|
|
Tradeoff optimization of key elements of technical interface of railway bridge-tunnel engineering |
Xue-ying BAO1(),Ya-juan LI1,Suo-ting HU2,3,Xin-lin BAN2,3,Lin WANG1,Jian-chao XU2,3 |
1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China 2. Railway Engineering Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences, Beijing 100081, China 3. State Key Laboratory for Track Technology of High-Speed Railway, China Academy of Railway Sciences, Beijing 100081, China |
|
|
Abstract In order to collaboratively and optimally control the key elements of the technical interface of the railway bridge-tunnel in the arduous mountainous area, the tradeoff optimization model of the key elements for the technical interface was established, which was combined the multi-attribute utility function and the "three-one" elements transformation structure. Firstly, the relationships among quality, schedule, cost and safety were analyzed and quantified by functional forms. The "three-one" elements transformation structure was employed to determine the "main attachment" dimensions, and the tradeoff optimization function of the key elements for the technical interface of the railway bridge-tunnel in the arduous mountainous area was established. Then based on the mechanism that the technical interface to the key elements, the decision preference coefficients of the tradeoff optimization function were determined by ANP, the achievement scalarizing functions preference inspired co-evolutionary algorithm (ASF-PICEA-g) was used to obtain the optimal solution of the tradeoff optimization model, and find the optimal solution of each key element under the optimal solution of the whole model. Finally, both the rationality of the tradeoff optimization function and the effectiveness of the ASF-PICEA-g were verified by constructing the tradeoff optimization function of the technical interface between the Zangmu Bridge and the Allah Tunnel and carrying out the optimization analysis.
|
Received: 16 April 2021
Published: 29 March 2022
|
|
Fund: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71942006);中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司基金资助项目(2020YJ218) |
铁路桥隧工程技术接口的关键要素均衡优化
为了实现对艰险山区铁路桥隧工程技术接口关键要素的协调优化控制,将多属性效用函数与“三一”要素转化结构结合,构建技术接口的关键要素均衡优化模型. 分析质量、进度、成本、安全要素间的关系,将它们的关联性以函数形式量化,并利用“三一”要素转化结构确定关键要素间的“主附”维度,构建艰险山区铁路桥隧工程技术接口的关键要素均衡优化目标函数. 基于技术接口对关键要素的作用机理,利用ANP确定均衡优化函数的决策偏好系数,采用基于偏好向量引导的高维目标协同进化算法(ASF-PICEA-g)求得均衡优化模型的最优解,并在整体模型的最优解下得到各关键要素的较优解. 以藏木特大桥与安拉隧道为例,对其技术接口构建均衡优化函数并进行优化分析,结果验证了构建的均衡优化函数的合理性以及ASF-PICEA-g在求解该模型方面的有效性.
关键词:
桥隧工程技术接口,
关键要素,
多属性效用函数,
偏好向量
|
|
[1] |
JU Q Q, DING L Y A web-based system for interface management of metro equipment engineering[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 2015, 79: 577- 590
doi: 10.1007/s10846-014-0121-y
|
|
|
[2] |
SAMIN S, MAHDI S, CARL T, et al. Interface management model for mega capital projects [C]// Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World. West Lafayette: ASCE, 2012: 447-456.
|
|
|
[3] |
TIAN X L. Influencing factors for project interface management [C]// ICCREM 2013: Construction and Operation in the Context of Sustainability. Karlsruhe: ASCE, 2013: 448-456.
|
|
|
[4] |
NUTTENS T, DE BREUCK V, CATTOOR R, et al Using BIM models for the design of large rail infrastructure projects: key factors for a successful implementation[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 2018, 13 (1): 73- 83
doi: 10.2495/SDP-V13-N1-73-83
|
|
|
[5] |
NILSEN M A, FALK K, HAUGEN T A Reducing project cost growth through early implementation of interface management[J]. INCOSE International Symposium, 2018, 28 (1): 96- 114
doi: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2018.00470.x
|
|
|
[6] |
琚倩茜, 姜红丙 城市轨道交通工程关键接口识别方法研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2020, 17 (10): 2672- 2679 JU Qian-qian, JIANG Hong-bing Research on key interface points identification for metro projects[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2020, 17 (10): 2672- 2679
|
|
|
[7] |
沈文欣, 唐文哲, 张清振, 等 基于伙伴关系的国际EPC项目接口管理[J]. 清华大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 57 (6): 644- 650 SHEN Wen-xin, TANG Wen-zhe, ZHANG Qing-zhen, et al Partnering to enhance interface management in international EPC projects[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University: Science and Technology, 2017, 57 (6): 644- 650
|
|
|
[8] |
蔡文涛. 高速公路大中修工程的多目标集成管理研究 [D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2017: 69-72. CAI Wen-tao. A research on integrated multi-objective management [D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2017: 69-72.
|
|
|
[9] |
钟登华, 李正, 吴斌平, 等 基于Pareto解的面板堆石坝施工工期-质量-成本均衡优化研究[J]. 天津大学学报:自然科学与工程技术版, 2016, 49 (10): 1001- 1007 ZHONG Deng-hua, LI Zheng, WU Bin-ping, et al Time-quality-cost tradeoff optimization of rockfill dam construction based on Pareto solution[J]. Journal of Tianjin University: Science and Technology, 2016, 49 (10): 1001- 1007
|
|
|
[10] |
袁剑波, 毛红日, 戴坤阳 非线性关系下绿色施工管理多目标权衡研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34 (9): 33- 37 YUAN Jian-bo, MAO Hong-ri, DAI Kun-yang Multi-objective tradeoff of green construction management under nonlinear relation[J]. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 2017, 34 (9): 33- 37
doi: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2017GC0015
|
|
|
[11] |
琚倩茜. 面向联合调试的地铁设备系统多属性集成接口管理研究 [D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2017: 37-40. JU Qian-qian. Research on multi-attribute integration interface management of metro equipment system for joint commissioning [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2017: 37-40.
|
|
|
[12] |
郑雨茜, 鲍学英 基于ANP和扩展TOPSIS法的青藏铁路冻土路基安全性分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2018, 15 (3): 605- 613 ZHENG Yu-qian, BAO Xue-ying The safety analysis of the Qinghai-Tibet railway permafrost subgrade based on ANP and the extension of TOPSIS method[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2018, 15 (3): 605- 613
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7029.2018.03.009
|
|
|
[13] |
WESHAH N, GHANDOUR W E, JERGEAS G, et al Factor analysis of the interface management (IM) problems for construction projects in Alberta[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2013, 40 (9): 848- 860
doi: 10.1139/cjce-2012-0531
|
|
|
[14] |
王峰. 高速铁路工程系统接口技术研究 [D]. 北京: 中国铁道科学研究院, 2013: 101-110. WANG Feng. Research on the interface technology of high-speed railway engineering system [D]. Beijing: China Academy of Railway Sciences, 2013: 101-110.
|
|
|
[15] |
杜洁洁. 基于多偏好协同的高维目标进化算法研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2018: 31-36. DU Jie-jie. Research on high-dimensional target evolution algorithm based on multi-preference collaboration [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University of Technology, 2018: 31-36.
|
|
|
[16] |
王丽萍, 陈宏, 杜洁洁, 等 偏好向量引导的高维目标协同进化算法[J]. 软件学报, 2020, 31 (12): 3716- 3732 WANG Li-ping, CHEN Hong, DU Jie-jie, et al Preference vector guided coevolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization[J]. Journal of Software, 2020, 31 (12): 3716- 3732
|
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|