Please wait a minute...
JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE)
    
Conceptual design method for low-carbon packaging of products based on principal component analysis
XU Feng1,2,JI Yang-jian1,GU Xin-jian1,QI Guo-ning1
1. Institute of Modern Manufacturing Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China;2. School of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Ningbo Institute of Technology, Zhejiang University, Ningbo, 315100, China
Download:   PDF(2234KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  
The proportion of carbon emissions in packaging industry has exceeded its proportion of output value in GDP, in order to reduce highly waste and carbon emissions in the life cycle of product packaging, a conceptual design processes and method of low-carbon packaging of products was provided, the guideline and boundary of conceptual design for low-carbon packaging was discussed. Under the constraint of comprehensive optimization which integrated protection, merchantability, low-carbon and economy, the principal component model of conceptual design parameters for low-carbon packaging was analyzed, its effective to reduce dimensions of design parameters by mathematical way, the new principal component which integrated and filtered original design information and reduced the difficulty of design; the carbon footprint calculation model of the conceptual design phase of product packaging was also discussed; the method of evaluation and selection on conceptual design scenario for low-carbon packaging was established. The case study results of gasoline packaging show this method is effective through three scenarios including wood, corrugated cardboard and plywood in the low-carbon packaging concept design guidance, and the corrugated cardboard is determined to be the best solution because of its comprehensive performance indicators: 161.17. This result consistent with packaging trend of mechanical and electrical product which use high-strength corrugated cardboard instead of wood.


Published: 01 November 2014
CLC:  TB 482  
Cite this article:

XU Feng,JI Yang-jian,GU Xin-jian,QI Guo-ning. Conceptual design method for low-carbon packaging of products based on principal component analysis. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 2014, 48(11): 2009-2016.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2014.11.014     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/Y2014/V48/I11/2009


基于主成分分析的产品低碳包装概念设计方法

为了降低产品包装生命周期中形成的高度浪费和高碳排放,给出产品低碳包装概念设计的流程和方法,讨论低碳包装概念设计的准则和边界,以防护性、销售性、低碳性和经济性的综合优化准则为约束,建立产品低碳包装概念设计参数的主成分模型,该模型在集成和筛选原有设计信息的基础上通过数学降维的方式形成新的主成分以降低概念设计方案选择的难度,同时还建立包装概念设计阶段的碳足迹计算模型,给出低碳包装概念设计方案的评价和选择方法,以小型汽油机包装为例,在低碳包装概念设计方法指导下选择的木材、瓦楞纸板和胶合板作为汽油机包装材料形成的3个方案中,结果表明,瓦楞纸板在综合性能指标中以161.17的分值被确定为最优解,符合目前高强度瓦楞纸板代木包装在机电产品包装中的应用趋势,从而验证了此方法有效.
[1] 戴宏民. 绿色包装的理论、标准及制造模式[J]. 中国机械工程, 2002,13(23):2048-2052.
DAI Hong-min, Theory, standard and manufacturing model of green packaging [J]. Chinese Mechanical Engineering, 2002,13(23):2048-2052.
[2] 苏建宁, 李鹤岐, 李奋强. 基于知识的绿色包装评价体系[J]. 包装工程, 2003,24(1):44-46.
SU Jian-ming, LI He-qi, LI Fen-qiang, The method of multilevel evaluation of green packaging [J]. Packaging Engineering, 2003,24(1):44-46.
[3] 张元标. 绿色包装设计的多层次灰色综合评价模型[J]. 包装工程, 2006,27(1):123-125.
ZHANG Yuan-biao, Model of multilevel gray evaluation of green packaging [J]. Packaging Engineering, 2006,27(1):123-125.
[4] JORGELINA P, MONTSE M, FRANCESC C. The carbon footprint and energy consumption of beverage packaging selection and disposal [J].
Journal of Food Engineering, 2011,103(4):357-365.
[5] SOTIRIOS B, DIMITRIOS G. A probabilistic framework for the evaluation of productsenvironmental performance using life cycle approach
and principal component analysis [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2013,42(5):103-115.
[6] DAVIS G, SONG J H. Biodegradable packaging based on raw materials from crops and their impact on waste management [J]. Industrial
Crops and Products, 2006,23(2):147-161.
[7] MICHELE G, STEFANO C, MARIO G, et al. Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems. An evaluation based on life
cycle assessment [J]. Waste Management, 2011,31(9/10):2092-2101.
[8] CRISTINA A, CLAUDIA D G. BEATRICE L, et al. From ecodesign products guidelines to materials guidelines for a sustainable product.
Qualitative and quantitative multicriteria environmental profile of a material [J]. Energy, 2012,39(1):90-99.
[9] LENNART Y L. Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products [J]. Materials & Design, 2007,28(2):466-479.
[10] LIXIN S, LAYA O, KANNAN G, et al. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green suppliers performance in green supply chain
with linguistic preferences [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2012:74(5):170-179.
[11] ROMMERT D, JACQUELINE B, IOANNIS M. Operations research for green logistics – an overview of aspects, issues, contributions and
challenges [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012,219(3):671-679.
[12] SUSAN C, KUMAR V. The energy and carbon intensity of wine distribution: A study of logistical options for delivering wine to consumers
[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009,17(16):14011413.
[13] JIN L, AI H, LEON M, et al. An economic and environmental framework for analyzing globally sourced auto parts packaging system [J].
Journal of Cleaner Production, 2008,16(15):1632-1646.
[14] 大卫.M.安德森. 21世纪企业竞争前沿: 大规模定制模式下的敏捷产品开发[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2000.
[15] 韩晓健, 邓家提. 基于网络协同的产品概念设计系统研究[J]. 制造业自动化, 2003,25(11):57.
HAN Xiao-jian, DENG Jia-ti. Research on web- based collaborative product conceptual design [J]. Manufacturing Automation, 2003,25(11):57.
No related articles found!