Please wait a minute...
Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science)  2026, Vol. 60 Issue (9): 1841-1850    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.09.001
    
Spatial-semantic hierarchical knowledge graph modeling for body-in-white datum design
Hongsheng FU1,2,3(),Yanlong CAO1,2,*(),Junding LUO3,Zongzheng ZHANG1,2,Tukun LI4,Fang HUANG1,2
1. State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2. Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Advanced Equipment Manufacturing and Measurement Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
3. NIO Automobile Technology (Anhui) Limited Company, Hefei 230061, China
4. School of Computing and Engineering, University of Huddersfield, West Yorkshire HD1 3DH, UK
Download: HTML     PDF(3100KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

A spatial–semantic hierarchical knowledge graph (SSH-KG) modeling method was proposed in order to address the problem of dispersed design knowledge and difficulty in fusing with geometric models in body-in-white datum design, which leads to low automation. A four-layer ontology model, “component–feature–point cloud–datum”, was constructed. A unified representation framework integrating spatial geometry and semantics information was established. Automated mapping and reasoning from semantic rule to spatial entity were achieved through formal axiomatic definition. Experimental studies on a B-pillar reinforcement, an A-pillar reinforcement and a sill beam were conducted. Results showed that the average topological relation coverage (evaluating knowledge representation completeness) was increased from 49% to 97.4%, and the average spatial-semantic alignment rate (measuring compliance of geometric entities with semantic rules) was improved from 48.2% to 98.3% compared with conventional manual design. A closed-loop, automated workflow that transformed rule into scheme was realized. The average number of design iterations per scheme decreased from 3.5 to 1, with the total design time reduced by approximately 83%. Ablation experiments confirmed that the point cloud discretization mechanism was critical for enhancing reasoning robustness and computational efficiency.



Key wordsbody-in-white      datum design      knowledge graph      spatial-semantic integration      point cloud      automated reasoning     
Received: 07 December 2025      Published: 20 July 2026
CLC:  TP 391  
Fund:  国家自然科学基金资助项目(52175520);国家重点研发计划资助项目(2023YFB3307202);浙江省“高层次人才特殊支持计划”科技创新领军人才项目(2022R52053).
Corresponding Authors: Yanlong CAO     E-mail: hongsheng.fu@nio.com;sdcaoyl@zju.edu.cn
Cite this article:

Hongsheng FU,Yanlong CAO,Junding LUO,Zongzheng ZHANG,Tukun LI,Fang HUANG. Spatial-semantic hierarchical knowledge graph modeling for body-in-white datum design. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(9): 1841-1850.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.09.001     OR     https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/Y2026/V60/I9/1841


白车身基准设计空间-语义分层知识图谱建模

针对白车身基准设计知识分散、难以与几何模型融合导致自动化程度低的问题,提出空间-语义分层知识图谱(SSH-KG)建模方法. 该方法构建“零件–特征–点云–基准”四层本体模型,形成空间与语义相融合的统一表示框架,通过形式化公理实现语义规则到空间实体的自动映射与推理. 以某车型B柱加强板、A柱加强板及门槛梁为案例进行实验. 结果表明,与传统人工设计相比,所提方法将知识表示完整性(平均拓扑关联覆盖率)从49%提升至97.4%,空间-语义一致性(平均对齐率)从48.2%提升至98.3%,实现了从规则到方案的闭环自动执行. 基准方案的平均迭代次数由3.5次降至1次,设计总时间缩短约83%. 消融实验验证了点云离散化机制对提升推理鲁棒性与计算效率的关键作用.


关键词: 白车身,  基准设计,  知识图谱,  空间-语义融合,  点云,  自动推理 
Fig.1 Example of spatial-semantic dual property in body-in-white datum design
方法类别典型代表/思路核心优势在基准设计中的局限本文方法的针对性改进
文档与孤立模型技术文档、独立CAD
模型
符合认知,
载体多样.
知识离散,几何与语义分离,
无法自动验证.
构建分层图谱,实现结构化集成与
关联推理.
通用本体/
知识图谱
基于Web本体语言
(OWL)的本体、
资源描述框架(RDF)三元组
语义关联能力强,
便于检索.
连续几何与空间关系表达弱;语义与
几何实体耦合弱,难支持计算.
拓展本体,引入点云层表征连续几何;
定义KRP作为空间-语义计算锚点.
基于STEP的
语义映射
STEP AP242 GD&T
至本体映射
实现标准化公差
信息语义提取.
侧重对已有标注的解释,而非方案生成;
缺乏工艺规则集成.
建立独立工艺规则库,通过KRP
驱动生成式推理.
分层表示模型“零件-特征-基准”
三层模型
层次清晰,
结构直观.
“特征-基准”层间关联缺失,
连续性几何上下文不足.
引入点云层提供几何上下文,基准点由
符合设计规则/工艺约束的KRP所确定.
Tab.1 Comparison of knowledge representation methods for datum design
Fig.2 Schematic diagram of key reference point
Fig.3 Interlayer mapping and knowledge evolution process in four-layer knowledge representation model
符号类别语义说明示例
${C} $概念类领域核心实体的抽象分类,是实体集$ {\boldsymbol{E}} $的类别化.零件、孔特征、点云、关键参考点
$ \boldsymbol{P} $属性集描述实例特征(空间/语义参数)的谓词集合,对应属性谓词.hasCoordinate,hasMaterialGrade, hasToleranceValue
$ \boldsymbol{R} $关系集定义实例间的逻辑与空间关联的谓词集合,是关系集$ {\boldsymbol{R}} $的元关系定义.isPartOf, isDerivedFrom, adjacentTo
$ {\boldsymbol{A}}^{\text{axiom}} $公理集形式化的领域规则与约束,是支持自动化推理的逻辑表达式集合.基准“2/3原则”
$ \boldsymbol{I} $实例集归属于特定概念的具体对象,是实体集$ E $的具体化.B柱加强板_001
Tab.2 Specification of BIW datum design ontology model
Fig.4 Construction framework of datum design ontology
Fig.5 Ontology concept system of spatial–semantic hierarchical knowledge graph
Fig.6 Schematic depiction of conceptual representation for spatial attribute of component
Fig.7 Datum positioning scheme for B-pillar reinforcement assembly
Fig.8 Schematic diagram (partial) of datum knowledge graph for B-pillar reinforcement assembly
Fig.9 Schematic diagram of typical body-in-white component
案例组别$ {R}_{{\rm{tr}}} $/%$ {A}_{{\rm{ss}}} $/%$ \overline{n} $$ \overline{t} $/h
B柱加强板传统人工组46.745.54.0~8.5
B柱加强板消融实验组71.565.82.8~3.8
B柱加强板本文方法组98.798.91.0~1.4
Sill梁传统人工组48.150.23.5~7.0
Sill梁消融实验组85.380.12.0~2.9
Sill梁本文方法组97.197.81.0~1.2
A柱加强板传统人工组52.348.83.0~6.5
A柱加强板消融实验组78.672.52.2~3.2
A柱加强板本文方法组96.598.31.0~1.3
Tab.3 Performance comparison result of multi-case datum design method
[1]   MASOUMI A, SHAHI V J Fixture layout optimization in multi-station sheet metal assembly considering assembly sequence and datum scheme[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 95 (9): 4629- 4643
[2]   SINGH K, BHISE A, KSHIRSAGAR S, et al Knowledge-based tool for assurance of car body dimensional quality in design[J]. SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing, 2022, 15 (4): 421- 432
doi: 10.4271/05-15-04-0027
[3]   CAMELIO J A, HU S J, CEGLAREK D Impact of fixture design on sheet metal assembly variation[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2004, 23 (3): 182- 193
doi: 10.1016/S0278-6125(05)00006-3
[4]   HUBHAM S, SAGAR L, RHUSHIKESH B, et al. Design, analysis and simulation of Body-in-White (BIW) fixture [J]. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2022, 1383-1391.
[5]   REZAEI A A, HALLMANN M, WÄRMEFJORD K, et al Integrated tolerance and fixture layout design for compliant sheet metal assemblies[J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11 (4): 1646
doi: 10.3390/app11041646
[6]   HALLMANN M, GOETZ S, SCHLEICH B Mapping of GD&T information and PMI between 3D product models in the STEP and STL format[J]. Computer-Aided Design, 2019, 115: 293- 306
doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2019.06.006
[7]   LI J, ZHOU G, ZHANG C A twin data and knowledge-driven intelligent process planning framework of aviation parts[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2021, 60 (17): 5217- 5234
doi: 10.1080/00207543.2021.1951869
[8]   DENG T, WANG T, WANG J, et al. Knowledge graph construction for automated automotive welding processes [C]// Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Manufacturing. Chengdu: IEEE, 2024: 39–45.
[9]   PENG G, WANG H, ZHANG H, et al A collaborative system for capturing and reusing in-context design knowledge with an integrated representation model[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2017, 33: 314- 329
doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2016.12.007
[10]   JIA J, ZHANG Y, SAAD M Knowledge graph–enabled tolerancing experience acquisition and reuse for tolerance specification[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2023, 129 (11): 5515- 5539
doi: 10.1007/s00170-023-12644-y
[11]   覃裕初. 基于本体的公差规范智能设计方法研究 [D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2017.
QIN Yuchu. Towards intelligent design of tolerance specifications: an ontology-based methodology [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2017.
[12]   黄劲, 黄美发, 江佳炜, 等 几何公差基准体系合理性检验的本体化方法研究[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2021, (9): 134- 139
HUANG Jing, HUANG Meifa, JIANG Jiawei, et al Study on ontology of rationality verification for geometric tolerance datum system[J]. Machinery Design and Manufacture, 2021, (9): 134- 139
[13]   SARIGECILI M I, ROY U, RACHURI S Interpreting the semantics of GD&T specifications of a product for tolerance analysis[J]. Computer-Aided Design, 2014, 47: 72- 84
doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2013.09.002
[14]   FU H, KONG C, CAO Y, et al A knowledge-graph based method for datum reference frame reasoning[J]. Procedia CIRP, 2024, 129: 7- 12
doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2024.10.003
[15]   裘科意. 基于STEP知识图谱的产品语义检索 [D]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2020.
QIU Keyi. Product semantic retrieval based on STEP knowledge graph [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University of Technology, 2020.
[16]   林崇. 基于STEP知识图谱的设计意图推理方法研究及应用 [D]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2019.
LIN Chong. Research and application of design intention reasoning method based on STEP knowledge graph [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University of Technology, 2019.
[17]   郭亮, 晏釜, 李湉, 等 基于知识图谱的工艺推理系统[J]. 现代制造工程, 2021, (10): 1- 10
GUO Liang, YAN Fu, LI Tian, et al Machining process reasoning system based on knowledge graph[J]. Modern Manufacturing Engineering, 2021, (10): 1- 10
[18]   高一聪, 吴栋, 密尚华, 等. 思维链增强的机电装备运维方案智能生成方法[J/OL]. 浙江大学学报: 工学版, 2026, 60(4): 1–13[2026-04-21]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/33.1245.T.20260211.1500.008.html.
GAO Yicong, WU Dong, MI Shanghua, et al. Intelligent generation method for electromechanical equipment operation and maintenance plans enhanced by chain-of-thought [J/OL]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2026, 60(4): 1–13[2026-04-21]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/33.1245.T.20260211.1500.008.html.
[19]   DING C, QIAO F, LIU J, et al Knowledge graph modeling method for product manufacturing process based on human–cyber–physical fusion[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2023, 58: 102183
doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2023.102183
[20]   LI Y, ZOU L. gBuilder: a scalable knowledge graph construction system for unstructured corpus [EB/OL]. [2025-11-20]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.09705.
[21]   冯超文, 耿程晨, 刘英莉 基于嵌入特征和稀疏矩阵的实体对齐方法[J]. 浙江大学学报: 工学版, 2026, 60 (2): 379- 387
FENG Chaowen, GENG Chengchen, LIU Yingli Entity alignment method based on embedding features and sparse matrices[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2026, 60 (2): 379- 387
[22]   SHI X, TIAN X, GU J, et al Knowledge graph-based assembly resource knowledge reuse towards complex product assembly process[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14 (23): 15541
doi: 10.3390/su142315541
[23]   孙学民, 刘世民, 申兴旺, 等 数字孪生驱动的高精密产品智能化装配方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2022, 28 (6): 1704- 1716
SUN Xuemin, LIU Shimin, SHEN Xingwang, et al Digital twin-driven intelligent assembly method for high precision products[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2022, 28 (6): 1704- 1716
doi: 10.13196/j.cims.2022.06.010
[24]   PELLISSIER T T, STEPANOVA D, RAZNIEWSKI S, et al. Completeness-aware rule learning from knowledge graphs [M]//The semantic Web–ISWC 2017. Cham: Springer, 2017: 507–525.
[25]   HE L, WANG S, HU Q, et al GFOICP: geometric feature optimized iterative closest point for 3-D point cloud registration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, 61: 5704217
doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2023.3317822
[26]   KIM E K, NAM Y J The comparative study on the methodologies of building ontology toward semantic web[J]. Journal of Information Management, 2004, 35 (2): 57- 85
doi: 10.1633/jim.2004.35.2.057
[27]   KONOPATSKIY E V, ROTKOV S I, LAGUNOVA M V, et al An approach to solid modeling of geometric objects in point calculus[J]. Ontology of Designing, 2025, 15 (1): 24- 33
doi: 10.18287/2223-9537-2025-15-1-24-33
[1] Aihua MAO,Siyu CHEN. 3D visual question answering guided by knowledge graph[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(8): 1801-1808.
[2] Shanglian PENG,Ying LOU,Li FENG. Incremental update method for knowledge graphs based on core entities and local subgraphs[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(8): 1809-1818.
[3] Yicong GAO,Dong WU,Shanghua MI,Hao ZHENG,Jianrong TAN. Chain-of-Thought enhanced intelligent generation method of electromechanical equipment operation and maintenance schemes[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(7): 1515-1527.
[4] Jiazhou CHEN,Xiaohang ZHU,Yanghui XU,Yin GAO,Yihui LU,Zhen MAO,Shenglong LI,Chaoquan ZHANG. Lightweight surface reconstruction method for building point clouds based on deep Hough voting[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(2): 341-350.
[5] Chaowen FENG,Chengchen GENG,Yingli LIU. Entity alignment method based on embedding features and sparse matrices[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(2): 379-387.
[6] Tao XIE,Huili GE,Ning CHEN,Xiaofeng WANG,Yansong LI,Xiaofeng HUANG. Knowledge embedding-enhanced contrastive recommendation model[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(1): 90-98.
[7] Jingyi HU,Shaowei CUI,Shaolin ZHANG,Shuo WANG. A novel curved palm visuotactile sensor[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2025, 59(6): 1103-1109.
[8] Zongmin LI,Chang XU,Yun BAI,Shiyang XIAN,Guangcai RONG. Dual-neighborhood graph convolution method for point cloud understanding[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2025, 59(5): 879-889.
[9] Yueqiao HOU,Chengyan WANG,Siran HUAI,Yonghang LI,Jialin CHEN,Dapeng TAN. Multi-hole repair method for unordered point cloud models[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2025, 59(10): 2045-2055.
[10] Zhongliang LI,Qi CHEN,Lin SHI,Chao YANG,Xianming ZOU. Dynamic knowledge graph completion of temporal aware combination[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2024, 58(8): 1738-1747.
[11] Jinye LI,Yongqiang LI. Spatial-temporal multi-graph convolution for traffic flow prediction by integrating knowledge graphs[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2024, 58(7): 1366-1376.
[12] Jun YANG,Chen ZHANG. Semantic segmentation of 3D point cloud based on boundary point estimation and sparse convolution neural network[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2024, 58(6): 1121-1132.
[13] Zhiwei XING,Shujie ZHU,Biao LI. Airline baggage feature perception based on improved graph convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2024, 58(5): 941-950.
[14] Yongxi HE,Hu HAN,Bo KONG. Aspect-based sentiment analysis model based on multi-dependency graph and knowledge fusion[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2024, 58(4): 737-747.
[15] Song LI,Zhe WANG,Liping ZHANG. SL-tgStore: new temporal knowledge graph storage model[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2024, 58(3): 449-458.