Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2019, Vol. 53 Issue (3): 563-570    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2019.03.018
计算机技术     
感知数据错误化攻击下分布式检测的性能分析
郑晓雁(),陈惠芳*(),谢磊
浙江大学 信息与电子工程学院，浙江 杭州 310027
Performance analysis of distributed detection under sensing data falsification attack
Xiao-yan ZHENG(),Hui-fang CHEN*(),Lei XIE
College of Information Science and Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
 全文: PDF(970 KB)   HTML
摘要：

针对分布式检测的安全问题，研究分布式检测中感知数据错误化（SDF）攻击及其对检测性能造成的影响. 定义一种概率型翻转攻击模型描述攻击者篡改初始感知数据的恶意行为. 以检测概率、虚警概率和错误概率为性能指标，推导在所提出的攻击模型下分布式系统检测性能的闭合表达式，进而分析SDF攻击下分布式检测系统的稳态性能和瞬态性能. 以偏移系数为目标函数，推导使分布式检测失效的盲化条件，即分布式系统无法检测出目标的真实状态时所对应的恶意节点攻击策略. 仿真结果表明：SDF攻击会恶化系统检测性能，且不同攻击参数会对检测性能造成不同程度的影响.
关键词： 分布式检测;  安全;  感知数据错误化（SDF）攻击;  一致性算法;  偏移系数    
Abstract:

The performance of distributed detection in the presence of sensing data falsification (SDF) attack was studied for the security problem of distributed detection. A probabilistic inverse SDF attack model was defined to characterize the malicious behavior falsifying initial sensing data. Taking the detection probability, false-alarm probability and error probability as the performance metrics, closed-form performance expressions for consensus-based distributed detection with defined SDF attack model were derived, and the steady-state and transient-state performance of distributed detection under SDF attack was analyzed. Using the deflection coefficient as objective function, the blind condition was deduced, which is the attack strategy of malicious nodes to make distributed detection system invalid. Simulation results show that the system performance degradation is caused by the SDF attack and different attack parameters have effect on the performance of consensus-based distributed detection.
Key words: distributed detection    security    sensing data falsification (SDF) attack    consensus algorithm    deflection coefficient
收稿日期: 2018-03-17 出版日期: 2019-03-04
CLC:  TN 92  
通讯作者: 陈惠芳     E-mail: 21631151@zju.edu.cn;chenhf@zju.edu.cn
作者简介: 郑晓雁（1993-），女，硕士生，从事分布式信息处理中安全问题研究. orcid.org/0000-0001-9140-1739. E-mail： 21631151@zju.edu.cn
服务　　
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章　　
郑晓雁
陈惠芳
谢磊

引用本文:

郑晓雁,陈惠芳,谢磊. 感知数据错误化攻击下分布式检测的性能分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(3): 563-570.

Xiao-yan ZHENG,Hui-fang CHEN,Lei XIE. Performance analysis of distributed detection under sensing data falsification attack. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2019, 53(3): 563-570.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2019.03.018    或    http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2019/V53/I3/563

图 1  分布式检测系统示意图
图 2  不同攻击参数对偏移系数的影响
图 3  不同攻击参数对错误概率的影响
图 4  不同攻击参数下的受试者工作特性（ROC）曲线
图 5  无攻击时检测概率和虚警概率随迭代次数变化关系
图 6  有攻击时检测概率和虚警概率随迭代次数变化关系
1 KAILKHURA B, HAN Y S, BRAHMA S, et al Distributed Bayesian detection in the presence of Byzantine Data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2015, 63 (19): 5250- 5263
doi: 10.1109/TSP.2015.2450191
2 STANKOVIC S S, ILIC N, STANKOVIC M S, et al Distributed change detection based on a consensus algorithm[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2011, 59 (12): 5686- 5697
doi: 10.1109/TSP.2011.2168219
3 孙小静. 无线传感器网络中分布式检测的相关问题研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2017.
SUN Xiao-jing. Some issues on distributed detection in wireless sensor network [D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2017.
4 LI Z, YU F R, HUANG M A distributed consensus-based cooperative spectrum-sensing scheme in cognitive radios[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2010, 59 (1): 383- 393
doi: 10.1109/TVT.2009.2031181
5 ZHANG W, WANG Z, GUO Y, et al. Distributed cooperative spectrum sensing based on weighted average consensus [C] // IEEE GLOBECOM. Houston: IEEE, 2011: 1–6.
6 ALONSO-ROMAN D, BEFERULL-LOZANO B. Adaptive consensus-based distributed detection in WSN with unreliable links [C] // IEEE ICASSP. Shanghai: IEEE, 2016: 4438–4442.
7 GUO J, ROGERS U, LI X, et al Secrecy constrained distributed detection in sensor networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 2018, 4 (2): 378- 391
doi: 10.1109/TSIPN.2017.2705479
8 ZHANG W, GUO Y, LIU H, et al Distributed consensus-based weight design for cooperative spectrum sensing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2015, 26 (1): 54- 64
doi: 10.1109/TPDS.2014.2307951
9 LIU S, ZHU H, LI S, et al. An adaptive deviation-tolerant secure scheme for distributed cooperative spectrum sensing [C] // IEEE GLOBECOM. Anaheim: IEEE, 2012: 603–608.
10 SADREAZAMI H, MOHAMMADI A, ASIF A, et al Distributed graph-based statistical approach for intrusion detection in cyber-physical systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 2018, 4 (1): 137- 147
doi: 10.1109/TSIPN.2017.2749976
11 KAILKHURA B, BRAHMA S, VARSHNEY P K Data falsification attacks on consensus-based detection systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 2017, 3 (1): 145- 158
doi: 10.1109/TSIPN.2016.2607119
12 米士超. 基于无线传感器网络的分布式估计及安全机制设计[D] 上海: 上海交通大学, 2015.
MI Shi-chao. Distributed estimation and security mechanism for wireless sensor networks [D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2015.
13 YAN Q, LI M, JIANG T, et al. Vulnerability and protection for distributed consensus-based spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks [C] // IEEE INFOCOM. Orlando: IEEE, 2012: 900–908.
14 VOSOUGHI A, CAVALLARO J R, MARSHALL A Trust-aware consensus-inspired distributed cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radio ad hoc networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 2016, 2 (1): 24- 37
doi: 10.1109/TCCN.2016.2584080
15 GENTZ R, WU S X, WAI H T, et al Data injection attacks in randomized gossiping[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 2016, 2 (4): 523- 538
16 ZHAO C, HE J, CHEN J Resilient consensus with mobile detectors against malicious attacks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 2018, 4 (1): 60- 69
doi: 10.1109/TSIPN.2017.2742859
17 WANG P, CHEN C, ZHU S, et al. An optimal reputation-based detection against SSDF attacks in industrial cognitive radio network [C] // IEEE ICCA. Ohrid: IEEE, 2017: 729–734.
18 FENG H, LIANG L, LEI H Distributed outlier detection algorithm based on credibility feedback in wireless sensor networks[J]. IET Communications, 2017, 11 (8): 1291- 1296
doi: 10.1049/iet-com.2016.0986
19 周明. 认知无线电网络合作频谱感知中的SSDF攻击及其防御机制[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2016.
ZHOU Ming. SSDF attack and defense strategies in cooperative spectrum sensing of cognitive radio networks [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2016.
[1] 张琦,陈红,周继彪,张敏,郭璘,杨仁法. 道路开口对临近交叉口交通安全的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(4): 720-726.
[2] 朱斌,蒋楠,周传波,贾永胜,罗学东,吴廷尧. 粉质黏土层直埋铸铁管道爆破地震效应[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(3): 500-510.
[3] 李冬,鲁喻,于俊清. 软件定义网络中源地址验证绑定表安全[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(8): 1543-1549.
[4] 王龙,余隋怀,初建杰. 基于眼动分析的车内信息显示位置设计[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(4): 671-677.
[5] 余亚波,邓亚东. 燃料电池客车高压舱氢气泄漏扩散[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(2): 381-388.
[6] 李智靖,叶锦华,吴海彬. 基于卷积力矩观测器与摩擦补偿的机器人碰撞检测[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(3): 427-434.
[7] 柯懂湘,潘丽敏,罗森林,张寒青. 基于随机森林算法的Android恶意行为识别与分类方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(10): 2013-2023.
[8] 吴柯娴, 金伟良, 夏晋. 荷载分项系数调整对砌体结构设计的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(10): 1901-1910.
[9] 陆源源, 王慧, 宋春跃. 考虑列车混行的运行调度一体化优化方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(1): 106-116.
[10] 李显生, 孟凡淞, 郑雪莲, 任园园, 严佳晖. 交通冲突类型对驾驶人生理特性的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(9): 1720-1726.
[11] 欧祖敏, 孙璐. 冻融损伤混凝土的弯曲疲劳寿命可靠性分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(6): 1074-1081.
[12] 游录金, 卢兴见, 何高奇. 云环境亚健康研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(6): 1181-1189.
[13] 李晓东, 祝跃飞, 刘胜利, 肖睿卿. 基于权限的Android应用程序安全审计方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(3): 590-597.
[14] 付宏勋, 赵又群, 林棻, 杜现斌, 倪新伟. 机械弹性车轮稳态侧偏特性的理论与试验分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(2): 344-349.
[15] 季学斌, 王慧, 宋春跃. 基于元胞自动机的施工场内交通流建模及安全分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(10): 2005-2011.