Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2025, Vol. 59 Issue (3): 480-487    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2025.03.005
交通工程、土木工程     
钢筋桁架混凝土空心叠合板静力性能试验与破坏分析
陈旭东1,2,3(),马芹永1,3,*()
1. 安徽理工大学 土木建筑学院,安徽 淮南 232001
2. 安徽建筑大学 土木工程学院,安徽 合肥 230601
3. 建筑健康监测与灾害预防技术国家地方联合工程实验室,安徽 合肥 230601
Static performance and failure analysis of reinforced truss concrete hollow composite slab
Xudong CHEN1,2,3(),Qinyong MA1,3,*()
1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
2. College of Civil Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
3. National-local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Building Health Monitoring and Disaster Prevention Technology, Hefei 230601, China
 全文: PDF(3535 KB)   HTML
摘要:

结合现浇空心板与预制钢筋桁架混凝土叠合板的优点,提出内置空心薄壁箱的钢筋桁架混凝土叠合板. 进行5块钢筋桁架混凝土空心叠合板、1块钢筋桁架混凝土现浇空心板在单调荷载作用下的静力足尺模型受弯性能试验. 分析板的破坏形态、受弯承载力、截面整体工作性能、裂缝分布、钢筋应变、混凝土应变等. 结果表明:空心叠合板在正常使用状态下,未出现沿叠合面开展的水平裂缝,预制层与现浇层协调工作性能良好;破坏过程符合适筋破坏的破坏特征;板底出现多条均匀分布的裂缝,整体变形性能较好;空心叠合板在开裂后仍有充分的承载力安全储备;极限承载力的试验值和理论值基本一致,误差均小于6.0% ,满足规范规定;同一尺寸规格的预制空心叠合板与现浇空心板的整体受力性能较接近,均可满足工程设计要求.

关键词: 空心叠合板钢筋桁架静力试验受弯性能破坏分析    
Abstract:

A reinforced truss concrete composite slab with a built-in hollow thin-walled box was proposed, which combined the advantages of the cast-in-place hollow slab and the prefabricated reinforced truss concrete composite slab. Static full-scale model bending performance tests were conducted on five reinforced truss concrete hollow composite slabs and a reinforced truss concrete cast-in-place hollow slab under monotonic load. The failure mode, bending bearing capacity, overall working performance of the section, crack distribution, steel strain, and concrete strain of the plate were analyzed. Results showed that under regular use, there was no horizontal crack along the composite surface of the laminated hollow slab, and the coordination performance between the prefabricated layer and the cast-in-place layer was good. The failure process conformed to the characteristics of suitable reinforcement failure. Multiple evenly distributed cracks appeared at the bottom of the board, resulting in good overall deformation performance. Composite hollow slabs still had sufficient load-bearing capacity and safety reserves after cracking. The experimental and theoretical values of the ultimate bearing capacity were consistent, with an error of within 6.0%, meeting the specifications. The overall stress performance of the prefabricated composite hollow slabs with the same size and specification was relatively similar to that of cast-in-place hollow slabs, so both of them could meet the engineering design requirements.

Key words: hollow composite slab    steel truss    static test    bending performance    failure analysis
收稿日期: 2024-01-15 出版日期: 2025-03-10
CLC:  TU 375.2  
基金资助: 建筑健康监测与灾害预防国家地方联合工程实验室开放课题资助项目(GG22KF001);安徽省住房城乡建设科学技术计划资助项目(2022-YF083).
通讯作者: 马芹永     E-mail: xdchen_ah@163.com;qymaah@126.com
作者简介: 陈旭东(1991—),男,博士生,从事装配式混凝土结构研究. orcid.org/0009-0006-2856-6382. E-mail:xdchen_ah@163.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章  
陈旭东
马芹永

引用本文:

陈旭东,马芹永. 钢筋桁架混凝土空心叠合板静力性能试验与破坏分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2025, 59(3): 480-487.

Xudong CHEN,Qinyong MA. Static performance and failure analysis of reinforced truss concrete hollow composite slab. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2025, 59(3): 480-487.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2025.03.005        https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2025/V59/I3/480

图 1  空心叠合板构造示意图
图 2  空心薄壁箱
试件H/mml1×b1/mm×mmh1/mm
DKB1-1180450×45080
DKB1-2180450×45090
DKB1-3180400×40080
DKB1-4180450×45060
DKB2-1200450×450100
XJKB180450×45080
表 1  空心楼板试件基本参数
图 3  试件几何尺寸及配筋
d/ mm$ {f_{\mathrm{y}}} $/ MPa$ {f_{\mathrm{u}}} $/ MPa$ {E_{\mathrm{s}}} $/(105 MPa)
63054132.1
85006112.0
表 2  钢筋力学性能
图 4  试件加载装置示意图
图 5  试件位移计与应变片测点布置图
图 6  试件裂缝分布图
图 7  试件荷载-跨中位移曲线对比
图 8  试件荷载-跨中钢筋应变曲线对比
图 9  不同荷载作用下板底面和顶面的混凝土跨中应变
图 10  跨中截面混凝土应变分布
图 11  板端黏结滑移曲线
图 12  正截面极限承载力简化计算模型
试 件Fcr / kNFu,t / kNFu,c / kNμ /%Fcr / Fu,t)/%
DKB1-136.40141.91142.86?1.6725.65
DKB1-237.30148.00142.863.4725.20
DKB1-337.50140.27142.86?1.8526.73
DKB1-434.60144.27142.860.9823.98
XJKB34.25144.77142.861.3223.66
DKB2-142.29171.85161.805.8524.61
表 3  试件极限承载力比较
1 王俊, 赵基达, 胡宗羽 我国建筑工业化发展现状与思考[J]. 土木工程学报, 2016, 49 (5): 1- 8
WANG Jun, ZHAO Jida, HU Zongyu Review and thinking on development of building industrialization in China[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2016, 49 (5): 1- 8
2 刘洋, 李志武, 杨思忠, 等 装配式建筑叠合楼板研究进展[J]. 混凝土与水泥制品, 2019, (1): 61- 68
LIU Yang, LI Zhiwu, YANG Sizhong, et al Research progress on prefabricated building composite floors[J]. China Concrete and Cement Products, 2019, (1): 61- 68
3 黄海林, 吴方伯, 祝明桥, 等 板肋形式对预制带肋底板混凝土叠合板受弯性能的影响研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015, 36 (10): 66- 72
HUANG Hailin, WU Fangbo, ZHU Mingqiao, et al Influence of rib details on flexural behavior of concrete composite slab with precast prestressed ribbed panel[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2015, 36 (10): 66- 72
4 杨悦, 姜雪蔚, 聂鑫, 等 开槽密拼混凝土叠合板受力性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2023, 44 (7): 142- 151
YANG Yue, JIANG Xuewei, NIE Xin, et al Experimental study on mechanical behavior of concrete composite slab with rabbets[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2023, 44 (7): 142- 151
5 LIU J P, HU H F, LI J, et al. Flexural behavior of prestressed concrete composite slab with precast inverted T-shaped ribbed panels [J]. Engineering Structures , 2020, 215: 110687.
6 周旺华. 现代混凝土叠合结构[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1998.
7 吴方伯, 刘彪, 邓利斌, 等 预应力混凝土叠合空心楼板静力性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2014, 35 (12): 10- 19
WU Fangbo, LIU Biao, DENG Libin, et al Experimental study on static behavior of prestressed concrete composite hollow floors[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2014, 35 (12): 10- 19
8 吴方伯, 刘彪, 罗继丰 预应力混凝土叠合空心楼板的受剪性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33 (3): 196- 203
WU Fangbo, LIU Biao, LUO Jifeng Experimental study on shear resisting properties of prestressed concrete composite hollow core slabs[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33 (3): 196- 203
9 武立伟, 陈海彬, 刘亦斌 混凝土预制叠合空心楼板静力性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2018, 39 (Suppl.2): 36- 42
WU Liwei, CHEN Haibin, LIU Yibin Experimental study on static performance of precast concrete composite hollow floors[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2018, 39 (Suppl.2): 36- 42
10 BARAN E Effects of cast-in-place concrete topping on flexural response of precast concrete hollow-core slabs[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 98: 109- 117
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.017
11 罗斌 构造形式对复合叠合板弯曲刚度的影响[J]. 湖南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2023, 50 (1): 36- 44
LUO Bin Title influence of shape on bending stiffness of composite slab[J]. Journal of Hunan University: Natural Sciences, 2023, 50 (1): 36- 44
12 陈旭东, 马芹永, 黄坤. 一种新型钢筋桁架混凝土叠合空心楼盖及其实施方法: 202211270505.0 [P]. 2023–05–23.
13 中国工程建设标准化协会. 钢筋桁架混凝土叠合板应用技术规程: T/CECS715—2020 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2020.
14 熊学玉, 葛益芃, 姚刚峰 预制预应力混凝土双T板受弯性能足尺试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2022, 43 (2): 127- 136
XIONG Xueyu, GE Yipeng, YAO Gangfeng Experimental study on flexural behavior of full-scale precast prestressed concrete double-tee members[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2022, 43 (2): 127- 136
15 林彦, 宋健凯, 仲崇廷 不同拼缝构造措施的叠合板受力性能试验研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2020, 50 (6): 45- 50
LIN Yan, SONG Jiankai, ZHONG Chongting Experimental research on mechanical properties of composite concrete slabs with different joint construction measures[J]. Industrial Construction, 2020, 50 (6): 45- 50
16 赵作周, 韩文龙, 钱稼茹, 等 整体式拼缝连接的预制空心楼板受弯性能试验研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2016, 46 (5): 86- 91
ZHOU Zuozhou, HAN Wenlong, QIAN Jiaru, et al Experimental study on flexural behavior of precast concrete hollow slab connected by monolithic seam[J]. Industrial Construction, 2016, 46 (5): 86- 91
17 丁克伟, 陈东, 刘运林, 等 一种新型拼缝结构的叠合板受力机理及试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 48 (10): 64- 69
DING Kewei, CHEN Dong, LIU Yunlin, et al Theoretical and experimental study on mechanical behavior of laminated slabs with new type joints[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48 (10): 64- 69
[1] 佘振扬,黎雅乐,李雪红,徐秀丽,刘径恺. 带耗能系梁的摇摆自复位双肢薄壁高墩抗震性能研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2023, 57(5): 977-987.
[2] 肖彤,张明山,李本悦,徐铨彪,龚顺风. 叠合板板侧凹槽拼缝连接受弯性能试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2023, 57(4): 842-854.
[3] 周浙件,范毅雄,方燃,边学成. 地基沉降引发输水盾构隧道复合结构受弯分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2023, 57(12): 2476-2488.
[4] 李通,王新武,时强,布欣,孙海粟. 可替换式偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(9): 1725-1733.
[5] 王威,赵昊田,权超超,宋鸿来,李昱,周毅香. 墙趾可更换竖波钢板剪力墙抗剪承载力[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(8): 1407-1418.
[6] 金跃东,汪儒灏,赵阳. 单层网壳预埋螺栓装配式节点六杆模型试验[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(11): 2100-2108.
[7] 邱文亮,胡哈斯,田甜,张哲. 影响钢管混凝土组合桥墩抗震性能的结构参数[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(5): 889-898.
[8] 罗斌,黄炜,马相,李斌,周文彩,任杉杉. 采用发泡聚苯乙烯保温砂浆芯材的夹芯叠合板受弯性能[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(11): 2185-2196.
[9] 韩冬, 布欣, 王新武, 蒋沧如. 空间剖分T型钢梁柱连接角柱节点抗震试验[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(2): 287-296.
[10] 楼文娟,杨伦,陈勇,阎东. 覆冰导线静张力对输电塔横担的作用特征[J]. J4, 2013, 47(11): 1917-1925.
[11] 孙晓燕 王海龙 黄承逵. 超载运营对服役桥梁受弯性能影响的试验研究[J]. J4, 2008, 42(1): 152-156.
[12] 李玉荣 沈金 裘涛 孙炳楠 秦从律. 型钢混凝土梁式转换节点抗震性能研究[J]. J4, 2006, 40(1): 96-102.