Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)  2024, Vol. 50 Issue (2): 221-230    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2023.06.270
研究论文     
基于熵权TOPSIS模型的农业绿色发展水平评价
郭书娟1(),许亚东1,黄进勇2,3()
1.郑州大学农学院, 河南 郑州 450001
2.郑州大学生命科学学院, 河南 郑州 450001
3.河南省伏牛山生物资源与生态环境野外科学观测研究站, 河南 南阳 473000
Evaluation of agricultural green development level based on entropy-weighted TOPSIS model: a case study of Henan Province
Shujuan GUO1(),Yadong XU1,Jinyong HUANG2,3()
1.School of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China
2.School of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China
3.Henan Funiu Mountain Biological and Ecological Environment Observatory, Nanyang 473000, Henan, China
 全文: PDF(1132 KB)   HTML
摘要:

现代农业绿色发展水平反映了农业综合实力,通过评估河南省农业绿色发展水平,可为河南省建设现代农业强省提供指导。本研究采用熵权TOPSIS模型,构建了包含资源节约、环境友好、生态保育、质量高效4个维度14个指标的农业绿色发展综合评价指数,对河南省2007—2021年农业绿色发展水平动态变化及河南省下辖18个地市2019—2021年农业绿色发展水平(3年的平均值)进行了综合分析。结果表明:反映河南省农业绿色发展水平的综合评价指数呈波动上升趋势,但该指数反映的整体水平仍然较低;河南省各地市之间农业绿色发展水平差异较大,西部地区明显低于其他地区;根据聚类分析结果,河南省不同地市可划分为Ⅰ区(现代农业区)、Ⅱ区(传统农业区)和Ⅲ区(都市农业发展区)3个区域类型。河南省各地市应依据本地资源禀赋,面向国家发展战略需要,因地制宜,重点突破影响现代农业绿色发展的薄弱环节,进一步推进农业绿色发展进程。

关键词: 农业绿色发展综合评价熵权法TOPSIS模型河南省    
Abstract:

Green agriculture is a new model of modern agricultural development. The level of agricultural green development reflects the comprehensive strength of modern agriculture. By evaluating the level of agricultural green development in Henan Province, it can provide guidance for building a strong province of modern agriculture. The TOPSIS model based on the entropy-weighted method was used to construct a comprehensive evaluation index for agricultural green development, which included 14 indexes from the four dimensions of resource conservation, environmental friendliness, ecological conservation, and quality and efficiency. The dynamic changes of agricultural green development level were analyzed in Henan Province from 2007 to 2021, as well as the level of agricultural green development (based on the average values of 2019, 2020, and 2021) in its 18 jurisdiction cities. The results indicated that the comprehensive evaluation index of agricultural green development in Henan Province showed a fluctuating upward trend, but the index was still at a low level. In addition, the levels of agricultural green development among different cities in Henan Province were quite different, and those in the western regions were significantly lower than those in the other regions. According to the cluster analysis results, different cities in Henan Province could be divided into three types: zone Ⅰ (modern agricultural regions), zone Ⅱ (traditional agricultural regions), and zone Ⅲ (urban agricultural development regions). In summary, all regions should be based on local resource endowments and in response to the needs of national development strategies, adapt to local conditions, focus on breaking through weak links, and further promote the process of agricultural green development in Henan Province.

Key words: agricultural green development    comprehensive evaluation    entropy-weighted method    TOPSIS model    Henan Province
收稿日期: 2023-06-27 出版日期: 2024-04-30
CLC:  F323.4  
基金资助: 中国工程科技发展战略河南研究院2020年战略咨询研究项目“乡村振兴战略背景下河南省绿色高效农业发展战略研究”(2020HENZT12)
通讯作者: 黄进勇     E-mail: guoshujuan@zzu.edu.cn;hjy666@zzu.edu.cn
作者简介: 郭书娟(https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0158-3515),E-mail:guoshujuan@zzu.edu.cn
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
郭书娟
许亚东
黄进勇

引用本文:

郭书娟,许亚东,黄进勇. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的农业绿色发展水平评价[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2024, 50(2): 221-230.

Shujuan GUO,Yadong XU,Jinyong HUANG. Evaluation of agricultural green development level based on entropy-weighted TOPSIS model: a case study of Henan Province. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2024, 50(2): 221-230.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2023.06.270        https://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/Y2024/V50/I2/221

目标层

Target layer

准则层

Criterion layer

指标层

Index layer

指标计算方法

Index calculation method

指标属性

Index attribute

农业绿色发展水平

Agricultural green

development level

资源节约复种指数播种面积/耕地面积正向指标
单位农业总产值耗水量总耗水量/农业总产值负向指标
耕地保有率本年末耕地总面积/上年末耕地总面积正向指标
有效灌溉水平有效灌溉面积/耕地面积正向指标
环境友好肥料施用强度化肥施用折纯量/耕地面积负向指标
农药使用强度农药使用量/耕地面积负向指标
农膜使用强度农膜使用量/耕地面积负向指标
生态保育森林覆盖率原始指标正向指标
除涝系数除涝面积/耕地面积正向指标
当年造林面积比重当年造林面积/耕地面积正向指标
质量高效粮食单产能力粮食产量/播种面积正向指标
农业产值效益农业生产总值/耕地面积正向指标
劳动生产率农业生产总值/第一产业就业人员数正向指标
单位面积机械总动力机械总动力/耕地面积正向指标
表1  河南省农业绿色发展指标体系
图1  河南省农业绿色发展水平动态分析

地市

City

资源节约指数

Resource

conservation index

环境友好指数

Environmental

friendliness index

生态保育指数

Ecological

conservation index

质量高效指数

Quality and

efficiency index

综合评价指数

Comprehensive

evaluation index

郑州市 Zhengzhou0.4820.6550.4210.3490.533
开封市 Kaifeng0.7530.5580.6300.4890.586
洛阳市 Luoyang0.4750.6660.4920.3670.526
平顶山市 Pingdingshan0.6860.8820.4960.3850.602
安阳市 Anyang0.6150.3320.4700.5150.454
鹤壁市 Hebi0.6120.7060.5070.8830.672
新乡市 Xinxiang0.4490.6460.6600.6950.597
焦作市 Jiaozuo0.4940.5890.5530.7140.591
濮阳市 Puyang0.5960.6700.5920.6860.650
许昌市 Xuchang0.6940.6930.5270.4640.624
漯河市 Luohe0.7830.7450.5890.5970.682
三门峡市 Sanmenxia0.5090.5740.4980.2360.495
南阳市 Nanyang0.5770.5590.4950.4240.514
商丘市 Shangqiu0.8640.6660.5700.5750.674
信阳市 Xinyang0.5770.6060.4740.4640.549
周口市 Zhoukou0.7220.3910.9820.4990.517
驻马店市 Zhumadian0.7610.7600.7450.6370.727
济源市 Jiyuan0.2720.6560.4950.6790.552
表2  河南省各地市农业绿色发展水平评价结果

类别

Category

地市

City

Ⅰ区 Zone Ⅰ新乡市、焦作市、济源市、鹤壁市、濮阳市、商丘市、驻马店市、漯河市、开封市
Ⅱ区 Zone Ⅱ周口市、安阳市
Ⅲ区 Zone Ⅲ南阳市、信阳市、郑州市、洛阳市、三门峡市、平顶山市、许昌市
表3  河南省各地市农业绿色发展水平分类
1 万宝瑞.加快提高我国农业竞争力的思考[J].农业经济问题,2016,37(4):4-8. DOI:10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2016.04.001
WAN B R. Thoughts on speeding up the improvement of China’s agricultural competitiveness[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2016, 37(4): 4-8. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2016.04.001
2 夏显力,陈哲,张慧利,等.农业高质量发展:数字赋能与实现路径[J].中国农村经济,2019(12):2-15.
XIA X L, CHEN Z, ZHANG H L, et al. Agricultural high-quality development: digital empowerment and implementation path[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(12): 2-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
3 张春玲,刘秋玲.乡村振兴战略背景下农业高质量发展评价及路径研究[J].经济论坛,2019(4):141-146. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-3580.2019.04.021
ZHANG C L, LIU Q L. Study on evaluation and path of agricultural high quality development under the background of rural revitalization strategy[J]. Economic Forum, 2019(4): 141-146. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3580.2019.04.021
4 杜志雄,金书秦.中国农业政策新目标的形成与实现[J].东岳论丛,2016,37(2):24-29. DOI:10.15981/j.cnki.dongyueluncong.2016.02.004
DU Z X, JIN S Q. The formation and realization of the new goal of China’s agricultural policy[J]. Dongyue Tribune, 2016, 37(2): 24-29. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.15981/j.cnki.dongyueluncong.2016.02.004
5 金书秦,牛坤玉,韩冬梅.农业绿色发展路径及其“十四五”取向[J].改革,2020,312(2):30-39.
JIN S Q, NIU K Y, HAN D M. The path of agricultural green development and its orientation in the 14th Five-Year Plan period[J]. Reform, 2020, 312(2): 30-39. (in Chinese with English abstract)
6 张乃明,张丽,赵宏,等.农业绿色发展评价指标体系的构建与应用[J].生态经济,2018,34(11):21-24.
ZHANG N M, ZHANG L, ZHAO H, et al. Construction and application of evaluation index system for agricultural green development[J]. Ecological Economy, 2018, 34(11): 21-24. (in Chinese with English abstract)
7 李菲菲,周玉玺,周霞.山东农业绿色发展水平时空差异与障碍因素分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2023,44(5):111-121. DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20230511
LI F F, ZHOU Y X, ZHOU X. Spatial and temporal differences and obstacles of agricultural green development in Shandong Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023, 44(5): 111-121. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20230511
8 贾云飞,赵勃霖,何泽军,等.河南省农业绿色发展评价及推进方向研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2019,53(5):823-830. DOI:10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.2019.05.019
JIA Y F, ZHAO B L, HE Z J, et al. Research on evaluation and direction of the green development of agriculture in Henan Province[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2019, 53(5): 823-830. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.2019.05.019
9 王火根,胡霜.农业绿色发展背景下资源-环境-经济耦合协调发展研究:以江西为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2023,44(8):74-86. DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20230808
WANG H G, HU S. Coupling coordination degree of resource-environment-economy under the background of green agricultural development: a case study of Jiangxi Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023, 44(8): 74-86. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20230808
10 周瑶,卢东宁,马勇.乡村振兴视阈下陕西农业绿色发展评价体系构建及应用[J].辽宁农业科学,2020(6):12-17. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1728.2020.06.003
ZHOU Y, LU D N, MA Y. Construction and application of evaluation system for agricultural green development in Shaanxi Province from the perspective of rural revitalization[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2020(6): 12-17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1728.2020.06.003
11 巩前文,李学敏.农业绿色发展指数构建与测度:2005—2018年[J].改革,2020,311(1):133-145.
GONG Q W, LI X M. Construction and measurement of agricultural green development index: 2005—2018[J]. Reform, 2020, 311(1): 133-145. (in Chinese with English abstract)
12 盖美,杨苘菲,何亚宁.东北粮食主产区农业绿色发展水平时空演化及其影响因素[J].资源科学,2022,44(5):927-942. DOI:10.18402/resci.2022.05.05
GAI M, YANG Q F, HE Y N. Spatiotemporal changes and influencing factors of agricultural green development level in main grain-producing areas in Northeast China[J]. Resources Science, 2022, 44(5): 927-942. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.18402/resci.2022.05.05
13 GENG S B, SHI P L, ZONG N, et al. Agricultural land suitability of production space in the Taihang Mountains, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 29(6): 1024-1038. DOI: 10.1007/s11769-019-1075-6
doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1075-6
14 王鹏,况福民,邓育武,等.基于主成分分析的衡阳市土地生态安全评价[J].经济地理,2015,35(1):168-172. DOI:10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.01.024
WANG P, KUANG F M, DENG Y W, et al. Assessment of land eco-security of Hengyang City on the principal component[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(1): 168-172. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.01.024
15 LI H H, LIU H, GONG X W, et al. Optimizing irrigation and nitrogen management strategy to trade off yield, crop water productivity, nitrogen use efficiency and fruit quality of greenhouse grown tomato[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 245: 106570. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106570
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106570
16 余永琦,王长松,彭柳林,等.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的农业绿色发展水平评价与障碍因素分析:以江西省为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2022,43(2):187-196. DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20220219
YU Y Q, WANG C S, PENG L L, et al. Evaluation of agricultural green development level and analysis of its obstacle factors based on entropy weight TOPSIS model: a case study of Jiangxi Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2022, 43(2): 187-196. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20220219
17 信桂新,杨朝现,杨庆媛,等.用熵权法和改进TOPSIS模型评价高标准基本农田建设后效应[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(1):238-249. DOI:10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.01.033
XIN G X, YANG C X, YANG Q Y, et al. Post-evaluation of well-facilitied capital farmland construction based on entropy weight method and improved TOPSIS model[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017, 33(1): 238-249. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.01.033
18 鲁春阳,文枫,张宏敏,等.基于改进TOPSIS法的河南省农业现代化发展水平评价[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(1):92-97. DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20200112
LU C Y, WEN F, ZHANG H M, et al. Evaluation on agricultural modernization level based on the improved TOPSIS method in Henan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020, 41(1): 92-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20200112
19 傅琳琳,毛晓红,毛小报,等.乡村振兴背景下浙江省绿色农业发展评价研究:基于农业资源综合利用的视角[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(12):23-34. DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20201203
FU L L, MAO X H, MAO X B, et al. Research on evaluation of the green agriculture development in Zhejiang Province under the background of rural revitalization: from the perspective of comprehensive utilization of agricultural resources[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020, 41(12): 23-34. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20201203
20 高健,葛子豪.江苏省农业绿色发展水平区域差异及趋势分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(12):14-22. DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20201202
GAO J, GE Z H. Regional difference and trend analysis of agricultural green development level in Jiangsu Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020, 41(12): 14-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20201202
21 孙炜琳,王瑞波,姜茜,等.农业绿色发展的内涵与评价研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(4):14-21. DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20190403
SUN W L, WANG R B, JIANG Q, et al. Study on connotation and evaluation of the agricultural green development[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019, 40(4): 14-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20190403
22 伍度志,杨帆,赵静.基于信息熵的加权基因关联网络融合方法[J].电子科技大学学报,2018,47(2):286-291. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0548.2018.02.020
WU D Z, YANG F, ZHAO J. Integration of weighted gene association networks based on information entropy[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2018, 47(2): 286-291. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0548.2018.02.020
23 ZHANG Z Y, HU Z N, ZHONG F L, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of high quality development in the Yunnan-Guizhou region based on the perspective of a beautiful China and SDGs[J]. Land, 2022, 11(6): 821. DOI: 10.3390/land11060821
doi: 10.3390/land11060821
24 倪九派,李萍,魏朝富,等.基于AHP和熵权法赋权的区域土地开发整理潜力评价[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(5):202-209. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2009.05.038
NI J P, LI P, WEI C F, et al. Potentialities evaluation of regional land consolidation based on AHP and entropy weight method[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2009, 25(5): 202-209. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2009.05.038
25 HWANG C L, YOON K. Methods for multiple attribute decision making[M]//Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 186. Berlin: Springer, 1981: 58-191.
26 AGHAJANI M, MOSTAFAZADEH-FARD B, NAVABIAN M. Assessing criteria affecting performance of the sefidroud irrigation and drainage network using TOPSIS-entropy theory[J]. Irrigation and Drainage, 2017, 66(4): 626-635. DOI: 10.1002/ird.2145
doi: 10.1002/ird.2145
27 HOSSEINZADE Z, PAGSUYOIN S A, PONNAMBALAM K, et al. Decision-making in irrigation networks: selecting appropriate canal structures using multi-attribute decision analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 601/602: 177-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.189
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.189
28 WANG Z G, WANG J B, ZHANG G P, et al. Evaluation of agricultural extension service for sustainable agricultural development using a hybrid entropy and TOPSIS method[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(1): 347. DOI: 10.3390/su13010347
doi: 10.3390/su13010347
29 王馨,陈妮,赵雅雯.基于熵权TOPSIS法的企业创新型技术人才价值评价[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2020,41(12):1788-1793. DOI:10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2020.12.018
WANG X, CHEN N, ZHAO Y W. Value evaluation of innovative technical talents in enterprises based on entropy weight TOPSIS[J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2020, 41(12): 1788-1793. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2020.12.018
30 李帅,魏虹,倪细炉,等.基于层次分析法和熵权法的宁夏城市人居环境质量评价[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(9):2700-2708. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2014.0215
LI S, WEI H, NI X L, et al. Evaluation of urban human settlement quality in Ningxia based on AHP and the entropy method[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(9): 2700-2708. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2014.0215
[1] 王罗其,傅伟军,叶正钱,马闪闪,丁立忠,赵科理. 基于地理信息系统和遥感技术的山核桃产区林地土壤质量退化评价[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2022, 48(2): 216-226.
[2] 吴荣康,潘芳慧,常佳悦,张星,TIBAMBA Matthew,王友保. 河南省畜禽粪便的耕地污染及其未来风险预测[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2021, 47(2): 233-242.
[3] 张晓玮, 龚雪梅, 李琳, 周志翔, 柳丹. 基于层次分析法的皖北地区引种的彩叶植物综合评价[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(5): 580-587.
[4] 骆健民  郑文钟  何勇 . 浙江省农业机械化发展水平评价 [J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2007, 33(2): 217-221.
[5] 徐卫国  张清宇  魏玉梅  丁峰. 大气污染物达标排放阈值模型的建立与应用[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2006, 32(6): 687-692.
[6] 方萍  谢锦良. 水稻土养分状况的综合评价 [J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2004, 30(1): 17-21.
[7] 门宝辉  梁川. 属性识别方法在水资源系统可持续发展程度综合评价中的应用 [J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2002, 28(6): 675-678.
[8] 吕苏丹  汪光宇  邬亚浪  史舟  王珂. 东阳万亩园区土壤养分综合评价研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2002, 28(3): 272-276.