不同激素处理下番茄实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应内参基因的筛选

doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2022.03.081

浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）

2023, Vol. 49

Issue (1): 31-44 DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2022.03.081

园艺科学

不同激素处理下番茄实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应内参基因的筛选

白圣懿¹(

),王晓敏^1,^2,^3,⁴(

),刘文娟¹,程国新^1,^2,^3,⁴,郭猛^1,^2,^3,⁴,姚文孔^1,^2,^3,⁴,高艳明^1,^2,^3,⁴,李建设^1,^2,^3,⁴

^1.宁夏大学农学院，宁夏银川 750021
^2.宁夏优势特色作物现代分子育种重点实验室，宁夏银川 750021
^3.宁夏现代设施园艺工程技术研究中心，宁夏银川 750021
^4.宁夏设施园艺技术创新中心（宁夏大学），宁夏银川 750021

Screening of reference genes for real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in tomato induced by different hormones

Shengyi BAI¹(

),Xiaomin WANG^1,^2,^3,⁴(

),Wenjuan LIU¹,Guoxin CHENG^1,^2,^3,⁴,Meng GUO^1,^2,^3,⁴,Wenkong YAO^1,^2,^3,⁴,Yanming GAO^1,^2,^3,⁴,Jianshe LI^1,^2,^3,⁴

^1.School of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China
^2.Key Laboratory of Modern Molecular Breeding for Dominant and Special Crops in Ningxia, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China
^3.Ningxia Modern Facility Horticulture Engineering and Technology Research Center, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China
^4.Ningxia Facility Horticulture Technology Innovation Center (Ningxia University), Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China

全文: PDF(2754 KB) HTML

摘要：

为筛选出在不同激素诱导下番茄中较为稳定的内参基因，本研究以脱落酸（abscisic acid, ABA）、茉莉酸甲酯（methyl jasmonate, MeJA）、水杨酸（salicylic acid, SA）3种外源激素分别诱导处理0、24、48、120 h的感病番茄品种‘Moneymaker’（MM）和抗病番茄自交系62579叶片为试验材料，通过实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应（real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction, qRT-PCR）进行扩增，利用geNorm、NormFinder和BestKeeper 3个软件分析EF1α、L33、Act、Ubi、GAPDH、UK、CAC、TIP41这8个番茄候选内参基因的表达稳定性。结果表明，8个候选内参基因的平均C_T值为26～34。综合3个软件的分析结果发现，在ABA诱导下，番茄中较稳定表达的内参基因为L33和Ubi；在MeJA诱导下，番茄中较稳定表达的内参基因为L33和EF1α；在SA诱导下，番茄中较稳定表达的内参基因为EF1α和L33。综上所述，L33基因是番茄在不同激素诱导下表达最稳定的候选内参基因。本研究筛选的最稳定内参基因将为后续番茄响应外源激素处理的差异基因表达分析和分子机制研究提供校准依据。

关键词： 番茄; 激素诱导; 实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应; 内参基因

Abstract:

Screening of stable reference genes was significant when the real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to study gene expression. To identify the most stable reference genes in tomato induced by different hormones, the leaves of susceptible tomato ‘Moneymaker’ (MM) and resistant tomato inbred line 62579, which were treated with abscisic acid (ABA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), and salicylic acid (SA) for 0, 24, 48, and 120 h, respectively, were used for qRT-PCR amplification. In the current study, the expression stabilities of eight tomato candidate reference genes, including EF1α, L33, Act, Ubi, GAPDH, UK, CAC, and TIP41, were analyzed using geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper softwares. The results revealed that the average C_T values of eight candidate reference genes ranged from 26 to 34. Based on the data from these softwares, L33 and Ubi, L33 and EF1α,as well as EF1α and L33 were considered to be the stably expressed reference genesin tomato induced by ABA, MeJA, and SA, respectively. In conclusion, L33 is the most stably expressed gene among all studied candidate reference genes in tomato induced by different hormones. The most stable reference genes screened in this study will provide a calibration basis for the expression analyses of differential genes and the research on molecular mechanisms in tomato response to exogenous hormone treatments in the future.

Key words: tomato hormone induction real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) reference gene

收稿日期: 2022-03-08 出版日期: 2023-03-07

CLC:

S641.2

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金项目(31860561);宁夏回族自治区农业特色优势产业育种专项(NXNYYZ20200104);宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划项目(2019BBF02022)

通讯作者: 王晓敏 E-mail: baishengyi0602@163.com;wangxiaomin_1981@163.com

作者简介: 白圣懿（https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9784-6787），E-mail：baishengyi0602@163.com

	服务
	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	白圣懿
	王晓敏
	刘文娟
	程国新
	郭猛
	姚文孔
	高艳明
	李建设

引用本文:

白圣懿,王晓敏,刘文娟,程国新,郭猛,姚文孔,高艳明,李建设. 不同激素处理下番茄实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应内参基因的筛选[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2023, 49(1): 31-44.

Shengyi BAI,Xiaomin WANG,Wenjuan LIU,Guoxin CHENG,Meng GUO,Wenkong YAO,Yanming GAO,Jianshe LI. Screening of reference genes for real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in tomato induced by different hormones. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2023, 49(1): 31-44.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2022.03.081 或 https://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/Y2023/V49/I1/31

序号No.	基因名称 Gene name	基因符号 Gene symbol	引物序列（5 $′$ →3 $′$ ） Primer sequence (5 $′$ →3 $′$ )	产物长度 Product length/bp	文献 Reference
1	Elongation factor 1α	EF1α	F: ACAGGCGTTCAGGTAAGGAA	120	[27]
1	Elongation factor 1α	EF1α	R: GAGGGTATTCAGCAAAGGTCTC	120	[27]
2	50S ribosomal protein L33	L33	F: GGGAAGAGGCTGGGATACATC	138	[9]
2	50S ribosomal protein L33	L33	R: AGGAGGCAAATTGGACTTGAAC	138	[9]
3	β-actin	Act	F: GCTCCACCAGAGAGGAAATACAGT	107	[9]
3	β-actin	Act	R: CATACTCTGCCTTTGCAATCCA	107	[9]
4	Ubiquitin	Ubi	F: GGACGGACGTACTCTAGCTGAT	134	[27]
4	Ubiquitin	Ubi	R: AGCTTTCGACCTCAAGGGTA	134	[27]
5	Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase	GAPDH	F: ACCACAAATTGCCTTGCTCCCTTG	110	[28]
5	Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase	GAPDH	R: ATCAACGGTCTTCTGAGTGGCTGT	110	[28]
6	Uridylate kinase	UK	F: TGGTAAGGGCACCCAATGTGCTAA	114	[29]
6	Uridylate kinase	UK	R: ATCATCGTCCCATTCTCGGAACCA	114	[29]
7	Clathrin adaptor complexes medium subunit	CAC	F: CCTCCGTTGTGATGTAACTGG	173	[28]
7	Clathrin adaptor complexes medium subunit	CAC	R: ATTGGTGGAAAGTAACATCATCG	173	[28]
8	TAP42-interacting protein	TIP41	F: ATGGAGTTTTTGAGTCTTCTGC	235	[23]
8	TAP42-interacting protein	TIP41	R: GCTGCGTTTCTGGCTTAGG	235	[23]

表1 番茄候选内参基因的引物信息

图1 不同激素诱导处理下番茄RNA完整性检测结果A.感病番茄MM；B.抗病番茄62579。M：DL2000分子标志物。

图2 番茄8个候选内参基因PCR产物琼脂糖凝胶电泳分析M：DL2000分子标志物。

图3 番茄8个候选内参基因的 CT 值分布情况

图4 geNorm软件分析8个候选内参基因表达稳定值（ M ）A. ABA诱导处理；B. MeJA诱导处理；C. SA诱导处理。

图5 geNorm软件分析8个候选内参基因配对变异值（ V ）A. ABA诱导处理；B. MeJA诱导处理；C. SA诱导处理。

表2 NormFinder软件分析结果

表3 BestKeeper软件分析8个候选内参基因在ABA诱导下的表达稳定性

表4 BestKeeper软件分析8个候选内参基因在MeJA诱导下的表达稳定性

表5 BestKeeper软件分析8个候选内参基因在SA诱导下的表达稳定性

表6 番茄在ABA诱导下8个候选内参基因的稳定性排序

表7 番茄在MeJA诱导下8个候选内参基因的稳定性排序

表8 番茄在SA诱导下8个候选内参基因的稳定性排序

1	赵丹丹,陈景超,黄兆峰,等.刺萼龙葵种子中适宜内参基因的筛选[J].植物保护,2020,46(3):40-46, 51. DOI:10.16688/j.zwbh.2019105 ZHAO D D, CHEN J C, HUANG Z F, et al. Selection of suitable reference genes in Solanum rostratum seeds[J]. Plant Protection, 2020, 46(3): 40-46, 51. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16688/j.zwbh.2019105
2	张兰,檀鹏辉,滕珂,等.草地早熟禾荧光定量PCR分析中内参基因的筛选[J].草业学报,2017,26(3):75-81. DOI:10.11686/cyxb2016297 ZHANG L, TAN P H, TENG K, et al. Screening of reference genes for real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR in Kentucky bluegrass[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(3): 75-81. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11686/cyxb2016297
3	张燕梅,王瑞芳,杨子平,等.剑麻内参基因筛选与稳定表达分析[J].热带作物学报,2019,40(11):2166-2173. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.11.010 ZHANG Y M, WANG R F, YANG Z P, et al. Screening of suitable reference genes for qRT-PCR normalization in sisal[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(11): 2166-2173. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.11.010
4	赵艺蕊,黄春颖,王克涛,等.山核桃实时荧光定量PCR分析中内参基因的筛选与验证[J].果树学报,2022,39(1):10-21. DOI:10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.202310289 ZHAO Y R, HUANG C Y, WANG K T, et al. Screening and verification of internal reference genes by real time quantitative PCR analysis in Carya cathayensis [J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2022, 39(1): 10-21. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.202310289
5	丁苏芹,李玺,唐东芹.小苍兰实时荧光定量PCR中的内参基因筛选[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,44(3):19-25. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201909021 DING S Q, LI X, TANG D Q. Screening on reference genes for real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR of Freesia hybrida [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2020, 44(3): 19-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201909021
6	SMITHA P K, VISHNUPRIYAN K, KAR A S, et al. Genome wide search to identify reference genes candidates for gene expression analysis in Gossypium hirsutum [J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2019, 19: 405. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-019-1988-3 doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1988-3
7	韩晓雪,韩佳轩,姜晶.番茄在非生物胁迫下实时定量RT-PCR中内参基因的筛选[J].分子植物育种,2015,13(4):822-831. DOI:10.13271/j.mpb.013.000822 HAN X X, HAN J X, JIANG J. Screening the reference genes for the studies of quantitative real-time RT-PCR in tomato under abiotic stress[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2015, 13(4): 822-831. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.013.000822
8	姜静,王银磊,赵丽萍,等.番茄qRT-PCR内参基因的筛选[J].江苏农业学报,2017,33(2):389-396. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.024 JIANG J, WANG Y L, ZHAO L P, et al. Selection of tomato reference genes for qRT-PCR[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricul-tural Sciences, 2017, 33(2): 389-396. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.024
9	ZHENG Z, NONOMURA T, APPIANO M, et al. Loss of function in Mlo orthologs reduces susceptibility of pepper and tomato to powdery mildew disease caused by Leveillula taurica [J]. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(7): e70723. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070723 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070723
10	崔菲菲,孟川,王彦华,等.大白菜-结球甘蓝易位系实时荧光定量PCR内参基因的筛选[J].华北农学报,2018,33(5):60-67. DOI:10.7668/hbnxb.2018.05.008 CUI F F, MENG C, WANG Y H, et al. Reference genes selection for quantitative real-time PCR in Chinese cabbage-cabbage translocation lines[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2018, 33(5): 60-67. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2018.05.008
11	ZHOU X H, LIU J, ZHUANG Y. Selection of appropriate reference genes in eggplant for quantitative gene expression studies under different experimental conditions[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2014, 176: 200-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.07.010 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.07.010
12	CHEN H, YANG Z Q, HU Y, et al. Reference genes selection for quantitative gene expression studies in Pinus massoniana L.[J]. Trees, 2016, 30(3): 685-696. DOI: 10.1007/s00468-015-1311-3 doi: 10.1007/s00468-015-1311-3
13	覃慧娟,范付华,周紫晶.激素处理下马尾松茎干组织qPCR内参基因的筛选[J].农业生物技术学报,2022,30(2):393-401. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2022.017 QIN H J, FAN F H, ZHOU Z J. Screening of qPCR internal reference genes in stem tissue of Pinus massoniana under hormone treatment[J]. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2022, 30(2): 393-401. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2022.017
14	VANGUILDER H D, VRANA K E, FREEMAN W M. Twenty-five years of quantitative PCR for gene expression analysis[J]. Biotechniques, 2008, 44(5): 619-626. DOI: 10.2144/000112776 doi: 10.2144/000112776
15	ZHANG H, HAN W, DE SMET I, et al. ABA promotes quiescence of the quiescent centre and suppresses stem cell differentiation in the Arabidopsis primary root meristem[J]. The Plant Journal, 2010, 64(5): 764-774. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04367.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04367.x
16	TON J, FLORS V, MAUCH-MANI B. The multifaceted role of ABA in disease resistance[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2009, 14(6): 310-317. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.03.006 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.03.006
17	陈田硕.脱落酸对番茄防御灰叶斑病的功能研究[D].山东,泰安:山东农业大学,2020. CHEN T S. The role of ABA in tomato resistance to grey leaf spot disease[D]. Tai’an, Shandong: Shandong Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)
18	范志金,刘秀峰,刘凤丽,等.水杨酸在诱导系统获得抗性中的信号传导作用[J].农药,2004(6):257-260. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-0413.2004.06.005 FAN Z J, LIU X F, LIU F L, et al. The role of salicylic acid in systemic acquired resistance signaling pathways[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesiticides, 2004(6): 257-260. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0413.2004.06.005
19	YU X X, ZHANG W J, ZHANG Y, et al. The roles of methyl jasmonate to stress in plants[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2019, 46(3): 197-212. DOI: 10.1071/FP18106 doi: 10.1071/FP18106
20	胡彦江,张茹琴,王瑞荣,等.水杨酸、乙酰水杨酸对番茄幼苗叶片中PPO和POD的诱导作用[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(2):262-266. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2007.02.009 HU Y J, ZHANG R Q, WANG R R, et al. Induction of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase activity in tomato seedling leaves by salicylic acid and acetylsalicylic acid[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2007, 27(2): 262-266. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2007.02.009
21	董汉松.植物抗病防卫基因表达调控与诱导抗性遗传的机制[J].植物病理学报,1996,26(4):289-293. DONG H S. Expressive regulation of plant disease defense genes in relation with hereditability mechanism of induced resistance[J]. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 1996, 26(4): 289-293. (in Chinese)
22	DU M M, ZHAO J H, TZENG D T W, et al. MYC2 orchestrates a hierarchical transcriptional cascade that regulates jasmonate-mediated plant immunity in tomato[J]. The Plant Cell, 2017, 29(8): 1883-1906. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.16.00953 doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00953
23	UEHARA T, SUGIYAMA S, MATSUURA H, et al. Resistant and susceptible responses in tomato to cyst nematode are differentially regulated by salicylic acid[J]. Plant & Cell Physiology, 2010, 51(9): 1524-1536. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcq109 doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq109
24	VANDESOMPELE J, DE PRETER K, PATTYN F, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes[J]. Genome Biology, 2002, 3(7): research0034.1. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034 doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034
25	ANDERSEN C L, JENSEN J L, ØRNTOF T F. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets[J]. Cancer Research, 2018, 64(15): 5245-5250. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0496 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0496
26	PFAFFL M W, TICHOPAD A, PRGOMET C, et al. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper-Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations[J]. Biotechnology Letters, 2004, 26(6): 509-515. DOI: 10.1023/b:bile.0000019559.84305.47 doi: 10.1023/b:bile.0000019559.84305.47
27	XIAO Z, SUN X B, LIU X Q, et al. Selection of reliable reference genes for gene expression studies on Rhododendron molle G. Don[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 1547. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01547 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01547
28	DIE J V, ROMÁN B, NADAL S, et al. Evaluation of candidate reference genes for expression studies in Pisum sativum under different experimental conditions[J]. Planta, 2010, 232: 145-153. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-010-1158-1 doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1158-1
29	SCHOLTZ J J, VISSER B. Reference gene selection for qPCR gene expression analysis of rust-infected wheat[J]. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 2013, 81: 22-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2012.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2012.10.006
30	刘霞宇.基于实时荧光定量PCR的忍冬内参基因筛选[D].山西,太原:山西农业大学,2017. LIU X Y. Selection of candidate reference genes for gene expression studies by quantitative real-time PCR in Lonicera japonica Thunb.[D]. Taiyuan, Shanxi: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
31	吴建阳,何冰,杜玉洁,等.利用geNorm、NormFinder和BestKeeper软件进行内参基因稳定性分析的方法[J].现代农业科技,2017(5):278-281. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2017.05.174 WU J Y, HE B, DU Y J, et al. Analysis method of systematically evaluating stability of reference genes using geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017(5): 278-281. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2017.05.174
32	刘小飞,于波,黄丽丽,等.杜鹃红山茶实时定量PCR内参基因筛选及验证[J].广东农业科学,2020,47(12):203-211. DOI:10.16768/j.issn.1004-874x.2020.12.021 LIU X F, YU B, HUANG L L, et al. Screening and validation of reference genes of Camellia azalea by quantitative real-time PCR[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 47(12): 203-211. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16768/j.issn.1004-874x.2020.12.021
33	乔永刚,王勇飞,曹亚萍,等.药用蒲公英低温和高温胁迫下内参基因筛选与相关基因表达分析[J].园艺学报,2020,47(6):1153-1164. DOI:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2019-1005 QIAO Y G, WANG Y F, CAO Y P, et al. Reference genes selection and related genes expression analysis under low and high temperature stress in Taraxacum officinale [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2020, 47(6): 1153-1164. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2019-1005
34	LACERDA A L M, FONSECA L N, BLAWID R, et al. Reference gene selection for qPCR analysis in tomato-bipartite begomovirus interaction and validation in additional tomato-virus pathosystems[J]. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(8): e0136820. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136820 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136820
35	HONG Y, TANG X J, HUANG H, et al. Transcriptomic analyses reveal species-specific light-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in chrysanthemum[J]. BMC Genomics, 2015, 16: 202. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1428-1 doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1428-1
36	WANG Q, ISHIKAWA T, MICHIUE T, et al. Stability of endogenous reference genes in postmortem human brains for normalization of quantitative real-time PCR data: comprehensive evaluation using geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper[J]. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2012, 126(6): 943-952. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-012-0774-7 doi: 10.1007/s00414-012-0774-7
37	BUSTIN S A, BENES V, GARSON J A, et al. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments[J]. Clinical Chemistry, 2009, 55(4): 611-622. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797 doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797
38	吝月爱.玉米在非生物胁迫和激素处理条件下实时荧光定量PCR内参基因的选择[D].四川,成都:四川农业大学,2012. LIN Y A. Reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR in maize treated with abiotic stresses and hormones[D]. Chengdu, Sichuan: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract)
39	ZHANG Y T, ZHU L J, XUE J Y, et al. Selection and verification of appropriate reference genes for expression normalization in Cryptomeria fortunei under abiotic stress and hormone treatments[J]. Genes, 2021, 12(6): 791-809. DOI: 10.3390/genes12060791 doi: 10.3390/genes12060791
40	宋雄.欧芹不同逆境条件下适宜内参基因的筛选[D].江苏,南京:南京农业大学,2016. SONG X. Screening of stable reference genes under different stress conditions in parsley[D]. Nanjing, Jiangsu: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)
41	DEKKERS B J W, WILLEMS L, BASSEL G W, et al. Identification of reference genes for RT-qPCR expression analysis in Arabidopsis and tomato seeds[J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2012, 53(1): 28-37. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcr113 doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr113

[1]	孙佳琦,王晨,王光华,任应党,祝增荣,白耀宇. 再生稻田拟环纹豹蛛与青翅蚁形隐翅甲间的集团内捕食及其影响因素[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2022, 48(6): 807-822.
[2]	谭洪吉,高艳明,李建设,魏文璐. 不同功能肥料对基质栽培樱桃番茄的品质产量及基质环境的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2022, 48(4): 434-442.
[3]	王慧茹,闫思华,高艳明,李建设. 不同整枝方式对樱桃番茄果实商品性、营养品质及产量的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2021, 47(3): 347-353.
[4]	王晓慧,周昆鹏. 自然环境中的红色番茄图像识别方法研究[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2021, 47(3): 395-403.
[5]	张钟炎,胡鲁巍,陈加威,朱祝军,祝彪. 矮生观赏番茄种质资源农艺性状鉴定及观赏性评价[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2021, 47(2): 158-170.
[6]	郑福顺,王晓敏,李国花,李洪磊,周鹏泽,王林,白圣懿,刘珮君,张雪艳,胡新华,付金军,高艳明,李建设. 基于表型性状的宁夏番茄种质资源核心种质构建[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2021, 47(2): 171-181.
[7]	梁颖,石玉,赵鑫,白龙强,侯雷平,张毅. 低磷条件下硅对番茄幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2020, 46(2): 151-160.
[8]	莫远亮,王郁石,王继文. 天府肉鹅母系不同阶段颗粒细胞内参基因的选择[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2019, 45(3): 376-384.
[9]	田萍, 李建设, 高艳明. 微咸水灌溉对日光温室番茄产量及果实各部位蔗糖代谢的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2018, 44(6): 667-677.
[10]	陈珊珊, 周业凯, 张志明, 张敏, 汪俏梅. 二氧化碳施肥对樱桃番茄果实发育和品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2018, 44(3): 318-326.
[11]	陶晓亚, 李家寅, 茅林春. 脱落酸对采后番茄果实损伤愈合的作用[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(3): 321-326.
[12]	郑嫩珠, 李丽, 辛清武, 缪中纬, 朱志明, 刘凤辉, 吴俭飞, 卢立志. 内参基因对TYR、MITF和ASIP基因在白绒乌骨鸡各组织表达水平的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(6): 732-740.
[13]	梁喜凤, 蔡阳阳, 王永维. 番茄钵苗自动移栽钵体物理机械特性试验[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(5): 616-622.
[14]	王燕，潘长田，王洁，秦力，邹滔，卢钢. 赤霉素对亚高温胁迫下番茄花柱外露及相关基因表达的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(4): 449-457.
[15]	郑磊, 张静, 彭燕, 麻文建, 朱天辉. 实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应检测核桃根际土壤生防菌Bacillus amyloliquefaciens和Trametes versicolor的定殖[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(03): 277-284.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed