Please wait a minute...
Chinese Journal of Engineering Design  2026, Vol. 33 Issue (3): 315-325    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2026.05.178
Theory and Method of Mechanical Design     
Matching design method for guideway geometric error shape of machine tool considering pose error and assembly stress of feed system
Guangming SUN1(),Rui GAO1,Xin GUO2,3,Dawei ZHANG2,Shengqi TONG1,Zhe SU2,3,Minsheng LI1(),Bing YAN1
1.School of Control and Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China
2.Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
3.Shenyang Zhongjie Friendship Machine Tool Factory, Shenyang 110044, China
Download: HTML     PDF(3856KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

In order to improve the assembly accuracy of precision machine tool guideways, a matching design method for guideway geometric error shapes considering the pose error and assembly stress of the feed system is proposed. Firstly, a mapping model between the geometric errors of the guideways and the pose errors of the worktable was established based on the static equilibrium method. The geometric error shapes of the guideways were analyzed, and the matching experiments on the geometric error shapes were designed. Then, the CRITIC (criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation) weighting method was used to assign weights and evaluate the pose errors of the worktable. The comprehensive scores of the five errors under different combinations of guideway geometric error shapes were obtained, thus obtaining the optimal combinations of three sets of guideway geometric error shapes. On this basis, the stress model of rollers in the guideway slider was established using the Hertz contact theory, and the assembly stress under different combinations of guideway geometric error shapes was analyzed based on the information entropy theory. Finally, the combinations of guideway geometric error shapes that simultaneously met the optimal worktable pose error evaluation results and the most uniform distribution of assembly stress were screened out, and the optimum matching of guideway geometric error shapes considering the pose error and assembly stress of the feed system was obtained. The effectiveness of the proposed method was verified through experiments. The research results have important guiding significance for the precision design and guideway assembly error control of machine tools.



Key wordsprecision machine tool      pose error      assembly stress      guideway geometric error      shape matching     
Received: 27 August 2025      Published: 27 June 2026
CLC:  TH 122  
Corresponding Authors: Minsheng LI     E-mail: gmsun@tju.edu.cn;liminsheng@tcu.edu.cn
Cite this article:

Guangming SUN,Rui GAO,Xin GUO,Dawei ZHANG,Shengqi TONG,Zhe SU,Minsheng LI,Bing YAN. Matching design method for guideway geometric error shape of machine tool considering pose error and assembly stress of feed system. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2026, 33(3): 315-325.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2026.05.178     OR     https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/Y2026/V33/I3/315


考虑进给系统位姿误差与装配应力的机床导轨几何误差形态匹配设计方法

为了提高精密机床导轨的装配精度,提出了考虑进给系统位姿误差与装配应力的导轨几何误差形态匹配设计方法。首先,基于静力平衡法建立了导轨几何误差与工作台位姿误差之间的映射模型,分析了导轨的几何误差形态,并设计了几何误差形态匹配实验。然后,运用CRITIC(criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation,通过指标间相关性评估指标重要性)赋权法对工作台位姿误差进行赋权评价,获得了不同导轨几何误差形态组合下5项误差的综合得分,并得到了3组导轨几何误差形态的最优组合。在此基础上,运用Hertz接触理论建立了导轨滑块中滚柱的应力模型,并基于信息熵理论分析了不同导轨几何误差形态组合下的装配应力。最后,筛选出同时满足工作台位姿误差评价结果最优与装配应力分布最均匀的导轨几何误差形态组合,获得了考虑进给系统位姿误差与装配应力的导轨几何误差形态的最佳匹配,并通过实验验证了所提出方法的有效性。研究结果对机床的精度设计与导轨装配误差控制具有重要的指导意义。


关键词: 精密机床,  位姿误差,  装配应力,  导轨几何误差,  形态匹配 
Fig.1 Schematic diagram of force on worktable
Fig.2 Geometric error of guideway
Fig.3 Geometric error shape of guideway
组合导轨1的几何误差形态导轨2的几何误差形态
x方向y方向x方向y方向
1正拱形正拱形正拱形正拱形
2正拱形负拱形负拱形负拱形
3正拱形正弦形正弦形正弦形
4正拱形负弦形负弦形负弦形
5负拱形正拱形正拱形负拱形
6负拱形负拱形负拱形正拱形
7负拱形正弦形正弦形负弦形
8负拱形负弦形负弦形正弦形
9正弦形正拱形负拱形正弦形
10正弦形负拱形正拱形负弦形
11正弦形正弦形负弦形正拱形
12正弦形负弦形正弦形负拱形
13负弦形正拱形负拱形负弦形
14负弦形负拱形正拱形正弦形
15负弦形正弦形负弦形负拱形
16负弦形负弦形正弦形正拱形
Table 1 Combinations of guideway geometric error shapes
Fig.4 Pose error of worktable under different combinations of guideway geometric error shapes
Fig.5 Mechanical model of single slider guideway system
组合应力熵
水平载荷工况竖直载荷工况
11.001.00
20.911.00
30.881.00
40.881.00
50.910.91
61.000.91
70.880.98
80.880.98
90.880.99
100.880.99
110.830.99
121.000.99
130.880.99
140.880.99
151.000.99
160.830.99
Table 2 Calculation results of roller stress entropy
参数数值
床身尺寸/(mm×mm×mm)1 800×600×485
工作台尺寸/(mm×mm×mm)570×550×102
滑块跨距/mmx方向:474;y方向:443
Table 3 Specific parameters of experimental platform
名称用途备注
千分尺测量塞尺厚度和工作台位移分辨率为1 μm
光电准直仪测量滑块位移偏差精度为0.1'',分辨率为0.01''
应力应变测试仪采集应力、应变数据分辨率为0.1 μm/m
水平仪测量基准度精度等级为00级
塞尺调整误差形态规格为10~50 μm
扭矩扳手拧紧螺栓扭矩量程为28~210 N·m
电阻应变片测量应力、应变灵敏系数为2.11,相对误差为±1%
Table 4 Experimental equipment and measurement tools
Fig.6 Adjustment method of geometric error shape of guideway
Fig.7 Measurement site of straightness error of guideway and worktable
Fig.8 Measurement site of worktable stress
Fig.9 Straightness error of left guideway (reference group)
Fig.10 Straightness error of right guideway (reference group)
Fig.11 Stress entropy of worktable (reference group)
Fig.12 Stress entropy of test plate (reference group)
Fig.13 Straightness error of left guideway (original group)
Fig.14 Straightness error of right guideway (original group)
Fig.15 Stress entropy of worktable (original group)
Fig.16 Stress entropy of test plate (original group)
Fig.17 Straightness error of left guideway (optimal group)
Fig.18 Straightness error of right guideway (optimal group)
Fig.19 Stress entropy of worktable (optimal group)
Fig.20 Stress entropy of test plate (optimal group)
 
[[1]]   姜晓飞, 张冠伟, 胡永秀, 等. 数控机床整机动态特性评价方法[J]. 工程设计学报, 2020, 27(2): 135-145.
JIANG X F, ZHANG G W, HU Y X, et al. Evaluation method of dynamic characteristics of whole NC machine tool[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2020, 27(2): 135-145.
[[2]]   杨兆军, 何佳龙, 刘志峰, 等. 数控机床可靠性技术新进展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(19): 152-163. doi:10.3901/jme.2023.19.152
YANG Z J, HE J L, LIU Z F, et al. Recent progress in reliability technology of CNC machine tools[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(19): 152-163.
doi: 10.3901/jme.2023.19.152
[[3]]   马雅丽, 李阳阳. 基于几何误差不确定性的滚动导轨运动误差研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(5): 11-18. doi:10.3901/jme.2019.05.011
MA Y L, LI Y Y. Motion error of rolling guide based on uncertainty of geometric error[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(5): 11-18.
doi: 10.3901/jme.2019.05.011
[[4]]   KHIM G, PARK C H, SHAMOTO E, et al. Prediction and compensation of motion accuracy in a linear motion bearing table[J]. Precision Engineering, 2011, 35(3): 393-399.
[[5]]   KIM G H, HAN J A, LEE S K. Motion error estimation of slide table on the consideration of guide parallelism and pad deflection[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2014, 15(9): 1935-1946.
[[6]]   XUE F, ZHAO W H, CHEN Y L, et al. Research on error averaging effect of hydrostatic guideways[J]. Precision Engineering, 2012, 36(1): 84-90.
[[7]]   WU J, WANG J S, WANG L P, et al. Study on the stiffness of a 5-DOF hybrid machine tool with actuation redundancy[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2009, 44(2): 289-305.
[[8]]   SHAMOTO E, PARK C H, MORIWAKI T. Analysis and improvement of motion accuracy of hydrostatic feed table[J]. CIRP Annals, 2001, 50(1): 285-290.
[[9]]   SUN W, KONG X X, WANG B, et al. Statics modeling and analysis of linear rolling guideway considering rolling balls contact[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2015, 229(1): 168-179.
[[10]]   孙光明, 张大卫, 孙铭泽, 等. 精密机床直线进给系统误差均化机理研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2023, 30(2): 200-211.
SUN G M, ZHANG D W, SUN M Z, et al. Research on error averaging mechanism of linear feed system for precision machine tools[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2023, 30(2): 200-211.
[[11]]   SUN G M, CHEN S Q, SUN M Z, et al. Research on the error averaging effect of linear feed systems for precision machine tool[J]. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2024, 15(12): 103101.
[[12]]   PARK C H, OH Y J, LEE C H, et al. Theoretical verification on the motion error analysis method of hydrostatic bearing tables using a transfer function[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2003, 4(2): 64-70.
[[13]]   NI Y B, ZHOU H Y, SHAO C Y, et al. Research on the error averaging effect in a rolling guide pair[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 32(1): 72.
[[14]]   HWANG J, PARK C H, GAO W, et al. A three-probe system for measuring the parallelism and straightness of a pair of rails for ultra-precision guideways[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2007, 47(7/8): 1053-1058.
[[15]]   MAJDA P. Relation between kinematic straightness errors and angular errors of machine tool[J]. Advances in Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2012, 36: 47-53.
[[16]]   MAJDA P. Modeling of geometric errors of linear guideway and their influence on joint kinematic error in machine tools[J]. Precision Engineering, 2012, 36(3): 369-378.
[[17]]   郭龙真. 精密卧式加工中心精度设计及装配误差控制方法研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2018.
GUO L Z. Investigation into accuracy design and assembly error control of high-precision horizontal machining centers[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2018.
[[18]]   EKINCI T O, MAYER J R R, CLOUTIER G M. Investigation of accuracy of aerostatic guideways[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2009, 49(6): 478-487.
[[19]]   KHAN A W, CHEN W Y. Correlation between linear and angular kinematic errors in prismatic joint of machine tools[C]//2009 International Conference on Optical Instruments and Technology: Optoelectronic Measurement Technology and Systems. Shanghai, Oct. 19-22, 2009.
[[20]]   WU Y, WANG Z, DONG H M, et al. A novel accuracy model for the intrinsic kinematic property of a prismatic pair[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2018, 232(15): 2697-2710.
[[21]]   HE G Y, HUANG C, GUO L Z, et al. Identification and adjustment of guide rail geometric errors based on BP neural network[J]. Measurement Science Review, 2017, 17(3): 135-144.
[[22]]   KHIM G, OH J S, PARK C H. Analysis of 5-DOF motion errors influenced by the guide rails of an aerostatic linear motion stage[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2014, 15(2): 283-290.
[1] Guangming SUN,Dawei ZHANG,Mingze SUN,Pengfei XU,Faze CHEN,Zhijun LI. Research on error averaging mechanism of linear feed system for precision machine tools[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2023, 30(2): 200-211.
[2] Guang-ming SUN,Yi-miao WANG,Qian WAN,Kun GONG,Wen-jin WANG,Jian ZHAO. Optimization design of precision machine tool bed considering assembly deformation[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2022, 29(3): 318-326.
[3] HE Gai-yun, ZHANG Xiao-lei, ZHANG Da-wei, SUN Guang-ming. Research on three-dimensional evaluation method for repeated positioning accuracy of machine tool linear axis[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2019, 26(4): 371-378.