Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(理学版)  2019, Vol. 46 Issue (3): 339-344    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2019.03.012
化学     
动物源性食品中地西泮残留量的检测方法研究
丁宇琦, 朱价, 梁晶晶, 罗金文
浙江省食品药品检验研究院,浙江 杭州310052
Research on methods for determination of diazepam residue in animal original food
Yuqi DING, Jia ZHU, Jingjing LIANG, Jinwen LUO
Zhejiang Institute for Food and Drug Control, Hangzhou 310052, China
 全文: PDF(452 KB)   HTML  
摘要: 采用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)、气相色谱质谱联用法(GC-MS/MS)以及液相色谱质谱联用法(HPLC-MS/MS)测定动物源性食品中镇静剂类药物地西泮的残留量。将样品均质粉碎后,经乙腈提取,固相萃取小柱净化后上机检测,外标法定量。实验证明,当固相萃取的洗脱液中甲醇与乙酸溶液的体积比为70:30时,洗脱效率最高。在不同仪器条件下,地西泮在各自浓度范围内的线性关系良好,相关系数(r2)均大于0.999,回收率在84.6%~ 101.7%,相对标准偏差(RSD)在0.52%~9.44%(n=3),检出限为0.5 μg·kg-1S/N=3,气相色谱质谱联用法以及液相色谱质谱联用法)和10.0 μg·kg-1S/N=3,高效液相色谱法),定量限按照3倍检出限计算; 3种方法均可分析动物源性食品中的地西泮残留量。对比可知,质谱法灵敏度和准确率高,但有一定的基质效应;液相色谱法操作简单,几乎不受基质效应的影响,但灵敏度和准确率不如质谱法。
关键词: 高效液相色谱法气相色谱质谱联用法液相色谱质谱联用法地西泮    
Abstract: High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) were applied to determine the diazepam residue in animal original food. Samples were detected quantitatively by external standard method through smashed homogeneously, extracted by acetonitrile as well as purified by solid phase extraction column. The highest efficiency of elution was reached when the ratio of methanol to acetic acid solution was 70:30 in volume. The linearity ranges of diazepam were all very well with different instruments, meanwhile, correlations were all above 0.999, the recoveries were between 84.6% and 101.7% with the RSDs in the range of 0.52% to 9.44% (n=3). The limit of detection was 0.5 μg·kg-1 for both LC-MS/MS and GC-MS, 10.0 μg·kg-1 for HPLC. The diazepam residue in animal original food can be quantitatively analyzed by all these three instrumental methods. In particular, mass spectral methods were highly sensitive and accurate while the operation of HPLC were easy and matrix-effect free.
Key words: high performance liquid chromatography    gas chromatography mass spectrometry    liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry    diazepam
收稿日期: 2018-10-15 出版日期: 2019-05-25
CLC:  O657  
基金资助: 浙江省科技厅科技计划项目(2018C37011);浙江省食品药品监管系统科技计划项目(SP201703).
通讯作者: ORCID:http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1695-1647, E-mail: 35386375@qq. com.     E-mail: 35386375@qq. com.
作者简介: 丁宇琦(1986—),ORCID:http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6420-0325, 男,博士生,工程师,主要从事仪器分析和食品检验方法研究.
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
丁宇琦
朱价
梁晶晶
罗金文

引用本文:

丁宇琦, 朱价, 梁晶晶, 罗金文. 动物源性食品中地西泮残留量的检测方法研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2019, 46(3): 339-344.

Yuqi DING, Jia ZHU, Jingjing LIANG, Jinwen LUO. Research on methods for determination of diazepam residue in animal original food. Journal of ZheJIang University(Science Edition), 2019, 46(3): 339-344.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2019.03.012        https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/Y2019/V46/I3/339

1 KAURA, SINGLAN, DHAWAND K. Low dose X-irradiation mitigates diazepam induced depression in rat brain[J]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2016, 80: 82-90.doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.06.004
2 YANL J, ZHANGJ, PANC S, et al. High throughput screening of tranquilizers in dairy products using ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2013, 41(1): 31-35.
3 CHENGL L, ZHANGY J, SHENJ Z, et al. GC-MS method for simultaneous determination of four sedative hypnotic residues in swine tissues[J]. Chromatographia, 2010, 71(1/2): 155-158.doi:10.1365/s10337-009-1403-6
4 KAWANOT, OSHIBUCHIH, KAWANOM, et al. Diazepam suppresses the stress-induced dopaminergic release in the amygdala of methamphetamine-sensitized rat[J]. European Journal of Pharmacology, 2018, 833: 247-254.doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.05.048
5 UDDINM N, SAMANIDOUV F, PAPADOYANNISI N. Validation of SPE-HPLC determination of 1,4-benzodiazepines and metabolites in blood plasma, urine and saliva[J]. Journal of Separation Science, 2008, 31(21): 3704-3717.doi:10.1002/jssc.200800342
6 XUA Y, WUB, HONGG L, et al. Application investigation of sedatives in the emergency treatment of critical care[J]. Journal of Medical Research, 2014, 43(4): 99-103.
7 PANL Z, YANZ Y, ZUOC Y, et al. Influence of long-term usage of diazepam on neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction signaling pathway[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2011, 42(5): 443-446.doi:10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20110511
8 XUQ, ZHANY P, GAOC H. Preparation of diazepam transdermal gel and its bioavailability[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Medical Sciences), 2012, 41(4): 441-444.doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2012.04.014
9 LIG M, NINGB A, BAIJ L, et al. Preparation of anti-diazepam monoclonal antibody and establishment of its enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method[J]. Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2014, 5(3): 956-963.
10 TANG L, ZHAOT Z, WANGW L, et al. Determination of seven sedative residues in sausage by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2014, 30(2): 274-278.
11 WEIJ M, LUOY Z, BAIY X, et al. Simultaneous high performance liquid chromatographic determination of 11 common sedatives in mutton[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, 35(10): 95-102.
12 SRUTHIA, TEJASWIP, THANUJAN, et al. Simple RP-HPLC method for estimation of diazepam in tablet dosage form[J]. Journal of Pharmacy Research, 2013, 6(1): 140-144.doi:10.1016/j.jopr.2012.11.029
13 ZHANGS, ZHOUS, CHEND W, et al. Determination of ten sedative residues in livestock products by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of Instrumental Analysis, 2014, 33(11): 1213-1218.
14 ORFANIDISA, GIKAH, MASTROGIANNIO, et al. Determination of drugs of abuse and pharmaceuticals in skeletal tissue by UHPLC–MS/MS[J]. Forensic Science International, 2018, 290: 137-145.doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.07.004
15 LIC, HUANGFUW G, YANGT, et al. Rapid determination of tranquillizers residues in swine urine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2010, 38(7): 1015-1018.
16 ZHUX L, LIUQ, LID, et al. Determination of diazepam in swine urine by gas chromatography - mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Drug, 2009, 43(1): 28-30.
[1] 丁宇琦, 朱价, 周霞, 罗金文. 阳离子交换皂石黏土在基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱分析中的应用[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2020, 47(4): 469-475.
[2] 宗婧婧, 严忠雍, 张小军, 李停停, 高学慧. 离子交换固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定水产品中泰妙菌素和沃尼妙林残留量[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2019, 46(4): 466-473.
[3] 朱作艺, 张玉, 王君虹, 李雪, 王伟, 孙彬. 离子色谱法同时测定植物生长调节剂中氯化胆碱、甲哌鎓及N-甲基哌啶[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2019, 46(3): 333-338.
[4] 汪建妹, 杨华, 曾银欢, 吴俐勤, 李锐, 袁玉伟, 钱鸣蓉. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定蜂蜜中抗生素和农药浓度[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2018, 45(3): 330-342.
[5] 戚荣平, 周晓红, 孟琪, 桑娴, 商晓春, 郭伟强. 双系统离子色谱法同时测定湖水中的氨氮和过硫酸根[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2017, 44(4): 480-484.
[6] 严忠雍, 张小军, 李佩佩, 方益, 喻亮, 张帅, 祝银, 李强. QuEChERS-超高效液相色谱串联质谱法测定水产品中红霉素残留[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2017, 44(3): 339-344.
[7] 魏孜, 朱亚尔, 宋瑶, 张瑜铎, 孙建腾. 基质固相分散-气相色谱/质谱法测定土壤中13种多溴联苯醚[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2017, 44(1): 106-111.
[8] 朱彬和, 倪承珠, 赵训燕, 郭伟强, 朱岩. 离子色谱法测定减水剂中的阴离子[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2016, 43(3): 316-320.
[9] 赵训燕, 倪承珠, 朱彬和, 张培敏, 张嘉捷, 陈素清, 朱岩. 柱切换在线前处理法鉴别地沟油的离子色谱研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2016, 43(2): 220-225.
[10] 陈秀华 蔡国权 . Meso-四( 4-甲氧基-3-磺酸苯基) 卟啉 与钴的显色反应及其钴的价态研究 [J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 1998, 25(4): 59-62.
[11] 郭伟强. 用人工神经网络方法解析色谱重叠峰[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 1998, 25(3): 62-65.
[12] 陈秀华;颜海斌. 新试剂(S-Br-PADCAP)与铜显色反应及其应用的研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 1997, 24(2): 151-154.
[13] 毛雪琴,陈恒武,金劲草,陈裕稽,朱国锋. 阴离子树脂微柱在线预富集火焰原子吸收法测定痕量镉[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 1999, 26(1): 59-64.
[14] 吴丹,冯建跃,侯镜德. 气相色谱法研究杭州大曲中微量成分与酒质的数理关系[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 1999, 26(2): 65-68.