Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)
浙江大学学报(工学版)
土木工程与水利工程     
排水和排涝设计暴雨重现期的异同
张泽慧,丁晶,覃光华,姚瑞虎
1.四川大学 水利水电学院 四川 成都 610065;
2.四川大学 水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室 四川 成都 610065
Differences and similarities of design rainstorm’s return period between drainage and water logging
ZHANG Zebhui,DING Jing,QIN Guang hua,YAO Rui hu
1.College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Chengdu, 610065, China
 全文: PDF(690 KB)   HTML
摘要：

针对市政系统和水利系统中设计暴雨重现期不一致的情况,提出基于年多个样法和年最大值法的次风险理念和年风险理念.指出市政系统重现期所表征的风险除特大值外还包括次大值等所引起的风险,而水利系统重现期所表征的风险仅为年最大值主宰的风险.以广州市暴雨资料为例,分析2种重现期的大小关系.研究表明,市政系统重现期小于或等于水利系统重现期的数量关系,2种重现期化异求同的关键在于统一风险理念和选样时采用年最大值法．
Abstract:

The concepts of time-risk and annual-risk were respectively presented based on the annual multi-samples method and the annual maximum sample method aiming  at the inconsistent of return periods about design rainstorm in the municipal and water conservancy systems. The risk of municipal system was caused by the annual biggest flood or the second flood or others, but the risk of water conservancy systems was  caused by the annual biggest flood. Taking the storm data in Guangzhou city as an example, the relationship between the two kinds return period was deeply analyzed. Results show that the return period of municipal system is not more than water conservancy system. The  key to change  the two return periods into accordance is unifying the two risk concepts and adopting the annual maximum sample method.
出版日期: 2016-11-01
:  TV 122  
基金资助:

国家“973”重点基础研究发展计划资助项目(2013CB036401).
通讯作者: 覃光华，女，副教授. ORCID:0000-0002-2942-3387.     E-mail: ghqin2000@163.com
作者简介: 张泽慧(1991-)，女，硕士生，主要从事水资源开发利用及其经济管理等研究. ORCID:0000-0001-8441-3723. E-mail: zhangzehui_2010@sina.com
服务　　
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章　　

引用本文:

张泽慧,丁晶,覃光华,姚瑞虎. 排水和排涝设计暴雨重现期的异同[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.11.017.

ZHANG Zebhui,DING Jing,QIN Guang hua,YAO Rui hu. Differences and similarities of design rainstorm’s return period between drainage and water logging. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.11.017.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.11.017    或    http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2016/V50/I11/2158

［1］ 曾娇娇.市政排水与水利排涝标准衔接研究［D］.广州:华南理工大学,2015．
ZENG Jiaojiao. Study on standard syntaxis of urban drainage between pipe and river ［D］. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology,2015．
［2］ 邱瑞田,徐宪彪,文康,等.关于确定城市防洪标准的几点认识［J］. 中国防汛与抗旱,2006,13:43-47．
QIU Ruitian,XU Xianbiao,WENG Kang,et al. Considerations related to formulation of urban flood control standards ［J］. China flood & drought management,2006,13:43-47．
［3］ 何文学,李茶青.城市“排水、排涝、防洪”工程之间的和谐关系研究［J］.给水排水,2015,41（S1）：85-88．
HE Wenxue,LI Chaqing. Study of harmonious relationship about“municipal drainage,drain waterlogging,flood control”in city waterlogging ［J］. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering,2015,41(S1)：85-88．
［4］ 陆廷春.南京市六合区市政排水与水利排涝设计暴雨重现期衔接关系［J］. 水利与建筑工程学报,2012,10（6）：191-194．
LU Tingchun. Study on connection relationship between return period of municipal drainage system and waterlogged drainage system in Liuhe district of Nanjing city［J］. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering,2012,10（6）：191-194．
［5］ 杨星,李朝方,刘志龙,等.基于风险分析法的排水排涝暴雨重现期转换关系［J］.武汉大学学报:工学版,2012,45(2)：171-176．
YANG Xing,LI Chaofang,LIU Zhilong,et al. Risk probability analysis of design storm combination of urban pipe drainage and rive drainage［J］. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2012, 45(2): 171-176．
［6］ 高学珑.城市排涝标准与排水标准衔接的探讨［J］.给水排水,2014,6（40）:18-21．
GAO Xuelong. On the connection relationship between the standards of urban Waterlogging and drainage ［J］. Water & Wastewater Engineering,2014,40（6）:18-21．
［7］ 冯耀龙,马姗姗,肖静.水利排涝与市政排水重现期的转换关系［J］.南水北调与水利科技,2015, 8（13）：614-617．
FENG Yaolong,MA Shanshan,XIAO Jing. Transformation relationship of return period between municipal drainage system and waterlogged drainage system ［J］.SouthtoNorth Water Transfers and Water Science &Technolog,2015, 8（13）：614-617．
［8］ 陈鑫,邓慧萍,马细霞.基于SWMM的城市排涝与排水体系重现期衔接关系研究［J］. 给水排水,2009,9(35) :114-117．
CHEN Xin,DENG Huiping,MA Xixia. Study on connection relationship between return period of urban drainage system and waterlogged drainage system based on SWMM ［J］. Water & Wastewater Engineering,2009,9 (35) :114-117．
［9］ 邵卫云.基于水文特性的暴雨选样方法的频率转换［J］.浙江大学学报:工学版,2010,44（8）：1597-1603．
SHAO Weiyun. Probability relationship between rainstorm sampling methods base on hydrologic characters ［J］. Journal of Zhejiang University :Engineering Science,2010,44（8）：1597-1603．
［10］ 叶守泽.水文水利计算\[M\].北京：中国水利水电出版社，1994：47-52．
［11］ 马戈.概率论与数理统计\[M\].北京：科学出版社，2012：5-12．
［12］ 邓培德.城市暴雨2种选样方法的概率关系与应用评述［J］. 给水排水,2003,32（6）：39-42．
DENG Peide. Review on probability and application of two sampling methods for urban storm ［J］. Water & Wastewater Engineering,2003,32（6）：39-42．
［13］ 夏军良.城市防洪排涝体系建设存在的问题与对策［J］. 江西建材,2015,8（161）：295．
XIA Liangjun. Problems existing in the construction of urban flood control and drainage system and the countermeasures ［J］. Jiangxi Building Material,2015,8（161）：295．
［14］ 方国华,钟淋娟,苗苗.我国城市防洪排涝安全研究［J］.灾害学,2008,23(3):119-123．
FANG Guohua,ZHONG Linjuan,MIAO Miao. Research on urban flood control and waterlogged drainage safety of our country ［J］. Journal of Catastrophology,2008,23(3):119-123．
［15］ 中华人民共和国水利部.SL442006 水利水电工程设计洪水计算规范［S］.北京：中国水利水电出版社,2006:7．
Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. SL442006.Regulation for calculating design flood of water resources and hydropower projects\[S\].Beijing:Water&Power Press,2006:7
[1] 陈一帆,程伟平,蒋建群,钱镜林. 含水工构筑物的山区河流二维流场数值模拟[J]. J4, 2013, 47(11): 1945-1950.
[2] 鲍鑫 ,贺治国,王振宇,吴钢锋,刘国华,钱镜林. 台风暴雨影响区溃坝洪灾淹没损失评估[J]. J4, 2012, 46(9): 1638-1646.
[3] 贺治国, 吴钢锋, 王振宇, 刘国华, 鲍鑫, 冯威. 台风暴雨影响区域的溃坝洪水演进数值计算[J]. J4, 2010, 44(8): 1589-1596.
[4] 吴钢锋,贺治国,刘国华. 基于守恒稳定格式的二维坡面降雨动力波洪水模型[J]. J4, 2014, 48(3): 514-520.