Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报（理学版）
浙江大学学报（理学版）  2020, Vol. 47 Issue (4): 455-459    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2020.04.008
数学与计算机科学     
计算OWA算子权重的最小最大不一致方法及讨论
张晓慧, 冯源
太原师范学院 数学系，山西 晋中 030619
Minimax disparity model for obtaining OWA operator weights: Issues of multiple solutions
ZHANG Xiaohui, FENG Yuan
Department of Mathematics，Taiyuan Normal University，Jinzhong 030619, Shanxi Province, China
 全文: PDF(594 KB)   HTML  
摘要： 权重向量的确定是有序加权平均（ordered weighted aweraging,OWA）算子理论中的一个关键问题，目前已有不少获取权重向量的模型。2010年EMROUZNEJAD 和AMIN两位专家在计算OWA算子权重向量时提出了改进最小最大不一致模型：对于给定的orness测度建立一个最小最大目标规划问题，求解该模型可以得到最优权重向量。但由该方法得到的最优解并不唯一，且存在无穷多解，因此，该模型存在不可靠性。本文通过引理给出定理，证明了其最优解的不唯一性，并用简单有效的数值例子予以说明。
关键词： 权重向量;  最小最大不一致方法;  最小方差方法;  orness测度    
Abstract: The determination of weights vector is one of the key issues in the theory of ordered weighted averaging(OWA) operators. Therefore, many weight generating models have been proposed in the literature.The main purpose of this paper is to point out the problems in the improved minimax disparity model for calculating OWA weight vector, which is suggested by EMROUZNEJAD and AMIN (2010). In this model, a minimax objective programming problem for a given orness measure is proposed, and the optimal weight can be obtained by solving the model, but the optimal solution obtained by this method is not unique,which has infinite solutions even with the same model, different decision makers may get different decision results. From this point of view, there is a certain risk in using this method in decision-making. As a consequence, this model is not reliable. The non-uniqueness of the optimal solution is proved by applying lemma and giving theorem. Some numerical examples is provided to illustrate this reason at the end of the article in a simple and effective way.
Key words: weights vector    orness measure    minimax disparity    minimum variance
收稿日期: 2018-11-30 出版日期: 2020-07-25
CLC:  O224  
基金资助: 山西省留学基金项目（2017-104）.
作者简介: 张晓慧（1992—），ORCID:http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6125-757X，女，硕士研究生，主要从事决策理论研究，E-mail:1520476364@qq.com.。
服务　　
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章　　
张晓慧
冯源

引用本文:

张晓慧, 冯源. 计算OWA算子权重的最小最大不一致方法及讨论[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2020, 47(4): 455-459.

ZHANG Xiaohui, FENG Yuan. Minimax disparity model for obtaining OWA operator weights: Issues of multiple solutions. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2020, 47(4): 455-459.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2020.04.008    或    https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/Y2020/V47/I4/455

1 YAGER R R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man and Cybernetics, 1988, 18(1): 83-190.DOI:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1450-4.50011-0
2 CHEN S M, TSAI B H. Autocratic decision making using group recommendations based on the OWA operator and correlation coefficients[J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 290(C): 106-119.DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.032
3 LIU X W. Models to determine parameterized ordered weighted averaging operators using optimization criteria[J]. Information Sciences, 2012, 190: 27-55.DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.007
4 LIU H B, CAI J F, MARTÍNEZ L. The importance weighted continuous generalized ordered weighted averaging operator and its application to group decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 48: 24-36.
5 HAN B, CHEN H Y, ZHOU L G. Generalized dependent unbalanced linguistic aggregation operators and their applications to multiple-attribute decision making[J]. Control and Decision, 2017, 32(5): 836-844.
6 TORRA V. OWA operators in data modeling and reidentification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2004, 12(5): 652-660.DOI:10.1109/tfuzz.2004.834814
7 MERIGÓ J M, ALRAJEH N, PERIS-ORTIZ M. Induced aggregation operators in the ordered weighted average sum[C]//2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence. Athens: IEEE, 2016.
8 YI P T, LI W W,GUO Y J.Quantile induced heavy ordered weighted averaging operators and its application in incentive decision making[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2018, 33(3): 514-528. DOI:10.1002/int.21945
9 AMIN G R, EMROUZNEJAD A. An extended minimax disparity to determine the OWA operator weights[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2006, 50(3): 312-316.
10 AGGARWAL M. Generalized compensative weighted averaging aggregation operators[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2015, 87(C): 81-90. DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2015.04.021
11 LIU X W. A review of the OWA determination methods: Classification and some extensions[M]//Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Switzerland: Springer, 2011, 265: 49-90.DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-17910-5_4
12 WANG Y M, LUO Y, LUI X W. Two new models for determining OWA operator weights[J]. Computer and Industrial Engineering, 2007,52(2): 203-209.DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2006.12.002
13 HAGAN M O. Aggregating template or rule antecedents in real-time expert systems with fuzzy set logic[C]//Twenty-Second Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers. Pacific Grove: IEEE,1998: 681-689. DOI:10.1109/acssc.1988.754637
14 FULLÉR R, MAJLENDER P. On obtaining minimal variability OWA operator weights[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003,136(2): 203-215. DOI:10.1016/s0165-0114(02)00267-1
15 WANG Y M, PARKAN C. A minimax disparity approach for obtaining OWA operator weights[J]. Information Sciences, 2005,175(1/2): 20-29.DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2004.09.003
16 LIU X. The solution equivalence of minimax disparity and minimum variance problems for OWA operators[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2007,45(1): 68-81. DOI:10.1016/j.ijar.2006.06.004
17 LIU X W. On the properties of equi different OWA operator[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2006,43(1): 90-107.DOI:10.1016/j.ijar.2005.11.003
18 EMROUZNEJAD A, AMIN G R. Improving minimax disparity model to determine the OWA operator weights[J]. Information Sciences, 2010, 180(8):1477-1485. DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2009.11.043
19 COOK W D, KRESS M. A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings[J]. Management Science, 1990, 36(11): 1302-1310.DOI:10.1287/mnsc.36.11.1302
20 赵萌,秦松松,谢佳恒,等.考虑决策者风险偏好的区间直觉模糊多属性群决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(1): 7-16. ZHAO M, QIN S S, XIE J H. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making considering risk preference of decision maker[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(1): 7-16.
[1] 刘卫锋, 常娟, 杜迎雪. 连续拟有序加权几何算子及其群决策应用[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 45(2): 180-187,195.