Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(理学版)  2017, Vol. 44 Issue (2): 174-180    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2017.02.009
数学与计算机科学     
基于区间数的直觉模糊多属性决策研究
段传庆1,2
1. 合肥工业大学 管理学院, 安徽 合肥 230009;
2. 合肥工业大学 数学学院, 安徽 合肥 230009
Intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making based on interval numbers
DUAN Chuanqing1,2
1. School of Business Administration, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China;
2. School of Mathematics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
 全文: PDF(698 KB)   HTML  
摘要: 研究一类属性权重未知的直觉模糊多属性决策问题.将直觉模糊数的属性值转由双区间数表示,根据决策方案属性值间的离差确定属性权重.根据各方案属性加权综合值及区间直觉模糊数的得分函数,对2套方案分别进行排序和比较,并通过实例说明了该方法的有效性.
关键词: 直觉模糊数区间数多属性决策权重    
Abstract: This paper discusses the multiple attribute decision making problems, in which the information about attribute weights is totally unknown and the attribute values are expressed by intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Two interval numbers are used to take the place of attribute values. A new method is proposed to gain the weights of the attributes based on the deviations between the values of the attributes. We make the ranking of projects by the weighted comprehensive values of all projects and the score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, respectively, and then compared with the results of the two methods. Finally,an illustrative example is given to verify the effectiveness of the method.
Key words: intuitionistic fuzzy number    interval number    multiple attribute decision making    entropy
收稿日期: 2016-05-19 出版日期: 2017-07-08
CLC:  C934  
基金资助: 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(J2014HGXJ0080).
作者简介: 段传庆(1978-),ORCID:http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3096-3479,男,博士,讲师,主要从事决策分析研究,E-mail:dcqhn@126.com.
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
段传庆

引用本文:

段传庆. 基于区间数的直觉模糊多属性决策研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2017, 44(2): 174-180.

DUAN Chuanqing. Intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making based on interval numbers. Journal of ZheJIang University(Science Edition), 2017, 44(2): 174-180.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2017.02.009        https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/Y2017/V44/I2/174

[1] ZADEH L A. Fuzzy set[J]. Information and Control,1965,8(3):338-356.
[2] ATANASSOV K. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1986,20(1):87-96.
[3] MAO J J, YAO D B, WANG C C. A novel crossentropy and entropy measures of IFSs and their applications[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,2013, 48:37-45.
[4] 王晓杰,魏翠萍,郭婷婷.基于交叉熵和熵的直觉模糊多属性群决策专家权重的确定[J].曲阜师范大学学报,2011,37(3):35-40. WANG X J,WEI C P,GUO T T. A method to drive experts' weights in intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making based on cross entropy and entropy[J]. Journal of Qufu Normal University,2011,37(3):35-40.
[5] 赵萌,任嵘嵘.基于模糊熵的直觉模糊多属性群决策方法[J].数学的实践与认识,2014,44(23):153-159. ZHAO M, REN R R. Method based on fuzzy entropy with intuitionistic fuzzy set for group multi-attribute decision making[J]. Journal of Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2014,44(23):153-159.
[6] 戚晓雯,梁昌勇,张恩桥,等.基于熵最大化的区间直觉模糊多属性群决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2011,31(10):1940-1948. QI X W, LIANG C Y, ZHANG E Q, et al. Approach to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attributes group decision making based on maximum entropy[J].Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2011,31(10):1940-1948.
[7] 陈晓红.基于熵和关联系数的区间直觉模糊决策方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2013,35(4):791-794. CHEN X H. Approach to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision making based on entropy and correlation coefficient[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics,2013,35(4):791-794.
[8] 李兰平.基于一类新的直觉模糊熵的直觉模糊多属性决策法[J].齐齐哈尔大学学报,2014,30(2):83-86. LI L P. Intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on a new intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measure[J].Journal of Qiqihar University,2014,30(2):83-86.
[9] 刘小弟,朱建军,张世涛,等.考虑属性权重优化的犹豫模糊多属性决策方法[J].控制与决策,2016,31(2):297-302. LIU X D, ZHU J J, ZHANG S T, et al. Hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making method based on optimization of attribute weight[J]. Control and Decision,2016,31(2):297-302.
[10] 韩二东,郭鹏,赵静.主客观权重集成及扩展VIKOR的多属性群决策方法[J].计算机工程与应用,2015,51(11):1-6. HAN E D, GUO P, ZHAO J. Method for multiple attribute group decision maling based on subjective-objective weight integrated and extended VIKOR[J].Computer Engineering and Applications, 2015,51(11):1-6.
[11] 段传庆.一种对方案有偏好的区间直觉模糊多属性算法[J].中国科学技术大学学报,2015,45(12):100-105. DUAN C Q. Approach to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with preference information[J].Journal of University of Science and Technology of China, 2015,45(12):100-105.
[12] XU Z S. Multiple attribute group decision making with different formats of preference information on attributes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B,2007,37:1500-1511.
[13] XU Z S, CHEN J. MAGDM linear programming models with distinct uncertain preference structures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man,and Cyber-netics-Part B,2008,38:1356-1370.
[14] YOON K. The propagation of errors in multiple-attribute decision analysis:A practical approach[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society,1989, 40(7):681-686.
[15] 张吉军. 区间数多指标决策问题的模糊层次分析法[J]. 工业工程与管理,2003(6):20-23. ZHANG J J. Fuzzy AHP in multiple attribute decision making with interval numbers[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management,2003(6):20-23.
[16] 刘秀梅,赵克勤. 基于联系数的属性权重未知的区间数多属性决策研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识,2013,43(3):143-148. LIU X M, ZHAO K Q. Interval multi-attribute decision making with the attribute weight unknown based on connection number[J]. Journal of Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2013,43(3):143-148.
[17] ATANASSOV K, GARGOV G. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1989,31(3):343-349.
[18] XU Z S. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,2007,15(6):1179-1187.
[19] XU Z S, YAGER R R. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. International Journal of General Systems,2006,35(4):417-433.
[20] 徐泽水.区间直觉模糊信息的集成方法及其在决策中的应用[J].控制与决策,2007,22(2):215-219. XU Z S. Methods for aggregating interval-valu
[1] 李丹,王贵君. 直觉折线模糊数空间的完备可分性和逼近性[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2022, 49(5): 532-539.
[2] 崔洪雷,许立波,黄茹,庞超逸. 基于保守决策偏好的犹豫模糊余弦优化投影决策方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2022, 49(2): 184-194.
[3] 常娟, 杜迎雪, 刘卫锋. 广义毕达哥拉斯犹豫模糊集混合加权距离测度及决策应用[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2021, 48(3): 304-313.
[4] 曾金迪, 张丰, 吴森森, 杜震洪, 刘仁义. 基于空间自回归神经网络模型的空间插值研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2020, 47(5): 572-581.
[5] 张晓慧, 冯源. 计算OWA算子权重的最小最大不一致方法及讨论[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2020, 47(4): 455-459.
[6] 刘尧, 王颖志, 王立君, 张丰, 杜震洪, 刘仁义. 交通事故的时空热点分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2020, 47(1): 52-59.
[7] 贾玉杰, 杜震洪, 张丰, 刘仁义. 基于属性权重优化算法的土地利用绩效评价及差异分解分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2019, 46(5): 610-618.
[8] 刘卫锋, 常娟, 杜迎雪. 连续拟有序加权几何算子及其群决策应用[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2018, 45(2): 180-187,195.
[9] 张恺, 王应明. 考虑多角度效用的应急案例调整方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2017, 44(3): 314-321.