Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)  2019, Vol. 45 Issue (3): 325-331    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2018.07.261
资源利用与环境保护     
猪粪沼液对籼稻农艺性状、产量和饲用品质的影响
侯福银1(),陈应江1,杨智青1(),金崇富1,时凯1,陈长宽1,封功能2,李洪山2
1. 江苏沿海地区农业科学研究所,盐城市畜牧养殖装备工程技术研究中心,江苏 盐城 224002
2. 盐城工学院,江苏省海洋滩涂生物化学与生物技术重点建设实验室,江苏 盐城 224051
Effects of digested pig slurry application on agronomic trait, yield and forage quality of indica rice
Fuyin HOU1(),Yingjiang CHEN1,Zhiqing YANG1(),Chongfu JIN1,Kai SHI1,Changkuan CHEN1,Gongneng FENG2,Hongshan LI2
1. Yancheng Engineering & Technology Research Center of Animal Husbandry Equipment, Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Yancheng 224002, Jiangsu, China
2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Biochemistry and Biotechnology of Sea Spreads, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, Jiangsu, China
 全文: PDF(796 KB)   HTML
摘要:

为推进生态养殖及粪尿发酵沼液合理资源化利用,试验设置了14个不同处理组(N1~N14),探索了其对籼稻农艺性状、产量和饲用品质的影响。结果表明:1)在本试验沼液施用量(N 40%~480%)范围内,籼稻总体长势、产量和品质都优于无氮施肥处理时;与常规施肥(N2)相比,除N3株高和N4分蘖数显著降低外,其他沼液施肥组株高、分蘖数和有效穗数均变化不显著(P>0.05)。2)随着沼液施用量的增加,与N2相比,N5和N8处理组稻谷增产效果较好,分别增加了9.5%(P>0.05)和8.9%(P>0.05);就地上部生物量而言,N8和N9分别增加了21.4%(P<0.05)和5.4%(P>0.05);N6~N9各处理组千粒质量有增加趋势,其中N7增加了11.3%(P<0.05);但当沼液超过N10处理(816 t/hm2)施用量时,籼稻产量出现下降趋势,甚至低于常规施肥组(N2)。3)N5~N14各处理组籼稻糙米蛋白质含量都高于N1组,其中N7~N14处理组显著升高(P<0.05);而各处理组糙米直链淀粉含量与N2组相比有一定程度的减少。总体而言,在本试验条件下适量沼液施用比常规施肥更有利于籼稻的生长,当沼液控制在N8处理(612 t/hm2)施用量时,可有效提高籼稻产量和饲用品质。

关键词: 猪粪沼液籼稻农艺性状产量饲用品质    
Abstract:

In order to promote ecological breeding and reasonable utilization of digested pig slurry from large-scale biogas project, we designed 14 treatments (N1-N14) to explore the effects of biogas slurry application on agronomic trait, yield and forage quality of indica rice. The results showed that: 1) The overall growth, yield and quality were better than no nitrogen fertilizer treatment within the range of biogas slurry applied amount (N 40%-480%); and compared with the conventional chemical fertilizer treatment (N2), except that the plant height of N3 treatment and tiller number of N4 treatment were both significantly lower, the plant height, tiller number and effective panicle number in other biogas slurry applied treatments changed no significance (P>0.05), presented the trend of increasing first and then decreasing. 2) Compared with the N2 treatment, with the increase of biogas slurry applied amount, the rice yield of N5 and N8 treatments increased by 9.5% (P>0.05) and 8.9% (P>0.05), respectively. As for the aboveground biomass, N8 and N9 treatments increased by 21.4% (P<0.05) and 5.4% (P>0.05), respectively. The thousand seed mass of N6-N9 treatments indicated an increasing trend with N7 treatment significantly increasing by 11.3% (P<0.05). However, when the biogas slurry applied amount was above N10 (816 t/hm2), the yield of indica rice decreased, even lower than that of N2 treatment. 3) The protein contents of unpolished rice in N5-N14 treatments were higher than that of N1, with the treatments of N7-N14 markedly higher (P<0.05). The amylose contents of unpolished rice in N3-N14 decreased to a certain extent compared with the N2. All in all, application of proper biogas slurry is more conducive to the growth of indica rice than conventional chemical fertilizers in this test. Besides, biogas slurry can effectively improve the yield and forage quality of indica rice when the application amount of biogas slurry is 612 t/hm2 (N8).

Key words: digested pig slurry    indica rice    agronomic trait    yield    forage quality
收稿日期: 2018-07-26 出版日期: 2019-06-25
CLC:  S 511.21  
基金资助: 江苏省农业科技自主创新资金[CX(16);江苏省社会发展重大科技示范项目(BE2018680);江苏省“333”人才资助项目(BRA2017237)
通讯作者: 杨智青     E-mail: houfuyin2008@126.com;yangzhiq88@126.com
作者简介: 侯福银(https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0245-9723),E-mail:houfuyin2008@126.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
侯福银
陈应江
杨智青
金崇富
时凯
陈长宽
封功能
李洪山

引用本文:

侯福银,陈应江,杨智青,金崇富,时凯,陈长宽,封功能,李洪山. 猪粪沼液对籼稻农艺性状、产量和饲用品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(3): 325-331.

Fuyin HOU,Yingjiang CHEN,Zhiqing YANG,Chongfu JIN,Kai SHI,Changkuan CHEN,Gongneng FENG,Hongshan LI. Effects of digested pig slurry application on agronomic trait, yield and forage quality of indica rice. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(3): 325-331.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2018.07.261        http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/Y2019/V45/I3/325

指标

Index

pH

w(腐殖酸)

Humic acid/%

w(有机质)

Organic matter/%

w(全氮)

Total nitrogen/%

w(氨氮)

Ammonium

nitrogen/‰

w(全磷)

Total phosphorus/%

w(全钾)

Total potassium/%

沼液

Biogas slurry

7.54 0.23 0.25 0.12 0.96 0.01 0.04
表1  规模化供试猪场沼液理化性状
处理Treatment

基肥

Basic fertilizer

分蘖肥

Tillering fertilizer

穗肥

Panicle fertilizer

施用总量与比例

Total applied amount and percentage

ABSA/L ABSA/L ABSA/L TABSA/L NPCFA/%
N1 0 0 0 0 0
N2 0 0 0 0 0
N3 48.8 42.7 30.5 122 40
N4 97.6 85.4 61.0 244 80
N5 146.4 128.1 91.5 366 120
N6 195.2 170.8 122.0 488 160
N7 244.0 213.5 152.5 610 200
N8 292.8 256.2 183.0 732 240
N9 341.6 298.9 213.5 854 280
N10 390.4 341.6 244.0 976 320
N11 439.2 384.3 274.5 1 098 360
N12 488.0 427.0 305.0 1 220 400
N13 536.8 469.7 335.5 1 342 440
N14 585.6 512.4 366.0 1 464 480
表2  籼稻施用沼液试验设计

处理

Treatment

株高

Plant height/cm

分蘖数

Tiller number

有效穗数

Effective panicle number

N1 95.89±3.32d 5.33±0.71f 6.33±0.71d
N2 104.70±3.42ab 8.00±1.66abcd 8.67±1.50abcd
N3 97.79±3.39cd 7.33±1.87bcde 8.44±2.24bcd
N4 103.21±6.72ab 6.11±1.97ef 6.78±2.05cd
N5 101.66±3.84bc 7.44±1.94abcde 8.44±2.56bcd
N6 105.71±4.53ab 9.00±1.66ab 8.56±1.59bcd
N7 105.03±5.21ab 7.78±1.20abcde 8.67±2.35abcd
N8 101.23±4.45bc 6.78±1.64def 9.11±2.85abc
N9 107.60±4.18a 7.67±1.12abcde 8.22±3.31bcd
N10 107.99±3.45a 7.44±0.88abcde 10.67±2.06ab
N11 106.14±5.57ab 8.33±1.58abcd 10.56±3.32ab
N12 105.27±5.52ab 9.11±1.62a 11.22±3.35a
N13 104.49±5.82ab 8.67±1.73abc 10.00±2.65ab
N14 104.04±3.56ab 7.22±1.56cde 8.11±2.03bcd
表3  沼液施用对籼稻农艺性状的影响
图1  沼液施用对籼稻稻谷产量的影响
图2  沼液施用对籼稻地上部生物量的影响
图3  沼液施用对籼稻千粒质量的影响
图4  沼液施用对籼稻蛋白质含量的影响
图5  沼液施用对籼稻直链淀粉含量的影响
1 魏玉明,钱振波,吕伟,等 .沼气工程技术对规模化猪场饲养环境和猪生长发育的影响.畜牧兽医杂志,2016,35(3):48-52.
WEI Y M , QIAN Z B , Lü W , et al . Effect of biogas technology on breeding environment and pig growth development in large-scale pig farms. Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2016,35(3):48-52. (in Chinese with English abstract)
2 PU C J , LIU H , DING G C , et al . Impact of direct application of biogas slurry and residue in fields: in situ analysis of antibiotic resistance genes from pig manure to fields. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018,344(3):441-449.
3 宋成芳,单胜道,张妙仙,等 .畜禽养殖废弃物沼液的浓缩及其成分.农业工程学报,2011,27(12):256-259.
SONG C F , SHAN S D , ZHANG M X , et al . Concentration and determination of composition of biogas slurry. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011,27(12):256-259. (in Chinese with English abstract)
4 沈其林,单胜道,周健驹,等 .猪粪发酵沼液成分测定与分析.中国沼气,2014,32(3):83-86.
SHEN Q L , SHAN S D , ZHOU J J , et al . Determination and analysis of compositions in biogas slurry produced by swine manure digestion. China Biogas, 2014,32(3):83-86. (in Chinese with English abstract)
5 毛晓月,伍钧,孟晓霞,等 .连续3年定位施用沼液对水稻产量和品质的影响.华北农学报,2016,31(3):218-224.
MAO X Y , WU J , MENG X X , et al . Effects of three-year continuous application of digested biogas slurry on yield and quality of rice. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2016,31(3):218-224. (in Chinese with English abstract)
6 张璘玮,伍钧,杨刚,等 .猪粪沼液连续定位施用对油菜产量及菜籽品质的影响.农业环境科学学报,2014,33(3):562-568.
ZHANG L W , WU J , YANG G , et al . Effects of continuous applications of digested pig biogas slurry on Brassica napus yields and rapeseed quality. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2014,33(3):562-568. (in Chinese with English abstract)
7 黄继川,徐培智,彭智平,等 .基于稻田土壤肥力及生物学活性的沼液适宜用量研究.植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(2):362-371.
HUANG J C , XU P Z , PENG Z P , et al . Biogas slurry use amount for suitable soil nutrition and biodiversity in paddy soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016,22(2):362-371. (in Chinese with English abstract)
8 孙国峰,郑建初,陈留根,等 .猪粪沼液施用后土壤理化性状及水稻产量初步研究.中国稻米,2013,19(4):74-76,79.
SUN G F , ZHENG J C , CHEN L G , et al . Preliminary study of the soil physical and chemical properties and rice yield after biogas pig slurry application. Chinese Rice, 2013,19(4):74-76,79. (in Chinese)
9 唐微,伍钧,孙百晔,等 .沼液不同施用量对水稻产量及稻米品质的影响.农业环境科学学报,2010,29(12):2268-2273.
TANG W , WU J , SUN B Y , et al . Effects of application amounts of biogas slurry on yield and quality of rice. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2010,29(12):2268-2273. (in Chinese with English abstract)
10 侯云鹏,韩立国,孔丽丽,等 .不同施氮水平下水稻的养分吸收、转运及土壤氮平衡.植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(4):836-845.
HOU Y P , HAN L G , KONG L L , et al . Nutrient absorption, translocation in rice and soil nitrogen equilibrium under different nitrogen application doses. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015,21(4):836-845. (in Chinese with English abstract)
11 刘彦伶,来庆,徐旱增,等 .不同氮肥类型对黄泥田双季稻产量及氮素利用的影响.浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2013,39(4):403-412.
LIU Y L , LAI Q , XU H Z , et al . Effect of different types of nitrogen fertilizers on grain yield and nitrogen utilization of double-cropping rice in yellow clayey soil. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2013,39(4):403-412. (in Chinese with English abstract)
12 张进,张妙仙,单胜道,等 .沼液对水稻生长产量及其重金属含量的影响.农业环境科学学报,2009,28(10):2005-2009.
ZHANG J , ZHANG M X , SHAN S D , et al . Growth status, grain yield and heavy metals content of rice (Oryza sativa L.) as affected by biogas slurry application. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2009,28(10):2005-2009. (in Chinese with English abstract)
13 SORENSEN P , AMATO M . Remineralisation and residual effects of N after application of pig slurry to soil. European Journal of Agronomy, 2002,16(2):81-95.
14 GERICKE D , BORNEMANN L , KAGE H , et al . Modelling ammonia losses after field application of biogas slurry in energy crop rotations. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2012,223(1):29-47.
15 王文博,陈长青,仇忠启,等 .不同沼液施灌量对水稻生长及土壤氮磷平衡的影响.作物杂志,2014(3):85-91.
WANG W B , CHEN C Q , QIU Z Q , et al . Effects of application amounts of biogas slurry on rice growth and the balance of nitrogen, phosphorus in soil system. Crops, 2014(3):85-91. (in Chinese with English abstract)
16 黄继川,彭智平,徐培智,等 .沼液稻田消解对水稻生产、土壤肥力及环境安全的影响.广东农业科学,2016,43(10):69-76.
HUANG J C , PENG Z P , XU P Z , et al . Effects of paddy field disposal of biogas slurry on rice production, soil fertility and environmental safety. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2016,43(10):69-76. (in Chinese with English abstract)
17 邵文奇,纪力,孙春梅,等 .不同沼液施用量对水稻生长、产量及重金属含量的影响.浙江农业学报,2017,29(12):1963-1969.
18 SHAO W Q , JI L , SUN C M , et al . Effects of application rate of biogas slurry on growth, grain yield and heavy metals contents of rice. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017,29(12):1963-1969. (in Chinese with English abstract)
19 姜丽娜,王强,李艾芬,等 .休闲稻田消解沼液生态效应及其对水稻安全生产影响研究.农业环境科学学报,2011,30(12):2483-2490.
JIANG L N , WANG Q , LI A F , et al . The ecological effects of fallow paddy field disposal biogas slurry and its impact on the following rice safety production. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2011,30(12):2483-2490. (in Chinese with English abstract)
20 姜丽娜,王强,陈丁江,等 .沼液稻田消解对水稻生产、土壤与环境安全影响研究.农业环境科学学报,2011,30(7):1328-1336.
JIANG L N , WANG Q , CHEN D J , et al . Effects of paddy field disposal of biogas slurry on the rice production, soil quality and environmental safety. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2011,30(7):1328-1336. (in Chinese with English abstract)
21 STANLEY O P B , WILSON L T , MEDLET J C , et al . Nitrogen utilization efficiency: relationships with grain yield, grain protein and yield-related traits in rice. Agronomy Journal, 2006,98(1):168-176.
22 伍钧,王静雯,张磷玮,等 .沼液对玉米产量及品质的影响.核农学报,2014,28(5):905-911.
WU J , WANG J W , ZHANG L W , et al . Effects of biogas slurry on yield and quality of maize. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2014,28(5):905-911. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 魏来,余明艳,覃楠楠,黄冲平,谢颖,孙文波,吴列洪,王伟忠,王国新. 农光耦合系统对田间光照条件和甘薯生长的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(3): 288-295.
[2] 白岗栓,耿伟,何登峰. 保水剂施用量对秦巴山区土壤特性及烤烟生长的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(3): 343-354.
[3] 郭长春,张桥,孙永健,武云霞,徐徽,何艳,杨志远,马鹏,彭志芸,马均. 不同产量水平的杂交籼稻品种穴直播茎秆抗倒特性及其差异性比较[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(2): 143-156.
[4] 陈心源,田忍国,沈林章,殷益明,朱利鑫,贾惠娟. 不同蓝红光比例发光二极管对火龙果花芽分化和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(1): 14-22.
[5] 蒋静静, 常晓晓, 胡晓辉. 供氮水平对基质袋培黄瓜养分吸收分配和产量的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(6): 678-686.
[6] 向洁, 王富强, 郭宝光, 王庆刚, 余成群, 沈振西, 邵小明. 西藏河谷区燕麦与箭筈豌豆混间作对产量和营养品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(5): 555-564.
[7] 王桂跃, 赵福成, 韩海亮, 包斐, 谭禾平, 俞琦英. 浙江省鲜食玉米新品种产量、品质和抗性分析及其育种目标选择[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(3): 343-355.
[8] 蒲石林,邓飞,胡慧,钟晓媛,王丽,李武,李书先,廖爽,任万军. 杂交稻不同机插穴距及苗数配置对干物质生产与产量的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(1): 21-30.
[9] 庞婷,帅鹏,陈平,杜青,付智丹,杨文钰,雍太文. 不同结瘤品种和行间距对套作大豆根瘤生长及物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2017, 43(4): 451-461.
[10] 李燕,林峰,李潞潞,徐海明. 浙江省糯玉米品种稳定性、适应性和试点综合评价[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2017, 43(3): 281-288.
[11] 魏常慧, 刘亚军, 冶秀香, 李越, 马琨. 马铃薯/玉米间作栽培对土壤和作物的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2017, 43(1): 54-64.
[12] 周旋,丁俊山,吴良欢,陆若辉,杨国标,王旭. 不同工艺复合肥对小白菜产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(5): 626-.
[13] 兰艳, 黄鹏, 江谷驰弘, 雷小波, 丁春邦, 李天. 成都平原稻作区施氮量和栽插密度对粳稻D46产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(1): 63-73.
[14] 李敏, 罗德强, 江学海, 周维佳, 姬广梅, 王学鸿, 李树杏. 低温寡日照条件下不同类型杂交稻品种的生态适应性[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(1): 47-52.
[15] 杨世民,杨志远,孙永健,马均. 氮肥运筹对2个不同穗重型杂交稻产量及氮肥利用的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(6): 685-694.