Please wait a minute...
J4  2012, Vol. 46 Issue (12): 2243-2251    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2012.12.016
    
A design process model of integrated morphological matrix and
conflict resolving principles
LIU Xi-ze1, QI Guo-ning1, FU Jian-zhong1, FAN Bei-bei1, XU Jing2
1. Institute of Modern Manufacturing Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China;
2. College of Engineering, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
Download:   PDF(0KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Based on the temporal correlation and function complement between morphological methods and theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ) on generating and analyzing the principle solutions in product design process, a doublematrix integrated model which combined morphological matrix and conflict resolving principles was proposed. The model system consists of concept model, process model and relation model which build models from approach idea, design process and relations between methods respectively, and follows a topdown spiral design approach. Based on the background of systematic design approach, the applicable scope of morphological analysis is extended to concept level by the model, and the combination capability of principle solutions can be analyzed, so that the coupling problems can be found in the early front-end of design process; the conflict resolving principles ars used on generating solutions and solving design decoupling in order to ensure the continuity of the design process and the creativity of the results. Taking the innovative development process of a hand driller as an example, the application process of the double-matrix on new product design and the implementation of the nested sub-cycle on variant design were validated, and the flexibility and operability of the model when facing deferent designing problems were proved.



Published: 01 December 2012
CLC:  TH 122  
Cite this article:

LIU Xi-ze, QI Guo-ning, FU Jian-zhong, FAN Bei-bei, XU Jing. A design process model of integrated morphological matrix and
conflict resolving principles. J4, 2012, 46(12): 2243-2251.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2012.12.016     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/Y2012/V46/I12/2243


集成形态学矩阵与冲突解决原理的设计过程模型

基于发明问题解决理论(TRIZ)和形态学方法在产品设计原理求解中具有的时序相关性与功能互补性,提出集成形态学矩阵和TRIZ冲突解决原理的设计过程模型.该模型体系包括概念模型、流程模型以及关联模型,分别从过程理念、设计流程、方法关联三方面进行了建模,遵循螺旋式自顶向下的设计特征.以系统设计方法为背景,将形态学分析的适用范围拓展到概念层,展开原理解的组合性分析,使得在设计前端即可发现耦合问题;将冲突解决原理在原理解的产生与设计解耦两方面进行综合应用,以保证设计过程的连贯性与设计结果的创新性.以手持电钻的创新研发过程为例,验证了面向新设计的双矩阵应用过程以及面向变型设计的嵌套子循环实现过程,证明了该模型及方法在针对不同设计问题时的灵活性与可操作性.

[1] PAHL G, BEITZ W. Engineering design— a systematic approach [M]. 3rd ed. Wallace K translation. Berlin: SpringerVerlag, 2007.
[2] CROSS N. Engineering design methods [M]. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2000.
[3] SUH N. Axiomatic design—advances and applications[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
[4] ULLRICH KT, EPPINGER S D.Product design and development[M]. 2nd ed. Michigan: McGrawHill, 2000.
[5] 冯培恩.基于产品基因的概念设计[J]. 机械工程学报,2002,38(10): 1-6.
 FENG Peien. Product gene based conceptual design[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2002, 38(10): 1-6.
[6] 马军,祁国宁,樊蓓蓓.基于本体的零件资源通用分类技术[J]. 机械工程学报, 2010,46(9): 150-158.
MA Jun, QI Guoning, FAN Beibei. Parts resource general classification technology based on ontology[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2010, 46(9): 150-158.
[7] 马力辉,檀润华.发明问题解决理论解到领域解的转化方法研究[J]. 计算机集成制造系统,2008, 14(10): 1873-1888.
MA Lihui, TAN Runhua. Transferring method from TRIZ solutions to domain solutions[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2008, 14(10): 1873-1888.
[8] ROSA F, ROVIDA E, VIGANO R, Proposal of integration of some methods to develop industrial products[C]∥2007 conference of Product Lifecycle Management: Assessing The Industrial Relevance. \
[S.l.\]: \
[s.n.\], 2007: 547-557.
[9] ZWICKY F, The morphological method of analysis and construction[M]. New York: Interscience Publisher, 1948: 461-470.

[10] WANG C S, WANG W H A, CHANG T R. Integrated design structure system for modular design in products development[C]∥2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. \
[S.l.\]: IEEE, 2009: 1121-1125.
[11] ALTSHULLER G, The innovation algorithm, TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity[M]. INC, Worcester: Technical Innovation Center, 2007.
[12] CINZIA Battistella, De TONI Alberto F. A methodology of technological foresight: a proposal and field study[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2011: 78(6): 10291048.[13] 马建红,李娟,檀润华.计算机辅助创新设计系统IventionTool 3.0开发[J]. 河北工业大学学报,2004,33(4): 1-6.
MA Jianhong, LI Juan, TAN Runhua. Development of a computer aided inventive problem solving systemInvention tool 3.0[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Technology, 2004, 33(4): 1-6.
[14] SIMPSON Timothy W, SIDDIQUE Zahed, JIAO Jianxin. Product platform and product family design: methods and applications[M]. Berlin: Birkhuser, 2006.

[1] LIU Zheng, GU Xin-jian, PAN Kai, YANG Qing-hai. Research on TRIZ-based product eco-design
——Integrating rule-based reasoning and case-based reasoning
[J]. J4, 2014, 48(3): 436-444.
[2] YANG Wei, ZHANG Xiu-feng, YANG Can-jun, WU Hai-jie. Design of a lower extremity exoskeleton
based on 5-bar human machine model
[J]. J4, 2014, 48(3): 430-435.
[3] JI Xiang, GU Xin-jian, DAI Feng, LIU Zheng. BioTRIZ-based product innovative design process[J]. J4, 2014, 48(1): 35-41.
[4] LIN Xiao-hua, FENG Yi-xiong, TAN Jian-rong. Intervals prediction of system reliability parameters based on immune optimization[J]. J4, 2013, 47(6): 1013-1021.
[5] YING Zheng, WANG Qing, LI Jiang-xiong, KE Ying-lin,SUN Wen-bo,HAN Yong-wei. Motion data integration and monitoring of digital assembly system of aircraft[J]. J4, 2013, 47(5): 761-767.
[6] YING Zheng, ZHANG Ming, WANG Qing, KE Ying-lin. Modeling and simulation of wear for alignment mechanism of
large aircraft component
[J]. J4, 2013, 47(2): 209-215.
[7] HUANG Xue-mei, ZHANG Lei-an, WEI Xiu-ting. D-MFAC algorithm control of megawatt wind turbine
blade static loading process
[J]. J4, 2012, 46(12): 2280-2284.
[8] . Constraint model and calculating method by evolutionary game algorithm for product conceptual design[J]. J4, 2012, 46(3): 533-541.
[9] LUO Cheng-dui, FENG Yi-xiong, TAN Jian-rong, AN Xiang-hua. Group multicriteria solving for product design scheme based on semantic PROMETHEE[J]. J4, 2012, 46(3): 524-532.
[10] AN Xiang-hua, FENG Yi-xiong, TAN Jian-rong. Collaborative evaluation method for product concept based on
Choquet integral and evidence theory
[J]. J4, 2012, 46(1): 163-169.
[11] MA Zhi-yong, QIU Qing-ying, FENG Pei-en, SHEN Men-hong, ZENG Ling-bin. Concept system and application method of mechanical symmetry[J]. J4, 2010, 44(12): 2354-2359.
[12] ZHANG Xiu-Fen, ZHANG Shu-Wei, YI Guo-Dong. Multi-granularity and hierarchy disassemblability evaluation model
and methodology for products
[J]. J4, 2010, 44(3): 581-588.
[13] JIANG Wei-Guang, WU Jian-Wei, TUN Can, et al. Ontology based product knowledge integration[J]. J4, 2009, 43(10): 1801-1807.
[14] LIU Hai-Jiang, JI Yang-Jian, QI Guo-Ning, et al. Product integrated design knowledge model supporting multidisciplinary design optimization[J]. J4, 2009, 43(10): 1841-1847.
[15] FU Yu-Ying, BO Xiao-Hong, WANG Zheng-Xiao. Supply chain multiobjective optimization based on fuzzy cooperative game[J]. J4, 2009, 43(09): 1644-1648.