Please wait a minute...
J4  2012, Vol. 46 Issue (3): 524-532    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2012.03.022
机械工程     
基于语义PROMETHEE的产品设计方案群体多准则求解
罗成对,冯毅雄,谭建荣,安相华
浙江大学 流体动力与机电系统国家重点实验室,浙江 杭州 310027
Group multicriteria solving for product design scheme based on semantic PROMETHEE
LUO Cheng-dui, FENG Yi-xiong, TAN Jian-rong, AN Xiang-hua
State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
 全文: PDF  HTML
摘要:

 为了使产品设计方案评价和决策过程充分考虑决策者偏好特征,并避免模糊决策信息的失真,提出基于语义PROMETHEE的设计方案求解支持方法.定义了度量决策者偏好程度的权偏好函数和语义偏好函数,分别改进了传统PROMETHEE方法偏好函数在选型和数据处理上的局限性.对单一类型和区间类型的多粒度自然语义混合决策信息采用不同的语义变换模式,均转化为等效的二元语义类型作为语义偏好函数的保真信息输入.在此基础上,运用语义PROMETHEE方法的基本原理进行产品设计方案群体多准则求解.以停车设备的方案优选为例验证了本方法的可行性.

Abstract:

 A design scheme solving support method based on semantic PROMETHEE was proposed to give due considerations to the preference characteristics of decision makers and avoid distortion of fuzzy decision information in the process of product design scheme evaluation and selection.  Weight preference function and semantic preference function which measuring the preference of decision makers were defined to improve the limitations of preference function of traditional PROMETHEE method in both type selection and data processing. Through different semantic translation models, the multi-granularity natural semantic hybrid decision information including single type and interval type was translated into equivalent two-tuple type which was taken as fidelity information input for semantic preference function. Then, the basic principle of semantic PROMETHEE method was applied to product design scheme group multi-criteria solving. Finally, a case study of parking system scheme selection was presented to demonstrate the feasibility and validity of this method.

出版日期: 2012-03-01
:  TH 122  
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51175456,50835008);国家“973”重点研究发展计划资助项目(2011CB706500);宁波市重大科技攻关资助项目(2009B11002).

通讯作者: 冯毅雄,男,副教授     E-mail: fyxtv@zju.edu.cn
作者简介: 罗成对(1985-),男,硕士生,从事制造业信息化、产品设计等研究.E-mail:luochengdui@zju.edu.cn
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

罗成对,冯毅雄,谭建荣,安相华. 基于语义PROMETHEE的产品设计方案群体多准则求解[J]. J4, 2012, 46(3): 524-532.

LUO Cheng-dui, FENG Yi-xiong, TAN Jian-rong, AN Xiang-hua. Group multicriteria solving for product design scheme based on semantic PROMETHEE. J4, 2012, 46(3): 524-532.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2012.03.022        http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2012/V46/I3/524

[1] 杨明顺, 李言, 林志航. 产品总体设计方案评价与优选的组合决策[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(4):540-545.
YANG Ming-shun, LI Yan, LIN Zhi-hang. Combinatorial decision-making on product outline schemes evaluation & optimum selection [J].Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2006, 12(4):540-545.
[2] 钟诗胜, 王体春, 丁刚. 基于多指标灰区间数关联决策模型的产品方案设计[J].控制与决策,2008,23(12):1378-1382.
ZHONG Shi-sheng, WANG Ti-chun, DING Gang. Mechanism scheme design based on multi-attribute gray interval relevant optimized decision-making model [J]. Control and Decision, 2008, 23(12):1378-1382.
[3] GENG Xiu-li, CHU Xue-ning, ZHANG Zai-fang. A new integrated design concept evaluation approach based on vague sets [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(9):6629-6638.
[4] 古莹奎, 杨振宇. 概念设计方案评价的模糊多准则决策模型[J].计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(8):1504-1510.
GU Ying-kui, YANG Zhen-yu. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for conceptual design candidates evaluation [J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2007, 13(8):1504-1510.
[5] 刘开第, 赵奇, 周少玲,等. 机械产品方案设计模糊综合评价中隶属度转换的新方法[J].机械工程学报,2009, 45 (12):162-166.
LIU Kai-di, ZHAO Qi, ZHOU Shao-ling, et al. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for conceptual design of mechanic product based on new membership conversion [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 45 (12):162-166.
[6] 方辉, 谭建荣, 殷国富,等. 基于改进不确定语言多属性决策的设计方法评价[J].计算机集成制造系统,2009,15(7):1257-1261.
FANG Hui, TAN Jian-rong, YIN Guo-fu, et al. Design scheme evaluation based on improved uncertain-language multi-attribute decision making method [J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2009, 15(7):1257-1261.
[7] LIAN Yin-zhai, LI P K, ZHAO Wei-zhong. Design concept evaluation in product development using rough sets and grey relation analysis [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(3):7072-7079.
[8] BRANS J P, VINCKE P, MARESCHAL B. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method [J].European Journal of Operational Research, 1986, 24(2):228-238.
[9] BRANS J P, VINCKE P. A preference ranking organisation method: the PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decisionmaking [J]. Management Science, 1985, 31(6):647-656.
[10] GOUMAS M, LYGEROU V. An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects [J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 123(3):606-613.
[11] LI Wei-xiang, LI Bang-yi. An extension of the PROMETHEE Ⅱmethod based on generalized fuzzy numbers [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(7):5314-5319.
[12] 高阳, 唐新平, 周向红. 基于PROMETHEE的群体多准则模糊规划方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(2):205-208.
GAO Yang, TANG Xin-ping, ZHOU Xiang-hong. Fuzzy programming of group multi-criteria decision making method based on PROMETHEE [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2007, 29(2):205-208.
[13] HERRERA F, MARTINEZ L. A 2tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words [J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8(6):746-752.
[14] HERRERA F, MARTINEZ L, SANCHEZ P J. Managing nonhomogeneous information in group decision making [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 166(1):115-132.
[15] 李朝玲, 高齐圣. 质量功能展开中基于二元语义的顾客需求重要度的确定[J].计算机集成制造系统,2009,15(6):1202-1206.
LI Zhao-ling, GAO Qi-sheng. Importance of customer requirements in quality function deployment based on two-tuple linguistic [J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2009, 15(6):1202-1206.
[16] YEH Duen-yian, CHENG Ching-hsue, CHI Mei-lin. A modified two-tuple FLC model for evaluating the performance of SCM: By the six sigma DMAIC process[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2007,7(3):1027-1034.
[17] WEI Gui-wu. A method for multiple attribute group decision making based on the ET-WG and ET-OWG operators with 2tuple linguistic information [J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37(12):7895-7900.
[18] HALOUANI N, CHABCHOUB H, MARTEL J M. PROMETHEE-MD-2T method for project selection [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 195(3):841-849.
[19] 李浒, 岳超源. PROMETHEE Ⅱ法的变形方法及一类优先函数[J].系统工程,1999,17(5):13-16.
LI Hu, YUE Chaoyuan. The alternative method of PROMETHEE Ⅱ and a kind of preference function[J]. Systems Engineering, 1999, 17(5):13-16.
[20] LARRY E S, RICHARD R J, RONALD L T, et al.Determining attribute weights using mathematical programming [J]. The International Journal of Management Science, 2003, 31(6):423-437.

[1] 杨巍,张秀峰,杨灿军,吴海杰. 基于人机5杆模型的下肢外骨骼系统设计[J]. J4, 2014, 48(3): 430-435.
[2] 刘征, 顾新建, 潘凯, 杨青海. 基于TRIZ的产品生态设计方法研究——融合规则和案例推理[J]. J4, 2014, 48(3): 436-444.
[3] 程吉祥,顾新建,代风,刘征. 基于BioTRIZ的产品创新设计过[J]. J4, 2014, 48(1): 35-41.
[4] 林晓华, 冯毅雄, 谭建荣. 基于免疫优化的产品系统可靠性参数区间预测方法[J]. J4, 2013, 47(6): 1013-1021.
[5] 应征, 王青, 李江雄, 柯映林,孙文博,韩永伟. 飞机数字化装配系统运动数据集成及监控技术[J]. J4, 2013, 47(5): 761-767.
[6] 应征, 章明, 王青, 柯映林. 飞机大部件调姿机构磨损预测模型的构建与仿真[J]. J4, 2013, 47(2): 209-215.
[7] 刘曦泽, 祁国宁, 傅建中, 樊蓓蓓, 许静. 集成形态学矩阵与冲突解决原理的设计过程模型[J]. J4, 2012, 46(12): 2243-2251.
[8] 黄雪梅, 张磊安, 魏修亭. 兆瓦级风机叶片静力加载过程D-MFAC控制[J]. J4, 2012, 46(12): 2280-2284.
[9] 林晓华,冯毅雄,谭建荣. 产品方案设计约束模型及其演化博弈算法求解[J]. J4, 2012, 46(3): 533-541.
[10] 安相华,冯毅雄,谭建荣. 基于Choquet积分与证据理论的
产品方案协同评价方法
[J]. J4, 2012, 46(1): 163-169.
[11] 马志勇, 邱清盈, 冯培恩, 沈萌红, 曾令斌. 机械对称性的概念体系及其应用方法[J]. J4, 2010, 44(12): 2354-2359.
[12] 张秀芬, 张树有, 伊国栋. 产品多粒度层次可拆卸性评价模型与方法[J]. J4, 2010, 44(3): 581-588.
[13] 江伟光, 武建伟, 吴参, 等. 基于本体的产品知识集成[J]. J4, 2009, 43(10): 1801-1807.
[14] 刘海强, 纪杨建, 祁国宁, 等. 支持多学科设计优化的产品集成设计知识模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 43(10): 1841-1847.
[15] 傅玉颖, 潘晓弘, 王正肖. 模糊合作博弈下的供应链多目标优化[J]. J4, 2009, 43(09): 1644-1648.