Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)  2026, Vol. 60 Issue (4): 855-864    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.04.017
土木工程、交通工程     
环槽铆钉群铆效应及铆后预紧力松弛试验研究
刘震北1(),王海磊2,3,董伟东2,3,李亮4,王琨1,刘永健1,5,*(),刘紫豪1
1. 长安大学 公路学院,陕西 西安 710064
2. 广东省公路建设有限公司,广东 广州 510030
3. 广东湾区交通建设投资有限公司,广东 广州 511462
4. 中交公路规划设计院有限公司,北京 100010
5. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045
Experimental study on group riveting effect and post-rivet preload relaxation of ring groove rivet
Zhenbei LIU1(),Hailei WANG2,3,Weidong DONG2,3,Liang LI4,Kun WANG1,Yongjian LIU1,5,*(),Zihao LIU1
1. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
2. Guangdong Provincial Highway Construction Co. Ltd, Guangzhou 510030, China
3. Guangdong Bay Area Transportation Construction Investment Co. Ltd, Guangzhou 511462, China
4. CCCC Highway Consultants Co. Ltd, Beijing 100010, China
5. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
 全文: PDF(2309 KB)   HTML
摘要:

预紧力作为连接中抵抗外部荷载的关键因素,其大小直接影响连接的刚度和疲劳寿命. 以狮子洋大桥?一座大跨径钢桁梁悬索桥为依托工程,针对传统螺栓连接在荷载作用下易松动问题,研究短尾环槽铆钉群铆效应及铆后预紧力松弛行为. 开展弦杆环槽铆钉足尺模型试验,探究环槽铆钉的预紧力分布、施铆顺序对预紧力的影响以及施铆后预紧力松弛规律. 研究结果表明:环槽铆钉的预紧力呈正态分布于310~350 kN范围内,显著高于同型号高强螺栓的设计值,且满足规范要求. 施铆过程会导致预紧力产生衰减,由群铆中心向四周交叉施铆的顺序具有更小的预紧力衰减程度,此时群铆中心区域的铆钉受影响最大. 在1600 h的监测期内,预紧力平均衰减2.57%,松弛后仍满足设计要求. 施拧过程造成的预紧力损失比铆钉松弛造成的预紧力损失更为显著.

关键词: 钢桁梁环槽铆钉足尺模型试验预紧力施拧顺序    
Abstract:

The pre-tightening force is the key factor to resist external load in a connection, and its magnitude directly affects the stiffness and fatigue life of the connection. The Shiyang Bridge, a long-span steel truss suspension bridge, was taken as the support project. Aiming at the problem that the traditional bolt connections were prone to loosening under load, the group riveting effect of short-tailed ring groove rivets and the preload relaxation behavior after riveting were studied. Through a full-scale model test of chord ring groove rivets, the distribution of preload, the influence of riveting sequence on preload, and the law of preload relaxation after riveting were systematically investigated. The results showed that the pre-tightening force of the ring groove rivet was normally distributed in the range of 310~350 kN, which was significantly higher than the design value of high-strength bolts of the same type, and met the specification requirements. The riveting process can cause pre-tightening force attenuation. The sequence of cross-riveting from the center of the rivet cluster to the periphery resulted in a smaller degree of pre-tightening force attenuation. The rivets in the center area of the group riveting were most affected. During the 1600 hours monitoring period, the preload attenuated by an average of 2.57%, which still met the design requirements after relaxation. The preload loss caused by the riveting process was more significant than that caused by rivet relaxation.

Key words: steel truss beam    ring groove rivet    full-scale model test    pre-tightening force    riveting sequence
收稿日期: 2025-06-05 出版日期: 2026-03-19
CLC:  U 443  
基金资助: 广东省交通集团重点研发项目(JT2023ZD01-01).
通讯作者: 刘永健     E-mail: damienliu@163.com;liuyongjian@chd.edu.cn
作者简介: 刘震北(1998―),男,博士生,从事钢结构桥梁研究. orcid.org/0009-0009-2718-8190. E-mail:damienliu@163.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
作者相关文章  
刘震北
王海磊
董伟东
李亮
王琨
刘永健
刘紫豪

引用本文:

刘震北,王海磊,董伟东,李亮,王琨,刘永健,刘紫豪. 环槽铆钉群铆效应及铆后预紧力松弛试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(4): 855-864.

Zhenbei LIU,Hailei WANG,Weidong DONG,Liang LI,Kun WANG,Yongjian LIU,Zihao LIU. Experimental study on group riveting effect and post-rivet preload relaxation of ring groove rivet. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2026, 60(4): 855-864.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2026.04.017        https://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2026/V60/I4/855

图 1  环槽铆钉安装原理图示
图 2  环槽铆钉和高强螺栓剖面示意图
图 3  标准节段立面布置
图 4  加劲梁横断面布置
图 5  弦杆足尺模型试验试件构造
图 6  足尺模型试验试件照片
图 7  环槽铆钉布置形式
图 8  试件腹板施拧顺序
图 9  试件顶底板施拧顺序(施铆顺序Ⅰ)
图 10  临时拼装措施
图 11  环槽铆钉预紧力测量设备
图 12  环槽铆钉测点布置
图 13  环槽铆钉施铆预紧力历程曲线
铆钉编号P'/kNP0/kNr1/%铆钉编号P'/kNP0/kNr1/%
FA1439.1340.329.02FA77439.2335.330.99
FA5423.4339.224.84FA81431.4331.730.07
FA9449.4366.222.74FA89434.2328.032.38
FA13437.4332.131.69FA93434.4339.028.13
FA17434.8346.325.55FA95442.5341.429.60
FA21428.4337.227.03FA97436.9332.331.49
FA25346.4337.22.72FA101457.8330.538.53
FA29439.3339.929.27FA105429.9345.424.49
FA33438.7329.133.31FA109433.3338.228.11
FA37434.9338.028.68FA113447.5324.537.90
FA41420.9329.927.60FA117431.5336.228.36
FA45437.0336.429.90FA121434.8330.231.68
FA49431.0325.932.27FA125458.7345.032.96
FA53438.2338.229.57FA126434.7346.125.57
FA57430.8332.929.39FA127439.1340.828.85
FA61433.2337.128.51FA128422.9343.922.95
FA65430.2349.423.12平均值433.5337.628.47
FA69433.7333.230.13标准差16.947.73
FA73438.6340.128.97变异系数0.0390.023
表 1  环槽铆钉预紧力监测结果
图 14  环槽铆钉预紧力分布
铆钉编号P0/ kNP1/ kNΔP1/ kNrs/%铆钉编号P0/ kNP1/ kNΔP1/ kNrs/%
FA1340.3331.48.92.63FA77335.3322.113.23.95
FA5339.2329.39.92.91FA81331.7319.712.03.62
FA9366.2347.019.25.23FA89328.0317.011.03.35
FA13332.1315.916.24.88FA93339.0323.615.54.57
FA17346.3320.914.94.30FA95341.4330.810.73.13
FA21337.2331.614.74.35FA97332.3320.711.63.48
FA25337.2318.818.55.47FA101330.5318.711.83.56
FA29339.9323.716.24.76FA105345.4334.810.63.06
FA33329.1311.417.75.38FA109338.2328.59.72.86
FA37338.0317.920.15.94FA113324.5315.59.12.80
FA41329.9311.618.35.54FA117336.2326.79.52.81
FA45336.4321.514.84.41FA121330.2322.47.92.38
FA49325.9309.716.24.96FA125345.0338.96.21.78
FA53338.2324.813.43.96FA126346.1340.16.01.73
FA57332.9316.516.44.93FA127340.8333.67.22.10
FA61337.1320.616.54.91FA128343.9
FA65349.4335.014.44.13平均值337.6324.413.03.84
FA69333.2322.111.23.35标准差7.737.733.78
FA73340.1328.211.93.49变异系数0.0230.0230.292
表 2  施铆顺序对测试区域CA预紧力影响(铆接顺序Ⅱ)
铆钉编号P0/ kNP1/ kNΔP1/ kNrs/%铆钉编号P0/ kNP1/ kNΔP1/ kNrs/%
FA1332.7324.68.12.44FA65349.1339.39.82.81
FA2342.8334.18.62.52FA69339.2331.77.52.20
FA3336.1330.65.41.61FA73337.4331.26.21.83
FA4340.9335.85.11.51FA77344.3335.58.92.58
FA5339.1329.89.32.75FA81338.2327.111.13.27
FA9328.7320.18.62.62FA85342.7334.97.82.27
FA13338.7329.09.72.87FA89345.3336.78.62.48
FA17333.2323.49.92.96FA93339.4330.58.92.63
FA21340.9327.213.64.00FA97336.0332.14.01.18
FA25339.3329.49.92.92FA101338.4329.49.02.65
FA29336.1324.112.03.58FA105346.5329.716.84.85
FA33335.4322.712.73.79FA109346.5333.812.73.66
FA37335.4328.27.22.15FA113336.8328.48.52.51
FA41339.0330.78.42.46FA117343.3335.97.42.15
FA45335.4325.410.02.98FA121335.2327.97.32.19
FA49337.4329.97.42.21FA125329.7324.74.91.50
FA53338.9332.06.92.03平均值339.2330.38.92.62
FA57339.0328.110.93.22标准差5.145.02
FA61354.2345.68.52.41变异系数0.0150.015
表 3  施铆顺序对测试区域CA预紧力影响(铆接顺序Ⅰ)
铆钉编号P1/ kNPa/ kNΔPa/ kNra/%铆钉编号P1/ kNPa/ kNΔPa/ kNra/%
FA14349.9327.722.26.34T14337.5328.29.32.76
FA58355.4349.75.71.60T66343.1332.610.53.06
FA106350.7345.75.01.43T74338.2326.611.63.43
FA110348.8343.55.31.52T98329.0311.317.75.38
FA126348.9343.95.01.43T110316.4309.56.92.18
FB3353.3347.85.51.56B14339.4331.38.12.39
FB19344.2339.44.81.39B66337.0334.03.00.89
FB23342.2337.15.11.49B74339.8331.58.32.44
FB71331.1326.05.11.54B98361.4337.923.56.50
FB115351.2345.65.61.59B110343.1335.08.12.36
表 4  预紧力松弛结果
图 15  各测试区域环槽铆钉平均预紧力松弛结果
1 JASPART J P General report: session on connections[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2000, 55 (1/2/3): 69- 89
2 MOTALEB M, LINDQUIST W, IBRAHIM A, et al Repair assessment for distortion-induced fatigue cracks in a seismically retrofitted double-deck bridge complex[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 183: 124- 134
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.004
3 ALAMPALLI S, LUND R Estimating fatigue life of bridge components using measured strains[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2006, 11 (6): 725- 736
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:6(725)
4 陆春振. 桥梁用高强度螺栓延迟断裂研究 [D]. 北京: 中国铁道科学研究院, 2019.
LU Chunzhen. Study on delayed fracture of high strength bolts for bridges [D]. Beijing: China Academy of Railway Science, 2019.
5 GLIENKE R, SCHWARZ M, EBERT A, et al Joints with lockbolts in steel structures–part 1: lockbolt technology[J]. Steel Construction, 2020, 13 (2): 120- 127
doi: 10.1002/stco.202000011
6 MARIAM M, AFENDI M, ABDUL MAJID M S, et al Hydrothermal ageing effect on the mechanical behaviour and fatigue response of aluminium alloy/glass/epoxy hybrid composite single lap joints[J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 219: 69- 82
doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.078
7 PEROGAMVROS N, LAMPEAS G Experimental investigation of composite lockbolt fastened joints under in-plane low velocity impact[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2016, 90: 510- 521
doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.010
8 张天雄, 王元清, 陈志华, 等 高强度不锈钢短尾环槽铆钉力学性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38 (Suppl.1): 151- 158
ZHANG Tianxiong, WANG Yuanqing, CHEN Zhihua, et al Experimental study on the mechanical properties of high strength stainless steel short tail swage-locking pins[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38 (Suppl.1): 151- 158
9 杨俊芬, 同钿萌, 李立和, 等 腐蚀对5.8级环槽铆钉疲劳性能影响的研究[J]. 工程力学, 2025, 42 (5): 111- 121
YANG Junfen, TONG Tianmeng, LI Lihe, et al Study on the influence of corrosion on fatigue properties of the 5.8-grade lock bolt[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2025, 42 (5): 111- 121
doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.12.1100
10 LIU Z, ZHENG M, YAN X, et al Changing behavior of friction coefficient for high strength bolts during repeated tightening[J]. Tribology International, 2020, 151: 106486
doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106486
11 KONG Q, LI Y, WANG S, et al The influence of high-strength bolt preload loss on structural mechanical properties[J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 271: 114955
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114955
12 邓华, 陈伟刚, 白光波, 等 铝合金板件环槽铆钉搭接连接受剪性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2016, 37 (1): 143- 149
DENG Hua, CHEN Weigang, BAI Guangbo, et al Experimental study on shearing behavior of lockbolted lap connection for aluminum alloy plates[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2016, 37 (1): 143- 149
13 徐菲, 曾文彦, 周绪红, 等 高强度环槽铆钉拉-剪力学性能研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2024, 45 (8): 259- 270
XU Fei, ZENG Wenyan, ZHOU Xuhong, et al Investigation of mechanical behaviour of high-strength swage lockbolts subjected to combined tension and shear[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2024, 45 (8): 259- 270
14 WANG Z, WANG Y, ZHANG Y, et al Experimental investigation and design of extruded aluminium alloy T-stubs connected by swage-locking pins[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 200: 109675
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109675
15 WANG Z, WANG Y, YUN X, et al Numerical modelling of extruded aluminium alloy T-stubs connected by swage-locking pins: FE validation and parametric study[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 155: 106926
doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.106926
16 王中兴, 韩晔声, 孙健婕, 等. 高温下拉断型环槽铆钉力学性能试验研究 [EB/OL] (2024-05-27). https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.24020162.
17 王贤强, 杨羿, 刘朵, 等 节点板高强螺栓预紧力松弛试验研究[J]. 钢结构: 中英文, 2019, 34 (11): 40- 44
WANG Xianqiang, YANG Yi, LIU Duo, et al Experimental research on pre-tightening force relaxation of high-strength bolt in joint plate[J]. Steel Construction, 2019, 34 (11): 40- 44
18 易志宏, 刘浪, 田波, 等 环槽铆钉在公路桥梁中应用的试验研究[J]. 公路, 2022, 67 (1): 104- 108
YI Zhihong, LIU Lang, TIAN Bo, et al Practice study of ring groove rivets in highway bridges[J]. Highway, 2022, 67 (1): 104- 108
19 戴润达, 于红杰, 付常谊, 等 环槽铆钉连接副抗腐蚀性能及夹紧力群铆试验研究[J]. 世界桥梁, 2023, 51 (2): 76- 81
DAI Runda, YU Hongjie, FU Changyi, et al Experimental study of corrosion resistance and clamping force of ring grooved rivet connection pair[J]. World Bridges, 2023, 51 (2): 76- 81
20 王琨, 刘永健, 张太科, 等. 钢桁梁拼接节点中环槽铆钉预紧力试验研究 [EB/OL]. (2025–07–11). https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=ZDZC20250704001&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ.
21 刘震北, 黄河, 崔冰, 等. 板桁结合密横梁桥面系结构布置研究 [EB/OL]. (2025–07–02). https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=DNDX20250702001&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ.
22 陈伟乐, 刘震北, 刘双, 等 狮子洋大桥整体节点足尺模型静载试验[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2025, 25 (3): 65- 81
CHEN Weile, LIU Zhenbei, LIU Shuang, et al Full-scale model static tests of integral joint on the Shiziyang Bridge[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25 (3): 65- 81
23 王金锁, 张钦, 徐玉波, 等. 螺栓与环槽铆钉的抗剪性能对比试验研究 [EB/OL]. (2023-12-15). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2068.TU.20231215.1024.002.html.
24 徐菲, 陆一安, 周绪红, 等 高强度环槽铆钉ML40Cr材料单轴拉伸及低周疲劳性能研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2024, 45 (10): 217- 228
XU Fei, LU Yian, ZHOU Xuhong, et al Uniaxial tensile and low-cycle fatigue performance of high-strength lockbolt ML40Cr materials[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2024, 45 (10): 217- 228
25 XUE X, LIN S, GUO Z, et al Mechanical behavior of loose high-strength bolted connections with thin sheet steels[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2021, 168: 108281
doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108281
26 中国工程建设标准化协会. 钢结构高强度环槽铆钉连接技术规程: T/CECS 1552—2024 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2024.
27 陈学森, 施刚 超大承载力端板连接节点螺栓施拧顺序及预拉力松弛研究[J]. 钢结构, 2018, 33 (6): 1- 5
CHEN Xuesen, SHI Gang Tightening sequence and pretension relaxation of bolts in ultra-large capacity end-plate connections[J]. Steel Construction, 2018, 33 (6): 1- 5
[1] 王琨,刘永健,张太科,崔高炎,郭峰超,刘震北,马文杰. 钢桁梁拼接节点中环槽铆钉预紧力试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2026, 60(1): 199-207.
[2] 曹长明, 关富玲, 黄河, 朱术华. 新型热刀式锁紧释放装置设计与试验[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(12): 2350-2356.
[3] 毕运波,吴原骅,朱伟东,沈立恒,黄稳,朱宇. 飞机叠层结构预联接工艺优化[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(11): 2040-2046.
[4] 鲍侃袁 吴玉华 陈勇 孙炳楠. 新型楼盖体系的足尺模型试验及简化计算方法[J]. J4, 2008, 42(7): 1128-1134.