基于传动可供性评价的机械系统方案设计方法

doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2020.11.013

浙江大学学报(工学版)

2020, Vol. 54

Issue (11): 2179-2189 DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2020.11.013

机械工程

基于传动可供性评价的机械系统方案设计方法

萨日娜1,2,3(

),张树有2,裘乐淼2,张利春3

1. 内蒙古工业大学机械工程学院，内蒙古呼和浩特 010051
2. 浙江大学机械工程学院，浙江杭州 310027
3. 康力电梯股份有限公司，江苏苏州 215213

Schematic design of mechanism system based on transmission affordance evaluation

Sarina1,2,3(

),Shu-you ZHANG2,Le-miao QIU2,Li-chun ZHANG3

1. Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China
2. Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
3. Canny Elevator Co. Ltd, Suzhou 215213, China

全文: PDF(1147 KB) HTML

摘要：

针对基于功能的设计方法无法将非功能性作用融入机械系统方案设计阶段的问题，提出传动可供性评价的机械系统方案设计方法. 给出传动可供性定义；构建设计需求、传动类型、传动元件、传动可供性的关联关系模型；以设计需求为统一颜色、传动类型为个人颜色、传动件为元素、传动可供性为约束、传动可供性性质为约束统一颜色，建立机械传动系统多色模型. 通过设计需求与传动类型、传动类型与传动件围道推理及合取规则，获得传动类型组合方案粗糙集. 考虑机械传动件约束统一颜色评估为设计准则，以功能可供性信息量最小、非功能可供性理想度最大为综合评价目标，建立传动元件配置优化多目标0-1线性规划模型. 借助跳跃路径二进制位置更新机制和多样性测度维护的布谷鸟算法求解最优传动系统配置方案. 以实例验证该方法的有效性.

关键词： 传动系统; 方案设计; 传动可供性; 多色集合; 布谷鸟算法

Abstract:

A novel schematic design method of mechanism transmission system based on transmission affordance evaluation was presented aiming at the problem that the function-based design method cannot integrate non-functional impact into the schematic design stage of the mechanical transmission system. Firstly, the definition of transmission affordance was given. An association model was constructed to demonstrate the relationship of design requirement, transmission type, transmission part and transmission affordance. Then, the association model was represented by polychromatic sets theory, through viewing design requirements as uniform color, transmission type as individual color, transmission part as element, transmission affordance as constraint uniform, and feature of transmission affordance as constraint uniform. The transmission type combination schemes’ rough set was obtained by two kinds of contour reasoning and conjunctive rules inference based on the association model. One kind of contour reasoning was the reasoning between design requirements and transmission type, and the other was the reasoning between trainsmission type and transmission part. Additionally, a multi-objective zero one linear programming model for optimal configuration of transmission components was developed, considering the uniform color evaluation of mechanical transmission constraints as a design criterion. The purpose of the design criterion was to minimize the functional affordance information, and maximize the non-functional ideal degree. Finally, the optimal transmission system configuration scheme was solved by the improved Cuckoo algorithm that utilizing skip path binary location update mechanism and diversity measure. The effectiveness of the proposed method was verified by an example.

Key words: transmission system schematic design transmission affordance polychromatic set Cuckoo search algorithm

收稿日期: 2019-12-30 出版日期: 2020-12-15

CLC:

TH 122

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目（51765052，51405247）；内蒙古自然科学基金资助项目（2020LH05009）；江苏省成果转化专项资金资助项目（BA2018083）

作者简介: 萨日娜（1981—），女，副教授，从事产品数字化设计、产品方案设计理论研究. orcid.org/0000-0002-1778-1144. E-mail： srnnmg@163.com

	服务
	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	作者相关文章
	萨日娜
	张树有
	裘乐淼
	张利春

引用本文:

萨日娜,张树有,裘乐淼,张利春. 基于传动可供性评价的机械系统方案设计方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(11): 2179-2189.

Sarina,Shu-you ZHANG,Le-miao QIU,Li-chun ZHANG. Schematic design of mechanism system based on transmission affordance evaluation. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2020, 54(11): 2179-2189.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2020.11.013 或 http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2020/V54/I11/2179

图 1 减速器机械传动系统设计因素关联关系

表 1 齿轮箱传动可供性分析

图 2 基于传动可供性的机械传动系统多色模型

图 3 基于传动可供性评价的传动件多目标配置模型

图 4 布谷鸟位置编码

图 5 传动件多目标配置流程

表 2 传动类型和设计需求围道矩阵

表 3 传动件与传动类型围道矩阵

表 4 轴承候选规格、传动功能可供性信息量及单价

表 5 减速器组件传动可供性约束及有害关系数

表 6 轴承候选规格非功能可供性评价与理想度

图 6 改进布谷鸟算法和改进NSGAⅡ算法求解方案对比

图 7 不同非功能可供性理想度下得到的轴承选配方案

图 8 不同成本约束下的候选规格配置方案

图 9 本研究方法与不考虑非功能可供性理想度方法配置方案

1	祖耀. 功能特征驱动的机械产品概念设计研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2009. ZU Yao. Research on the conceptual design of mechanical products based on functional feature-drived [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2009.
2	徐敬华, 张树有. 基于关联与回溯的产品变异设计过程重用方法[J]. 浙江大学学报: 工学版, 2010, 44(11): 2063-2069. XU Jing-hua, ZHANG Shu-you. Process reuse of product variation design based on associating and backtracking [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2010, 44(11): 2063-2069.
3	郑浩, 冯毅雄, 高一聪, 等基于性能演化的复杂产品概念设计求解过程研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54 (9): 214- 223 ZHENG Hao, FENG Yi-xiong, GAO Yi-cong, et al The solving process of conceptual design for complex product based on performance evolution[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54 (9): 214- 223
4	魏巍定制产品需求只是重构及粗糙集分析方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2012, 18 (2): 230- 236 WEI Wei Customization products requirement knowledge reconstruction and rough set analysis method[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2012, 18 (2): 230- 236
5	JERZY P, KONRAD O, et al Knowledge based processes in the context of conceptual design[J]. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 2019, 15: 219- 238 doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2018.07.002
6	ANTONIO J F G, LUIS I, ANTONIO C, et al A recommender system for component-based applications using machine learning[J]. Knowledge Based System, 2019, 15 (164): 68- 84
7	JIANG S F, JING L T, SUN T, et al A conceptual scheme improvement approach based on the performance value of the principle solution taking a coal mining machine as a case study[J]. Computers in Industry, 2019, (105): 17- 34
8	JONATHAN R, GEORGES M F Affordance based design: a relational theory for design[J]. Research in Engineering Design, 2009, 20 (1): 13- 27 doi: 10.1007/s00163-008-0060-3
9	JONATHAN R, GEORGES M F Affordance-based design methods for innovative design redesign and reverse engineering[J]. Research in Engineering Design, 2009, 20 (4): 225- 239 doi: 10.1007/s00163-009-0064-7
10	JONATHAN R, GEORGES M F, BATTISTO D G An affordance-based approach to architectural theory, design, and practice[J]. Design Studies, 2009, 30 (4): 393- 414 doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2009.01.002
11	SEIB V, KNAUF M, PAULUS D. Affordanceorigami: unfolding agent models for hierarchical affordance prediction [C]// 11th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications. Rome: IEEE, 2017, 693: 555-574.
12	MAIER J R A, EZHILAN T, FADEL G M. The affordance structure matrix: aconcept exploration and attention directing tool for affordance based design [C]// ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences/Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Las Vegas: ASME, 2008, 3: 277-287.
13	CHEN Yong, HUANG Jian, ZHANG Zhi-nan, et al A part affordance-based approach for capturing detailed design knowledge[J]. Computer-Aided Design, 2013, 45 (12): 1617- 1629 doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2013.08.005
14	HSIAO S W, HSU C F, LEE Y T An online affordance evaluation model for product design[J]. Design Studies, 2012, 33 (2): 126- 159 doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.003
15	CORMIER P, OLEWNIK A, LEWIS K Toward a formalization of affordance modeling for engineering design[J]. Research in Engineering Design, 2016, 25 (3): 259- 277
16	YOU H C, CHEN K Application of affordance and semantics in product design[J]. Design Studies, 2007, 28 (1): 23- 38 doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2006.07.002
17	姜少飞, 周升铭, 李吉泉, 等基于物-场可供性模型提升产品设计质量的研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52 (15): 128- 138 JIANG Shao-fei, ZHOU Sheng-ming, LI Ji-quan, et al enhancing the quality of product design based on substance-field affordance[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 52 (15): 128- 138 doi: 10.3901/JME.2016.15.128
18	ABTEEN I M, MOJAN M, ASHKAN H, et al Hybrid hierarchical fuzzy group decision-making based on information axioms and BWM: prototype design selection[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2019, 127: 788- 804 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.018
19	YANG X S, DEB S. Cuckoo search via levy flights [C]// Proceedings of world Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing. Piscataway, Coimbatore: IEEE, 2009: 210-214.
20	YANG X S, DEB S Multiobjective cuckoo search for design optimization[J]. Computers and Operation Research, 2011, 10 (9): 1- 9
21	刘建华. 粒子群算法的基本理论机器改进研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2009: 77-98. LIU Jian-hua. The research of basic theory and improvement on particle swarm optimization [D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2009: 77-98.
22	李敏强, 寇纪淞, 林丹, 等. 遗传算法的基本理论与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002.
23	成大先. 机械设计手册(第6版): 单行本. 机械传动[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社. 2017.
24	SKF Website. Rolling bearings. [DB/OL]. https://www.skf.com/binary/31-121486/0901d196802809de-Rolling-bearings17000_1-EN.pdf. 2019-09-07.

[1]	李阳健,何伟,刘宏伟,李伟,林勇刚,顾亚京. 水平轴海流能机组传动链主动阻尼控制技术[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(7): 1355-1361.
[2]	郭磊,张秀芬. 多重故障驱动的再制造并行拆卸序列规划方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(11): 2233-2246.
[3]	周懿, 钟崴, 谢金芳, 童水光. 过程型机械系统的方案设计模型[J]. J4, 2012, 46(8): 1526-1533.
[4]	冯毅雄,宋轩,谭建荣,丁力平. 基于K-WFA的机械产品运动方案设计求解[J]. J4, 2012, 46(3): 515-523.
[5]	林晓华,冯毅雄,谭建荣. 产品方案设计约束模型及其演化博弈算法求解[J]. J4, 2012, 46(3): 533-541.
[6]	麦泽宇, 冯毅雄, 谭建荣, 魏喆. 基于基因模型的机构变异方案设计[J]. J4, 2010, 44(9): 1629-1636.
[7]	蔡际令金若君. 基于DSP控制的开关磁阻电机可逆传动系统[J]. J4, 2006, 40(6): 1019-1026.
[8]	钟崴童水光. 锅炉智能CAD的技术和方法研究[J]. J4, 2006, 40(4): 572-576.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed