Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)
J4  2012, Vol. 46 Issue (2): 250-256    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2012.02.011
    
Approximately determining preloading duration considering creep
HU Ya-yuan
Key Laboratory of Soft soils and Geoenviromental Engineering of Ministry of Education, Geotechnical institute,
Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058,China
Download:   PDF(0KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

As the secondary consolidation settlement was not taken into account in classical preloading theory and the flaw sometimes happened that the critical consolidation degree was bigger than 100% considering secondary consolidation settlement in Johnson’s method, an approximate formula of preloading duration under a single-stage sudden loading was proposed. During the derivation of this approximate formula, Bjerrum’s equal-time creep diagram and Yin-Graham equivalent-time rheological model are used and Zeng Guo-xi’s approximate formula of consolidation degree is employed. So the approximate formula can be able to avoid the flaw of Johnson’s method, and analyze the effects of soft subsoil’s consolidation coefficient, creep coefficient, swelling index, surcharge pressure ratio, allowable post-construction settlement and preconsolidation time on preloading duration. Research results show that when surcharge pressure ratio is relatively smaller, preloading duration decays with the power growth of surcharge pressure ratio. An increase in surcharge pressure ratio can obviously make preloading duration short. When surcharge pressure ratio become bigger, preloading duration slowly decays with the growth of surcharge pressure ratio. An increase in surcharge pressure ratio can only make preloading duration a little decrease.

Published: 20 March 2012
CLC:  TD 853.34  
  TU 411.3  
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cite this article:

HU Ya-yuan. Approximately determining preloading duration considering creep. J4, 2012, 46(2): 250-256.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2012.02.011     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/Y2012/V46/I2/250


考虑蠕变时预压期的近似确定方法

针对经典预压理论无法考虑次固结沉降以及考虑次固结沉降的Johnson法有时会出现临界固结度超过100％的错误,提出预压荷载一次骤然施加完毕后预压持续时间的近似计算公式.在推导该近似公式过程中,利用Bjerrum等时蠕变图和Yin-Graham等效时间线流变模型,采用曾国熙近似固结度计算公式,因此该近似公式能够克服Johnson法的缺陷,分析软基固结系数、蠕变系数、回弹指数、超固结比、工后允许沉降和预固结时间对预压工期的影响.研究表明:当预压超载较小时,预压持续时间随着超载比的增加呈幂函数趋势减少,增大超载比能够有效地缩短预压工期；当预压超载较大时,预压持续时间随着超载比的增加缓慢减少,增大超载比对缩短工期意义不大.

［1］ 龚晓南.地基处理手册［M］.3版.北京:中国建筑出版社,2008: 69-164.
［2］ 岑仰润,龚晓南,温晓贵.真空排水预压工程中孔压实测资料的分析与应用［J］.浙江大学学报:工学版,2003, 37(1): 16-18, 55.
CEN YangRun., GONG XiaoNan., WEN XiaoGui. Analysis of field test data on pore pressure in vacuum drainage preloading ［J］. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science , 2003, 37(1): 16-18, 55.
［3］ 丁洲祥,俞建霖,朱建才,等.真空——堆载联合预压加固地基简化非线性分析［J］.浙江大学学报:工学版,2005,39(12): 1897-1901.
DING ZhouXiang., YU JianLin., ZHU JianCai.,et al. Simplified nonlinear analysis of subsoil improved by vacuum combined with surcharge preloading ［J］. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2005,39 (12): 1897-1901.
［4］ 魏鉴栋,凌道盛,陈云敏.受大面积堆载影响负摩擦桩的QS曲线分析［J］.浙江大学学报:工学版,2007,41(1): 166-170.
WEI JianDong, LING DaoSheng, CHEN YunMin. Analysis of QS curve on negative frictional pile under largescale vertical loads ［J］. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science , 2007, 41(1): 166-170.
［5］ 朱斌,陈若曦,陈云敏,等.分层真空预压软土地基一维大变形固结模型及试验研究［J］.浙江大学学报:工学版,2007,41(11): 1927-1930.
ZHU Bin, CHEN RuoXi, CHEN YunMin, et al. Modeling and experimental study of onedimensional large strain consolidation of soft soil under multilayer vacuum preloading ［J］. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science,2007,41(11): 1927-1930.
［6］ 谢康和,徐妍,单君.软土地基一维非单调压缩固结性状分析［J］.浙江大学学报:工学版,2008,42(1): 29-33.
XIE Kanghe, XU Yan., SHAN Jun. Onedimensional consolidation behavior of soft soil under nonmonotonic compression ［J］. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2008,42(1): 29-33.
［7］ JOHNSON S J. Precompression for improving foundation soil ［J］. Journal of soil mechanics and foundation division, ASCE, 1970, 96(SMI): 111-114.
［8］ 潘秋元,朱向荣,谢康和.关于砂井地基超载预压的若干问题［J］.岩土工程学报,1991,13(2): 1-12.
PAN QiuYun, ZHU XiangRong, XIE KangHe. Some problems on sand wick foundation under surcharge preloading ［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1991, 13(2): 1-12.
［9］ 张光永,王靖涛,徐辉.超载预压法的超载比及卸载控制研究［J］.华中科技大学学报:城市科学版,2003,20(4): 37-39.
ZHANG GuangYong, WANG JinTao, XU Hui. Study on surcharge ratio and unloading control of surcharge precompression ［J］. Journal of Huazhong university of Science and Technology: Urban Science Edition. 2003,20(4): 37-39.
［10］ 胡亚元.软土预固结对堆载预压卸载临界沉降的影响［J］.浙江大学学报:工学版,2010,44(8): 1615-1620.
HU YaYuan. Settlement standard of unloading time in preloading method with an eye to the secondary consolidation ［J］. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2010, 44(8): 1615-1620.
［11］ 胡亚元.考虑次压缩时堆载预压的临界沉降和持续时间［C］∥2009海峡两岸地工技术/岩土工程交流研讨会论文集.北京:中国科学技术出版社,2009: 67-92.
HU YaYuan. Determination of critical settlement and duration for preloading method when taking into account secondary settlement ［C］∥ Proceeding of conference on the geotechnical engineering of intercoastal strait. Beijing: Chinese Science Press, 2009: 67-92.
［12］ BJERRUM L. Engineering geology of Norwegian normally consolidated marine clay as related to the settlements of buildings ［J］.Geotechnique,1967,17(2): 83-118.
［13］ 殷宗泽,张海波,朱俊高,等.软土的次固结［J］.岩土工程学报,2003,25(5): 521-526.
YIN ZongZe, ZHANG HaiBo, ZHU JunGao, et al. Secondary consolidation of soft soils ［J］. Chinese journal of geotechnical engineering, 2003, 25(5): 521-526.
［14］ 殷建华,JACK I C. 土体与时间相关的一维应力应变形状、弹黏塑性模型和固结分析［J］.岩土力学,1994, 15(3): 65-80.
YIN JianHua, JACK I C. Onedimensional time dependent stressstress behavior of soil, elastic Viscoplastic modeling and consolidation analysis ［J］. Rock and Soil mechanics, 1994, 15(3): 65-80.
［15］ 殷建华,JACK I C. 土体与时间相关的一维应力应变形状、弹黏塑性模型和固结分析(续)［J］.岩土力学,1994,15(4): 65-75.
YIN JianHua, JACK I C. Onedimensional time dependent stressstress behavior of soil, elastic Viscoplastic modeling and consolidation analysis(Continue) ［J］. Rock and Soil mechanics, 1994, 15(4): 65-75.
［16］ SCHMERTMANN J H. The mechanical aging of soils ［J］. Journal of geotechnical engineering, 1991,117(9): 1288-1330.
［17］ 顾晓鲁,钱鸿缙,刘惠珊,等.地基与基础［M］.3版.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003: 138198, 238-245.
［18］ 胡亚元,江涛.数值分析蠕变系数对准超固结软土固结特性的影响［J］.浙江大学学报：工学版,已录用.
HU YaYuan, JIANG Tao. The numerical analysis of the impact of creep coefficient on the consolidation characteristics of the quasi overconsolidated soft clay ［J］. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science,accepted.
［19］ 胡亚元.关于“超载卸载后再压缩软土的次压缩特征及变形计算”的讨论［J］.岩土工程学报, 2009, 31(12): 1963-1965.
HU YaYuan. Discussion on “ Secondary compression characterisitics and settlement calculation of soft clay under overloadingunloading and reloading”［J］. Chinese journal of geotechnical engineering, 2009,31(12): 1963-1965.
［20］ 杨建国,李帆.真空预压技术在轨道交通中的应用［J］.铁路标准,2004,(9): 16-18.
YANG JianGuo, LI Fan. Application of vacuum preload on rail traffic Engineering ［J］. Railway Standards, 2004,(9): 16-18.