Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)
土木与交通工程     
桩后及桩侧土拱共同作用的抗滑桩桩间距分析
邱子义,韩同春,豆红强,李智宁
浙江大学 滨海与城市岩土工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310058;浙江大学 软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室,浙江 杭州 310058
Analysis of spacing between anti slide piles considering soil arch on lateral sides and back
QIU Zi yi, HAN Tong chun, DOU Hong qiang, LI Zhi ning
Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
 全文: PDF(714 KB)   HTML
摘要:

 为得到较为符合工程实际的抗滑桩合理桩间距计算公式,在考虑桩土相互作用及已有数值模拟结果的基础上,提出桩后土拱及桩侧土拱同时存在并共同受力的计算模型,且两者拱轴线线型符合合理拱轴线条件.分析抗滑桩桩后土拱及桩侧土拱极限承载力,并假定在合理桩间距条件下,桩后土拱及桩侧土承载力之和为土体总推力的大小.在此假设的基础上,推导出合理桩间距的计算公式,分析考虑滑坡推力在沿桩深度方向上非均匀分布的工况,并与工程实际进行比较,结果与之相符合.对所得合理桩间距计算公式中参数进行分析,结果表明:合理桩间距随抗滑桩截面尺寸及土体黏聚力增大而线性增加,随土体内摩擦角增加而曲线递增.

Abstract:

A calculation model considering soil arching behind the pile and soil arching in the pile side working together was established on the basis of  numerical simulations by previous studies as well as the interaction between piles and soil, in order to set up a more practical reasonable anti slide pile spacing calculation formula. The arch axis of soil arching behind the pile and soil arching in the pile side met requirements for the reasonable arch axis. Both the ultimate bearing capacities of soil arch  in the pile side and behind the pile were analyzed. With reasonable pile spacing, the summation of both ultimate bearing capacities was equaled to the total load behind the piles. Under this assumption, the formulation was proposed to calculate the reasonable pile spacing. And one case was analyzed according to the non uniform distribution of landslide thrust along the depth of piles. The calculating results fitted well with engineering practice. At last, some parameters in the formation were analyzed. Results show that the reasonable pile spacing increases linearly with the increase of the section size and cohesion, and increases along the curve with the increase of internal friction angle.

出版日期: 2016-09-18
:  TU 473  
基金资助:

 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51178423);浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(LY15E080010).

通讯作者: 韩同春,男,博士,副教授. ORCID:0000 0001 6553 6795.     E-mail: htc@zju.edu.cn
作者简介: 邱子义(1990-),男,硕士生,从事边坡加固等方面的数值及理论研究. ORCID:0000 0003 0445 2955. E-mail:qiuziyi1012@zju.edu.cn
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

邱子义,韩同春,豆红强,李智宁. 桩后及桩侧土拱共同作用的抗滑桩桩间距分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.03.021.

QIU Zi yi, HAN Tong chun, DOU Hong qiang, LI Zhi ning. Analysis of spacing between anti slide piles considering soil arch on lateral sides and back. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.03.021.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.03.021        http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2016/V50/I3/551

[1] TERZAGHI. Theoretical soil mechanics [M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1943.
[2] LIANG R, ZENG S. Numerical study of soil arching mechanism in drilled shafts for slope stabilization [J]. Soil and Foundation, 2002, 42(2) : 8392.
[3] CHEN C Y, MARTIN G R. Soil structure interaction for landslide stabilizing piles [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2002, 29(5): 363386.
[4] LI C D, TANG H M, HU X L, et al. Numerical modelling study of the load sharing law of anti sliding piles based on the soil arching effect for Erliban landslide, China [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2013, 17(6): 12511262.
[5] 李忠诚, 杨敏. 被动受荷桩成拱效应及三维数值分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2006, 39(3): 114117.
LI Zhong cheng, YANG Min, Soil arching effect on passive piles and 3 D numerical analysis [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2006, 39(3): 114117.
[6] 刘钦, 李地元, 刘志祥, 等. 水平推力作用下抗滑桩间土拱效应影响因素的数值分析[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 42(7): 20712077.
LIU Qin, LI Di yuan, LIU Zhi xiang, et al. Numerical analysis of influence factors on soil arching effect between anti sliding piles under horizontal pushing loads [J]. Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology , 2011, 42(7): 20712077.
[7] 戴自航, 徐祥. 边坡抗滑桩设计计算的三维有限元法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(12): 25722578.
DAI Zi hang, XU Xiang. 3D finite element method for design computations of anti slide piles [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(12): 25722578.
[8] LIRER S. Landslide stabilizing piles: Experimental evidences and numerical interpretation [J]. Engineering Geology, 2012, 149: 7077.
[9] 周德培, 肖世国, 夏雄. 边坡工程中抗滑桩合理桩间距的探讨[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2004, 26(1): 132135.
ZHOU DE pei, XIAO Shi guo, XIA Xiong. Discussion on rational spacing between adjacent anti slide piles in some cutting slope projects [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2004, 26(1): 132135.
[10] 赵明华, 廖彬彬, 刘思思. 基于拱效应的边坡抗滑桩桩间距计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(4): 12121216.
ZHAO Ming hua, LIAO Bin bin, LIU Si si. Calculation of anti slide piles spacing based on soil arching effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(4): 12121216.
[11] 赵明华, 陈炳初, 刘建华. 考虑土拱效应的抗滑桩合理桩间距分析[J]. 中南公路工程, 2006, 31(2): 13.
ZHAO Ming hua, CHEN Bing chu, LIU Jian hua. Analysis of the spacing between anti slide piles considering soil arch effect [J]. Central South Highway Engineering, 2006, 31(2): 13.
[12] 胡晓军, 王建国. 边坡加固工程中抗滑桩间距的确定[J]. 河海大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 35(3): 330333.
HU Xiao jun, WANG Jian guo. Determination of anti slide pile spacing in side slope consolidation projects [J]. Journal of Hohai University:Natural Sciences, 2007, 35(3): 330333.
[13] 李邵军, 陈静, 练操. 边坡桩 土相互作用的土拱力学模型与桩间距问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(5): 13521358.
LI Shao jun, CHEN Jing, LIAN Cao. Mechanical model of soil arch for interaction of piles and slope and problem of pile spacing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(5): 13521358.
[14] 肖世国, 程富强. 再论悬臂式抗滑桩合理桩间距的计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(1): 111116.
XIAO Shi guo, CHENG Fu qiang. Further discussion on calculation method of rational spacing between two adjacent cantilever piles for stabilizing slope [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(1): 111116.
[15] 戴自航. 抗滑桩滑坡推力和桩前滑体抗力分布规律的研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21(4): 517521.
DAI Zi hang Study on distribution laws of landslide thrust and resistance of sliding mass acting on antislide piles [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21(4):517521.
[16] 张永兴, 董捷, 文海家, 等.考虑自重应力的悬臂式抗滑桩三维土拱效应及合理间距研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2009, 22(2):1825.
ZHANG Yong xing, DONG Jie, WEN Hai jia, et al. Research on three dimensional soil arching effect and appropriate spacing of cantilever anti slide piles with consideration of geostatic stress [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2009,22(2):1825.
[17] 刘永莉, 孙红月, 于洋, 等. 基于 BOTDR 监测技术抗滑桩上滑坡推力确定[J]. 浙江大学学报:工学版, 2012, 46(5): 798803.
LIU Yong li, SUN Hong yue, YU Yang, et al. Determining landslide thrust on anti sliding pile by BOTDR monitoring technology [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science, 2012, 46(5): 798803.
[18] 林治平, 刘祚秋, 商秋婷. 抗滑桩结构土拱的分拆与联合研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(10): 31093114.
LIN Zhi ping, LIU Zuo qiu, SHANG Qiu ting. Research on soil arch of anti slide pile structure with methods of separation and combination [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(10): 31093114.
[19] 贾海莉, 王成华, 李江洪. 基于土拱效应的抗滑桩与护壁桩的桩间距分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 2004, 12(1): 98103.
JI Hai li, WANG Cheng hua, LI Jiang hong. Analysis of pile spacing between anti slide piles and pertaining piles in accordance with soil arching effect [J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2004, 12(1): 98103.
[20] 杨雪强, 吉小明, 张新涛. 抗滑桩桩间土拱效应及其土拱模式分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2014, 27(1): 3037.
YANG Xue qiang, JI Xiao ming, ZHANG Xin tao, Analysis of soil arching effect between anti slide piles and different arch body modes [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2014, 27(1): 3037.
[21] 刘小丽. 新型桩锚结构设计计算理论研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2003.
LIU Xiao li. Study on designing and computing theory of new pattern pile anchor structures [D]. Chengdu: South west Jiaotong University, 2003.
[22] 周文权,冷伍明,阮波,等. 考虑桩土相互作用的抗滑桩临界桩间距研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2014,11(3):8387.
ZHOU Wen quan, LENG Wu ming, RUAN Bo, et al. Research of critical pile spacing of anti slide pile considering the interaction of pile and soil [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2014,11(3):8387.
[23] 张骞, 李术才, 张乾青, 等. 抗滑桩岩拱效应与合理桩间距分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(增2): 180185.
ZHANG Qian, LI Shu cai, ZHANG Qian qing, et al. Analysis on rock arch effect of anti slide piles and rational pile spacing in engineering project [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(Suppl. 2): 180185.

[1] 吴意谦,朱彦鹏. 潜水地区基坑降水诱发地面沉降的一种改进算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(11): 2188-2197.
[2] 袁炳祥, 吴跃东, 陈锐, 冯仲文, 汪亦显. 侧向受荷桩周土体内部位移场的模型试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(10): 2031-2036.
[3] 徐铨彪,陈刚,贺景峰,龚顺风. 复合配筋混凝土预制方桩抗弯性能试验[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(9): 1768-1776.
[4] 单华峰, 夏唐代, 俞峰, 胡军华, 潘金龙. 地下增层开挖托换桩的屈曲稳定临界荷载分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(8): 1425-1430.
[5] 何奔,王欢,洪义,王立忠,赵长军,秦肖. 竖向荷载对黏土地基中单桩水平受荷性能的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(7): 1221-1229.
[6] 庾焱秋,王奎华,吕述晖,徐礼阁. 传感器黏结剂对低应变测试曲线的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(9): 1725-1730.
[7] 苟尧泊,俞峰,夏唐代. 增层开挖引起既有预制桩残余应力释放分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(5): 969-974.
[8] 刘念武, 龚晓南, 俞峰. 大直径钻孔灌注桩的竖向承载性能[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(4): 763-768.
[9] 王奎华,李振亚,吕述晖,张鹏,庾焱秋. 静钻根植竹节桩纵向振动特性及应用研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(3): 522-530.
[10] 龙凡, 王立忠, 李凯, 李玲玲. 舟山黏土和温州黏土灵敏度差别成因[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(2): 218-224.
[11] 王奎华,陈鑫,吕述晖,吴文兵,李振亚. 自由振动时带承台单桩的纵向动力特性[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2014, 48(9): 1595-1602.
[12] 刘念武,龚晓南,楼春晖. 软土地区基坑开挖对周边设施的变形特性影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2014, 48(7): 1141-1147.
[13] 伍程杰, 龚晓南, 俞峰, 楼春晖, 刘念武. 既有高层建筑地下增层开挖桩端阻力损失[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2014, 48(4): 671-678.
[14] 胡安峰, 张光建, 贾玉帅, 张晓冬. 刚度衰减模型在大直径桩累积侧向位移分析中的应用[J]. J4, 2014, 48(4): 721-726.
[15] 王忠瑾,谢新宇,方鹏飞,李金柱,金伟良. 刚性长短组合桩的非线性沉降计算分析[J]. J4, 2014, 48(3): 463-470.