Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报（理学版）
浙江大学学报（理学版）  2019, Vol. 46 Issue (4): 439-444    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2019.04.009
数学与计算机科学     
考虑多阶段决策信息集结的新算法及其应用
李静, 张玉林
东南大学 经济管理学院，江苏 南京 211189
A new algorithm for aggregating interval information of multistage decision making problems and its application
LI Jing, ZHANG Yulin
School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
 全文: PDF(458 KB)   HTML  
摘要： 针对多阶段区间信息集结与决策问题，提出一种考虑最小化集结矩阵与阶段区间矩阵之间距离的新方法，寻求更趋近帕累托最优的集结结果，使最终评价值更符合多阶段评价的目标。 首先，根据多阶段专家评价值将区间信息转化为二维坐标点，并将其映射到二维坐标系中。然后，构建区间信息离差最小化集结模型，并基于植物模拟生长算法(PGSA）进行群体判断信息的集结，再通过合成各方案的属性评价值，给出各决策方案的综合评价值并进行排序，进而给出最优决策方案。最后，以物流服务商的多阶段绩效评价为例，验证了该方法的合理性和有效性。
关键词： 区间信息;  二维坐标点;  植物模拟生长算法;  物流服务商    
Abstract: A new method is proposed to multistage interval information aggregation and decision making. This method considers minimizing the distance between the aggregation matrix and multistage interval matrices. The method aims to seek the aggregation result which is closer to Pareto optimum so as to make the final evaluation value more in line with the goal of multistage evaluation. Firstly, the interval information is converted into two dimensional coordinate points according to the multistage expert evaluation values， and then these points are mapped to planar reference frame. Next, the dispersion minimization aggregation model is constructed and solved by plant simulation growth algorithm. Later, the ranking of each decision plan is given by synthesizing the attribute evaluation values of each plan and then the optimal decision plan is given. Finally, the comprehensive evaluation values and the rationality and effectiveness of the method are verified by the example of the multistage performance evaluation of the logistics service providers.
Key words: interval information    two-dimensional coordinates    plant simulation growth algorithm    logistics service providers
收稿日期: 2018-03-29 出版日期: 2019-07-25
CLC:  C934  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71671036,71171046)；江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目(2018SJZDA005)；江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX19_0129).
作者简介: 李静(1992—)，ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9344-4828，男，博士研究生，主要从事行为决策和博弈论研究.
服务　　
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章　　
李静
张玉林

引用本文:

李静, 张玉林. 考虑多阶段决策信息集结的新算法及其应用[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2019, 46(4): 439-444.

LI Jing, ZHANG Yulin. A new algorithm for aggregating interval information of multistage decision making problems and its application. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2019, 46(4): 439-444.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2019.04.009    或    https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/Y2019/V46/I4/439

1 ZADEHL A.Fuzzy sets[J]. Information & Control, 1965, 8(3): 338-353.
2 PENGB, YEC M.Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic pure linguistic information and their application to group decision making[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2016, 36(6): 1526-1535.
3 ZHANGJ J, WUD S, OLSOND L.The method of grey related analysis to multiple attribute decision making problems with interval numbers[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2005, 42(9/10): 991-998.
4 YUY S, DIAOL W.Monte Carlo method for interval multi-attribute decision making[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Nature Science Edition), 2008, 38(1): 187-190.
5 XUZ S.Extended C-OWA operators and their use in uncertain multi-attribute decision making[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2005 (11): 9-15.
6 YANGW, LIUS Y, PANGY F.Uncertain aggregator and its application to multiple attribute decision making[J]. System Engineering and Electronics, 2007, 29(10): 1662-1664.
7 WEIG W.New method of grey relational analysis to multiple attribute decision making with intervals[J]. System Engineering and Electronics, 2006, 28(9): 1358-1359,1383.
8 WEIG W, WEIY.Model of grey relational analysis for interval multiple attribute decision making with preference information on alternatives[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2008, 16(1): 158-162.
9 ZHANGY, FANZ P.A method for interval multiple attribute decision making with partial attribute weight information[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2008, 40(10): 1672-1676.
10 LIUY, JEFFREYF, LIUS F, et al.Multi-attribute and multistage decision-making method with unknown weights[J]. Control and Decision, 2013, 28(6): 940-944.
11 YIP T, YOUH Y, GUOY J, et al.Multi-phase evaluation method of information aggregation based on phases gain inspiriting[J]. Systems Engineering, 2015, 33(12): 126-131.
12 XUZ S, YAGERR R.Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2008, 48(1): 246-262.
13 ZHANGF M, SUNW L.Multi-stage dynamic interactive group evaluation method based on interval information and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(10): 129-135.
14 LUZ P, HOUL Q, LUC Y.Multi-stage three-point group decision-making method considered stage weight[J]. Control and Decision, 2013, 28(11): 1756-1760.
15 LIH, ZHUJ J, ZHANGS T, et al.Dynamic risk decision-making method considering three reference point in cumulative prospect theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(S1): 42-50. SUZ X, WANGL, XIAG P.Extended VIKOR method for dynamic multi-attribute decision making with interval numbers[J]. Control and Decision, 2010, 25(6): 836-840.
16 XUZ S.Multi-period multi-attribute group decision-making under linguistic assessments[J]. International Journal of General Systems, 2009, 38(8): 823-850.
17 XUZ S.On multi-period multi-attribute decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2008, 21(2): 164-171.
18 LIL, XIEX L, GUOR. Research on group decision making with interval numbers based on plant growth simulation algorithm[J]. Kybernetes, 2014, 43(2): 250-264.
19 LIUW, LIL.An approach to determining the integrated weights of decision makers based on interval number group decision matrices[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2015, 90(C): 92-98.
20 LIL, LIJ, LIT.An optimal method to aggregation of experts’ judgment matrices[J]. Systems Engineering, 2016, 34(9): 120-127.
21 QIUJ D, LIL.A new approach for multiple attribute group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 61: 111-121.
22 LIL, ZONGM T, LIJ.Research on a method of uncertain linguistic information group decision-making based on the steiner point[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(6): 55-62.
23 苏志欣, 王理, 夏国平.区间数动态多属性决策的VIKOR扩展方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2010, 25(6): 836-840.
24 LIL, WANGY Q.A new method determining the weights of experts in multiple-attribute group decision-making[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2017(2): 14-18.
25 LIT, WANGC F, WANGW B, et al.A global optimization bionics algorithm for solving integer programming-plant growth simulation algorithm[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2005,25(1): 76-85.
[1] 常娟, 杜迎雪, 刘卫锋. 直觉正态模糊数Choquet积分算子及其决策应用[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2020, 47(6): 705-714.
[2] 刘卫锋, 常娟, 杜迎雪. 连续拟有序加权几何算子及其群决策应用[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 45(2): 180-187,195.
[3] 林杨, 王应明, 陈磊. 基于决策单元交叉排序的中立DEA评价方法[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 45(2): 162-168.
[4] 李铭洋, 李博, 曹萍萍, 霍春辉. 考虑双方主体失望-欣喜感知的多指标双边匹配决策方法[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 45(2): 169-179.
[5] 张笛, 孙涛, 闫超栋, 万良琪, 陈洪转. 得分信息下考虑多种形式主体期望的双边匹配方法[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2017, 44(6): 735-741.
[6] 段传庆. 基于区间数的直觉模糊多属性决策研究[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2017, 44(2): 174-180.
[7] 陈圣群, 王应明, 施海柳, 林杨, 郑晶. 考虑利益相关者偏好的双边匹配决策方法[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2016, 43(3): 296-302.
[8] 乐琦. 得分信息下考虑不确定心理行为的双边匹配[J]. 浙江大学学报（理学版）, 2016, 43(2): 242-246.