Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)  2019, Vol. 45 Issue (3): 376-384    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2018.03.132
动物科学与动物医学     
天府肉鹅母系不同阶段颗粒细胞内参基因的选择
莫远亮(),王郁石,王继文()
四川农业大学动物科技学院/畜禽遗传资源发掘与创新利用四川省重点实验室,成都 611130
Identification for internal reference genes in different periods of granulosa cells of Tianfu meat geese.
Yuanliang MO(),Yushi WANG,Jiwen WANG()
College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University/Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 611130, China
 全文: PDF(1963 KB)   HTML
摘要:

为筛选出鹅卵泡不同阶段颗粒细胞稳定表达的内参基因,以产蛋期天府肉鹅母系卵泡颗粒层细胞为材料,利用实时荧光定量聚合酶链式反应(real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction, RT-qPCR)技术分别对GAPDHACTBTUBUBCHMBSSDH18S28STBPHPRT1等10个候选内参基因的相对表达量进行测定,采用ΔC T法、qbase+、NormFinder、BestKeeper等4种评价方法对9个不同阶段卵泡颗粒细胞的表达稳定性进行评定。RT-qPCR熔解曲线和PCR扩增显示,10个候选内参基因的引物特异性良好;通过构建标准曲线,表明各内参基因在系列稀释的浓度梯度内具有良好的线性关系;综合4种方法的评价结果,发现在不同阶段颗粒细胞中,最稳定的3个内参基因依次为SDHHMBS18S,稳定性最差的3个内参基因依次为UBCGAPDHTUB。在不同阶段颗粒细胞中最稳定的内参基因为SDHHMBS,以最稳定的2个内参基因的几何平均数作为标准化校正因子可得到更加准确的结果。

关键词: 颗粒细胞内参基因稳定性选择    
Abstract:

In order to screen out the most stable reference genes in different periods of granulosa cells in goose, we selected 10 candidate reference genes (GAPDH, ACTB, TUB, UBC, HMBS, SDH, 18S, 28S, TBP, HPRT1) to determine the relative expression levels by the real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The expression stabilities of 10 candidate reference genes in nine different stages of granulosa cells were systematically analyzed by delta-C T, qbase+, NormFinder and BestKeeper, respectively. The results of RT-qPCR melting curve and PCR amplification showed that the 10 candidate reference genes were specifically amplified. By constructing a standard curve, between C q value and the logarithm of relative copy number exhibited a good linear relationship in the serial dilution concentration gradient. Based on the evaluation results of four different algorithms, SDH, HMBS and 18S were found to be three of the most stable reference genes, but UBC, GAPDH and TUB were three of the least stable reference genes in the different periods of granulosa cells. Therefore, the most stable internal reference genes were SDH and HMBS in granulosa cells at different developmental stages, and it could get more accurate normalization of RT-qPCR data by geometric averaging of the most stable reference genes.

Key words: geese    granulosa cell    reference gene    stability    selection
收稿日期: 2018-03-13 出版日期: 2019-06-25
CLC:  S 835  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(31672424);国家现代水禽产业技术体系(CARS-42-4);国家科技支撑计划(2015BAD03B06)
通讯作者: 王继文     E-mail: evianmoyl@foxmail.com;wjw2886166@163.com
作者简介: 莫远亮(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4945-5028),E-mail:evianmoyl@foxmail.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
莫远亮
王郁石
王继文

引用本文:

莫远亮,王郁石,王继文. 天府肉鹅母系不同阶段颗粒细胞内参基因的选择[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(3): 376-384.

Yuanliang MO,Yushi WANG,Jiwen WANG. Identification for internal reference genes in different periods of granulosa cells of Tianfu meat geese.. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(3): 376-384.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2018.03.132        http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/Y2019/V45/I3/376

基因

Gene

引物序列(5′→3′)

Primer sequence (5′→3′)

扩增长度

Amplification

size/bp

退火温度

Annealing

temperature/℃

GenBank登录号

GenBank

accession number

文献

Reference

GAPDH

F:GCTGATGCTCCCATGTTCGTGAT

R:GTGGTGCAAGAGGCATTGCTGAC

86 60 DQ821717.1 [16]
ACTB

F:CAACGAGCGGTTCAGGTGT

R:TGGAGTTGAAGGTGGTCTCG

92 59.6 M26111 [17]
TUB

F:GAGCGGAGCAGGAAACAAC

R:GCCAGTACCACCACCAAGA

151 55 NM_001080860.2 [18]
HMBS

F:GGCTGGGAGAATCGCATAGG

R:TCCTGCAGGGCAGATACCAT

131 60 XM_417846.2 [19]
HPRT1

F:GCACTATGACTCTACCGACTATTG

R:CAGTTCTGGGTTGATGAGGTT

112 60 AJ132697 [20]
UBC

F:AGGGTGGATTCTTTCTGG

R:ACTGAGTTTGGAGGGAGC

243 60 GO240773 [21]
TBP

F:ATCAAGCCAAGAATTGTTCTGC

R:CTTCGTAGATTTCTGCTCGAACT

85 60 NM_205103.1 [22]
SDH

F:ATCCATCGAGCCTTACC

R:CATAGAGTCCGTCCAGTTT

101 55 NM_001080875.1 [18]
18S

F:TTGGTGGAGCGATTTGTC

R:ATCTCGGGTGGCTGAACG

129 53.9 L21170 [17]
28S

F:ATTCCCACTGTCCCTACCTAC

R:CTCCCACTTATCCTACACCTCT

144 55 EF552792.1 [18]
表1  候选内参基因引物信息
图 1  候选内参基因的RT-qPCR熔解曲线
图 2  内参基因的PCR扩增

基因

Gene

扩增效率

Amplification

efficiency/%

曲线斜率

Slope of curve

决定系数(R 2

Coefficient of

determination (R 2)

GAPDH 93.90 -3.478 0.991
ACTB 82.10 -3.842 0.995
TUB 97.67 -3.379 0.999
SDH 98.28 -3.364 0.999
TBP 83.30 -3.799 0.997
HMBS 104.70 -3.125 0.981
UBC 107.90 -3.146 0.993
HPRT1 91.10 -3.555 0.983
18S 108.19 -3.140 0.982
28S 108.68 -3.130 0.997
表2  候选内参基因的标准曲线
图3  候选内参基因在颗粒细胞中的 C q 值
图4  基于不同方法的内参基因稳定性分析结果

内参基因

Reference genes

ΔC T qbase+ NormFinder BestKeeper

综合排名

Comprehensive ranking

SDH 1 1 1 5 1
HMBS 2 2 2 2 2
18S 4 4 4 1 3
TBP 3 3 3 4 4
ACTB 6 6 5 7 5
HPRT1 5 7 6 6 6
28S 9 8 9 3 9
TUB 7 5 7 8 7
GAPDH 8 9 8 9 8
UBC 10 10 10 10 10
表3  内参基因表达稳定性综合排序
图5  最佳内参基因数目的确定
图6   FSHR 在不同阶段颗粒细胞中的表达分析
1 HIGUCHI R , DOLLINGER G , WALSH P S , et al . Simultaneous amplification and detection of specific DNA sequences. Nature Biotechnology, 1992,10:413-417.
2 HUGGETT J , DHEDA K , BUSTIN S , et al . Real-time RT-PCR normalisation: strategies and considerations. Genes and Immunity, 2005,6:279-284.
3 THELLIN O , ZORZI W , LAKAYE B , et al . Housekeeping genes as internal standards: use and limits. Journal of Biotechnology, 1999,75(2/3):291-295.
4 GUTIERREZ L , MAURIAT M , GUéNIN S , et al . The lack of a systematic validation of reference genes: a serious pitfall undervalued in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis in plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2008,6(6):609-618.
5 DHEDA K , HUGGETT J F , BUSTIN S A , et al . Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR. Biotechniques, 2004,37(1):112-114,116,118-119.
6 M I-U-R KHAN , DIAS F C F , DUFORT I , et al . Stable reference genes in granulosa cells of bovine dominant follicles during follicular growth, FSH stimulation and maternal aging. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 2016,28(6):795-805.
7 BADDELA V S , BAUFELD A , YENUGANTI V R , et al . Suitable housekeeping genes for normalization of transcript abundance analysis by real-time RT-PCR in cultured bovine granulosa cells during hypoxia and differential cell plating density. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 2014,12:118.
8 Lü Y , ZHAO S G , LU G , et al . Identification of reference genes for qRT-PCR in granulosa cells of healthy women and polycystic ovarian syndrome patients. Scientific Reports, 2017,7(1):6961.
9 JOHNSON A L , LEE J . Granulosa cell responsiveness to follicle stimulating hormone during early growth of hen ovarian follicles. Poultry Science, 2015,95(1):108-114.
10 JOHNSON A L . Ovarian follicle selection and granulosa cell differentiation. Poultry Science, 2015,94(4):781-785.
11 SILVER N , BEST S , JIANG J , et al . Selection of housekeeping genes for gene expression studies in human reticulocytes using real-time PCR. BMC Molecular Biology, 2006,7:33.
12 VANDESOMPELE J , PRETER K DE , PATTYN F , et al . Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biology, 2002,3(7):research0034.1-0034.12.
13 ANDERSEN C L , JENSEN J L , ?RNTOFT T F . Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Research, 2004,64(15):5245-5250.
14 PFAFFL M W , TICHOPAD A , PRGOMET C , et al . Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper-Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnology Letters, 2004,26(6):509-515.
15 GILBERT A B , EVANS A J , PERRY M M , et al . A method for separating the granulosa cells, the basal lamina and the theca of the preovulatory ovarian follicle of the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 1977,50(1):179-181.
16 KANG B , GUO J R , YANG H M , et al . Differential expression profiling of ovarian genes in prelaying and laying geese. Poultry Science, 2009,88(9):1975-1983.
17 WEN R , HU S Q , XIAO Q H , et al . Leptin exerts proliferative and anti-apoptotic effects on goose granulosa cells through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2015,149:70-79.
18 王忠伟 .籽鹅不同发育时期和不同组织内参基因选择的研究.黑龙江,大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学,2011.
WANG Z W . Selection of reference genes from different development periods and tissues in Zi geese. Daqing, Heilongjiang: Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract)
19 YIN R F , LIU X X , LIU C , et al . Systematic selection of housekeeping genes for gene expression normalization in chicken embryo fibroblasts infected with Newcastle disease virus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2011,413(4):537-540.
20 NASCIMENTO C S , BARBOSA L T , BRITO C , et al . Identification of suitable reference genes for real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays on Pectoralis major muscle in chicken (Gallus gallus). PLoS One, 2015,10(5):e0127935.
21 PAN Z , WANG J , HAN C , et al . Identification of differentially expressed genes between hepatocytes of Landes geese (Anser anser) and Sichuan white geese (Anser cygnoides). Molecular Biology Reports, 2010,37(8):4059-4066.
22 á SIMON , JáVOR A , BAI P , et al . Reference gene selection for reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction in chicken hypothalamus under different feeding status. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2019,102:286-296.
23 WANG Q , ISHIKAWA T , MICHIUE T , et al . Stability of endogenous reference genes in postmortem human brains for normalization of quantitative real-time PCR data: comprehensive evaluation using geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2012,126(6):943-952.
24 WOODS D C , JOHNSON A L . Regulation of follicle-stimulating hormone-receptor messenger RNA in hen granulosa cells relative to follicle selection. Biology of Reproduction, 2005,72(3):643-650.
25 MCDERMENT N A , WILSON P W , WADDINGTON D , et al . Identification of novel candidate genes for follicle selection in the broiler breeder ovary. BMC Genomics, 2012,13:494.
26 RADONI? A , THULKE S , MACKAY I M , et al . Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2004,313(4):856-862.
27 DERVEAUX S , VANDESOMPELE J , HELLEMANS J . How to do successful gene expression analysis using real-time PCR. Methods, 2010,50(4):227-230.
28 CHEN D L , PAN X P , XIAO P , et al . Evaluation and identification of reliable reference genes for pharmacogenomics, toxicogenomics, and small RNA expression analysis. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 2011,226(10):2469-2477.
29 JI H , WANG J F , LIU J X , et al . Selection of reliable reference genes for real-time qRT-PCR analysis of Zi geese (Anser anser domestica) gene expression. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2013,26(3):423-432.
30 袁振杰,陈秋月,姜运良,等 .不同发育时期鸡下丘脑和卵巢组织中内参基因表达稳定性分析.山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,48(6):801-806.
YUAN Z J , CHEN Q Y , JIANG Y L , et al . Stability analysis of reference genes expression in chicken hypothalamus and ovary during the different developmental stages. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2017,48(6):801-806. (in Chinese with English abstract)
31 计红,王忠伟,郭景茹,等 .产蛋前期和产蛋期籽鹅组织内参基因的稳定性.中国农业科学,2012,45(11):2260-2266.
JI H , WANG Z W , GUO J R , et al . Stability of endogenous reference genes in green-goose tissues during prelaying and laying periods. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011,45(11):2260-2266. (in Chinese with English abstract)
32 SAMIULLAH S , ROBERTS J , WU S B . Reference gene selection for the shell gland of laying hens in response to time-points of eggshell formation and nicarbazin. PLoS One, 2017,12(7):e0180432.
[1] 关法春,边步云,黄立华,张永锋,李晓辉,张立春. 农牧一体化农田系统可利用生产资源分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(2): 221-228.
[2] 于金鑫,方超,周佳怡,姚园园,曾鑫年,刘家莉. 嗅觉学习对橘小实蝇寄主气味选择行为的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(2): 181-188.
[3] 刘甜, 陈晓宇, 朱志伟, 于福先, 黄菁, 贾若欣, 石放雄, 潘建治. 卵泡刺激素剂量依赖性表达基因的筛选[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(2): 162-171.
[4] 谭博文,竺方欢,徐佳明,张馨元,李铎. 中国大陆年轻群体食物选择动机探究(英文)[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2017, 43(2): 220-228.
[5] 赵倩明,朱隆基,詹康,霍永久,赵国琦. 不同粉碎粒度苜蓿草粉对扬州鹅生产性能和血液生化指标的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2017, 43(2): 253-261.
[6] 曹玉杰, 吴兴富, 肖炳光, 徐海明. 清香型产区烤烟品种经济性状环境稳定性[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(3): 340-349.
[7] 陈婷婷,李显富,贾春雷,安雪琴,朱俊,肖立增,戴秀梅,张建奎. 云烟87突变体新品系的特征特性及其DNA指纹图谱鉴定[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(2): 179-189.
[8] 郑嫩珠, 李丽, 辛清武, 缪中纬, 朱志明, 刘凤辉, 吴俭飞, 卢立志. 内参基因对TYR、MITF和ASIP基因在白绒乌骨鸡各组织表达水平的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(6): 732-740.
[9] 庄远红,刘静娜,黄家福,林娇芬,潘裕添. 食用菌壳聚糖卡波姆复合凝胶的稳定性及其抑菌效果[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(2): 147-152.
[10] 胡书琴, 汤一*, 刘莉. 茶渣对儿茶素的吸附动力学[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2014, 40(6): 679-687.
[11] 沙志鹏, 关法春*, 王军峰, 田飞鹏. 玉米田养鹅生产模式的能值评估[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2013, 39(6): 655-662.
[12] 马林1, 周练1, 周正剑1, 唐桂香2, 沈志成2, 寿惠霞1.   抗除草剂转基因水稻和大豆快速准确检测技术研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2012, 38(6): 647-654.
[13] 章明奎, 顾国平, 王阳. 生物质炭在土壤中的降解特征[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2012, 38(3): 329-335.
[14] 吴敬超,欧阳五庆,芮弦,刘梅雪,宋冰,兰莹. 乙酰甲喹微乳的制备及其体外透皮释药研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2012, 38(2): 147-152.
[15] 刘维屏,张颖. 手性农药毒性评价进展[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2012, 38(1): 63-70.