公交时分复用车道设置条件及交通临界模型

doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2021.04.012

浙江大学学报(工学版)

2021, Vol. 55

Issue (4): 704-712 DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2021.04.012

土木工程

公交时分复用车道设置条件及交通临界模型

赵晨馨(

),董红召*(

),郝伟娜

浙江工业大学智能交通系统联合研究所，浙江杭州 310014

Setting condition and traffic critical model of bus lane with time-division multiplexing

Chen-xin ZHAO(

),Hong-zhao DONG*(

),Wei-na HAO

Joint Institute of Intelligent Transportation System, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China

全文: PDF(1334 KB) HTML

摘要：

为了提供可靠的间歇式公交专用道设置标准和依据，研究公交时分复用车道（BLTDM）的设置条件. 基于车道的设置目的及特性，对车道的道路设置条件和交通设置条件进行定性分析，得到道路设置条件为单向3车道以上路段，交通设置条件为高交通饱和度和低公交车流量. 为了获取明确的交通设置条件量化区间和设置指标，以路段出行者总时耗临界最大为目标函数，综合考虑混行车道、公交专用道和公交时分复用车道3种方式下的交通效率和车道设置约束条件，建立公交时分复用车道的交通设置条件临界模型. 通过求解模型获取车道交通设置条件的临界值，得到车道的交通设置条件量化区间. 以杭州市某路段为案例，验证该模型的可行性，评估设置公交时分复用车道的运行效果.

关键词： 间歇式公交专用道; 公交时分复用车道; 设置条件; 交通临界模型; 量化区间

Abstract:

The setting condition of the bus lane with time-division multiplexing (BLTDM) was analyzed in order to provide a reliable setting standard and basis for intermittent bus lane. The road setting condition and traffic setting condition were qualitatively analyzed based on the purpose and characteristics of the lane setting. The road setting condition is one-way 3 lanes or more, and the traffic setting condition is high traffic saturation and low bus flow. The traffic efficiency and the lane setting constraints were comprehensively considered under the three modes of general lanes, dedicated bus lanes and BLTDM by taking the maximum traveller’s total time consumption as the objective function in order to identify the traffic setting condition quantization interval and setting index. A traffic critical model of the traffic setting condition for BLTDM was established. The critical value of the lane traffic setting condition was obtained by solving the model, and the setting quantization interval was obtained. A case study was given to demonstrate the feasibility of the model, and the operation effect after setting BLTDM was evaluated.

Key words: intermittent bus lane bus lane with time-division multiplexing setting condition traffic critical model quantization interval

收稿日期: 2020-04-10 出版日期: 2021-05-07

CLC:

U 491

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目（61773347）；浙江省自然科学基金资助项目（LY17F030017，LY19E050008）

通讯作者: 董红召 E-mail: zcx_2009@foxmail.com;its@zjut.edu.cn

作者简介: 赵晨馨（1992—），男，博士生，从事智能交通的研究. orcid. org/0000-0002-0162-972X. E-mail： zcx_2009@foxmail.com

	服务
	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	作者相关文章
	赵晨馨
	董红召
	郝伟娜

引用本文:

赵晨馨,董红召,郝伟娜. 公交时分复用车道设置条件及交通临界模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(4): 704-712.

Chen-xin ZHAO,Hong-zhao DONG,Wei-na HAO. Setting condition and traffic critical model of bus lane with time-division multiplexing. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2021, 55(4): 704-712.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2021.04.012 或 http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2021/V55/I4/704

图 1 公交时分复用车道拓扑结构

图 2 公交时分复用车道控制信号

表 1 公交专用车道设置规范

图 3 公交时分复用车道的适用交通条件

图 4 公交时分复用车道设置案例路段示意图

表 2 公交时分复用车道设置案例路段属性信息

图 5 视频卡口采集的流量-行程时间数据

表 3 BPR模型标定结果评判

图 6 案例路段公交时分复用车道的交通设置临界曲线

表 4 选取的交通条件

表 5 各设置方式下的路段出行者平均行程时间

表 6 各设置方式下的路段公交车辆平均行驶速度

表 7 各设置方式下的路段社会车辆平均行驶速度

1	DAGANZO C, DAGANZO C F. Fundamentals of transportation and traffic operations [M]. Oxford: Pergamon, 1997.
2	VIEGAS J, LU B. Turn of the century, survival of the compact city, revival of public transport [C]// Transforming the Port and Transportation Business. Leuven: Acco, 1996: 55-63.
3	VIEGAS J, LU B Traffic control system with intermittent bus lanes[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 1997, 30 (8): 865- 870 doi: 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)43930-9
4	VIEGAS J, LU B The intermittent bus lane signals setting within an area[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2004, 12 (6): 453- 469 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2004.07.005
5	YANG H, WANG W. An innovative dynamic bus lane system and its simulation-based performance investigation [C]// 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. Xi'an: IEEE, 2009: 105-110.
6	QIU F, LI W, ZHANG J, et al Exploring suitable traffic conditions for intermittent bus lanes[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2015, 49 (3): 309- 325 doi: 10.1002/atr.1265
7	DONG H, ZHAO Y, MA S A novel TDM approach for dedicated bus lanes guaranteeing bus priority[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2011, 48-49: 106- 109 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.48-49.106
8	DONG H, ZHAO Y, LI M An approach of multiplexing for bus lanes based on VII and multisensory information fusion[J]. Sensor Letters, 2011, 9 (5): 1968- 1973 doi: 10.1166/sl.2011.1541
9	DONG H, LIN Y, LIU D, et al Research on TDM approach of sharing BRT-lane supported by vehicle-infrastructure integration[J]. Engineering Sciences, 2013, 11 (5): 77- 83
10	DONG H, ZHAO C, FU F. Sharing bus lanes: a new lanes multiplexing-based method using a dynamic time slice policy[EB/OL]. (2018-12-12). http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/jtran.180075.
11	ZHAO C, DONG H. Modeling and evaluation of a novel intermittent bus lane with time-division multiplexing[EB/OL]. (2020-12-11). http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/jtran.19.00002.
12	董红召, 赵玉婷基于PARAMICS的公交专用道时分复用方法研究及优化[J]. 浙江工业大学学报, 2012, 40 (1): 65- 69 DONG Hong-zhao, ZHAO Yu-ting Optimization of time division multiplexing for dedicated bus lanes based on PARAMICS[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology, 2012, 40 (1): 65- 69 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4303.2012.01.016
13	胡淑芬. 间歇性公交专用道的发展历程及研究综述 [C]// 2018中国城市规划年会论文集(06城市交通规划). 杭州: [s.n.], 2018: 793-801. HU Shu-fen. The review of the development and research of intermittent bus lanes [C]// 2018 China Urban Planning Annual Meeting (06 Urban Transport Planning). Hangzhou: [s.n.], 2018: 793-801.
14	GIRAO P S, ALEGRIA F, VIEGAS J M, et al. Wireless system for traffic control and law enforcement [C]// 2006 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology. Piscataway: IEEE, 2006: 1768-1770.
15	VIEGAS J M, ROQUE R, LU B, et al The intermittent bus lane system: Lisbon demonstration project[J]. International Association of Public Transport, 2007, 56 (3): 40- 43
16	CURRIE G, LAI H Intermittent and dynamic transit lanes: Melbourne, Australia, experience[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2008, 2072 (1): 49- 56 doi: 10.3141/2072-06
17	CHIABAUT N, BARCET A Demonstration and evaluation of an intermittent bus lane strategy[J]. Public Transport, 2019, 11 (3): 443- 456 doi: 10.1007/s12469-019-00210-3
18	刘伟, 别牧, 张建旭, 等设置公交专用道的流量条件研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 24 (6): 129- 132 LIU Wei, BIE Mu, ZHANG Jian-xu, et al Study on traffic volume condition of setting bus lane[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University: Natural Science, 2005, 24 (6): 129- 132
19	王涛, 陈峻基于时间效益的城市公交专用道设置流量条件[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2014, 46 (4): 115- 121 WANG Tao, CHEN Jun Traffic volume conditions of setting bus lane on urban roadway based on time utility[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014, 46 (4): 115- 121 doi: 10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.2014.04.020
20	NESTLE E, SCHUNNEMAN R F. Time division multiplexing: U. S. Patent 3, 599, 160 [P]. 1971-08-10.
21	公安部交通管理科学研究院. 公交专用车道设置: GA/T 507—2004 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2004.
22	要甲. 基于多式交通均衡的公交专用道设置分析与优化[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2014. YAO Jia. Bus exclusive lane setting analysis and optimization based on multi-modal transportation equilibrium [D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2014.
23	四兵锋, 钟鸣, 高自友城市混合交通条件下路段阻抗函数的研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2008, 8 (1): 72- 77 SI Bing-feng, ZHONG Ming, GAO Zi-you A link resistance function of urban mixed traffic network[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2008, 8 (1): 72- 77
24	中国公路学会《交通工程手册》编委会. 交通工程手册[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 1995.
25	郭晖, 李文权设置临时性公交专用道的效益分析[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2011, 9 (2): 92- 96 GUO Hui, LI Wen-quan Traffic benefit evaluation of the bus lanes with intermittent priority[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2011, 9 (2): 92- 96 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4747.2011.02.017
26	TRB. Highway capacity manual [M]. Washington DC: National Research Council, 2000.
27	LUO Y, JIA B, LI X, et al A realistic cellular automata model of bus route system based on open boundary[J]. Transportation Research Part C-emerging Technologies, 2012, 25: 202- 213 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2012.06.004
28	张巧. 混合交通流条件下城市路段BPR函数参数标定研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2013. ZHANG Qiao. Calibrating BPR function under urban mixed traffic flow condition [D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2013.

[1]	张琦,陈红,周继彪,张敏,郭璘,杨仁法. 道路开口对临近交叉口交通安全的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(4): 720-726.
[2]	王忠宇,王玲,王艳丽,吴兵. 基于网络变结构优化的大型活动交通拥堵预防方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(2): 358-366.
[3]	张翕然,陈绍宽,汪波,刘爽,王卓. 考虑替代救援可靠度的应急配置优化模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(1): 20-30.
[4]	曾佳棋,王殿海. 双向干线协调控制的改进数解算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(12): 2386-2394.
[5]	马新卫,季彦婕,金雪,徐洋,曹睿明. 租赁自行车用户出行特征及方式的影响因素分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(6): 1202-1209.
[6]	卢凯,田鑫,林观荣,邓兴栋. 交叉口信号相位设置与配时同步优化模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(5): 921-930.
[7]	朱文韬,钱国敏,马东方,王殿海. 考虑路口上游停靠站影响的公交延误模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(4): 796-803.
[8]	孙超,李孟晖,韩飞. 智慧公路多源数据下的交通出行演化模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(3): 546-556.
[9]	田秀娟,于德新,周户星,邢雪,王世广. 基于改进Newman算法的动态控制子区划分[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(5): 950-956.
[10]	张思佳,贾顺平,毛保华,麻存瑞,张桐. 乘客出行距离分布对轨道线网内公交竞争力的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(2): 292-298.
[11]	倪玲霖, 张帅超, 陈喜群. 基于手机信号令数据的居民出行空间效应[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(5): 887-895.
[12]	曲昭伟, 曹宁博, 陈永恒, 白乔文, 康萌, 陈明涛. 信号交叉口的行人信号提前建模[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(3): 538-544.
[13]	王韩麒, 陈红, 冯微, 刘玮蔚. 基于CPT的异质通勤者多维出行决策模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(2): 297-303.
[14]	王福建, 龚成宇, 马东方, 郭伟伟, 王殿海. 采用交通出行量数据的多点联动瓶颈控制方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(2): 273-278.
[15]	于谦, 李铁柱, 任彦铭. 乘客载重量对柴油公交车尾气排放影响分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(10): 2009-2017.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed