Please wait a minute...
Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng.  2014, Vol. 15 Issue (10): 848-860    DOI: 10.1631/jzus.C14a0027
    
Advances in the control of mechatronic suspension systems
Wajdi S. Aboud, Sallehuddin Mohamed Haris, Yuzita Yaacob
Centre for Automotive Research, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi 43600, Malaysia; Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi 43600, Malaysia; Institute of Technology-Baghdad, Foundation of Technical Education, Baghdad, Iraq
Download:   PDF(0KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  The suspension system is a key element in motor vehicles. Advancements in electronics and microprocessor technology have led to the realization of mechatronic suspensions. Since its introduction in some production motorcars in the 1980s, it has remained an area which sees active research and development, and this will likely continue for many years to come. With the aim of identifying current trends and future focus areas, this paper presents a review on the state-of-the-art of mechatronic suspensions. First, some commonly used classifications of mechatronic suspensions are presented. This is followed by a discussion on some of the actuating mechanisms used to provide control action. A survey is then reported on the many types of control approaches, including look-ahead preview, predictive, fuzzy logic, proportional–integral–derivative (PID), optimal, robust, adaptive, robust adaptive, and switching control. In conclusion, hydraulic actuators are most commonly used, but they impose high power requirements, limiting practical realizations of active suspensions. Electromagnetic actuators are seen to hold the promise of lower power requirements, and rigorous research and development should be conducted to make them commercially usable. Current focus on control methods that are robust to suspension parameter variations also seems to produce limited performance improvements, and future control approaches should be adaptive to the changeable driving conditions.

Key wordsMechatronics      Active suspensions      Semi-active suspensions      Multiple model adaptive control     
Received: 20 January 2014      Published: 09 October 2014
CLC:  TP273  
  TB535  
Cite this article:

Wajdi S. Aboud, Sallehuddin Mohamed Haris, Yuzita Yaacob. Advances in the control of mechatronic suspension systems. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2014, 15(10): 848-860.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/fitee/10.1631/jzus.C14a0027     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/fitee/Y2014/V15/I10/848


Advances in the control of mechatronic suspension systems

The suspension system is a key element in motor vehicles. Advancements in electronics and microprocessor technology have led to the realization of mechatronic suspensions. Since its introduction in some production motorcars in the 1980s, it has remained an area which sees active research and development, and this will likely continue for many years to come. With the aim of identifying current trends and future focus areas, this paper presents a review on the state-of-the-art of mechatronic suspensions. First, some commonly used classifications of mechatronic suspensions are presented. This is followed by a discussion on some of the actuating mechanisms used to provide control action. A survey is then reported on the many types of control approaches, including look-ahead preview, predictive, fuzzy logic, proportional–integral–derivative (PID), optimal, robust, adaptive, robust adaptive, and switching control. In conclusion, hydraulic actuators are most commonly used, but they impose high power requirements, limiting practical realizations of active suspensions. Electromagnetic actuators are seen to hold the promise of lower power requirements, and rigorous research and development should be conducted to make them commercially usable. Current focus on control methods that are robust to suspension parameter variations also seems to produce limited performance improvements, and future control approaches should be adaptive to the changeable driving conditions.

关键词: Mechatronics,  Active suspensions,  Semi-active suspensions,  Multiple model adaptive control 
[1] Guo-liang Tao, Ce Shang, De-yuan Meng, Chao-chao Zhou. Posture control of a 3-RPS pneumatic parallel platform with parameter initialization and an adaptive robust method[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2017, 18(3): 303-316.
[2] Guo-liang Tao, Ce Shang, De-yuan Meng, Chao-chao Zhou. Posture control of a 3-RPS pneumatic parallel \\[3mm] platform with parameter initialization and an \\[4mm] adaptive robust method[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2017, 18(3): 303-316.
[3] Xiao-yu ZHANG. Application of direct adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control into a class of non-affine discrete nonlinear systems[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(12): 1331-1343.
[4] Yong-chun Xie, Huang Huang, Yong Hu, Guo-qi Zhang. Applications of advanced control methods in spacecrafts: progress, challenges, and future prospects[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(9): 841-861.
[5] Guo-jiang Shen, Yong-yao Yang. A dynamic signal coordination control method for urban arterial roads and its application[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(9): 907-918.
[6] Kyong-il Kim, Hsin Guan, Bo Wang, Rui Guo, Fan Liang. Active steering control strategy for articulated vehicles[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(6): 576-586.
[7] Jin-yi Liu, Jing-quan Tan, En-rong Mao, Zheng-he Song, Zhong-xiang Zhu. Proportional directional valve based automatic steering system for tractors[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(5): 458-464.
[8] Chang-bin Yu, Yin-qiu Wang, Jin-liang Shao. Optimization of formation for multi-agent systems based on LQR[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(2): 96-109.
[9] Mei-qin Liu, Hai-yang Chen, Sen-lin Zhang. H reference tracking control design for a class of nonlinear systems with time-varying delays[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2015, 16(9): 759-768.
[10] Gurmanik Kaur, Ajat Shatru Arora, Vijender Kumar Jain. Using hybrid models to predict blood pressure reactivity to unsupported back based on anthropometric characteristics[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2015, 16(6): 474-485.
[11] Salvador Ibarra-Martínez, José A. Castán-Rocha, Julio Laria-Menchaca. Optimizing urban traffic control using a rational agent[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2014, 15(12): 1123-1137.
[12] Peng-fei Qian, Guo-liang Tao, De-yuan Meng, Hao Liu. A modified direct adaptive robust motion trajectory tracking controller of a pneumatic system[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2014, 15(10): 878-891.
[13] Farnaz Sabahi, M.-R. Akbarzadeh-T. A framework for analysis of extended fuzzy logic[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2014, 15(7): 584-591.
[14] Hua Zhang, Lu-ping Xu, Yang-he Shen, Rong Jiao, Jing-rong Sun. A new maximum-likelihood phase estimation method for X-ray pulsar signals[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2014, 15(6): 458-469.
[15] Md Nishat Anwar, Somnath Pan. A frequency domain design of PID controller for an AVR system[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2014, 15(4): 293-299.