Please wait a minute...
JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE)
    
Comparison of solutions from different displacement boundary conditions at fixed end of cantilever beams
YANG Lian-zhi1,2, ZHANG Liang-liang2,3, YU Lian-ying2, SHANG Lan-ge2, GAO Yang2, WANG Min-zhong4
1. Civil and Environmental Engineering School, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. College of Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China; 3. College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China; 4. Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Download:   PDF(702KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

To obtain the influence of different displacement boundary conditions for the fixed end on analytical solutions of a cantilever beam, three load cases for a cantilever beam were investigated, which were a transverse shear force at the free end, a uniformly distributed load at the top surface, and a linearly distributed load at the top surface, respectively. Analytical solutions were given for Levinson theory, Timoshenko theory, and the elastic theory by using the conventional displacement boundary condition and the boundary condition through least squares method at the fixed end of the beam, and were compared with the solutions by  finite element method. It is shown that the solutions from Timoshenko theory by using both the conventional displacement boundary condition and the condition through least squares method are the same; Levinson theory and the elastic theory by using the boundary condition through least squares method provide better results than those by using the conventional boundary condition. With an increase in the order of the load, the superiority becomes more and more obvious.



Published: 01 November 2014
CLC:  TU 391  
  TU 392  
Cite this article:

YANG Lian-zhi, ZHANG Liang-liang, YU Lian-ying, SHANG Lan-ge, GAO Yang, WANG Min-zhong. Comparison of solutions from different displacement boundary conditions at fixed end of cantilever beams. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2014, 48(11): 1955-1961.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2014.11.007     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/Y2014/V48/I11/1955


悬臂梁固定端不同位移边界条件下解的对比

为了获得不同的悬臂梁固定端位移边界处理方式对结果的影响,针对悬臂梁承受3种载荷的情况:自由端受切向力,上表面受均布载荷和线性分布载荷,给出悬臂梁固定端利用传统边界条件和最小二乘法处理边界时,Timoshenko梁理论、Levinson梁理论和弹性力学理论的解析解,与有限元计算结果对比.结果表明,Timoshenko梁理论采用传统位移边界和最小二乘法处理边界的结果一致,采用最小二乘法处理边界获得的Levinson梁理论和弹性力学理论的解明显优于传统位移确定方法,且这种优势随着载荷阶次的增加而越加明显.

1] WANG C M, REDDY J N. Shear deformable beams and plates relations wiht classical solutions [M]. New York: Elsevier, 2000: 117.
[2] TIMOSHENKO S P. On the correction for shear of the differential equation for transverse vibration of prismatic bars \[J\]. Philosophical Magazine Series 6, 1921, 41: 744-746.
[3] LEVINSON M. A new rectangular beam theory [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1981, 74(1): 81-87.
[4] TIMOSHENKO S P, GOODIER J C. Theory of elasticity [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970: 44-45.
[5] GERE J M, Goodno B J. Mechanics of Materials (8th edition) [M]. USA: Cengage Learning, 2012: 730-735.
[6] 于涛, 仲政. 均布载荷作用下功能梯度悬臂梁弯曲问题的解析解[J].固体力学学报, 2006, 27(1): 15-20.
YU Tao, ZHONG Zheng. A general solution of a clamped functionally graded cantilever-beam under uniform loading [J]. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2006, 27(1): 15-20.
[7] 杨永波, 石志飞, 陈盈. 线性分布载荷作用下梯度功能压电悬臂梁的解[J]. 力学学报, 2004, 36(3): 305-310.
YANG Yong-bo, SHI Zhi-fei, CHEN Ying. Piezoelectric cantilever actuator subjected to a linearly distributed loading [J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2004, 36(3): 305-310.
[8] SHI Zhi-Fei, CHEN Ying. Functionally graded piezoelectric cantilever beam [J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 2004, 74: 237-247.
[9] HUANG De-jin, DING Hao-Jiang, CHEN Wei-Qiu. Analysis of functionally graded and laminated piezoelectric cantilever actuators subjected to constant voltage[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2008, 17: 065002.
[10] 王敏中. 关于“平面弹性悬臂梁剪切挠度问题[J]. 力学与实践,2004,26(6):66-68.
WANG Min-zhong. About “Problems on the shear deflection of a planer elastic cantilever beam” [J]. Mechanics in Engineering, 2004, 26(6): 66-68.
[11] 黄文彬.平面弹性悬臂梁剪切挠度问题[J].力学与实践,1997,19(2): 61-62.
HUANG Wen-bin. Problems on the shear deflection of a planer elastic cantilever beam [J]. Mechanics in Engineering, 1997, 19(2): 61-62.
[12] 黄文彬.平面弹性悬臂梁剪切挠度的进一步研究[J].力学与实践, 1998, 20(5): 65.
HUANG Wen-bin. Further study on the shear deflection of a planer elastic cantilever beam [J] . Mechanics in Engineering, 1998, 20(5):65.
[13] 唐玉花,王鑫伟.关于“平面弹性悬臂梁剪切挠度问题”的进一步研究[J].力学与实践,2008,30:97-99.
TANG Yu-hua, WANG Xin-wei. Further study on “Problems on the shear deflection of a planer elastic cantilever” [J]. Mechanics in Engineering, 2008, 30: 97-99.
[14] COWPER G R. The shear coefficients in Timoshenkos beam theory [J]. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1966, 33: 335-340.

[1] YANG Zhang, TONG Gen shu, ZHANG Lei. Effective Rigidity of two one-side stiffeners arranged symmetrically[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2016, 50(8): 1446-1455.
[2] XIANG Yang, LUO Yong feng, LIAO Bing, SHEN Zu yan. Correlation between seismic input and modal response of spherical latticed shell[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2016, 50(6): 1040-1047.
[3] OUYANG Dan dan, FU Bo,TONG Gen shu. Ductility grading of rectangular steel tube section and width thickness ratio correlation[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2016, 50(2): 271-281.
[4] TONG Gen shu, YANG Zhang, ZHANG Lei. Effective rigidity of one side stiffeners in Steel Shear Walls[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2015, 49(11): 2151-2158.
[5] WANG Jiao-jiao, SHI Yong-jiu, WANG Yuan-qing, PAN Peng, MAKINO Toshio, QI Xue. Experimental study on low yield point steel LYP100 under cyclic loading[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2015, 49(8): 1401-1409.
[6] LU Jin-yu, TANG Yi, SHU Gan-ping, WANG Heng-hua. Hysteretic behavior of steel plate shear wall with slits of unequal length[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2014, 48(11): 1968-1975.
[7] CHENG Hua-qiang, LUO Yao-zhi, XU Xian. Nonlinear force control of adaptive beam sting structure[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2014, 48(7): 1155-1161.
[8] ZHANG Lei, LUO Gui-fa, TONG Gen-shu. Refined study on lateral-force resistance of dual structural system composed of moment-resisting frame and chevron braces[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2013, 47(10): 1815-1823.
[9] XIAO Nan, WANG Hai, CHEN Hua-peng, ZHANG Fei-lin. Symptom-based reliability and lifetime prediction for latticed structures under atmospheric corrosion[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2013, 47(8): 1373-1378.
[10] WANG Zhen-yu, ZHANG Jin-fan, FANG Cheng, LIU Guo-hua,JIANG Jian-qun. Study on the component-based model of semi-rigid
beam-to-column joints initial stiffness
[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2012, 46(11): 1998-2006.
[11] ZHANG Lei, TONG Gen-shu. Finite element modelling of thin-walled members
in overall stability analysis
[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2011, 45(3): 531-538.
[12] JIN Yang, TONG Gen-Shu. Elastic buckling of web restrained by flanges in I-section members[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2009, 43(10): 1883-1891.