Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)
J4  2012, Vol. 46 Issue (3): 524-532    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2012.03.022
    
Group multicriteria solving for product design scheme based on semantic PROMETHEE
LUO Cheng-dui, FENG Yi-xiong, TAN Jian-rong, AN Xiang-hua
State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Download:   PDF(0KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

 A design scheme solving support method based on semantic PROMETHEE was proposed to give due considerations to the preference characteristics of decision makers and avoid distortion of fuzzy decision information in the process of product design scheme evaluation and selection.  Weight preference function and semantic preference function which measuring the preference of decision makers were defined to improve the limitations of preference function of traditional PROMETHEE method in both type selection and data processing. Through different semantic translation models, the multi-granularity natural semantic hybrid decision information including single type and interval type was translated into equivalent two-tuple type which was taken as fidelity information input for semantic preference function. Then, the basic principle of semantic PROMETHEE method was applied to product design scheme group multi-criteria solving. Finally, a case study of parking system scheme selection was presented to demonstrate the feasibility and validity of this method．

Published: 01 March 2012
CLC:  TH 122  
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cite this article:

LUO Cheng-dui, FENG Yi-xiong, TAN Jian-rong, AN Xiang-hua. Group multicriteria solving for product design scheme based on semantic PROMETHEE. J4, 2012, 46(3): 524-532.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2012.03.022     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/Y2012/V46/I3/524


基于语义PROMETHEE的产品设计方案群体多准则求解

 为了使产品设计方案评价和决策过程充分考虑决策者偏好特征,并避免模糊决策信息的失真,提出基于语义PROMETHEE的设计方案求解支持方法.定义了度量决策者偏好程度的权偏好函数和语义偏好函数,分别改进了传统PROMETHEE方法偏好函数在选型和数据处理上的局限性.对单一类型和区间类型的多粒度自然语义混合决策信息采用不同的语义变换模式,均转化为等效的二元语义类型作为语义偏好函数的保真信息输入.在此基础上,运用语义PROMETHEE方法的基本原理进行产品设计方案群体多准则求解.以停车设备的方案优选为例验证了本方法的可行性.

［1］ 杨明顺, 李言, 林志航. 产品总体设计方案评价与优选的组合决策［J］.计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(4):540-545．
YANG Ming-shun, LI Yan, LIN Zhi-hang. Combinatorial decision-making on product outline schemes evaluation & optimum selection ［J］.Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2006, 12(4):540-545．
［2］ 钟诗胜, 王体春, 丁刚. 基于多指标灰区间数关联决策模型的产品方案设计［J］.控制与决策,2008,23(12):1378-1382．
ZHONG Shi-sheng, WANG Ti-chun, DING Gang. Mechanism scheme design based on multi-attribute gray interval relevant optimized decision-making model ［J］. Control and Decision, 2008, 23(12):1378-1382．
［3］ GENG Xiu-li, CHU Xue-ning, ZHANG Zai-fang. A new integrated design concept evaluation approach based on vague sets ［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(9):6629-6638．
［4］ 古莹奎, 杨振宇. 概念设计方案评价的模糊多准则决策模型［J］.计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(8):1504-1510．
GU Ying-kui, YANG Zhen-yu. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for conceptual design candidates evaluation ［J］. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2007, 13(8):1504-1510．
［5］ 刘开第, 赵奇, 周少玲,等. 机械产品方案设计模糊综合评价中隶属度转换的新方法［J］.机械工程学报,2009, 45 (12):162-166．
LIU Kai-di, ZHAO Qi, ZHOU Shao-ling, et al. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for conceptual design of mechanic product based on new membership conversion ［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 45 (12):162-166．
［6］ 方辉, 谭建荣, 殷国富,等. 基于改进不确定语言多属性决策的设计方法评价［J］.计算机集成制造系统,2009,15(7):1257-1261．
FANG Hui, TAN Jian-rong, YIN Guo-fu, et al. Design scheme evaluation based on improved uncertain-language multi-attribute decision making method ［J］. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2009, 15(7):1257-1261．
［7］ LIAN Yin-zhai, LI P K, ZHAO Wei-zhong. Design concept evaluation in product development using rough sets and grey relation analysis ［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(3):7072-7079．
［8］ BRANS J P, VINCKE P, MARESCHAL B. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method ［J］.European Journal of Operational Research, 1986, 24(2):228-238．
［9］ BRANS J P, VINCKE P. A preference ranking organisation method: the PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decisionmaking ［J］. Management Science, 1985, 31(6):647-656．
［10］ GOUMAS M, LYGEROU V. An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects ［J］.European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 123(3):606-613．
［11］ LI Wei-xiang, LI Bang-yi. An extension of the PROMETHEE Ⅱmethod based on generalized fuzzy numbers ［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(7):5314-5319．
［12］ 高阳, 唐新平, 周向红. 基于PROMETHEE的群体多准则模糊规划方法［J］.系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(2):205-208．
GAO Yang, TANG Xin-ping, ZHOU Xiang-hong. Fuzzy programming of group multi-criteria decision making method based on PROMETHEE ［J］. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2007, 29(2):205-208．
［13］ HERRERA F, MARTINEZ L. A 2tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words ［J］. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8(6):746-752．
［14］ HERRERA F, MARTINEZ L, SANCHEZ P J. Managing nonhomogeneous information in group decision making ［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 166(1):115-132．
［15］ 李朝玲, 高齐圣. 质量功能展开中基于二元语义的顾客需求重要度的确定［J］.计算机集成制造系统,2009,15(6):1202-1206．
LI Zhao-ling, GAO Qi-sheng. Importance of customer requirements in quality function deployment based on two-tuple linguistic ［J］. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2009, 15(6):1202-1206．
［16］ YEH Duen-yian, CHENG Ching-hsue, CHI Mei-lin. A modified two-tuple FLC model for evaluating the performance of SCM: By the six sigma DMAIC process［J］. Applied Soft Computing, 2007,7(3):1027-1034．
［17］ WEI Gui-wu. A method for multiple attribute group decision making based on the ET-WG and ET-OWG operators with 2tuple linguistic information ［J］. Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37(12):7895-7900．
［18］ HALOUANI N, CHABCHOUB H, MARTEL J M. PROMETHEE-MD-2T method for project selection ［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 195(3):841-849．
［19］ 李浒, 岳超源. PROMETHEE Ⅱ法的变形方法及一类优先函数［J］.系统工程,1999,17(5):13-16．
LI Hu, YUE Chaoyuan. The alternative method of PROMETHEE Ⅱ and a kind of preference function［J］. Systems Engineering, 1999, 17(5):13-16．
［20］ LARRY E S, RICHARD R J, RONALD L T, et al.Determining attribute weights using mathematical programming ［J］. The International Journal of Management Science, 2003, 31(6):423-437．
[1] LIU Zheng, GU Xin-jian, PAN Kai, YANG Qing-hai. Research on TRIZ-based product eco-design
——Integrating rule-based reasoning and case-based reasoning[J]. J4, 2014, 48(3): 436-444.
[2] YANG Wei, ZHANG Xiu-feng, YANG Can-jun, WU Hai-jie. Design of a lower extremity exoskeleton
based on 5-bar human machine model[J]. J4, 2014, 48(3): 430-435.
[3] JI Xiang, GU Xin-jian, DAI Feng, LIU Zheng. BioTRIZ-based product innovative design process[J]. J4, 2014, 48(1): 35-41.
[4] LIN Xiao-hua, FENG Yi-xiong, TAN Jian-rong. Intervals prediction of system reliability parameters based on immune optimization[J]. J4, 2013, 47(6): 1013-1021.
[5] YING Zheng, WANG Qing, LI Jiang-xiong, KE Ying-lin,SUN Wen-bo,HAN Yong-wei. Motion data integration and monitoring of digital assembly system of aircraft[J]. J4, 2013, 47(5): 761-767.
[6] YING Zheng, ZHANG Ming, WANG Qing, KE Ying-lin. Modeling and simulation of wear for alignment mechanism of
large aircraft component[J]. J4, 2013, 47(2): 209-215.
[7] LIU Xi-ze, QI Guo-ning, FU Jian-zhong, FAN Bei-bei, XU Jing. A design process model of integrated morphological matrix and
conflict resolving principles[J]. J4, 2012, 46(12): 2243-2251.
[8] HUANG Xue-mei, ZHANG Lei-an, WEI Xiu-ting. D-MFAC algorithm control of megawatt wind turbine
blade static loading process[J]. J4, 2012, 46(12): 2280-2284.
[9] . Constraint model and calculating method by evolutionary game algorithm for product conceptual design[J]. J4, 2012, 46(3): 533-541.
[10] AN Xiang-hua, FENG Yi-xiong, TAN Jian-rong. Collaborative evaluation method for product concept based on
Choquet integral and evidence theory[J]. J4, 2012, 46(1): 163-169.
[11] MA Zhi-yong, QIU Qing-ying, FENG Pei-en, SHEN Men-hong, ZENG Ling-bin. Concept system and application method of mechanical symmetry[J]. J4, 2010, 44(12): 2354-2359.
[12] ZHANG Xiu-Fen, ZHANG Shu-Wei, YI Guo-Dong. Multi-granularity and hierarchy disassemblability evaluation model
and methodology for products[J]. J4, 2010, 44(3): 581-588.
[13] JIANG Wei-Guang, WU Jian-Wei, TUN Can, et al. Ontology based product knowledge integration[J]. J4, 2009, 43(10): 1801-1807.
[14] LIU Hai-Jiang, JI Yang-Jian, QI Guo-Ning, et al. Product integrated design knowledge model supporting multidisciplinary design optimization[J]. J4, 2009, 43(10): 1841-1847.
[15] FU Yu-Ying, BO Xiao-Hong, WANG Zheng-Xiao. Supply chain multiobjective optimization based on fuzzy cooperative game[J]. J4, 2009, 43(09): 1644-1648.