109/5.784219
[1] 赵明华,吕雨萱,吕佳豪,陈逸飞,石程,胡静. 基于多尺度外观运动融合的视频异常检测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(8): 1730-1738.
[2] 徐恺蔚,KHIZER BIN TALIBHafiz,曹衍龙,许源平,许志杰,宋景春. 基于光流和卷积视觉Transformer的轻量级微表情识别[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(7): 1381-1391.
[3] 杨艳春,李佳龙. 基于多路协同与空谱先验的高光谱与多光谱图像融合[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(7): 1427-1437.
[4] 张乃洲,赵云超,曹薇,张啸剑. 基于多视图跨模态特征融合的图像描述生成[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(6): 1205-1212.
[5] 李云红,张琪琪,陈锦妮,陈伟重,苏雪平,梁成名. 基于生成对抗网络和坐标注意力机制的文本生成图像算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(6): 1213-1220.
[6] 李国燕,于威,梅玉鹏,张明辉,王新强. 全局局部特征融合的遥感图像建筑物提取[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(5): 1100-1108.
[7] 宋耀莲,彭驰,唐菁敏,赵宣植,虞贵财. 基于融合注意力机制的光学遥感图像小目标检测算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(4): 763-771.
[8] 万刚,王小波,石纲,叶德震,朱思思,司帆. 基于特征细化与注意力增强重构的水下图像增强算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(4): 800-811.
[9] 陈文强,冯琳越,王东丹,顾玉磊,赵轩. 融合动态风险图与多变量注意力机制的车辆轨迹预测模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(3): 455-467.
[10] 胡从裕,殷晨波,马伟,杨超,颜士宽. 基于改进CNN-LSTM的挖掘机作业对象识别[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(3): 536-545.
[11] 李彬彬,张超,覃涛,陈昌盛,刘兴艳,杨靖. 面向光伏电站建设的移动端人体跌倒检测方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(3): 546-555.
[12] 李国燕,李鹏辉,刘榕,梅玉鹏,张明辉. 融合多尺度分辨率和带状特征的遥感道路提取[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(3): 585-593.
[13] 方芳,严军,郭红想,王勇. 基于时空注意力机制的轻量级脑纹识别算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(3): 633-642.
[14] 王爽,章熙泰,郭永存,孙守锁. 基于深度网络的可控混合式磁力耦合器退磁诊断[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(2): 279-286.
[15] 李宪华,杜鹏飞,宋韬,邱洵,蔡钰. 基于多尺度滑窗注意力时序卷积网络的脑电信号分类[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(2): 370-378.