Please wait a minute...
Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science)  2020, Vol. 54 Issue (2): 213-220    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2020.02.001
Civil and Transportation Engineering     
Seismic pounding fragility and risk assessment method for nonlinear adjacent structures based on subset simulation
Pei LIU(),Hai-xin ZHU,Wei-guo YANG
School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044
Download: HTML     PDF(1356KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

Existing procedures to determine a minimum separation distance needed to avoid seismic pounding are based on approximations of the peak relative horizontal displacement between linear adjacent buildings, and are characterized by unknown safety levels. Thus, a performance-based probabilistic procedure for assessing risk of seismic pounding between nonlinear adjacent buildings was proposed. An efficient small failure probability method, i.e. subset simulation, was used for calculating the seismic pounding fragility of adjacent buildings. The multi-degree-of-freedom systems of equal height with substantially different dynamic properties were taken as examples to assess the rules of seismic pounding fragility and risk with and without considering nonlinear behavior of adjacent buildings at different separation distances. Moreover, the proposed method was employed to assess the performance of link elements connecting the adjacent structures, which aimed at decreasing the pounding probability. Results show that with the increase of peak ground acceleration, the seismic pounding fragility curves with considering nonlinear behavior of adjacent buildings are generally monotonic and non-decreasing but have local variations. The difference between the seismic pounding probabilities of adjacent structures with and without considering nonlinear behavior becomes larger with the increase of separation distance. When the separation distance is large, the stiffness of linking between the adjacent structures should be large enough to achieve the goal of pounding mitigation.



Key wordsadjacent structure      seismic pounding      failure probability      fragility      risk     
Received: 02 June 2019      Published: 10 March 2020
CLC:  TU 311  
Cite this article:

Pei LIU,Hai-xin ZHU,Wei-guo YANG. Seismic pounding fragility and risk assessment method for nonlinear adjacent structures based on subset simulation. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2020, 54(2): 213-220.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2020.02.001     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/Y2020/V54/I2/213


基于子集模拟的非线性相邻结构地震碰撞易损性及风险评估方法

鉴于利用线性相邻结构的相对位移峰值估计避免地震碰撞的最小结构间距的方法安全水平未知,提出基于性能的概率方法用于评估非线性相邻结构发生地震碰撞的风险. 利用高效计算小失效概率的子集模拟法对地震碰撞易损性进行计算;以动力特性差异显著的等高多自由度相邻结构为例,研究不同结构间距下考虑非线性与否的相邻结构地震碰撞易损性与风险的规律;将所提方法用于评估结构间连接减轻相邻结构地震碰撞概率的效果. 结果表明,非线性相邻结构的地震碰撞概率随地面峰值加速度的增加整体呈增大趋势,但存在局部波动;结构间距越大,考虑非线性与否所得的地震碰撞概率差别越大;当结构间距较大时,为了保证减撞效果,结构间连接刚度须足够大.


关键词: 相邻结构,  地震碰撞,  失效概率,  易损性,  风险 
Fig.1 Fragility curves of seismic pounding
Fig.2 Model of adjacent structures
Fig.3 Displacement response of third story in nonlinear adjacent structures without pounding
Fig.4 Fragility curves of seismic pounding for adjacent structures at different separation distances
Fig.5 Comparison of seismic pounding fragility curves between adjacent structures with and without considering nonlinear behavior
算法 PGA
0.12g 0.14g 0.20g 0.40g 0.60g
子集模拟法 0.005 0 0.020 0 0.340 0 0.865 0 0.920 0
蒙特卡罗法 0.004 8 0.021 0 0.340 0 0.865 0 0.920 0
Tab.1 Comparison of failure probabilities for non-linear adjacent structures with separation distance of 0.10 m
Fig.6 Mean annual frequency of seismic pounding
Fig.7 Risk of seismic pounding in design life
Fig.8 Model of adjacent structures linked by spring elements
Fig.9 Peak relative displacements of adjacent structures with different linking stiffness values
Fig.10 Fragility curves of seismic pounding for adjacent structures with different linking stiffness values
[1]   COLE G L, DHAKAL R P, TURNER F M Building pounding damage observed in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2012, 41 (5): 893- 913
doi: 10.1002/eqe.1164
[2]   BARBOSA A R, FAHNESTOCK L A, FICK D R, et al Performance of medium-to-high rise reinforced concrete frame buildings with masonry infill in the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal, Earthquake[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2017, 33 (Suppl.1): 197- 218
[3]   杨永强, 戴君武, 公茂盛, 等 芦山地震中相邻建筑碰撞破坏调查与分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2015, 47 (12): 102- 105
YANG Yong-qiang, DAI Jun-wu, GONG Mao-sheng, et al Investigation and analysis on adjacent buildings pounding damage in Lushan Earthquake[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015, 47 (12): 102- 105
doi: 10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.2015.12.018
[4]   张泾钰 建筑物的变形缝在汶川地震中的反应及对策思考[J]. 西华大学学报:自然科学版, 2009, 28 (4): 83- 85
ZHANG Jing-yu Reflections on counter measures and responses of joints of structures in Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. Journal of Xihua University: Natural Science, 2009, 28 (4): 83- 85
[5]   JANKOWSKI R, MAHMOUD S. Earthquake-induced structural pounding [M]. Switzerland: Springer, 2015.
[6]   YU Z W, LIU H Y, GUO W, et al A general spectral difference method for calculating the minimum safety distance to avoid the pounding of adjacent structures during earthquakes[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 150: 646- 655
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.068
[7]   RAHEEM S E A, FOOLY M Y M, SHAFY A G A, et al Numerical simulation of potential seismic pounding among adjacent buildings in series[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 17: 439- 471
doi: 10.1007/s10518-018-0455-0
[8]   LOPEZ-GARCIA D, SOONG T T Assessment of the separation necessary to prevent seismic pounding between linear structural systems[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 24: 210- 223
doi: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2008.06.002
[9]   BARBATO M, TUBALDI E A probabilistic performance-based approach for mitigating the seismic pounding risk between adjacent buildings[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2013, 42: 1203- 1219
doi: 10.1002/eqe.2267
[10]   LIN J H Separation distance to avoid seismic pounding of adjacent buildings[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1997, 26: 395- 403
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199703)26:3<395::AID-EQE655>3.0.CO;2-F
[11]   贾宏宇, 杜修力, 李兰平, 等 地震作用下梁体碰撞间隙宽度的概率分析方法[J]. 工程力学, 2018, 35 (8): 39- 45
JIA Hong-yu, DU Xiu-li, LI Lan-ping, et al Probability analysis of pounding separation distance of bridges subjected to earthquake excitations[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35 (8): 39- 45
doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2017.03.0263
[12]   贾宏宇, 杜修力, 罗楠 随机地震激励下高墩桥梁碰撞可靠度分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2018, 53 (1): 88- 94
JIA Hong-yu, DU Xiu-li, LUO Nan Dynamic reliability analysis on pounding of high-pier bridges subjected to stochastics seismic excitations[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53 (1): 88- 94
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.01.011
[13]   TUBALDI E, BARBATO M, GHAZIZADEH S A probabilistic performance-based risk assessment approach for seismic pounding with efficient application to linear systems[J]. Structural Safety, 2012, 36/37: 14- 22
doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.01.002
[14]   TUBALDI E, FREDDI F, BARBATO M Probabilistic seismic demand model for pounding risk assessment[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2016, 45: 1743- 1758
doi: 10.1002/eqe.2725
[15]   WU Q Y, ZHU H P, CHEN X Y Seismic fragility analysis of adjacent inelastic structures connected with viscous fluid dampers[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2017, 20 (1): 18- 33
doi: 10.1177/1369433216646000
[16]   TAKABATAKE H, YASUI M, NAKAGAWA Y, et al Relaxation method for pounding action between adjacent buildings at expansion joint[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2014, 43: 1381- 1400
doi: 10.1002/eqe.2402
[17]   MIARI M, CHOONG K K, JANKOWSKI R Seismic pounding between adjacent buildings: identification of parameters, soil interaction issues and mitigation measures[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 121: 135- 150
doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.02.024
[18]   AU S K, BECK J L Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2001, 16: 263- 277
doi: 10.1016/S0266-8920(01)00019-4
[19]   SHINOZYKA M, DEODATIS G Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation[J]. Applied Mechanic Reviews, 1991, 44 (4): 191- 204
doi: 10.1115/1.3119501
[1] Chao-feng ZENG,Shuo WANG,Zhi-cheng YUAN,Xiu-li XUE. Characteristics of ground deformation induced by pre-excavation dewatering considering blocking effect of adjacent structure[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2021, 55(2): 338-347.
[2] Xiao-zhu LI,Wei-qing WANG. Bi-level robust game optimal scheduling of regional comprehensive energy system[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2021, 55(1): 177-188.
[3] Lin YANG,Jia-jun WANG. Risk transfer process in urban comprehensive corridor PPP project based on complex network model[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2020, 54(9): 1666-1676.
[4] Huang-yao ZENG,Dan-dan LI,Yan MA,Qun CONG. Risky accounts evaluation method of campus network[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2020, 54(9): 1761-1767.
[5] Bo HUANG,Kai-long LIAO,Yu ZHAO,Jian-qun JIANG. Seismic fragility analysis of multi-storey frame structure considering effect of valley terrain[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2019, 53(4): 692-701.
[6] Hao SUI,Gao-feng QIN,Xiang-bo CUI,Xin-jiang LU. Robust fuzzy T-S modeling method based on minimizing mean and variance of modeling error[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2019, 53(2): 382-387.
[7] WANG Rui, LI Yan-lai, ZHU Jiang-hong, YANG Yi. Improved FMEA method for risk evaluation considering expert consensus[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2018, 52(6): 1058-1067.
[8] ZHOU Jian, SHI De-xiao. Integrated resilient supply chain with contingency planning for supply disruption[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2018, 52(2): 240-246.
[9] DING Zhi, ZHANG Xiao, ZHOU Lian-ying, CHEN Zi-hai. Research and prospect of interaction between close bridge pile and metro tunnel[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2018, 52(10): 1943-1953.
[10] ZHANG Xin-yi, YANG Jia-qiang, ZHANG Xiao-jun. Dynamic economic dispatch incorporating multiple wind farms based on FFT simplified chance constrained programming[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2017, 51(5): 976-983.
[11] LIANG Yao, FENG Dong qin. Security risks assessment for physical layer of industrial control system based on attack gain[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2016, 50(3): 589-.
[12] QIN Xuan,ZHUO Guang jie,MO Yi yi. Vulnerability of risk paths of complex green building projects[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2016, 50(11): 2177-2187.
[13] JU Bin, QIAN Yun-tao, YE Min-chao. Collaborative filtering algorithm based on structured projective nonnegative matrix factorization[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2015, 49(7): 1319-1325.
[14] JIANG Zheng-wen, WAN Shui, LI Ming-hong, MA Lei. Hybrid simulation method for structural reliability analysis and its application[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2015, 49(4): 782-791.
[15] LU Ying, GUO Liang-jie, HOU Yun-yue, ZHAO Yun-sheng, CHEN Lian-jin. Comprehensive multi-hazard risk assessment method applicated in urban land-use planning[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2015, 49(3): 538-546.