Mutual Construction of Digital Technology Application and Institutional Reform of Emergency Management: An Empirical Study Based on Textual Data from 31 Provinces in China
Yu Jianxing1,2, Chen Shaohui1
1.School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China 2.Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
Abstract：In the digital era, the institutional reform in emergency management is both crucial and urgent, driven not only by the extensive and profound application of digital technology, but also by the interplay and mutual construction between technology and institution. However, most existing studies predominantly follow a unidirectional attribution logic, only explaining technological transformation or bureaucratic regulation. The different explanatory approaches capture only a specific stage or a certain aspect of digital development, failing to provide a comprehensive picture of emergency management reform in the digital era. To unravel the true relationship between digital technology application and institutional reform of emergency management, it is necessary to revisit the broader theoretical issue of the relationship between technology and organizations. A review of relevant literature reveals three main theoretical perspectives: technological determinism, organizational constructionism and bidirectional mutual-construction theory. This paper adopts the mutual construction perspective, shifting the analytical focus to dynamic interaction processes, systematically examining the interaction impact of technology and institution within a unified framework. Building on classical theory frameworks, this paper attempts to construct a dynamic mutual construction framework of digital technology application and institutional reform of emergency management, proposing a series of research hypotheses about their interaction impact.In practice, the two core explanatory variables—digital technology application and institutional reform of emergency management—are relatively abstract and difficult to measure directly. Therefore, this study employs big data research tools for text mining, establishing two text databases: “Digital Technology Application in Epidemic Control” and “Innovation of Emergency Institution in Epidemic Control”. By matching the text databases with standard statistical data, the study conducts indirect measurements, ultimately obtaining a panel dataset, spanning January 2020 to December 2022 and covering 31 provinces. Additionally, to address the endogeneity issue arising from mutual influence, we introduced a simultaneous equations model for empirical test. The results show that there is a significant mutual promoting effect between technology application and institutional reform. Specifically, the key pathway through which technology application drives institutional reform is by strengthening collaborative mechanisms, while institutional reform promotes technology application primarily through technology-inclusive institutional design. Moreover, the heterogeneity of regional technology environment and crisis impact has a moderating effect on the mutual promotion. Regions with superior technological environment exhibit better performance in the coordinated development of technology and institution, while the damage of a major crisis can be a key point in driving change, speeding up the process of interaction between technology and institution.The findings preliminarily validate a continuous picture of emergency management reform in the digital era, potentially contributing to theory in two ways. First, this paper bridges the theoretical research on digital governance and emergency management, broadening the research perspective of governance reform in the digital era. By focusing on the practice of crisis response, researchers will have a greater possibility to observe the general patterns and characteristics of governance reform. Second, the new analytical framework integrates environmental features of interactive systems and refines the specific roles of institutional elements in organizations. Thus, the relevant theories of the interaction between technology and institution have been supplementary revised. The theoretical explanation of the bidirectional mutual-construction between technology application and institutional reform also deepens practical understanding, and can provide policy implications for the adjustment and optimization of emergency management systems in the digital era.
郁建兴, 陈韶晖. 数字技术应用与应急管理制度变革的双向建构[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2025, 55(3): 43-59.
Yu Jianxing, Chen Shaohui. Mutual Construction of Digital Technology Application and Institutional Reform of Emergency Management: An Empirical Study Based on Textual Data from 31 Provinces in China. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2025, 55(3): 43-59.
1 Gao X. & Yu J.， “Public governance mechanism in the prevention and control of the COVID-19： information， decision-making and execution，” Journal of Chinese Governance， Vol. 5， No. 2 （2020）， pp. 178-197. 2 张海波、戴新宇、钱德沛等：《新一代信息技术赋能应急管理现代化的战略分析》，《中国科学院院刊》2022年第12期，第1727-1737页。 3 Hammerschmid G.， Palaric E. & Rackwitz M. et al.， “A shift in paradigm？ collaborative public administration in the context of national digitalization strategies，” Governance， Vol. 37， No. 2 （2024）， pp. 411-430. 4 Lember V.， Kattel R. & T?nurist P.， “Technological capacity in the public sector： the case of Estonia，” International Review of Administrative Sciences， Vol. 84， No. 2 （2018）， pp. 214-230. 5 詹承豫、高叶、李治博：《应急管理中技术赋能的双螺旋机理研究——以人脸识别技术在疫情常态化防控中的应用为例》，《行政管理改革》2021年第7期，第68-78页。 6 郁建兴、陈韶晖：《从技术赋能到系统重塑：数字时代的应急管理体制机制创新》，《浙江社会科学》2022年第5期，第66-75页。 7 张权、黄璜：《技术赋能与复杂性化约——基于“健康码”的分析》，《政治学研究》2022年第2期，第115-126页。 8 Ahn M. J. & Bretschneider S.， “Politics of e-government： e-government and the political control of bureaucracy，” Public Administration Review， Vol. 71， No. 3 （2011）， pp. 414-424. 9 吴晓林：《技术赋能与科层规制——技术治理中的政治逻辑》，《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第2期，第73-81页。 10 郁建兴、周幸钰：《数字技术应用与政府创新的双向互构——基于浙江省“三张清单”数字化改革的分析》，《经济社会体制比较》2023年第1期，第133-143页。 11 张燕、邱泽奇：《技术与组织关系的三个视角》，《社会学研究》2009年第2期，第200-215页。 12 Orlikowski W. J.， “The duality of technology： rethinking the concept of technology in organizations，” Organization Science， Vol. 3， No. 3 （1992）， pp. 398-427. 13 邱泽奇：《技术与组织的互构——以信息技术在制造企业的应用为例》，《社会学研究》2005年第2期，第32-54页。 14 黄甄铭、魏娜、梁正：《跨部门数据共享源于机构变革还是动机转变？——基于浙江省M区的案例研究》，《管理世界》2024年第5期，第87-106页。 15 朱光磊、陈璐：《双线改革联动：数字技术与政府组织何以适配——以广东省Y区数字政府建设为例》，《求实》2024年第3期，第19-30页。 16 樊博、于洁：《公共突发事件治理的信息协同机制研究》，《上海行政学院学报》2015年第5期，第16-30页。 17 Moon M. J. & Welch E. W.， “Same bed， different dreams？ a comparative analysis of citizen and bureaucrat perspectives on e-government，” Review of Public Personnel Administration， Vol. 25， No. 3 （2005）， pp. 243-264. 18 Wukich C.， “More monitoring， less coordination： Twitter and Facebook use between emergency management agencies，” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management， Vol. 17， No. 3 （2020）， pp. 1-29. 19 Robinson S. E.， Pudlo J. M. & Wehde W. ， “The new ecology of tornado warning information： a natural experiment assessing threat intensity and citizen-to-citizen information sharing，” Public Administration Review， Vol. 79， No. 6 （2019）， pp. 905-916. 20 彭勃、刘旭：《破解基层治理的协同难题：数字化平台的条块统合路径》，《理论与改革》2022年第5期，第42-56页。 21 Pierson P.， “Increasing returns， path dependence， and the study of politics，” The American Political Science Review， Vol. 94， No. 2 （2000）， pp. 251-267. 22 张西勇、杨继武：《历史制度主义视域下我国城市街道办事处的制度变迁》，《中国行政管理》2012年第12期，第69-73页。 23 翁士洪：《技术驱动与科层统合：城市治理数字化转型的交互机制》，《中国行政管理》2023年第6期，第42-50页。 24 刘一弘、钟开斌：《学习与竞争：重大突发事件如何触发政策变迁的文献述评》，《公共行政评论》2021年第6期，第24-43页。 25 Agostino D.， Arnaboldi M. & Lema M. D.， “New development： COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery，” Public Money & Management， Vol. 41， No. 1 （2021）， pp. 69-72. 26 马得勇：《历史制度主义的渐进性制度变迁理论——兼论其在中国的适用性》，《经济社会体制比较》2018年第5期，第158-170页。 27 孙宗锋、郑跃平：《我国城市政务微博发展及影响因素探究——基于228个城市的“大数据+小数据”分析（2011—2017）》，《公共管理学报》2021年第1期，第77-89页。 28 陈振明、张树全：《技术与制度互构关系转换及其对公共治理的影响》，《公共管理学报》2023年第4期，第1-12页。 29 于君博、戴鹏飞：《中国地方政府数字治理的“过程”与“组织”》，《公共管理学报》2023年第1期，第121-132页。 30 Dowding K.， Hindmoor A. & Martin A.， “Attention， content and measurement： rejoinder to Adams and Jones，” Journal of Public Policy， Vol. 36， No. 1 （2016）， pp. 46-50. 31 钟开斌：《“一案三制”：中国应急管理体系建设的基本框架》，《南京社会科学》2009年第11期，第77-83页。 32 范梓腾：《数字政府建设的议题界定：时空演进与影响因素——基于省级党委机关报的大数据分析》，《中国行政管理》2021年第1期，第42-51页。 33 祁毓、卢洪友：《污染、健康与不平等——跨越“环境健康贫困”陷阱》，《管理世界》2015年第9期，第32-51页。 34 郑休休、刘青、赵忠秀：《产业关联、区域边界与国内国际双循环相互促进——基于联立方程组模型的实证研究》，《管理世界》2022年第11期，第56-70页。 35 胡珺、彭远怀、宋献中等：《控股股东股权质押与策略性慈善捐赠——控制权转移风险的视角》，《中国工业经济》2020年第2期，第174-198页。 36 赵娟、杨泽森、张小劲：《趋同性与多样性：数字政府政策扩散模式与影响机制——一个事件史分析》，《公共管理学报》2023年第4期，第38-52页。 37 Leone A. J.， Minutti-Meza M. & Wasley C. E.， “Influential observations and inference in accounting research，” Accounting Review， Vol. 94， No. 6 （2019）， pp. 337-364.
2025, Vol. 55 
