Please wait a minute...
Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science)  2022, Vol. 56 Issue (8): 1578-1587    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2022.08.012
    
Calculation and prediction of flue gas residence time from CFB municipal solid waste incinerator
Xiao-qing LIN1(),Yu-xuan YING1,Hong YU2,Xiao-dong LI1,*(),Jian-hua YAN1
1. College of Energy Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
2. Fuchunjiang Environmental Technology Research Co. Ltd, Hangzhou 311504, China
Download: HTML     PDF(1591KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Ensuring that the flue gas in the furnace stays within the temperature range of no less than 850 ℃ for at least 2 s contributes to the steady municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration, and the reduction of secondary pollution. However, at present, it is difficult to quantitatively calculate and predict the residence time of flue gas in the high temperature area by only using the thermocouple for qualitative evaluation. Based on the thermodynamic calculation, correlation analysis of practical operation parameters, and a variety of machine learning algorithms (backpropagation neural network, recurrent neural network, and random forest regression), the residence time of flue gas in high-temperature areas (>850 ℃) was calculated, correlation analysis of key operation parameters was conducted, and the prediction model of residence time was constructed, aiming at a typical MSW circulating fluidized bed boiler in China. Results revealed that 10 key operating parameters, e.g. section temperature of the furnace, temperature and pressure of primary air and secondary air, etc., had a strong correlation and predictability with the high-temperature flue gas residence time. Moreover, the model of the recurrent neural network was relatively optimal, with a higher fitting degree and accuracy. Specifically, the mean square error (MSE) was 0.11626, and the average absolute error between the predicted value and real value was 1.174%. Research enabled the prediction of flue gas temperature variation in high-temperature areas, helped optimize the MSW incineration, and contributed to the advanced control of pollutant emission reduction.



Key wordsmunicipal solid waste      incineration      high-temperature flue gas      residence time      predictive model     
Received: 11 August 2021      Published: 30 August 2022
CLC:  TK 1  
Fund:  国家重点研发计划资助项目(2020YFC1910100).
Corresponding Authors: Xiao-dong LI     E-mail: linxiaoqing@zju.edu.cn;lixd@zju.edu.cn
Cite this article:

Xiao-qing LIN,Yu-xuan YING,Hong YU,Xiao-dong LI,Jian-hua YAN. Calculation and prediction of flue gas residence time from CFB municipal solid waste incinerator. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2022, 56(8): 1578-1587.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2022.08.012     OR     https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/Y2022/V56/I8/1578


流化床垃圾焚烧炉烟气停留时间计算及预测

保证焚烧烟气在大于850 ℃区域内停留2 s以上是保证垃圾稳定燃烧和避免二次污染的重要途径,但目前只采用炉膛出口热电偶测温对其定性评估,难以定量计算和预测烟气在高温区域停留时间. 本研究基于热力学计算方法、运行参数关联性分析和多种机器学习算法(反向传播神经网络、循环神经网络、随机森林算法),对我国某典型生活垃圾循环流化床焚烧锅炉开展了烟气高温段(>850 ℃)停留时间计算、关键运行参数关联计算和停留时间预测模型构建等研究. 结果表明,炉膛温度、一二次风温度和压力等10个关键运行参数与高温烟气停留时间具有强关联性和预测性. 循环神经网络预测模型相对最优,其拟合度及准确性较反向神经网络、随机森林算法更高,均方根误差(MSE)为0.11626,预测值与真实值的平均绝对误差为1.174%. 本研究可以用于预测炉内高温区域烟气温度变化,为炉内焚烧工况优化和污染物减排超前调控提供支撑.


关键词: 城市生活垃圾,  焚烧,  高温烟气,  停留时间,  预测模型 
样本 w(C) / % w(H) / % w(O) / % w(N) / % w(S) / % w(Ash) / % w(mois) / % Qnet/ (kJ·kg?1)
样本1 32.3 4.1 27.1 0.4 0.1 18.7 17.3 11 912.2
样本2 35.3 4.9 27.4 0.5 0.1 11.5 20.4 14 031.2
样本3 31.4 5.0 19.0 0.7 0.1 10.8 34.0 12 250.0
Tab.1 Ultimate analysis, water mass fraction analysis and calorific value analysis of MSW
Fig.1 Schematic diagram of flue gas staying area of “850 ℃-2 s” in fluidized bed MSW incinerator
运行参数 相关系数 运行参数 相关系数 运行参数 相关系数
烟气DUST 0.112 29 一次风机出口压力 0.912 32 空预器出口二次热风温度右 0.969 49
烟气HCl 0.212 85 补偿后一次风流量 0.984 51 旋风筒出口烟气温度(左) 0.106 55
烟气O2 0.525 43 二次风机出口压力 0.862 13 旋风筒出口烟气温度(右) 0.205 64
烟气H2O 0.100 78 补偿后二次风流量 0.978 78 喷水减温器进口蒸汽温度 0.196 71
烟气SO2 ?0.335 51 密相区出口压力(左) ?0.131 56 喷水减温器出口蒸汽温度 ?0.505 82
烟气NOx 0.392 01 密相区出口压力(右) ?0.002 35 省煤器出口水温 ?0.220 36
烟气CO ?0.470 88 中部断面均温 0.919 32 补偿后给水体积流量 0.156 56
烟气流速 0.413 88 上部断面均温 0.928 84 炉膛出口温度 0.871 81
吸收塔前温度 0.047 27 炉膛出口压力(左) 0.000 41 排烟温度 ?0.613 82
反应塔后压力变送器 0.030 15 炉膛出口压力(右) ?0.107 32 烟气处理设备出口烟气温度 0.593 85
布袋除尘空气压力 0.231 38 炉膛出口右温度 ?0.406 13 烟气处理设备入口烟气压力 ?0.314 86
布袋除尘器差压 ?0.309 85 炉膛出口左温度 ?0.504 52 烟气处理设备入口烟温 0.280 06
布袋除尘器后温度 0.402 67 旋风筒下部温度(左) 0.851 88 给水温度 0.263 19
除尘器烟气体积流量 0.368 66 旋风筒下部温度(右) 0.963 31 给水压力 0.437 10
除尘器后差压(体积流量计) 0.272 06 返料物料温度(左) ?0.409 56 主汽集箱出口蒸汽压力 ?0.140 27
风室温度(左) 0.621 17 返料物料温度(右) ?0.327 49 主汽集箱出口蒸汽温度 ?0.145 79
风室温度(右) 0.620 30 左侧返料流化风压 ?0.162 98 主汽集箱蒸汽压力 0.387 53
炉膛下部压力(右) ?0.062 88 右侧返料流化风压 ?0.183 75 主汽集箱蒸汽温度 ?0.300 52
沸下温度(前左) 0.229 23 一次风喷入温度 0.901 22 主蒸汽体积流量 0.407 25
沸中温度(右) ?0.585 89 空预器出口二次热风温度左 0.927 511 汽包水位 ?0.151 18
Tab.2 Correlation analysis between operation parameters and flue gas residue time of “No less than 850 ℃ for at least 2 s”
Fig.2 Flow chart of BP neural network
Fig.3 Structure diagram of RNN
Fig.4 Flow chart of RFR
Fig.5 Training load of BP network
Fig.6 Stopping condition of BP network
Fig.7 Predicted outputs of BP network
Fig.8 Prediction error curve of BP network
Fig.9 Error curve of percentage of BP network
Fig.10 Comparison of true values and predicted values of RNN
Fig.11 Absolute error of predicted values of RNN
Fig.12 Percentage error of predicted values of RNN
Fig.13 Scatter plot of RNN predicted value and true value
Fig.14 Absolute error of predicted values of RFR
Fig.15 Percentage error of predicted values of RFR
[1]   中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中华人民共和国国家统计局, 2020.
[2]   NIE Y Development and prospects of municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration in China[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science Engineering in China, 2008, 2 (1): 1- 7
doi: 10.1007/s11783-008-0028-6
[3]   张梦玫. 典型过渡金属化合物对二恶英异相催化生成影响及作用机理的研究 [D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2019.
ZHANG Meng-mei. Research on effect and reaction mechanisms of typical transition metal compounds on heterogeneous catalytic formation of dioxins [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2019.
[4]   应雨轩, 林晓青, 吴昂键, 等 生活垃圾智慧焚烧的研究现状及展望[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72 (2): 886- 900
YING Yu-xuan, LIN Xiao-qing, WU Ang-jian, et al Review and outlook on municipal solid waste smart incineration[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2021, 72 (2): 886- 900
[5]   GUO X, MA Y, LIN X, et al Reduction of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans by chemical inhibition and physisorption from a municipal solid waste incineration system[J]. Energy and Fuels, 2020, 34 (9): 11237- 47
doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01918
[6]   MA Y, LIN X, CHEN Z, et al Influences of PN-containing inhibitor and memory effect on PCDD/F emissions during the full-scale municipal solid waste incineration[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 228: 495- 502
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.161
[7]   RYU J, MULHOLLAND J, DUNN J, et al Potential role of chlorination pathways in PCDD/F formation in a municipal waste incinerator[J]. Environmental Science Technology, 2004, 38 (19): 5112- 9
doi: 10.1021/es0497227
[8]   STANMORE B Modeling the formation of PCDD/F in solid waste incinerators[J]. Chemosphere, 2002, 47 (6): 565- 73
doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00005-X
[9]   侯霞丽, 李晓东, 陈彤, 等 垃圾焚烧飞灰中主要元素的深度分布及形态[J]. 浙江大学学报:工学版, 2015, 47 (6): 565- 73
HOU Xia-li, LI Xiao-dong, CHEN Tong, et al Distribution and chemical forms of major elements in MSWI fly ash[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2015, 47 (6): 565- 73
[10]   HUTZINGER O, BLUMICH M, BERG M, et al Sources and fate of PCDDs and PCDFs: an overview[J]. Chemosphere, 1985, 14 (6/7): 581- 600
[11]   LIN X, MA Y, CHEN Z, et al Effect of different air pollution control devices on the gas/solid-phase distribution of PCDD/F in a full-scale municipal solid waste incinerator[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 265: 114888
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114888
[12]   MA Y, LIN X, CHEN Z, et al Influence factors and mass balance of memory effect on PCDD/F emissions from the full-scale municipal solid waste incineration in China[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 239: 124614
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124614
[13]   环境保护部. 生活垃圾焚烧污染控制标准: GB 18485—2014 [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2014.
[14]   LIN X, YAN M, DAI A, et al Simultaneous suppression of PCDD/F and NOx during municipal solid waste incineration[J]. Chemosphere, 2015, 126: 60- 6
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.02.005
[15]   孙小燕, 韩志明, 焦学军 垃圾焚烧炉膛烟气温度计算模型的探讨: 满足烟气850 ℃以上停留2 s的监管要求[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2020, 28 (5): 48- 53
SUN Xiao-yan, HAN Zhi-ming, JIAO Xue-jun Discussion on the calculation model of flue gas temperature in waste incineration furnace: meet the supervision requirements that the flue gas Stays Above 850 ℃ for 2 s[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2020, 28 (5): 48- 53
[16]   白良成, 徐文龙 层燃型垃圾焚烧锅炉的炉膛与炉膛温度简析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2021, 29 (1): 58- 63
BAI Liang-cheng, XU Wen-long Brief analysis of furnace and furnace temperature of layer burning waste incineration boiler[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2021, 29 (1): 58- 63
doi: 10.19841/j.cnki.hjwsgc.2021.01.009
[17]   WANG L, HSI H, CHANG J, et al Influence of start-up on PCDD/F emission of incinerators[J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 67 (7): 1346- 53
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.10.081
[18]   胡南, 徐梦, 杨海瑞, 等 循环流化床锅炉炉膛横向 温度非均匀性模型研究[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2019, 25 (2): 102- 107
HU Nan, XU Meng, YANG Hai-rui, et al Modeling study on lateral temperature non-uniformity in CFB boiler furnace[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2019, 25 (2): 102- 107
[19]   帅志昂. 660MW循环流化床锅炉流动和燃烧特性的数值模拟[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学(北京), 2017.
Shuai Zhi-ang. Numerical simulation of the flow and combustion characteristics of the 660 MW circulating fluidized bed[D]. Beijing: School of North China Electric Power University, 2017.
[20]   WANG S. Artificial neural network [M]. Interdisciplinary computing in java programming. Triumf: Springer, 2003: 81-100.
[1] Jia MENG,Jun-chao LI,Yun-min CHEN. Strain-hardening mechanism and applicability in hypergravity simulation of municipal solid waste[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2022, 56(4): 664-673.
[2] Jun LIU,Quan-gong LI,Yi-han LIAO,Wei-shu WANG. Performance of incinerator-waste heat boiler and NOx emissions in solid waste incineration power plants[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2020, 54(5): 1014-1021.
[3] XU Hui, MIAO Jian-dong, CHEN Ping, ZHAN Liang-tong, LUO Xiao-yong. Measurements of geotechnical properties of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash stabilized by chemical reagents[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2019, 53(1): 1-10.
[4] WU Mei-ling, SHUAI Yun, HUANG Zheng-liang, WANG Jing-dai, JIANG Bin-bo, YANG Yong-rong. Mixing characteristics of fixed bed bubble reactor[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2018, 52(4): 754-760.
[5] YOU Hai-hui, MA Zeng-yi, TANG Yi-jun, WANG Yue-lan, ZHENG Lin, YU Zhong, JI Cheng-jun. Soft measurement of heating value of burning municipal solid waste for circulating fluidized bed[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2017, 51(6): 1163-1172.
[6] LIU Rui-mei, LIU Yu-kun, WANG Zhi-hua, LIU Ying-zu, HU Li-hua, SHAO Zhe-ru, CEN Ke-fa. CFD simulation and optimization of secondary air distribution for waste combustion in grate furnace[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2017, 51(3): 500-507.
[7] KE Han, DONG Ding, CHEN Yun-min, GUO Cheng, FENG Shi-jin. Nonlinear elastic model for municipal solid waste considering dilatancy effect[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2017, 51(11): 2158-2164.
[8] LIU Hai long, ZHOU Jia wei, CHEN Yun min, LI Yu chao, ZHAN Liang tong. Evaluation of municipal solid waste landfill stabilization[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2016, 50(12): 2336-2342.
[9] WANG Yu-liang, ZHENG Hai-jun, ZHOU Ye-feng, HUANG Zheng-liang, WANG Jing-dai, YANG Yong-rong. Information entropy of residence time distribution in stirred tank with multiple inlets[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2015, 49(3): 590-597.
[10] LI Yan-ji1,, ZOU Ke-wei, JIANG Lu, LI Run-dong, CHI Yong, CEN Ke-fa. Experiment and simulation study on pollutants emission of refuse derived fuel during incineration[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2014, 48(7): 1254-1259.
[11] ZHANG Zhen-ying, YAN Li-jun. Correlation properties of the deformation and the shear strength of fresh municipal solid waste[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2014, 48(11): 1962-1967.
[12] KE Han,WANG Wen-fang, WEI Chang-chun, CHEN Yun-min, ZHAN Liang-tong. Experimental study on saturated hydraulic conductivity of MSW under different conditions[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2013, 47(7): 1164-1170.
[13] LU Sheng-yong, WU Hai-long, CHEN Tong, LI Xiao-dong, YAN Jian-hua. Dioxin mass balance in fluidized bed incinerator co-firing
municipal solid waste and coal
[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2011, 45(12): 2188-2195.
[14] WANG Qin, YAN Jian-hua, PAN Xin-chao, CHI Yong, GAO Fei. Vitrification of MSWI fly ash using direct current double arc plasma[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2011, 45(1): 141-145.
[15] JIANG Xu-Guang, LI Chun-Yu, CHE Chong, SHU Kai, FU Juan-Juan. Migration characteristics of inorganic bromine during
incineration of medical waste
[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2010, 44(9): 1787-1792.