|
|
Optimal design for truss structure shape based on response surface method |
CHEN Hong-wu, PENG Cong-cong, TIAN Cheng, WANG Li-yuan |
College of Engineering Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China |
|
|
Abstract In view of the problem of mathematical nonlinear regression, it is necessary to continuously improve the design model and design parameters, so that the design effect is the best. The response surface method is often used to optimize the minimum volume problem under the constraint conditions, which means that the simulation model is fitted by the function relation and the optimization direction is determined by the screening test. In order to optimize the shape of the classic 10-bar truss structure,based on the response surface, the APDL (ANSYS parametric design language) program was written and run, and the initial stress and volume of the truss were obtained. The change of node coordinates was used to reflect the change of shape. Each factor was set at three levels and encoded as -1, 0 and 1, and the center and level were adjusted by response surface method (RSM). Based on the adjusted level, the best neighborhood was found, and then the optimal solution of the volume under the allowable stress in the best neighborhood was solved by the optimization software. Finally, the determined node vertical coordinate value was returned to the APDL program to verify whether the constraint condition was satisfied. If it was satisfied, the volume was the best solution at this time. The results indicated that the iterations number was only 3 times when using the response surface method, which could quickly locate the optimal solution and reduce the previous design cost. By comparing the experimental design method in literature[9], it was found that the RSM was more efficient in optimizing the shape of the structure. In engineering applications, it is efficient to locate the design test program and find the best matching design under constraint conditions.
|
Received: 22 April 2017
Published: 28 August 2018
|
|
基于响应面法对桁架结构形状的优化设计
针对数学非线性回归问题,需不断改进设计模型和设计参数,从而使得设计效果达到最佳。求解约束条件下体积最小问题时经常用响应面法进行优化,即利用函数关系拟合仿真模型,采用筛选试验来确定优化方向。为了优化经典10杆桁架结构的形状,基于响应面法,编写并运行APDL(ANSYS parametric design language,参数化设计语言)程序,得到各桁架的初始应力和体积。以节点纵坐标值的改变来反映形状的变化,各因子设置三水平并编码为-1,0,1,通过响应面法(response surface method,RSM)进行寻优并调整中心点和水平。基于调整后的水平,先找到最佳邻域,再用优化软件在最佳邻域内求解桁架在许应力下体积的最优解,最后将确定好的节点纵坐标值回代到APDL程序中验证是否满足约束条件,若满足,则此时的体积为最优解。结果表明:利用响应面法优化桁架杆的迭代次数仅为3次,它能快速定位最优解,降低了前期设计成本。通过对比文献[9]可知响应面法对结构的形状优化更为有效,能快速定位出设计试验方案,在工程应用中对于寻找在约束条件下的最佳配比设计有着高效性。
关键词:
响应面法,
水平调整,
最佳邻域,
最优解
|
|
[[1]] |
王栋.结构优化设计:探索与进展[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2013:1-214. WANG Dong. Structural optimization:exploration and development[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2013:1-214.
|
|
|
[[2]] |
蔡新,郭兴文,张旭明.工程优化设计[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2003(5):20-29. CAI Xin, GUO Xing-wen, ZHANG Xu-ming. Engineering optimum design[M]. Beijing:China Water & Power Press, 2003(5):20-29.
|
|
|
[[3]] |
杨书仪,刘德顺,文泽军.基于响应面法的桥梁主桁架结构优化设计[J].机械设计,2007,24(6):14-16. YANG Shu-yi, LIU De-shun, WEN Ze-jun. Structural optimization design of bridge main truss based on method of respond surface[J]. Journal of Machine Design, 2007, 24(6):14-16.
|
|
|
[[4]] |
吕辉,于德介,谢展,等.基于响应面法的汽车盘式制动器稳定性优化设计[J].机械工程学报,2013,49(9):45-49. LÜ Hui; YU De-jie, XIE Zhan, et al. Optimization of vehicle disc brakes stability based on response surface method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 49(9):45-49.
|
|
|
[[5]] |
姜衡,管贻生,邱志成,等.基于响应面法的立式加工中心动静态多目标优化[J].机械工程学报,2011,47(11):56-60. JIANG Heng, GUAN Yi-sheng, QIU Zhi-cheng, et al. Dynamic and static multi-objective optimization of a vertical machining center based on response surface method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 47(11):56-60.
|
|
|
[[6]] |
JANG Choon-man, CHOI Ka-ram.Optimal design of splitters attached to turbo blower impeller by RSM[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2012, 21(3):215-222.
|
|
|
[[7]] |
王永菲,王成国.响应面法的理论与应用[J].中央民族大学学报(自然科学学报),2005,14(3):236-240. WANG Yong-fei, WANG Cheng-guo. The theory and application of the response surface method[J]. Journal of the Central University for Nationalities (Natural Science Edition), 2005, 14(3):236-240.
|
|
|
[[8]] |
张建方.关于试验设计的效率及有关问题[J].数理统计与管理,2007,26(5):92-801. ZHANG Jian-fang. On the efficiency of experiment design and its some related problem[J]. 2007, 26(5):92-801.
|
|
|
[[9]] |
杨冬梅,小木曾望,室津义定.基于实验设计法的工程结构优化设计[J].计算力学学报,2001,18(2):173-178. YANG Dong-mei, KOGISO Nozomu, MUROTSU Yoshisada. Structural optimization based on the experimental design method[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2001, 18(2):173-178.
|
|
|
[[10]] |
MONTGOMERY Douglas C.实验设计与分析[M].6版.傅钰生,张健,王振羽,等译.北京:人民邮电出版社,2009:8-371. MONTGOMERY Douglas C. Experimental design and analysis[M]. 6th ed. Translated by FU Yu-sheng, ZHANG Jian, WANG Zhen-yu, et al. Beijing:People's Posts and Telecommunications Press, 2009:8-371.
|
|
|
[[11]] |
盛骤,谢式千,潘承毅.概率论与数理统计[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2013:219-263. SHENG Zhou, XIE Shi-qian, PAN Cheng-yi. Probability theory and mathematical statistics[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2013:219-263.
|
|
|
[[12]] |
隋允康,宇慧平.响应面方法的改进及其对工程优化的应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2011:1-265. SUI Yun-kang, YU Hui-ping. The improvement of response surface method and its applications to engineering optimization[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2011:1-265.
|
|
|
[[13]] |
KANGA Soo-Chang, KOH Hyun-Moo, CHOO Jinkyo F. An efficient response surface method using moving least squares approximation for structural reliability analysis[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 25(4):365-371.
|
|
|
[[14]] |
张振伟,姚卫星,周琳,等.桁架结构尺寸和形状协同优化方法研究[J].航空工程进展,2012,3(2):138-143. ZHANG Zhen-wei, YAO Wei-xing, ZHOU Lin, et al. Study on size and shape collaborative optimization method of truss structure[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2012, 3(2):138-143
|
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|