Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2019, Vol. 53 Issue (8): 1517-1524    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2019.08.010
计算机与控制工程     
云环境下众包产品造型设计方案多目标群体决策
陈健(),莫蓉,余隋怀,初建杰*(),陈登凯,宫静
西北工业大学 陕西省工业设计工程实验室，陕西 西安 710072
Multi-objective group decision method for crowdsourcing product modeling design scheme in cloud environment
Jian CHEN(),Rong MO,Sui-huai YU,Jian-jie CHU*(),Deng-kai CHEN,Jing GONG
Shaanxi Engineering Laboratory for Industrial Design, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China
 全文: PDF(5764 KB)   HTML
摘要：

针对云环境中众包产品造型设计方案在制造过程中的决策问题，从工业设计角度出发提出多目标群体决策方法. 将已有众包产品造型设计方案作为研究对象，分析云环境中众包产品造型设计与制造过程的特点. 根据方案特点分析群体决策过程中须考虑的评价目标，采用层次分析法对评价目标与目标权重进行计算，建立众包设计方案的多目标评价体系. 将多目标群体决策问题转化为多目标优化问题，以评价体系为依据构建众包产品造型设计方案多目标群体决策模型，采用优化方法对模型进行求解，得到与理想方案最接近的众包设计方案. 以医疗镇痛泵的众包造型设计方案决策问题为例进行验证，结果表明所提方法可以有效解决众包产品造型设计方案在制造过程中的群体选择决策问题.
关键词： 计算机辅助工业设计;  众包产品;  造型设计;  多目标;  群体决策;  云环境    
Abstract:

Aiming at the decision problems in the manufacturing process of crowdsourcing product modeling design schemes in the cloud environment, a multi-objective group decision method was proposed from the perspective of industrial design. The characteristics of the crowdsourcing product modeling design and manufacturing process in the cloud environment were analyzed, by taking the existing crowdsourcing product modeling design schemes as the research object. The evaluation objectives that need to be considered in the process of group decision was analyzed according to the characteristics of the schemes. The evaluation objectives and objective weights were calculated by using the analytic hierarchy process, and the multi-objective evaluation system for the crowdsourcing design was established. The multi-objective group decision-making problem was transformed into multi-objective optimization problem. The multi-objective group decision model for the crowdsourcing product modeling design was constructed based on the evaluation system. The optimization method was used to solve the model, and the crowdsourcing design scheme which was closest to the idealized scheme was obtained. The decision problem of crowdsourcing product modeling design scheme for the medical analgesic pump was taken as an example, and results show that the proposed method can effectively solve the group selection and decision-making problem of crowdsourcing product modeling design scheme in the manufacturing process.
Key words: computer aided industrial design    crowdsourcing product    modeling design    multi-objective    group decision    cloud environment
收稿日期: 2018-11-12 出版日期: 2019-08-13
CLC:  TB 472  
通讯作者: 初建杰     E-mail: ureycj@163.com;cjj@nwpu.edu.cn
作者简介: 陈健（1987—），男，博士生，从事计算机辅助工业设计、云设计服务研究. orcid.org/0000-0002-5386-4852. E-mail： ureycj@163.com
服务　　
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章　　
陈健
莫蓉
余隋怀
初建杰
陈登凯
宫静

引用本文:

陈健,莫蓉,余隋怀,初建杰,陈登凯,宫静. 云环境下众包产品造型设计方案多目标群体决策[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(8): 1517-1524.

Jian CHEN,Rong MO,Sui-huai YU,Jian-jie CHU,Deng-kai CHEN,Jing GONG. Multi-objective group decision method for crowdsourcing product modeling design scheme in cloud environment. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2019, 53(8): 1517-1524.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2019.08.010    或    http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2019/V53/I8/1517

图 1  云环境下众包服务模式
图 2  众包产品造型设计方案多目标群体决策模型
图 3  医疗镇痛泵众包造型设计备选方案
评价目标 rij wi
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6
A1 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.50 1.00 3.00 0.183
A2 0.50 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.25 0.50 0.067
A3 0.50 3.00 1.00 0.25 0.50 2.00 0.113
A4 2.00 3.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.295
A5 1.00 4.00 2.00 0.50 1.00 3.00 0.271
A6 0.33 2.00 0.50 0.50 0.33 1.00 0.071
表 1  备选方案评价目标的相对权重
备选方案 eij
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6
P1 0.37 0.28 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.22
P2 0.27 0.22 0.37 0.11 0.37 0.15
P3 0.36 0.13 0.30 0.33 0.31 0.21
P4 0.32 0.28 0.33 0.31 0.34 0.25
P5 0.34 0.29 0.39 0.27 0.31 0.24
表 2  备选方案多目标评价的归一化参数
图 4  方案P4的结构设计与样机试制
1 陈健, 莫蓉, 初建杰, 等 工业设计云服务平台协同任务模块化重组与分配方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24 (3): 720- 730
CHEN Jian, MO Rong, CHU Jian-jie, et al Modular restructuring and distribution method of collaborative task in industrial design cloud platform[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing System, 2018, 24 (3): 720- 730
2 WU D, ROSEN D W, WANG L, et al Cloud-based design and manufacturing: a new paradigm in digital manufacturing and design innovation[J]. Computer-aided Design, 2015, 59: 1- 14
doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2014.07.006
3 CHANG D, CHEN C H Product concept evaluation and selection using data mining and domain ontology in a crowdsourcing environment[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2015, 29 (4): 759- 774
doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2015.06.003
4 MICHELUCCI P, DICKINSON J L The power of crowds[J]. Science, 2016, 351 (6268): 32- 33
doi: 10.1126/science.aad6499
5 XIANG W, SUN L Y, YOU W T, et al Crowdsourcing intelligent design[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology and Electronic Engineering, 2018, 19 (1): 126- 138
doi: 10.1631/FITEE.1700810
6 李伯虎, 张霖, 任磊, 等 再论云制造[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2011, (3): 449- 457
LI Bo-hu, ZHANG Lin, REN Lei, et al Further discussion on cloud manufacturing[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing System, 2011, (3): 449- 457
7 黄春水, 任艳丽, 蔡建兴 可验证模指数批计算外包方案[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2016, 43 (4): 135- 140
HUANG Chun-shui, REN Yan-li, CAI Jian-xing Verifiable outsourcing scheme for batch modular exponentiations[J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2016, 43 (4): 135- 140
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2400.2016.04.024
8 王燕 改进多目标进化算法的云工作流调度[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2019, 46 (1): 130- 136
WANG Yan Enhanced multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for workflow scheduling on the cloud platform[J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2019, 46 (1): 130- 136
9 陈英, 敬石开, 王业东 基于设计理性的群体一致性产品方案决策方法[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2018, 30 (7): 1356- 1365
CHEN Ying, JING Shi-kai, WANG Ye-dong Group decision making method with consensus of product scheme based on design rationale[J]. Journal of Computer-aided Design and Computer Graphics, 2018, 30 (7): 1356- 1365
10 薄瑞峰, 李瑞琴 基于Pareto最优的概念结构方案多目标决策方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2006, (9): 1114- 1116
BO Rui-feng, LI Rui-qin Pareto optimality based multi-objective decision-making approach to concept selection[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2006, (9): 1114- 1116
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-987X.2006.09.029
11 杨涛, 杨育, 张雪峰, 等 基于客户聚类分析的产品概念设计方案评价决策方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2015, 21 (7): 1669- 1678
YANG Tao, YANG Yu, ZHANG Xue-feng, et al Schemes evaluation and decision methods of product conceptual design based on customer analyses[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2015, 21 (7): 1669- 1678
12 安相华, 牛春亮, 薛冬娟, 等 基于变粒度权重与群决策的产品服务系统方案优选方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2016, 22 (1): 155- 165
AN Xiang-hua, NIU Chun-liang, XUE Dong-juan, et al Optimal selection method for product service system scheme based on variable granule weight and group decision-making[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2016, 22 (1): 155- 165
13 孙朋, 张骏, 曾红斌 基于前景理论的一种犹豫模糊多属性群决策方法[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2018, 36 (4): 735- 741
SUN Peng, ZHANG Jun, ZENG Hong-bin A hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making method based on prospect theory[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2018, 36 (4): 735- 741
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2018.04.019
14 ALFINA G, RHEE J, YOON B A simulation tool for prioritizing product-service system (PSS) models in a carsharing service[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2014, 70 (4): 59- 73
15 萨日娜, 张树有 复杂产品设计方案联合变权群决策方法[J]. 浙江大学学报:工学版, 2013, 47 (4): 711- 719
SARINA, ZHANG Shu-you Conjoint variable weight group decision method for complex product scheme design[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2013, 47 (4): 711- 719
16 CHEN L, WANG W, HUANG B A negotiation methodology for multidisciplinary collaborative product design[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2014, 28 (4): 469- 478
doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2014.07.003
17 ALASYASNEH M, AMERYAHIA S, GAUSSIER E, et al Personalized and diverse task composition in crowdsourcing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2018, 30 (1): 128- 141
doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2017.2755660
18 TUNG W F, JORDANN G Crowdsourcing social network service for social enterprise innovation[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2017, 19 (6): 1311- 1327
doi: 10.1007/s10796-017-9770-2
19 杨静, 余隋怀 基于改进逼近理想解排序法的产品评价研究[J]. 自动化与仪器仪表, 2016, (7): 157- 159
YANG Jing, YU Sui-huai Product evaluation research based on improved approximation ideal solution ranking method[J]. Automation and Instrumentation, 2016, (7): 157- 159
20 吴英. 基于众包的云制造运作模式及其服务组合研究[D]. 芜湖: 安徽工程大学, 2016.
WU Ying. Research on operation mode of cloud manufacturing based on crowdsourcing and its service composition [D]. Wuhu: Anhui Polytechinc University, 2016.
[1] 李笑竹,王维庆. 区域综合能源系统两阶段鲁棒博弈优化调度[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(1): 177-188.
[2] 楼恺俊,俞峰,夏唐代,马健. 黏土中地下连续墙支护结构的稳定性分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(9): 1697-1705.
[3] 孟祥飞,王仁广,徐元利. 双行星排汽车纯电驱动模式的转矩分配策略[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(11): 2214-2223.
[4] 黄华,邓文强,李源,郭润兰. 基于空间动力学优化的机床结构件质量匹配设计[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(10): 2009-2017.
[5] 樊佳爽,余隋怀,初建杰,王卉,陈晨,寸文哲,陈甜,郭家言. 云服务模式下设计方案的优选决策方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(1): 143-151.
[6] 欧阳永强,张新艳. 考虑堆垛机加减速的节能自动立库设计[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(9): 1681-1688.
[7] 童水光,赵航,刘会琴,童哲铭,余跃,唐宁,吴伟杰,李进富,从飞云,张昊,王寅华,郝国帅. 中开多级离心泵效率优化计算方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(5): 988-996.
[8] 郭洪武,蒲雷,张予燮,吴静,赵蕊,谭忠富. 基于粗糙集理论的风光蓄互补系统优化模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(4): 801-810.
[9] 荆丹翔,韩军,徐志伟,陈鹰. 基于成像声呐的水下多目标跟踪研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(4): 753-760.
[10] 张程,金涛,李培强,邓慧琼. 采用多目标蝙蝠算法的电力系统广域协调控制策略[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53(3): 589-597.
[11] 毕晓君, 王朝. 基于超平面投影的高维多目标进化算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(7): 1284-1293.
[12] 郝楠楠, 郑兵, 张超勇. 灰模糊积分在多目标决策中的应用[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(4): 663-673.
[13] 方俊, 王柏峰, 王伟铭, 张璇. 地下综合管廊公私合作项目定价机制[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(4): 744-753.
[14] 张德胜, 刘安, 陈健, 赵睿杰, 施卫东. 采用粒子群算法的水平轴潮流能水轮机翼型多目标优化[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(12): 2349-2355.
[15] 余洋, 夏春和, 胡潇云. 采用混和路径攻击图的防御方案生成方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(9): 1745-1759.