Abstract：Compared with the theories of social object, writer subjectivity, and work ontology, the academic research on Bakhtin’s reader acceptance poetics is significantly lagging behind，which is not conducive to our comprehensive understanding of the overall image of Bakhtin’s poetics construction, and naturally it does not contribute to the modern transformation of the discourse system of contemporary literary theory with Chinese characteristics.From a macroscopic perspective, Bakhtin’s reader acceptance poetic system mainly includes three aspects: the essentialism of reader acceptance, the methodology of reader acceptance, and the axiology of reader acceptance.Bakhtin systematically expounded the essence of reader acceptance from three levels Based on a thorough discussion of the essence and methods of reader acceptance, Bakhtin systematically revealed the holistic, dialogic, and open-ended values of reader acceptance. Bakhtin believed that although readers have different levels and realms in understanding and acceptance, the highest level is to encounter “the great works”, whether it is general appreciation or positively responsive understanding. Thus, Bakhtin’s reader acceptance poetic system provides three insights: aesthetic communication is the universal essence of literary creation and its reception activities; sociological poetics is the fundamental method for engaging in literary interpretation activities; open dialogue is the fundamental demand of literary reception activities. Bakhtin systematically expounded the essence of reader acceptance from three levels Based on a thorough discussion of the essence and methods of reader acceptance, Bakhtin systematically revealed the holistic, dialogic, and open-ended values of reader acceptance. Bakhtin believed that although readers have different levels and realms in understanding and acceptance, the highest level is to encounter “the great works”, whether it is general appreciation or positively responsive understanding. Thus, Bakhtin’s reader acceptance poetic system provides three insights: aesthetic communication is the universal essence of literary creation and its reception activities; sociological poetics is the fundamental method for engaging in literary interpretation activities; open dialogue is the fundamental demand of literary reception activities. Bakhtin systematically expounded the essence of reader acceptance from three levels Based on a thorough discussion of the essence and methods of reader acceptance, Bakhtin systematically revealed the holistic, dialogic, and open-ended values of reader acceptance. Bakhtin believed that although readers have different levels and realms in understanding and acceptance, the highest level is to encounter “the great works”, whether it is general appreciation or positively responsive understanding. Thus, Bakhtin’s reader acceptance poetic system provides three insights: aesthetic communication is the universal essence of literary creation and its reception activities; sociological poetics is the fundamental method for engaging in literary interpretation activities; open dialogue is the fundamental demand of literary reception activities.
龚举善. 巴赫金读者接受诗学系统论[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2025, 55(1): 122-135.
Gong Jushan. Bakhtin’s Systematic Study on Reader Acceptance of Poetics. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2025, 55(1): 122-135.
1 钱中文主编：《巴赫金全集》第二卷，李辉凡、张捷、张杰等译，石家庄：河北教育出版社，1998年。 2 英］戴维·舍菲尔德：《巴赫金与读者》，王云译，见周启超、王加兴主编：《欧美学者论巴赫金》，南京：南京大学出版社，2014年，第206-222页。 3 钱中文主编：《巴赫金全集》第四卷，白春仁、晓河、周启超等译，石家庄：河北教育出版社，1998年。 4 龚举善、陈园：《巴赫金主体论诗学的多维建构》，《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2023年第3期，第56-68页。 5 钱中文主编：《巴赫金全集》第三卷，白春仁、晓河译，石家庄：河北教育出版社，1998年。 6 钱中文主编：《巴赫金全集》第一卷，晓河、贾泽林、张杰等译，石家庄：河北教育出版社，1998年。 7 陈历明：《翻译：作为复调的对话》，《外国语》2006年第1期，第60-68页。 8 德］尤尔根·哈贝马斯：《交往行为理论（第一卷：行为合理性与社会合理化）》，曹卫东译，上海：上海人民出版社，2018年。 9 Kristeva J.， Desire in Language： A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art， New York： Columbia University Press， 1990. 10 曾军：《克里斯蒂娃在“词语、对话和小说”一文中对巴赫金理论的借鉴和改造》，《外国文学研究》2014年第1期，第133-139页。 11 Sempere J. P.， The Influence of Mikhail Bakhtin on the Formation and Development of the Yale School Deconstruction， Newcastle upon Tyne： Cambridge Scholars Publishing， 2014.
2025, Vol. 55 
