条石鲷自然群体和养殖群体形态差异分析

doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2023.11.161

浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）

2024, Vol. 50

Issue (5): 817-827 DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2023.11.161

动物科学与动物医学

条石鲷自然群体和养殖群体形态差异分析

王嘉浩^1,²(

),胡桂森³,吴章⁴,朱凯^1,²,徐开达^1,²(

),王好学^1,²,戴乾^1,²

^1.浙江省海洋水产研究所，农业农村部重点渔场渔业资源环境科学观测实验站/浙江省海洋渔业资源可持续利用技术研究重点实验室，浙江舟山 316021
^2.浙江海洋大学海洋与渔业研究所，浙江舟山 316022
^3.嵊泗县海洋与渔业局，浙江舟山 202450
^4.乐清市柳市中学，浙江温州 325608

Analysis of morphological differences between natural and cultured populations of Oplegnathus fasciatus

Jiahao WANG^1,²(

),Guisen HU³,Zhang WU⁴,Kai ZHU^1,²,Kaida XU^1,²(

),Haoxue WANG^1,²,Qian DAI^1,²

^1.Scientific Observation and Experimental Station of Fishery Resources of Key Fishing Grounds, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Key Laboratory of Sustainable Utilization of Technology Research for Fisheries Resources of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Zhoushan 316021, Zhejiang, China
^2.Marine and Fishery Research Institute, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, Zhejiang, China
^3.Oceanic and Fisheries Bureau of Shengsi County, Zhoushan 202450, Zhejiang, China
^4.Yueqing Liushi Senior Middle School, Wenzhou 325608, Zhejiang, China

全文: PDF(1358 KB) HTML

摘要：

为有效区分条石鲷自然群体和养殖群体，本研究随机抽取226尾条石鲷样本（自然群体126尾、养殖群体100尾），利用传统形态测量法和框架测量法分别测得7、36个可量性状，并对其进行差异性分析与逐步判别分析。差异性分析结果表明：采用传统形态测量法时，条石鲷6个可量性状（不包括体长）中有4个性状差异极显著（P＜0.01）、2个性状差异显著（P＜0.05）；采用框架测量法时，36个可量性状中有31个性状差异极显著（P＜0.01）、5个性状差异显著（P＜0.05）。说明条石鲷自然群体和养殖群体的形态特征存在显著差异，差异主要集中在头部、躯干和腹鳍。逐步判别分析结果表明：基于传统形态测量法和框架测量法交叉验证后的判别正确率分别为97.8%和94.7%，基于2种方法相结合的综合分析交叉验证后的判别正确率为99.6%。上述研究结果表明，利用形态学方法对条石鲷自然群体和养殖群体进行判别是可行的，并且，结合多种形态可量性状的综合判别方式的判别结果更准确。

关键词： 条石鲷; 群体判别; 框架测量法; 逐步判别分析

Abstract:

In order to effectively distinguish the natural population from the cultured population of Oplegnathus fasciatus, this study randomly selected 226 samples (126 from the natural population and 100 from the cultured population) and measured seven and thirty-six measurable traits by traditional morphometry and the truss network, respectively, and carried out difference analysis and stepwise discriminant analysis. The results of difference analysis showed that four of the six measurable traits (excluding body length) were extremely significantly different (P＜0.01), and two of them were significantly different (P＜0.05) according to traditional morphometry, while 31 of 36 measurable traits were extremely significantly different (P＜0.01) and five of them were significantly different (P＜0.05) according to the truss network. These results indicated that there were significant differences in the morphological characteristics between the natural and cultured populations, mainly in the head, trunk and pelvic fin. The results of stepwise discriminant analysis showed that the correct rate of discrimination were 97.8% and 94.7%, respectively, after cross-validation based on the traditional morphometry and truss network, and the correct rate of discrimination was 99.6% after cross-validation based on the comprehensive analysis combined with the two methods. The above results showed that it is feasible to discriminate the natural and cultured populations via morphological methods, and the results of the comprehensive discrimination can be more accurate when various morphologically measurable traits were combined.

Key words: Oplegnathus fasciatus population discrimination truss network stepwise discriminant analysis

收稿日期: 2023-11-16 出版日期: 2024-10-31

CLC:

S917.4

基金资助: 国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFD0901204);浙江省重点研发计划项目(2019C02056);浙江省公益技术应用研究项目(LGN21C190005)

通讯作者: 徐开达 E-mail: wjh1187969399wjh@126.com;xkd1981@163.com

作者简介: 王嘉浩（https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2750-7577），E-mail：wjh1187969399wjh@126.com

	服务
	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王嘉浩
	胡桂森
	吴章
	朱凯
	徐开达
	王好学
	戴乾

引用本文:

王嘉浩,胡桂森,吴章,朱凯,徐开达,王好学,戴乾. 条石鲷自然群体和养殖群体形态差异分析[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2024, 50(5): 817-827.

Jiahao WANG,Guisen HU,Zhang WU,Kai ZHU,Kaida XU,Haoxue WANG,Qian DAI. Analysis of morphological differences between natural and cultured populations of Oplegnathus fasciatus. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2024, 50(5): 817-827.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2023.11.161 或 https://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/Y2024/V50/I5/817

表1 条石鲷2个群体的样本概况

图1 条石鲷鱼体测量示意图1：吻前端；2：腹鳍起点；3：臀鳍起点；4：臀鳍末端；5：第二背鳍末端；6：第二背鳍起点（第一背鳍末端）；7：第一背鳍起点；8：椎骨柱末端；9：胸鳍起点。

表2 条石鲷鱼体形态传统可量性状的标准化比值比较

表3 基于传统形态测量法的逐步判别分析结果

表4 条石鲷鱼体形态可量性状的标准化比值比较

表5 基于框架测量法的逐步判别分析结果

表6 基于传统形态测量法和框架测量法的判别分析结果

表7 其他鱼类野生群体与养殖群体的形态比较

1	赵盛龙,徐汉祥,钟俊生,等.浙江海洋鱼类志(上册)[M].杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,2016. ZHAO S L, XU H X, ZHONG J S, et al. Fauna of Marine Fishes in Zhejiang (Part I) [M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Science & Technology Press, 2016. (in Chinese)
2	《福建鱼类志》编写组.福建鱼类志(下卷)[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社,1985. “Fishes of Fujian Province” Editorial Subcommittee. The Fishes of Fujian Province (Part II) [M]. Fuzhou: Fujian Science & Technology Publishing House, 1985. (in Chinese)
3	王健鑫,石戈,李鹏,等.条石鲷消化道的形态学和组织学[J].水产学报,2006,30(5):618-626. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0615.2006.05.007 WANG J X, SHI G, LI P, et al. Morphology and histology of digestive tract in Oplegnathus fasciatus [J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2006, 30(5): 618-626. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0615.2006.05.007
4	胡玲玲,李加儿,区又君,等.条石鲷肌肉营养成分分析及评价[J].华南农业大学学报,2010,31(3):71-75. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-411X.2010.03.018 HU L L, LI J E, OU Y J, et al. Analysis of nutrient components and evaluation of nutritive quality in the muscle of Oplegnathus fasciatus [J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2010, 31(3): 71-75. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-411X.2010.03.018
5	区又君,李加儿,林锋.南海区驯养条石鲷亲鱼的初次性成熟和产卵[J].南方水产科学,2014,10(5):82-86. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2014.05.012 OU Y J, LI J E, LIN F. First maturation and spawning of cultured Oplegnathus fasciatus broodstock in the South China Sea[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2014, 10(5): 82-86. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2014.05.012
6	区又君,李加儿,蔡文超,等.广东沿海驯养条石鲷的全人工繁育及苗种生物学[J].应用海洋学学报,2014,33(3):354-361. DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.2095-4972.2014.03.010 OU Y J, LI J E, CAI W C, et al. Studies on the artificial breeding and seedling for pond-cultured Oplegnathus fasciatus in Guangdong coastal area[J]. Journal of Applied Oceanography, 2014, 33(3): 354-361. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.2095-4972.2014.03.010
7	沈庞幼,尤仲杰.条石鲷苗种繁育技术[J].中国水产,2010(3):50-51. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6681.2010.03.017 SHEN P Y, YOU Z J. Breeding technique of Oplegnathus fasciatus seedlings[J]. China Fisheries, 2010(3): 50-51. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6681.2010.03.017
8	蔡文超,区又君,李加儿.南海区养殖条石鲷的胚胎发育[J].南方水产,2009,5(4):31-35. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2009.04.006 CAI W C, OU Y J, LI J E. Embryonic development of rock bream Oplegnathus fasciatus cultured in South China Sea[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2009, 5(4): 31-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2227.2009.04.006
9	余海,黄大宏,殷兴銮,等.条石鲷工厂化养殖技术的初步研究[J].浙江海洋学院学报(自然科学版),2010,29(3):215-221. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-830X.2010.03.004 YU H, HUANG D H, YIN X L, et al. Preliminary studies on industrial aquaculture technique of Oplegnathus fasciatus [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University (Natural Science), 2010, 29(3): 215-221. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-830X.2010.03.004
10	宋锋.工厂化养殖条石鲷技术[J].中国水产,2009(5):44-45. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6681.2009.05.024 SONG F. Industrialized culture technique for Oplegnathus fasciatus [J]. China Fisheries, 2009(5): 44-45. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6681.2009.05.024
11	王好学,徐开达,周永东,等.浙江北部海域条石鲷标志放流及回捕调查[J].浙江海洋大学学报(自然科学版),2022,41(5):455-458. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-830X.2022.05.013 WANG H X, XU K D, ZHOU Y D, et al. Investigation of a mark-recapture method of Oplegnathus fasciatus in the waters of northern Zhejiang[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University (Natural Science), 2022, 41(5): 455-458. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-830X.2022.05.013
12	陈新军.渔业资源与渔场学[M].北京:海洋出版社,2004:27-32. CHEN X J. Fishery Resources and Fishery Science[M]. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 2004: 27-32. (in Chinese)
13	赵祥,郑建,高天翔,等.基于线粒体DNA控制区的黄姑鱼养殖群体与野生群体比较研究[J].中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版),2021,51(8):11-19. DOI:10.16441/j.cnki.hdxb.20200174 ZHAO X, ZHENG J, GAO T X, et al. Comparative analysis of genetic variation between cultured and wild populations of Nibea albiflora based on mitochondrial DNA control region[J]. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 2021, 51(8): 11-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16441/j.cnki.hdxb.20200174
14	费鸿年,张诗全.水产资源学[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1990. FEI H N, ZHANG S Q. Aquatic Resources[M]. Beijing: Science and Technology of China Press, 1990. (in Chinese)
15	邓景耀,赵传絪.海洋渔业生物学[M].北京:农业出版社,1991. DENG J Y, ZHAO C Y. Marine Fisheries Biology[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1991. (in Chinese)
16	陈大刚.渔业资源生物学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1990. CHEN D G. Fishery Resources Biology[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1990. (in Chinese)
17	刘楚珠,严利平,李建生,等.基于框架法的东黄海日本鲭产卵群体形态差异分析[J].中国水产科学,2011,18(4):908-917. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1118.2011.00908 LIU C Z, YAN L P, LI J S, et al. Morphological differences between breeding stocks of chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus) in the East China and Yellow Seas[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 2011, 18(4): 908-917. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1118.2011.00908
18	HUMPHRIES J M, BOOKSTEIN F L, CHERNOFF B, et al. Multivariate discrimination by shape in relation to size[J]. Systematic Biology, 1981, 30(3): 291-308.
19	王映.大黄鱼野生群体和养殖群体鉴定技术研究[D].上海:上海海洋大学,2017. WANG Y. Germplasm identification of wild and cultured stock of large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea)[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ocean University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
20	ELLIS T, HOWELL B R, HAYES J. Morphological differences between wild and hatchery-reared turbot[J]. Journal of Fish Biology, 1997, 50(5): 1124-1128.
21	KEIZO Y, MASAMI K. Comparison of body proportions and meristic characters between hatchery-reared and wild Japanese flounder juveniles[J]. Scientific Reports of Hokkaido Fisheries Experimental Station, 2003, 64: 105-111.
22	ERGÜDEN D, TURAN C. Examination of genetic and mor-phologic structure of sea-bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L., 1758) populations in Turkish coastal waters[J]. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 2005, 29(3): 727-733.
23	玄文丹,谢玉,朱凯,等.基于耳石和鱼体形态的东海海域两种方头鱼判别[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(2):527-534. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202302.031 XUAN W D, XIE Y, ZHU K, et al. Discriminant analysis of two Branchiostegus species in the East China Sea based on otoliths and shape morphology[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(2): 527-534. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202302.031
24	韩霈武,陈新军,方舟,等.基于鱼体和耳石形态的东海两种鲐属鱼类判别分析[J].海洋渔业,2020,42(2):161-169. DOI:10.13233/j.cnki.mar.fish.2020.02.004 HAN P W, CHEN X J, FANG Z, et al. Discriminant analysis of two Scomber species in the East China Sea based on shape and otolith morphology[J]. Marine Fisheries, 2020, 42(2): 161-169. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13233/j.cnki.mar.fish.2020.02.004
25	孙中之,柳学周,徐永江,等.条石鲷人工育苗及养殖技术[J].齐鲁渔业,2009,26(1):28-31. SUN Z Z, LIU X Z, XU Y J, et al. Technologies for seeding rearing and culture of rock bream (Oplegnathus fasciatus)[J]. Shandong Fisheries, 2009, 26(1): 28-31. (in Chinese with English abstract)
26	王莹莹,杨天燕,孟玮,等.中国沿海龙头鱼群体多变量形态特征的比较[J].中国水产科学,2020,27(10):1234-1242. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1118.2020.20062 WANG Y Y, YANG T Y, MENG W, et al. Multivariate analysis of Harpadon nehereus populations from coastal areas of China based on morphological characters[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 2020, 27(10): 1234-1242. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1118.2020.20062
27	TZENG T D, YEH S Y. Stock structure of spotted mackerel (Scombe raustralasicus) in Taiwan inferred from morphometric variation[J]. Journal of the Fisheries Society of Taiwan, 2002, 29(2): 117-128.
28	CHAPMAN A R O. The genetic basis of morphological differentiation in some Laminaria populations[J]. Marine Biology, 1974, 24(1): 85-91.
29	WIMBERGER P H. Plasticity of fish body shape. The effects of diet, development, family and age in two species of Geophagus (Pisces: Cichlidae)[J]. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1992, 45(3): 197-218.
30	GUO H Y, ZHANG X F, NÄSLUND J, et al. Differences in external morphology, body composition and swimming per-formance between hatchery- and wild-origin marbled rockfish (Sebastiscus marmoratus)[J]. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2022, 9: 912129. DOI: 10.3389/FMARS.2022.912129 doi: 10.3389/FMARS.2022.912129
31	陈慧,陈武,林国文,等.官井洋种群网箱养殖大黄鱼的形态特征与生长式型[J].海洋渔业,2007,29(4):331-336. DOI:10.13233/j.cnki.mar.fish.2007.04.01 CHEN H, CHEN W, LIN G W, et al. The morphological characteristics and growth pattern of cage-cultured large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) in Guanjing-Yang population[J]. Marine Fisheries, 2007, 29(4): 331-336. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13233/j.cnki.mar.fish.2007.04.01
32	储天琪,王梦洁,刘峰,等.小黄鱼养殖群体与野生群体形态性状差异性分析[J].浙江海洋大学学报(自然科学版),2020,39(4):287-295. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-830X.2020.04.002 CHU T Q, WANG M J, LIU F, et al. Morphological difference analysis between cultured and wild group of Larimichthys polyactis [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University (Natural Science), 2020, 39(4): 287-295. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-830X.2020.04.002
33	CAESAR A, JERRY F, KRISTO G. Evaluation of the morpho-logical difference of wild, farmed and hatchery-released gilthead sea bream[J]. Global Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture, 2019, 7(1): 474-482.
34	WRINGE B F, FLEMING I A, PURCHASE C F. Rapid morphological divergence of cultured cod of the northwest Atlantic from their source population[J]. Aquaculture Envi-ronment Interactions, 2015, 7(2): 167-177. DOI: 10.3354/aei00145 doi: 10.3354/aei00145
35	FLEMING I A, JONSSON B, GROSS M R. Phenotypic divergence of sea-ranched, farmed, and wild salmon[J]. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1994, 51(12): 2808-2824.
36	WRINGE B F, PURCHASE C F, FLEMING I A. In search of a “cultured fish phenotype”: a systematic review, meta-analysis and vote-counting analysis[J]. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2016, 26(3): 351-373. DOI: 10.1007/s11160-016-9431-4 doi: 10.1007/s11160-016-9431-4
37	FU S J, CAO Z D, YAN G J, et al. Integrating environmental variation, predation pressure, phenotypic plasticity and locomotor performance[J]. Oecologia, 2013, 173(2): 343-354. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2626-7 doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2626-7
38	PAKKASMAA S, PIIRONEN J. Water velocity shapes juvenile salmonids[J]. Evolutionary Ecology, 2000, 14(8): 721-730.
39	FU S J, FU C, YAN G J, et al. Interspecific variation in hypoxia tolerance, swimming performance and plasticity in cyprinids that prefer different habitats[J]. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2014, 217(Pt 4): 590-597. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.089268 doi: 10.1242/jeb.089268
40	CLARK W C. The environment and the genotype in poly-morphism[J]. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1976, 58(3): 255-262.
41	PLAUT I. Effects of fin size on swimming performance, swimming behaviour and routine activity of zebrafish Danio rerio [J]. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2000, 203(Pt 4): 813-820.
42	LU Y, WU H, DENG L J, et al. Improved aerobic and anaerobic swimming performance after exercise training and detraining in Schizothorax wangchiachii: implications for fisheries releases[J]. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 2020, 245: 110698. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.110698 doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.110698
43	葛德燕,夏霖,吕雪霏,等.几何形态学方法及其在动物发育与系统进化研究中的应用[J].动物分类学报,2012,37(2):296-304. GE D Y, XIA L, LÜ X F, et al. Methods in geometric morphometrics and their applications in ontogenetic and evolutionary biology of animals[J]. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 2012, 37(2): 296-304. (in Chinese with English abstract)
44	HUMPHRIES J M, BOOKSTEIN F L, CHERNOFF B, et al. Multivariate discrimination by shape in relation to size[J]. Systematic Biology, 1981, 30(3): 291-308.
45	STRAUSS R E, BOOKSTEIN F L. The truss: body form reconstructions in morphometrics[J]. Systematic Biology, 1982, 31(2): 113-135.
46	ROGDAKIS Y G, KOUKOU K K, RAMFOS A, et al. Com-parative morphology of wild, farmed and hatchery-released gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) in western Greece[J]. International Journal of Fisheries & Aquaculture, 2011, 3(1): 1-9.
47	陆宇哲,潘红平,王帅,等.野生、池塘养殖及红树林生态养殖中华乌塘鳢成鱼的形态判别[J].南方农业学报,2017,48(10):1906-1911. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.10.27 LU Y Z, PAN H P, WANG S, et al. Morphological identi-fication of wild, pond-farm and mangrove eco-farm adult Bostrychus sinensis [J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2017, 48(10): 1906-1911. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.10.27
48	刘汉生,易祖盛,梁健宏,等.唐鱼野生种群和养殖群体的形态差异分析[J].暨南大学学报(自然科学版),2008,29(3):295-299. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9965.2008.03.016 LIU H S, YI Z S, LIANG J H, et al. Morphological variations between the wild population and hatchery stock of Tanichtys albonubes [J]. Journal of Jinan University (Natural Science Edition), 2008, 29(3): 295-299. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9965.2008.03.016
49	MANA S C, SASIPRABA T. An intelligent deep learning enabled marine fish species detection and classification model[J]. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools, 2022, 31(1): 2250017. DOI: 10.1142/S0218213022500178 doi: 10.1142/S0218213022500178
50	BARBEDO J G A. A review on the use of computer vision and artificial intelligence for fish recognition, monitoring, and management[J]. Fishes, 2022, 7(6): 335. DOI: 10.3390/fishes7060335 doi: 10.3390/fishes7060335

[1]	周依帆,张希昭,周彦锋,徐东坡,王晨赫,郭世越,蒋书伦,尤洋. 大银鱼早期发育阶段微生物群落特征及其与免疫和代谢的关联[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2024, 50(1): 123-136.
[2]	唐雪梅,周彦锋,方弟安,罗宇婷,张敏莹,蒋书伦,张希昭,彭飞,尤洋. 大银鱼全基因组简单重复序列标记开发及在不同生态型群体中的检验[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2023, 49(3): 413-423.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed