Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2023, Vol. 57 Issue (3): 552-561    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2023.03.013
土木工程     
滨海潮汐岩溶地表软土注浆技术研究与应用
高晓杰1(),李召峰1,*(),林久卿4,宋云龙2,青尚杰3,崔向东2,彭晓光4
1. 山东大学 岩土与结构工程研究中心,山东 济南 250061
2. 山东正元建设工程有限责任公司,山东 济南 250098
3. 华润水泥(合浦)有限公司,广西 北海 536119
4. 华润水泥投资有限公司,广东 深圳 518001
Grouting technology for surface soft soil in coastal tidal karst area and its application
Xiao-jie GAO1(),Zhao-feng LI1,*(),Jiu-qing LIN4,Yun-long SONG2,Shang-jie QING3,Xiang-dong CUI2,Xiao-guang PENG4
1. Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
2. Shandong Zhengyuan Construction Engineering Limited Company, Jinan 250098, China
3. China Resources Cement (Hepu) Limited Company, Beihai 536119, China
4. China Resources Cement Investments Limited Company, Shenzhen 518001, China
 全文: PDF(3177 KB)   HTML
摘要:

针对滨海岩溶第四系表层土质地松软、承压能力弱的工程施工难题,以某公司矿山首采区周边土层为研究对象,考虑滨海潮汐作用导致渗流水头变化的特殊因素,通过室内模型试验的手段,选取工程常用水泥-水玻璃双浆液对岩溶表层松软土层进行注浆加固试验研究. 结果表明:潮汐半潮及高潮环境下浆脉形态多样,且前进式注浆工艺加固效果最佳;埋深60 cm处定点注浆技术在承压能力及水稳特性提升方面具有最优的增长速率,被注土层抗压强度最大增幅为46.8%,水稳特性增幅区间为773 s. 确定将现场采用半潮时段定点注浆技术、注浆深度为表土层平均深度的2/3处,作为滨海岩溶上表松软土层的最佳加固方案.

关键词: 滨海岩溶松软土层注浆加固注浆工艺工程应用    
Abstract:

The soil around the first mining area of a company was taken as the research object, aiming at the engineering problems of soft and weak bearing capacity of Quaternary surface soil in coastal karst area. In consideration of the change of water head under tidal action, through the means of indoor model test, the cement-water glass double slurry commonly used in engineering was selected to study the grouting reinforcement of karst surface soft soil layer. Results show that the shape of plasma veins is various in the tidal semitidal and high tide environments, and the advanced grouting technology has the best reinforcement effect. Results also show that the fixed-point grouting technology at the buried depth of 60 cm has the optimal growth rate in the improvement of bearing capacity and water stability characteristics. The maximum increase of compressive strength of the injected soil layer was 46.8%, and the increase range of water stability characteristics was 773 s. The site adopts the fixed-point grouting technology in the half tide period, and the grouting depth is 2/3 of the average depth of the topsoil as the best reinforcement scheme for the coastal karst soft soil layer.

Key words: coastal karst    soft soil    grouting reinforcement    grouting process    engineering application
收稿日期: 2022-03-29 出版日期: 2023-03-31
CLC:  TU 45  
基金资助: 山东省重大科技创新工程项目(2021CXGCO10301, 2020CXGC011405);山东省自然科学基金重点项目(ZR2020KE006)
通讯作者: 李召峰     E-mail: 15005425712@163.com;lizf@sdu.edu.cn
作者简介: 高晓杰(1995—)男,博士生,从事地下工程防灾减灾研究. orcid.org/0000-0001-5160-091X. E-mail: 15005425712@163.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章  
高晓杰
李召峰
林久卿
宋云龙
青尚杰
崔向东
彭晓光

引用本文:

高晓杰,李召峰,林久卿,宋云龙,青尚杰,崔向东,彭晓光. 滨海潮汐岩溶地表软土注浆技术研究与应用[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2023, 57(3): 552-561.

Xiao-jie GAO,Zhao-feng LI,Jiu-qing LIN,Yun-long SONG,Shang-jie QING,Xiang-dong CUI,Xiao-guang PENG. Grouting technology for surface soft soil in coastal tidal karst area and its application. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2023, 57(3): 552-561.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2023.03.013        https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2023/V57/I3/552

图 1  地面开裂及浆液溢出实拍图
图 2  滨海潮汐侧向补给示意图
图 3  岩溶矿区周边土样颗粒级配曲线
rw/c 水泥 C-S p(3 d)/MPa p(7 d)/MPa
ti/h tf /h ti/s tf /s 水泥 C-S 水泥 C-S
0.7∶1 8.5 17.5 52 65 9.1 2.1 12.2 2.5
1∶1 12.5 23 78 88 4.8 1.6 7.9 1.8
1.5∶1 18 49.5 85 95 1.23 0.87 1.78 1.28
表 1  水泥单液浆及C-S双液浆物理力学性能
图 4  滨海潮汐渗流注浆模拟装置示意图
名称 数量 规格/cm 用途
承压钢板 3 L40×L40×H1.5 封闭腔体、承压
被注腔体 1 Φ28×H92 装载被注试样
千斤顶 2 市面常规 压力输出装置
螺纹螺杆 12 ΦH100 连接、固定实验装置
表 2  试验装置的基本参数
图 5  注浆加固试验取样示意图
图 6  退潮环境下的浆脉形态
图 7  3种注浆方法在半潮/高潮的浆脉形态
图 8  取样流程及标准试样实物图
图 9  不同潮汐作用环境下不同深度试样抗压强度随3种注浆方法的变化曲线图
图 10  不同潮汐作用环境下不同深度试样水稳定特性随3种注浆方法的变化曲线图
图 11  不同潮汐作用环境下45 cm埋深试样崩解率随3种注浆方法的变化曲线图
图 12  滨海环境浆脉扩散机制示意图
图 13  检查孔压力-时间曲线图及孔口压力图
1 肖昌林, 粟梅, 苏双凤, 等 六盘水市岩溶发育特征和规律研究[J]. 河南科技, 2020, (23): 156- 158
XIAO Chang-lin, LI Mei, SU Shuang-feng, et al Research on characteristics and laws of karst development in Liupanshui City[J]. Journal of Henan Science and Technology, 2020, (23): 156- 158
2 代万品 贵州岩溶地区工程勘察要点研究[J]. 工程技术研究, 2019, 4 (16): 107- 108
DAI Wan-pin Discussion on the key points of engineering investigation in Karst area of Guizhou Province[J]. Engineering and Technology Research, 2019, 4 (16): 107- 108
3 CUI Q L, WU H N, SHEN S L, et al Chinese karst geology and measures to prevent geohazards during shield tunnelling in karst region with caves[J]. Natural Hazards, 2015, 77: 129- 152
4 WALTHAM T The karst lands of southern China[J]. Geology Today, 2009, 25 (6): 232- 238
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2451.2009.00736.x
5 BALLESTEROS D, GIRALT S, GARCÍA-SANSEGUNDO J, et al Quaternary regional evolution based on karst cave geomorphology in Picos de Europa (Atlantic Margin of the Iberian Peninsula)[J]. Geomorphology, 2019, 336: 133- 151
doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.04.002
6 SZCZYGIEŁ J, GOLICZ M, HERCMAN H, et al Geological constraints on cave development in the plateau-gorge karst of South China (Wulong, Chongqing)[J]. Geomorphology, 2018, 304: 50- 63
7 ZHU J Q, LI T Z Catastrophe theory-based risk evaluation model for water and mud inrush and its application in karst tunnels[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27: 1587- 1598
doi: 10.1007/s11771-020-4392-0
8 张庆艳, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 等 断层破碎带突水突泥演化特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41 (6): 1911- 1922
ZHANG Qing-yan, CHEN Wei-zhong, YUAN Jing-qiang, et al Experimental study on evolution characteristics of water and mud inrush in fault fractured zone[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41 (6): 1911- 1922
9 韩伟伟, 李术才, 张庆松, 等 矿山帷幕薄弱区综合分析方法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32 (3): 512- 519
HAN Wei-wei, LI Shu-cai, ZHANG Qing-song, et al A comprehensive analysis method for searching weak zones of grouting curtain in mines[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32 (3): 512- 519
10 卞凯, 周孟然, 胡锋, 等 RF-CARS结合LIF光谱用于矿井涌水的预测评估[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2020, 40 (7): 2170- 2175
BIAN Kai, ZHOU Meng-ran, HU Feng, et al RF-CARSC combined with LIF spectroscopy for prediction and assessment of mine water in flow[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2020, 40 (7): 2170- 2175
11 张杰, 毕攀, 魏爱华, 等 基于模糊综合法的烟台市栖霞中桥岩溶塌陷易发性评价[J]. 中国岩溶, 2021, 40 (2): 215- 220
ZHANG Jie, BI Pan, WEI Ai-hua, et al Assessment of susceptibility to karst collapse in the Qixia Zhongqiao district of Yantai based on fuzzy comprehensive method[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2021, 40 (2): 215- 220
12 王桂林, 强壮, 曹聪, 等 基于地理探测器与层次分析法的岩溶地面塌陷易发性评价−以重庆中梁山地区为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2021, 41 (1): 79- 87
WANG Gui-lin, QIANG Zhuang, CAO Cong, et al Evaluation of susceptibility to karst collapse based on the geodetector and analytic hierarchy method: an example of Zhongliangshan area in Chongqing[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2021, 41 (1): 79- 87
13 朱耀庭, 胡文华, 吴福泉, 等 溶洞上覆土层注浆加固应用分析[J]. 武汉理工大学学报: 交通科学与工程版, 2017, 41 (6): 954- 957
ZHU Yao-ting, HU Wen-hua, WU Fu-quan, et al Application analyse on grouting reinforcement in overburden layer of karst cave[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology: Transportation Science and Engineering, 2017, 41 (6): 954- 957
14 刘妍, 杨浩军, 吴楚 袖阀管注浆技术在粉土地基中的试验研究及效果评价[J]. 市政技术, 2021, 39 (2): 143- 147
LIU Yan, YANG Hao-jun, WU Chu Study and evaluation of technology of sleeve-valve-pipe grouting applied to silt ground[J]. Journal of Municipal Technology, 2021, 39 (2): 143- 147
15 刘奇, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 等 岩溶充填黏土注浆加固试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38 (Suppl.1): 3179- 3188
LIU Qi, CHEN Wei-zhong, YUAN Jing-qiang, et al Laboratory experiment study of grouted materials filled in karst caverns[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38 (Suppl.1): 3179- 3188
16 张健, 李术才, 李召峰, 等 全风化花岗岩地层单-双液浆加固试验研究[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 49 (12): 3051- 3059
ZHANG Jian, LI Shu-cai, LI Zhao-feng, et al Comparative study of reinforcement patterns between single and double-fluid grouting in fully-weathered granite[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2018, 49 (12): 3051- 3059
17 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 土工试验方法标准: GB/T 50123—2019 [S/OL]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2019: 19-20 [2022-03-29]. https://www.mohurd.gov.cn/gongkai/fdzdgknr/tzgg/201908/20190801_241309.html.
18 中国建筑科学研究院. 软土地区岩土工程勘察规程: JGJ 83—2011[S/OL]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011: 14-23[2022-03-29]. https://wenku.so.com/d/b245957f94d349383622de5b08148645.
19 张伟杰, 李术才, 魏久传, 等 三维注浆模型试验系统研制及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37 (3): 902- 911
ZHANG Wei-jie, LI Shu-cai, WEI Jiu-chuan, et al Development of a 3D grouting model test system and its application[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37 (3): 902- 911
20 李召峰, 李术才, 刘人太, 等 富水破碎岩体注浆加固材料试验研究与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37 (7): 1937- 1946
LI Zhao-feng, LI Shu-cai, LIU Ren-tai, et al Development of the grouting material for reinforcing water-rich broken rock masses and its application[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37 (7): 1937- 1946
[1] 张霄,于昊,李壮,刘衍顺,张紫东,籍鑫雨,李相辉. 循环加载强化作用对花岗岩细观破坏影响的离散元研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(11): 2303-2312.
[2] 舒佳军,邓正定,伍冰妮,管华栋,曹茂森. 冻融循环作用下倾倒式危岩体稳定性劣化模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(9): 1714-1723.
[3] 陈曦,曾亚武. 粗糙节理的改进形貌表征方法及采样点距效应[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(11): 2161-2169.
[4] 赵建平,李建武,毕林,程贝贝. 富水区隧道渗流场解析解及合理支护参数[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(11): 2142-2150.
[5] 邱驰,黄建坤,胡雨村,郭小平,胡云卿. 灌溉对西北干旱荒漠区排土场边坡稳定的影响—以乌海市新星煤矿为例[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(8): 1467-1477.
[6] 翟朝娇, 夏唐代, 杜国庆, 刘志军. 半空间内洞室在冲击荷载作用下的瞬态响应[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2014, 48(6): 1043-1048.
[7] 史吏, 蔡袁强, 徐长节. 轨道结构动力响应Newmark方法时间积分步长的确定[J]. J4, 2014, 48(2): 228-235.
[8] 叶秋红, 凌道盛. 基于矢量和法的边坡三维极限平衡稳定分析法[J]. J4, 2013, 47(6): 1097-1103.
[9] 唐良琴, 刘东燕, 聂德新. 向家坝河床坝基软弱夹层强度参数取值[J]. J4, 2013, 47(1): 162-168.
[10] 盛佳韧,叶冠林,王建华. 软岩地下洞库施工的水土耦合有限元模拟[J]. J4, 2012, 46(5): 785-790.
[11] 王亚军,张我华. 堤防工程的模糊随机损伤敏感性[J]. J4, 2011, 45(9): 1672-1679.
[12] 彭从文,朱向荣,王金昌. 岩石节理多层结构模型研究[J]. J4, 2010, 44(11): 2220-2228.
[13] 孙红月, 吴红梅, 李焕强, 尚岳全. 松散堆积土中的隔水层对边坡稳定性的影响[J]. J4, 2010, 44(10): 2016-2020.
[14] 俞炯奇, 张仪萍. 基于参数收敛的时变参数沉降预测模型[J]. J4, 2009, 43(11): 2125-2128.
[15] 贾义鹏,吕庆,尚岳全,杜丽丽,支墨墨. 基于粗糙集-理想点法的岩爆预测[J]. J4, 2014, 48(3): 498-503.