Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)  2019, Vol. 45 Issue (4): 434-442    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2018.11.011
食品科学     
萎凋温度对茶鲜叶萎凋失水及白茶品质的影响
林清霞(),项丽慧,王丽丽,杨军国,宋振硕,陈林()
福建省农业科学院茶叶研究所,福建 福安 355015
Effect of withering temperature on water loss of fresh leaves and quality of white tea
Qingxia LIN(),Lihui XIANG,Lili WANG,Junguo YANG,Zhenshuo SONG,Lin CHEN()
Tea Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fu’an 355015, Fujian, China
 全文: PDF(1313 KB)   HTML
摘要:

为改进白茶萎凋工艺,实现白茶加工品质的稳定性和可控性,以15个茶树品种春季鲜叶为原料,在控湿条件下考察不同萎凋温度(30、25、20 ℃)对鲜叶萎凋失水速率、白茶感官品质及生化成分的影响,并通过二维“点集”分布视图和主成分分析对其主要生化成分含量进行模式差异分析。结果表明:不同品种鲜叶失水速率随萎凋过程均呈逐步减小趋势;温度越高,萎凋失水速率越快,萎凋失水拟合方程均符合双曲线函数。与室内自然萎凋相比,在25 ℃环境下平均萎凋时长缩短了13.6 h。感官审评表明,在萎凋温度为25 ℃时,白茶品质最优,与自然萎凋的白茶品质相当,且各生化成分的含量与自然萎凋无显著性差异。由此可见,在萎凋温度为25 ℃时可以大幅缩短白茶的萎凋时间,且制成的白茶品质优异。该研究结果可为提高白茶生产效率和改进白茶工艺提供参考依据。

关键词: 白茶萎凋温度失水速率品质生化成分    
Abstract:

This study aimed to improve the withering process of the white tea manufacturing and to achieve the stability and controllability of white tea quality. Fresh leaves plucked from tea (Camellia sinensis) bushes of 15 cultivars were used to explore the effects of withering temperatures (30, 25, 20 ℃) on the dehydration rate, sensory quality and biochemical compositions of white tea. The contents of biochemical compositions were compared among the samples based on the two-dimensional point set distribution and principal component analysis. The results showed that the water loss rates of all tea shoots tended to decelerate gradually under the different withering temperatures, the higher the withering temperature, the faster the water loss rate. Dehydration rate equation was consistent with the hyperbolic function. Compared with the natural withering, the average withering time at 25 ℃ was significantly shortened by 13.6 h. The sensory evaluation suggested that the white tea prepared under the withering condition of 25 ℃ had the highest quality, which was equivalent to the quality under the natural withering. The analysis of biochemical composition found that there was no difference between withering at 25 ℃ and natural withering. In conclusion, the time of the white tea withering at 25 ℃ was greatly shorten and the quality of the prepared white tea was superior, which could further improve the production efficiency of the white tea, and provide effective references for the improvement of the white tea process.

Key words: white tea    withering temperature    water loss rate    quality    biochemical composition
收稿日期: 2018-11-01 出版日期: 2019-09-17
CLC:  TS 272  
基金资助: 福建省科技重大专项专题(2017NZ0002-1);福建省农业科学院科技创新团队项目(STIT2017-1-3);福建省属公益类科研院所基本科研专项(2018R1012-5);福建省农业科学院青年人才创新基金(YC2018-7)
通讯作者: 陈林     E-mail: 735801309@qq.com;chenlin_xy@163.com
作者简介: 林清霞(https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7802-3366),E-mail:735801309@qq.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
林清霞
项丽慧
王丽丽
杨军国
宋振硕
陈林

引用本文:

林清霞,项丽慧,王丽丽,杨军国,宋振硕,陈林. 萎凋温度对茶鲜叶萎凋失水及白茶品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(4): 434-442.

Qingxia LIN,Lihui XIANG,Lili WANG,Junguo YANG,Zhenshuo SONG,Lin CHEN. Effect of withering temperature on water loss of fresh leaves and quality of white tea. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(4): 434-442.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2018.11.011        http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/Y2019/V45/I4/434

茶树品种

Tea cultivar

30 ℃萎凋

Withering at 30 ℃

25 ℃萎凋

Withering at 25 ℃

20 ℃萎凋

Withering at 20 ℃

自然萎凋

Natural withering

鲜叶

Fresh leaves

丹桂 Dangui H1 M1 L1 N1 X1
黄观音 Huangguanyin H2 M2 L2 N2 X2
黄玫瑰 Huangmeigui H3 M3 L3 N3 X3
金凤凰 Jinfenghuang H4 M4 L4 N4 X4
金观音 Jinguanyin H5 M5 L5 N5 X5
金牡丹 Jinmudan H6 M6 L6 N6 X6
梅占 Meizhan H7 M7 L7 N7 X7
肉桂 Rougui H8 M8 L8 N8 X8
水仙 Shuixian H9 M9 L9 N9 X9
迎春 Yingchun H10 M10 L10 N10 X10
矮脚乌龙 Aijiaowulong H11 M11 L11 N11 X11
北斗 Beidou H12 M12 L12 N12 X12
福鼎大毫 Fudingdahao H13 M13 L13 N13 X13
福云6号 Fuyun 6 H14 M14 L14 N14 X14
白云特早 Baiyuntezao H15 M15 L15 N15 X15
表1  样品来源及编码
图1  样品制作工艺流程
图2  室内自然萎凋温湿度情况
图3  在不同萎凋温度下鲜叶萎凋失水减重率的动态变化

萎凋方式

Withering

condition

外形Shape 汤色Liquid color 香气Aroma 滋味Taste 叶底Infused leaf

加权得分

Weighted score

评语

Remark

得分

Score

评语

Remark

得分

Score

评语

Remark

得分

Score

评语

Remark

得分

Score

评语

Remark

得分

Score

30 ℃萎凋

Withering at 30 ℃

暗褐或灰绿 84 深黄 88 带酵香 90 尚醇爽、略带酵味 87 有红叶、欠匀 86 87

25 ℃萎凋

Withering at 25 ℃

匀整、净度好 92 嫩黄明亮 92 微甜香、毫香 92 清甜醇爽 92 尚软嫩、均匀 88 91.6

20 ℃萎凋

Withering at 20 ℃

鲜绿 86 尚绿黄明亮 92 微甜香、略青 89 青涩 86 黄绿、稍杂 87 87.5

自然萎凋

Natural withering

匀整、净度好 90 嫩黄明亮 94 清香、毫香 93 甘和鲜爽 93 尚软嫩、均匀 90 92
表2  在不同萎凋温度下白茶(福云6号品种)的感官品质
图4  萎凋温度对茶多酚总量、游离氨基酸总量和咖啡碱含量的影响

生化成分

Biochemical

composition

萎凋方式Withering condition

鲜叶

Fresh leaves

30 ℃萎凋

Withering at 30 ℃

25 ℃萎凋

Withering at 25 ℃

20 ℃萎凋

Withering at 20 ℃

自然萎凋

Natural withering

茶多酚TPs 168.55±17.39bC 178.64±19.13bAB 178.91±17.62bAB 178.91±17.41bAB 194.26±17.71aA
游离氨基酸FAAs 36.31±5.16bBC 42.10±6.26aAB 39.48±5.57abAB 42.96±6.96aA 31.65±4.77cC
咖啡碱CAF 35.96±5.53aAB 36.56±6.92aAB 33.77±6.08abAB 37.31±7.15aA 30.69±4.43bB
表3  在不同萎凋温度下供试样茶多酚总量、游离氨基酸总量和咖啡碱含量
图5  氨基酸组分(A)和儿茶素组分(B)的构成

生化成分

Biochemical composition

萎凋方式Withering condition

鲜叶

Fresh leaves

30 ℃萎凋

Withering at 30 ℃

25 ℃萎凋

Withering at 25 ℃

20 ℃萎凋

Withering at 20 ℃

自然萎凋

Natural withering

天冬氨酸Asp 1.49±0.38bB 1.76±0.49abAB 1.97±0.43aA 1.67±0.53abAB 1.50±0.30bB
谷氨酸Glu 1.24±0.39bB 1.56±0.37aAB 1.69±0.39aA 1.54±0.33aAB 1.72±0.35aA
丝氨酸Ser 1.39±0.22bB 1.70±0.39aA 1.18±0.31bB 1.87±0.46aA 0.44±0.090cC
组氨酸His 2.89±1.25a 2.79±1.24a 2.88±1.60a 2.82±1.29a 2.29±1.19a
甘氨酸Gly 0.22±0.10aA 0.22±0.090aA 0.23±0.18aA 0.24±0.10aA 0.060±0.040bB
苏氨酸Thr 0.57±0.14aA 0.59±0.14aA 0.60±0.14aA 0.60±0.14aA 0.25±0.10bB
精氨酸Arg 1.30±1.21a 1.62±1.12a 1.58±1.20a 1.72±1.15a 1.45±1.04a
丙氨酸Ala 1.00±0.19aA 0.80±0.17bB 0.60±0.10cC 0.84±0.21bB 0.11±0.070dD
γ-氨基丁酸GABA 0.39±0.16aA 0.39±0.21aA 0.42±0.19aA 0.40±0.22aA 0.050±0.040bB
茶氨酸Thea 10.33±0.58a 10.41±5.16a 10.66±5.16a 10.14±4.48a 11.90±4.92a
酪氨酸Tyr 1.03±0.36aA 0.85±0.38aAB 0.92±0.31aA 0.83±0.43aAB 0.43±0.68bB
半胱氨酸Cys 0.21±0.15aA 0.26±0.14aA 0.31±0.15aA 0.26±0.18aA 0.009 0±0.019bB
缬氨酸Val 0.72±0.12bB 0.93±0.24aA 0.69±0.14bB 1.01±0.30aA 0.050±0.10cC
甲硫氨酸Met 0.010±0.19a 0.005 0±0.009 0a ND 0.008 0±0.010a 0.009 0±0.030a
苯丙氨酸Phe 1.24±0.22bB 1.45±0.24aA 1.08±0.24cB 1.55±0.27aA 0.050±0.080dC
异亮氨酸Ile 0.49±0.10bB 0.68±0.19aA 0.47±0.14bB 0.76±0.21aA 0.017±0.030cC
亮氨酸Leu 0.57±0.080bB 0.73±0.12aA 0.61±0.12bB 0.78±0.15aA 0.020±0.040cC
赖氨酸Lys 0.66±0.13bB 0.89±0.23aA 0.66±0.14bB 0.96±0.26aA 0.020±0.060cC
没食子酸GA 10.05±8.99aA 7.63±6.61aAB 6.25±5.10aAB 7.82±7.23aAB 1.46±1.20bB
没食子儿茶素GC 1.01±1.29a 1.11±1.10a 0.97±1.14a 1.20±1.19a 1.77±2.03a
可可碱TB 1.57±0.78bB 1.46±0.75bB 1.86±0.93bB 1.33±0.67bB 3.80±1.16aA
表没食子儿茶素EGC 35.02±18.40a 32.70±12.38a 36.23±14.56a 32.10±13.56a 37.77±11.04a
儿茶素C 0.58±0.29bA 0.66±0.36bA 0.67±0.38bA 0.65±0.36bA 0.96±0.43aA
茶叶碱TP 0.28±0.080a 0.30±0.090a 0.30±0.070a 0.31±0.090a 0.28±0.070a
表没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯EGCG 76.80±23.90bA 84.99±22.88abA 87.39±23.25abA 83.92±23.73abA 97.53±23.06aA
咖啡碱CAF 35.96±5.53aAB 36.56±6.92aAB 33.77±6.08abAB 37.31±7.15aA 30.69±4.43bB
表儿茶素EC 5.38±1.94bB 6.21±2.55bB 6.66±2.41bAB 5.95±2.73bB 8.95±2.63aA
没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯GCG 1.21±1.16abA 0.98±0.29bA 0.98±0.33bA 0.99±0.30bA 1.47±0.43aA
儿茶素没食子酸酯CG 0.19±0.10bB 0.26±0.080aAB 0.23±0.070abAB 0.27±0.10aAB 0.30±0.050aA
表儿茶素没食子酸酯ECG 21.45±5.15a 23.68±8.61a 23.84±8.48a 23.61±8.55a 25.50±9.33a
表4  在不同萎凋温度下供试样的氨基酸、儿茶素和生物碱组分含量
1 罗玲娜,刘琳燕,孙云 .白茶连续化加温萎凋过程中生化成分的变化.茶叶科学技术,2014(2):8-11,17.
LUO L N , LIU L Y , SUN Y . Variations of main biochemical components in white tea during the continuous and warmed withering. Tea Science and Technology, 2014(2):8-11,17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
2 DIAS T R , TOMáS G , TEIXEIRA N P , et al . White tea (Camellia Sinensis (L.)):antioxidant properties and beneficial health effects. International Journal of Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, 2013(2):1-15.
3 张丹丹,叶小辉,赵峰,等 .基于游离氨基酸组分的白茶滋味品质研究.福建农业学报,2016,31(5):515-520.
ZHANG D D , YE X H , ZHAO F , et al . Flavor and amino acids of brewed white teas. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016,31(5):515-520. (in Chinese with English abstract)
4 吕海鹏,张悦,陈兴华,等 .不同花色种类白茶的抗氧化活性及其主要品质化学成分分析.食品科学,2016,37(20):42-50.
Lü H P , ZHANG Y , CHEN X H , et al . Antioxidant activities and major chemical components in tea infusions of different kinds of white tea. Food Science, 2016,37(20):42-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
5 SAHA G , CHOUDHURY S , BERA B , et al . Biochemical and microbiological characterization of white tea. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, 2017,11(5):74-80.
6 HAJIAGHAALIPOUR F , KANTHINATHI M S , SANUSI J , et al . White tea (Camellia sinensis) inhibits proliferation of the colon cancer cell line, HT-29, activates caspases and protects DNA of normal cells against oxidative damage. Food Chemistry, 2015,169:401-410.
7 乔小燕,吴华玲,韩雪文,等 .仁化白毛茶生化成分与成品白茶品质的相关性研究.核农学报,2015,29(12):2327-2333.
QIAO X Y , WU H L , HAN X W , et al . Correlation on biochemical components and made-tea quality of Renhua Baimaocha. Acta Agriculturae Nucleatae Sininca, 2015,29(12):2327-2333. (in Chinese with English abstract)
8 滑金杰,袁海波,江用文,等 .萎凋过程鲜叶理化特性变化及其调控技术研究进展.茶叶科学,2013,33(5):465-472.
HUA J J , YUAN H B , JIANG Y W , et al . A review on the regulation technique of withering process and the change in physical and chemical properties of leaves. Journal of Tea Science, 2013,33(5):465-472. (in Chinese with English abstract)
9 潘玉华,黄先洲,周寒松 .人工调控萎凋室温湿度的白茶加工工艺探究.湖北农业科学,2013,52(5):1144-1148.
PAN Y H , HUANG X Z , ZHOU H S , et al . Study on white tea processing technology by artificial control of temperature and humidity during withering. Hubei Agricultural Science, 2013,52(5):1144-1148. (in Chinese with English abstract)
10 范方媛,陈萍,罗文文,等 .浙江“春雨2号”品种白茶加工工艺初探.浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2017,43(2):229-238.
FAN F Y , CHEN P , LUO W W , et al . Preliminary study on processing technology of white tea “Chunyu 2” from Zhejiang Province. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2017,43(2):229-238. (in Chinese with English abstract)
11 张应根,王振康,陈林,等 .环境温湿度调控对茶鲜叶萎凋失水及白茶品质的影响.福建农业学报,2012,27(11):1205-1210.
ZHANG Y G , WANG Z K , CHEN L , et al . Effect of temperature and RH during withering on water loss and quality of white tea. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012,27(11):1205-1210. (in Chinese with English abstract)
12 DAI W D , XIE D C , LU M L , et al . Characterization of white tea metabolome: comparison against green and black tea by a nontargeted metabolomics approach. Food Research International, 2017,96:40-45.
13 黄赟 .福建白茶化学成分与感官品质研究初报.福州:福建农林大学,2013.
HUANG Y . Studies on chemical components and sensory qualities of Fujian white teas. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture & Forestry University, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
14 陈林海,宋丹丹,潘哲瀚,等 .白茶萎凋工艺研究概述.茶叶科学技术,2010(3):4-8.
CHEN L H , SONG D D , PAN Z H , et al . Overview on withering process of white tea. Tea Science and Technology, 2010(3):4-8. (in Chinese)
15 张应根,陈林,陈泉宾,等 .白茶自然萎凋过程中风味形成的动态研究.茶叶学报,2016,57(2):80-84.
ZHANG Y G , CHEN L , CHEN Q B , et al . Flavor formation of white tea during natural withering. Acta Tea Sinica, 2016,57(2):80-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
16 张应根,邬龄盛,陈林,等 .白茶萎凋环境控制设备的测评与应用研究.茶叶科学技术,2014(4):25-28.
ZHANG Y G , WU L S , CHEN L , et al . Application testing of environmental control equipment in the withering of white tea. Tea Science and Technology, 2014(4):25-28. (in Chinese with English abstract)
17 中国标准出版社第一编辑室 .茶叶标准汇编.4版.北京:中国标准出版社,2011:93.
The First Editorial Office of China Standard Press . Tea Standard Compilation. 4th ed. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2011:93. (in Chinese)
18 许凌,周卫龙,高海燕,等 .茶磨碎试样的制备及其干物质含量测定:GB/T 8303—2013.北京:中国标准出版社,2014.
XU L , ZHOU W L , GAO H Y , et al . Preparation of Tea Grinding Samples and Determination of Dry Matter Content: GB/T 8303—2013. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2014. (in Chinese)
19 周卫龙,徐建峰,许凌 .茶叶中茶多酚和儿茶素类含量的检测方法:GB/T 8313—2008.北京:中国标准出版社,2008:1-7.
ZHOU W L , XU J F , XU L . Determination of Total Polyphenols and Catechin Content in Tea: GB/T 8313—2008. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2008:1-7. (in Chinese)
20 许凌,周卫龙,陆小磊,等 .茶游离氨基酸总量的测定:GB/T 8314—2013.北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
XU L , ZHOU W L , LU X L , et al . Determination of Total Free Amino Acid Contents in Tea: GB/T 8314—2013. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2013. (in Chinese)
21 王丽丽,陈键,宋振硕,等 .茶叶中没食子酸、儿茶素类和生物碱的HPLC检测方法研究.福建农业学报,2014,29(10):987-994.
WANG L L , CHEN J , SONG Z S , et al . Simultaneous HPLC determination of gallic acid, catechins and alkaloids in tea. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014,29(10):987-994. (in Chinese with English abstract)
22 宋振硕,王丽丽,陈键,等 .茶鲜叶萎凋过程中游离氨基酸的动态变化规律.茶叶学报,2015,56(4):206-213.
SONG Z S , WANG L L , CHEN J , et al . Changes on free amino acids in fresh tea leaves during withering. Acta Tea Sinica, 2015,56(4):206-213. (in Chinese with English abstract)
23 林芳,潘玉华,吴勇 .白茶萎凋温度条件探究.九江学院学报(自然科学版),2013,28(2):9-12.
LIN F , PAN Y H , WU Y . Exploration of white tea withering temperature conditions. Journal of Jiujiang University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2013,28(2):9-12. (in Chinese with English abstract)
24 周才碧,张敏星,穆瑞禄,等 .白茶萎凋技术的研究进展.农产品加工(学刊),2014(1):48-50.
ZHOU C B , ZHANG M X , MU R L , et al . Research progress on the technology of withering in white tea. Academic Periodical of Farm Products Processing, 2014(1):48-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
25 张少雄 .白茶室内自然萎凋不同品种鲜叶水分变化.茶叶科学技术,2012(3):13-18.
ZHANG S X . The moisture changes in white tea indoor natural withering process between two different cultivars. Tea Science and Technology, 2012(3):13-18. (in Chinese with English abstract)
26 黄亚辉,陈建华,周筠,等 .不同年代茯砖茶感官品质和化学成分的差异性.食品科学,2010,31(2):228-232.
HUANG Y H , CHEN J H , ZHOU Y , et al . Differences in sensory quality and chemical composition of Fuzhuan tea of different storage ages. Food Science, 2010,31(2):228-232. (in Chinese with English abstract)
27 蔡华春 .白茶品质形成研究概述.茶叶科学技术,2012(1):15-17.
CAI H C . Study summaries on quality formation of white tea. Tea Science and Technology, 2012(1):15-17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 范方媛,杨晓蕾,龚淑英,郭昊蔚,纵榜正,李春霖,钱虹,胡建平. 基于浙江部分主栽品种的黄茶滋味特征及化学组分贡献研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(4): 443-451.
[2] 侯福银,陈应江,杨智青,金崇富,时凯,陈长宽,封功能,李洪山. 猪粪沼液对籼稻农艺性状、产量和饲用品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(3): 325-331.
[3] 陈心源,田忍国,沈林章,殷益明,朱利鑫,贾惠娟. 不同蓝红光比例发光二极管对火龙果花芽分化和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(1): 14-22.
[4] 侯福银,杨智青,陈长宽,时凯,金崇富,陈应江. 原花青素对肉鸡肠道及屠宰性能、脂质代谢和肉品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(1): 119-125.
[5] 祁丹丹, 陈维, 苗爱清, 王雯雯, 庞式, 马成英. 气相色谱-串联质谱结合化学计量学分析快速陈化对白茶香气的影响 [J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(6): 704-710.
[6] 倪佳丹, 潘诗哲, 但凡, 蒋益虹. 茶多酚-壳聚糖复合液对鮸鱼在贮藏中品质指标变化的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(5): 594-600.
[7] 向洁, 王富强, 郭宝光, 王庆刚, 余成群, 沈振西, 邵小明. 西藏河谷区燕麦与箭筈豌豆混间作对产量和营养品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(5): 555-564.
[8] 王桂跃, 赵福成, 韩海亮, 包斐, 谭禾平, 俞琦英. 浙江省鲜食玉米新品种产量、品质和抗性分析及其育种目标选择[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(3): 343-355.
[9] 陈珊珊, 周业凯, 张志明, 张敏, 汪俏梅. 二氧化碳施肥对樱桃番茄果实发育和品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(3): 318-326.
[10] 范方媛,陈萍,罗文文,徐文武,谷兆骐,毛祖法,龚淑英. 浙江“春雨2号”品种白茶加工工艺初探[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2017, 43(2): 229-238.
[11] 徐红蕊, 陈小连, 时建青, 宋琼莉. 艾叶对热应激蛋鸡抗氧化功能、产蛋性能和蛋品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2017, 43(1): 113-119.
[12] 丁文雅, 林若筠, 周伟伟, 周恺, 林咸永. 不同供氮水平下雾培与水培生菜生长和营养品质差异的比较[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(6): 703-712.
[13] 周旋,丁俊山,吴良欢,陆若辉,杨国标,王旭. 不同工艺复合肥对小白菜产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(5): 626-.
[14] 方萍,刘卫国,刘孝德,刘婷,池晓玉,许燕,庞婷,彭霄,蔡凌,杨文钰. 玉-豆间作对菜用大豆品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(5): 556-.
[15] 张丽平, 卢晓明, 陆玫丹, 王莉, 李坤峰, 沈林章, 贾惠娟. “亚历山大”葡萄疏果省力化关键技术[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(3): 327-332.