Please wait a minute...
工程设计学报  2016, Vol. 23 Issue (4): 338-344    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2016.04.007
建模、分析、优化和决策     
同功重比修形斜齿和直齿面齿轮性能对比研究
周镇宇, 唐进元, 董建雄
中南大学 高性能复杂制造国家重点实验室, 湖南 长沙 410083
Comparative study on the performance of modified face gears with helical pinion and spur pinion in the case of same power density
ZHOU Zhen-yu, TANG Jin-yuan, DONG Jian-xiong
State Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
 全文: PDF(2787 KB)   HTML
摘要:

为深入了解同功重比修形斜齿与直齿面齿轮的性能差异,选择更适合于高速重载工况下的面齿轮传动.基于啮合原理推导了修形斜齿与直齿面齿轮齿面方程,基于CATIA建立了修形斜齿与直齿面齿轮三维模型,采用有限元接触分析方法,以接触应力、弯曲应力和重合度为面齿轮传动性能指标展开研究.研究结果表明:修形斜齿面齿轮相比修形直齿面齿轮接触应力大幅降低,算例最大接触应力降低16.3%;修形斜齿面齿轮相比修形直齿面齿轮弯曲应力大幅降低,算例最大弯曲应力降低32.4%;修形斜齿面齿轮相比修形直齿面齿轮重合度大幅提高,算例重合度提高10.3%.所以同功重比情况下,修形斜齿面齿轮传动性能优于修形直齿面齿轮,前者更适合于高速重载工况下的轻量化设计.

关键词: 轻量化功重比接触应力弯曲应力重合度修形    
Abstract:

In order to know the performance difference of the modified face gears with helical pinion and spur pinion under the same power density better and choose a more suitable kind of face gear drive for high speed and heavy load conditions. Based on meshing theory, the tooth surface equations of the modified face gears with helical pinion and spur pinion were derived. The three-dimensional models of the modified face gears with helical pinion and spur pinion were built by CATIA. The finite element contact analysis method was used and the contact stress, bending stress and contact ratio were considered as performance indexes of the face gears to expand the research. Researches proved that the contact stress of modified face gear with helical pinion was much lower than that of modified face gear with spur pinion. The maximum contact stress was reduced by 16.3% in the case. The bending stress of modified face gear with helical pinion was much lower than that of modified face gear with spur pinion. The maximum bending stress was reduced by 32.4% in the case. The contact ratio of modified face gear with helical pinion was much higher than that of modified face gear with spur pinion. The contact ratio was increased by 10.3% in the case. So the transmission performance of the modified face gear with helical pinion is better than that of modified face gear with spur pinion under the same power density, the former is more suitable for the lightweight design under high speed and heavy load condition.

Key words: lightweight    power density    contact stress    bending stress    contact ratio    modification
收稿日期: 2016-01-20 出版日期: 2016-08-28
CLC:  TH132.41  
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51535012,51305462,51275530).

通讯作者: 唐进元(1962-),男,湖南长沙人,教授,从事齿轮传动及数字化制造研究,E-mail:jytangcsu@163.com.http://orcid.org//0000-0001-7186-1316     E-mail: jytangcsu@163.com
作者简介: 周镇宇(1991—),男,江西宜春人,硕士生,从事齿轮传动及数字化制造研究,E-mail:zhenyuzhou@csu.edu.cn.http://orcid.org//0000-0001-5888-2892
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
周镇宇
唐进元
董建雄

引用本文:

周镇宇, 唐进元, 董建雄. 同功重比修形斜齿和直齿面齿轮性能对比研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2016, 23(4): 338-344.

ZHOU Zhen-yu, TANG Jin-yuan, DONG Jian-xiong. Comparative study on the performance of modified face gears with helical pinion and spur pinion in the case of same power density. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2016, 23(4): 338-344.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2016.04.007        https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/Y2016/V23/I4/338

[1] 王征兵. 大型偏航变桨齿轮箱轻量化设计技术研究[D]. 郑州:机械科学研究总院郑州机械研究所,2012:28-30. WANG Zheng-bing. Research on lightweight design technology for large scale yaw and pitch gearboxes [D]. Zhengzhou: China Academy of Machinery Science & Technology, Zhengzhou Research Institute of Mechanical Engineering, 2012: 28-30.
[2] LITVIN F L,ZHANG Y,WANG J C,et al.Design and geometry of face-gear drives[J].Journal of Mechanical Design,1992,114(4):642-647.
[3] LITVIN F L.Development of face-gear technology for industrial and aerospace power transmission[R].Washington D.C.:NASA/CR-2002-211320.
[4] HEATH G F,BOSSLER R B.Advanced Rotorcraft Transmission (ART) Program-Final Report[R].Washington D.C.:NASA/CR-1993-191057.
[5] LITVIN F L, FUENTES A,ZANZI C.Design,generation and stress analysis of two versions of geometry of face-gear drives[J].Mechanism and Machine Theory,2002,37(10):1179-1211.
[6] LITVIN F L,GONZALWZ-PEREZ I,FUENTES A.Design,generation and stress analysis of face-gear drive with helical pinion[J].Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,2005,194(36/38):3870-3902.
[7] LITVIN F L,FUENTES A,HOWKINS M.Design,generation and TCA of new type of asymmetric face-gear drive with modified geometry[J].Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2001, 190(43/44):5837-5865.
[8] LITVIN F L ,VECCHIATO D,GUROVICH E.Computerized developments in design,generation,simulation of meshing,and stress analysis of gear drives[J].Meccanica,2005,40(3):291-323.
[9] 雷敦财.面齿轮时变啮合刚度计算及动态啮合性能研究[D].长沙:中南大学机电工程学院,2013:42-46. LEI Dun-cai.Study of time varying mesh stiffness and dynamic performance of face-gear pair [D].Changsha: Central South University,School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering,2013:42-46.
[10] 李特文.齿轮几何学与应用理论[M].国凯,叶凌云,范琳,等,译.上海:科学技术出版社,2008:484-516. LITVIN F L.Gear geometry and applied theory [M].Translated by GUO Kai,YE Ling-yun,FAN Lin,et al.Shanghai:Science and Technology Press,2008:484-516.
[11] 李瑰贤.空间几何建模及工程应用[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007:135-137. LI Kui-xian.Spatial geometry modeling and its application in engineering[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press,2007:135-137.
[12] 丁仁亮.CATIA V5教程[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2007:2-30. DING Ren-liang.CATIA V5 Course[M].Beijing:China Machine Press,2007:2-30.
[13] 陈兴明.含安装误差的修形直齿面齿轮传动齿面接触分析的研究[D].长沙:中南大学机电工程学院,2012:21-24. CHEN Xing-ming.Tooth contact analysis of modified spur face gear drives with alignment errors[D].Changsha:Central South University,School of Mechanical and Electrical Sngineering, 2012:21-24.
[14] 刘艳平.直齿面齿轮加载接触分析及弯曲应力和接触应力计算方法研究[D].长沙:中南大学机电工程学院,2012:29-32. LIU Yan-ping.The loaded tooth contact analysis and bending stress and contact stress calculating method research of face gear drive with spur involute pinion[D].Changsha:Central South University,School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, 2012:29-32.
[15] 石亦平,周玉蓉.ABAQUS有限元分析实例详解[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2007:24-32. SHI Yi-ping,ZHOU Yu-rong.Detailed answers of instances by ABAQUS finite element analysis [M].Beijing:China Machine Press,2007,24-32.
[16] 罗希年.齿轮弯曲应力计算的优化[D].西安:长安大学机械工程学院,2012:42-47. LUO Xi-nian.The optimization of calculation of gear bending stress[D].Xi'an: Chang'an University,School of Mechanical Engineering,2012:42-47.
[17] 戈红霞,吕庆军,张志凯.关于面齿轮接触和弯曲应力有限元计算方法的研究[J].新技术 新工艺,2014(1):43-47. GE Hong-xia,LÜ Qing-jun,ZHANG Zhi-kai.Research on finite element method of face gear contact and bending stress calculation[J].New Technology & New Process,2014(1):43-47.
[18] 董建雄,唐进元.基于轮齿接触分析的修形面齿轮传动重合度计算研究[J].机械传动,2015,39(4):8-10. DONG Jian-xiong,TANG Jin-yuan.Study on contact ratio calculation of modified face gears based on contact analysis[J].Mechanical Transmission,2015,39(4):8-10.

[1] 廖红玉,邓梦洋,周敏,谢良喜,姚俊夫. 基于钢丝绳传动的自动抹灰机的轻量化设计[J]. 工程设计学报, 2022, 29(2): 196-201.
[2] 倪维宇, 张横, 姚胜卫. 基于多工况的汽车座椅骨架轻量化设计[J]. 工程设计学报, 2021, 28(6): 729-736.
[3] 何芝仙, 陈曦, 时培成. 基于动力学分析的大重合度直齿圆柱齿轮强度计算[J]. 工程设计学报, 2020, 27(6): 729-734.
[4] 魏雅君, 邱国梁, 丁广和, 杨亮, 刘桁. 一种重载码垛机器人结构优化设计方法[J]. 工程设计学报, 2020, 27(3): 332-339.
[5] 汤亮, 何仁杰, 龚发云, 李飞扬, 刘冠军, 杨敏. 变风载下风电齿轮箱内部激励规律研究及动态特性优化[J]. 工程设计学报, 2020, 27(2): 212-222.
[6] 王哲, 陈勇, 曹展, 李光鑫, 左扣成. 纯电动汽车两挡变速器减振降噪研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2019, 26(3): 280-286.
[7] 杨绍勇, 雷飞, 陈园. 基于铺层设计特征的碳纤维增强复合材料悬架控制臂结构优化[J]. 工程设计学报, 2016, 23(6): 600-605,619.
[8] 何 畏,肖 祥,陈 波,孙春梅,陈 洋,贺军超. 牙轮钻头弹性球面浮动套轴承的设计与优化[J]. 工程设计学报, 2015, 22(6): 607-612.
[9] 高创宽, 李 群. 齿面粗糙纹理方向对齿轮润滑效应的影响[J]. 工程设计学报, 2014, 21(4): 393-397.
[10] 黄尚兵, 金光, 安源, 王栋. 滚子摆动从动件盘形凸轮的设计及优化[J]. 工程设计学报, 2012, 19(6): 449-453.
[11] 张广玉, 李隆球, 菅翠营, 王林. 磁头与离散磁道式磁盘瞬态接触行为研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2012, 19(1): 34-38.
[12] 李立新, 江玉刚, 曹谊勃. 基于精确齿面建模的ZA蜗杆蜗轮有限元接触分析[J]. 工程设计学报, 2011, 18(1): 38-42.
[13] 张冰蔚, 马晓明 . 基于APDL的直线电机进给驱动平台的参数优化设计[J]. 工程设计学报, 2005, 12(2): 93-96.