Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)
土木工程、建筑工程     
YinGraham流变模型沉降简化计算统一公式
胡亚元, 杨秋华
浙江大学 滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310027
Unified simplified settlement formula based on YinGraham’s rheological model
HU Ya yuan, YANG Qiu hua
Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
 全文: PDF(1002 KB)   HTML
摘要:

从准塑性黏弹性模型在一定条件下假说B与修正的假说A近似等价的视角出发,基于YinGraham等效时间流变模型,通过时间折减因子修正实际时间和等效时间之间的差异,提出用等效时间表示的新孔隙比简化计算公式.该公式适用于任意突然加卸载工况,包括加载到正常固结土、加载到超固结土、卸载和卸载再加载.通过总固结度法和分级固结度法获得2种多级加载孔隙比简化计算公式.与精确解和现场实测数据对比结果表明,单级加载时新孔隙比简化公式预测的工后沉降计算偏差明显低于采用经典法和旧等效时间法得到的计算偏差;多级加载时总固结度法和分级固结度法计算的理论超载预压持续时间和工后沉降量均与精确解结果接近;由于总固结度法远比分级固结度法简单,建议采用前者计算预压法工艺的持续时间和工后沉降量.

Abstract:

From the perspective of the idea that under certain condition hypothesis B is approximately equivalent to modified hypothesis A in quasiplastic viscoelastic model, a new simplified formula of void ratio in terms of equivalent time was proposed based on YinGraham’s equivalent time rheological model and using time reduction factor to modify the difference between real time and equivalent time. The formula was valid for any suddenly loading and unloading cases, including loading in normally consolidated soil, loading in overconsolidated soil, unloading and loading after unloading. Two simplified formula of void ratio for the multistage construction were established by the means of total consolidation degree method and grading consolidation degree method, respectively. Through comparing with the exact solution and the measured data on site, results show that the calculation error of postconstruction settlement by the new simplified formula of void ratio is obviously smaller than those by the classical method and the old equivalenttime method in singlestage construction. The theoretical duration of surcharge preloading and postconstruction settlement were analyzed by the total consolidation degree method and the grading consolidation degree method respectively. Both results are approximate to the exact solution. As the total consolidation degree method is much simpler than the grading consolidation degree method, the former is suggested to calculate preloading duration and postconstruction settlement in the preloading method.

出版日期: 2016-06-01
:  TU 47  
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51178419).

作者简介: 胡亚元(1968—),男,副教授,博士,从事地基处理和土的本构关系研究.ORCID:0000000254227679. E-mail:huyayuan@zju.edu.cn
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

胡亚元, 杨秋华. YinGraham流变模型沉降简化计算统一公式[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.06.001.

HU Ya yuan, YANG Qiu hua. Unified simplified settlement formula based on YinGraham’s rheological model. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.06.001.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.06.001        http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2016/V50/I6/1009

[1] 中国人民共和国铁道部.高速铁路设计规范(试行):TB100262009 [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2009.
[2] 龚晓南.地基处理手册:第三版[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2008: 69-162.
[3] 中华人民共和国交通运输部.公路软土地基路堤设计与施工技术规范:JTG/T D31022013[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2013.
[4] 刘汉龙,扈胜霞,ALI Hassan.真空堆载预压作用下软土蠕变特性试验研究[J].岩土力学,2008, 29(1): 6-12.
LIU Hanlong, HU Shengxia, ALI H. Test study on creep characteristics of soft clayey soils under consolidation by vacuumsurcharge combined preloading method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(1): 612.
[5] 郭林, 蔡袁强,谷川,等.循环荷载下软黏土回弹和累积变形特性[J].浙江大学学报:工学版, 2013,47(12): 2111-2117.
GUO Lin, CAI Yuanqiang, GU Chuan, et al. Resilient and permanent strain behavior of soft clay under cyclic loading [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2013, 47(12): 2111-2117.
[6] 殷建华.从本构模型研究到试验和光纤监测技术研发[J].岩土工程学报,2011, 33(1): 1-15.
YIN Jianhua. From constitutive modeling to development of laboratory testing and optical fiber sensor monitoring technologies [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(1): 1-15.
[7] 殷宗泽,张海波,朱俊高,等.软土的次固结[J].岩土工程学报,2003, 25(5): 521-526.
YIN Zongze, ZHANG Haibo, ZHU Jungao, et al. Secondary consolidation of soft soils [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(5): 521-526.
[8] DEGAGO S A, GRIMSTAD G, JOSTAD H P, et al. Use and misuse of the isotache concept with respect to creep hypotheses A and B [J]. Geotechnique, 2011,61(10): 897-908.
[9] YIN J H, GRAHAM J. Viscouselasticplastic modelling of onedimensional timedependent behaviour of clays [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1989, 26(2): 199209.
[10] SHI J Y, ZHAO W B, LI F H. Settlement analysis for an embankment considering viscoelastoplastic characteristics [J]. China Ocean Engineering, 2000, 14(3): 349-360.
[11] YIN J H, ZHU J G, GRAHAM J. A new elastic viscoplastic model for timedependent behaviour of normally and overconsolidated claystheory and verification [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2002, 39(1): 157-173.
[12] 谢新宇,李金柱,王文军,等.宁波软土流变试验及经验模型[J].浙江大学学报:工学版,2012, 46(1): 64-71.
XIE Xinyu, LI Jinzhu, WANG Wenjun, et al. Rheological test and empirical model of Ningbo soft soil [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2012,46(1): 64-71.
[13] 张超杰,王立忠,陈云敏.一维弹粘塑性固结模型及其应用[J].浙江大学学报:工学版,2003, 37(1): 10-15.
ZHANG Chaojie, WANG Lizhong, CHEN Yunmin. Onedimensional elastic viscoplastic consolidation model and its application [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2003, 37(1): 10-15.
[14] 胡亚元.考虑蠕变时预压期的近似确定方法[J].浙江大学学报:工学版,2012, 46(2): 250-256.
HU Yayuan. Approximately determining preloading duration considering creep [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2012, 46(2): 250-256.
[15] 刘吉福,郑刚,安关峰.等效时间计算方法研究[J].广西大学学报:自然科学版,2012,37(1): 160-164.
LIU Jifu, ZHENG Gang, AN Guanfeng. Study on the calculation of equivalent time [J]. Journal of Guangxi University: Nature Science Edition, 2012, 37(1): 160-164.
[16] BJERRUM L. Engineering geology of Norwegian normally consolidated marine clay as related to the settlements of buildings [J]. Geotechnique, 1967, 17(2): 83-118.
[17] ZHU G F, YIN J H. Elastic viscoplastic finite element consolidation modelling of Berthierville test embankment [J]. International Journal of Numerical and Analytic Methods in Geomechanics, 2000, 24: 491-508.
[18] NASH D F T, RYDE S J. Modelling consolidation accelerated by vertical drains in soils subject to creep [J]. Geotechnique, 2001, 51(3): 257-273.
[19] HU Y Y, ZHOU W H, CAI Y Q. Largestrain elastic viscoplastic consolidation analysis of very soft clay layers with vertical drains under preloading [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2014, 51(2): 114-157.
[20] 谢康和.砂井地基:固结理论、数值分析与优化设计[D].杭州:浙江大学, 1987: 22-80.
XIE Kanghe. Sand well foundation: consolidation theory, numerical analysis and optimization design [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 1987: 22-80.
[21] 顾晓鲁,钱鸿缙,刘惠珊,等.地基与基础:第三版[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2008: 183-198.
[22] HU Y Y. A practical evaluation of the surcharge preload period in staged construction subject to creep [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2012, 42: 171-179.
[23] 刘加才,赵维炳,宰金珉.排水固结下卧层固结度简化计算[J].水运工程,2006, 1: 75-79.
LIU Jiacai, ZHAO Weibing, ZAI Jinmin. Simplified consolidation calculation on substratum of ground improved by drainage consolidation [J]. Port and Waterway Engineering, 2006,1: 75-79.

[1] 郑凌逶, 谢新宇, 谢康和, 李金柱, 刘亦民. 电渗法加固地基试验及应用研究进展[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(6): 1064-1073.
[2] 孔令刚, 姚宏波, 詹良通, 陈云敏. 含水率对非饱和土质覆盖层塌陷模式的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(5): 847-855.
[3] 邹圣锋, 李金柱, 王忠瑾, 兰璐, 王文军, 谢新宇. 基于GDS渗透仪的渗透试验及经验模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(5): 856-862.
[4] 项国圣, 方圆, 徐永福. 阳离子交换对高庙子钠基膨润土膨胀性能的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(5): 931-936.
[5] 臧俊超, 郑凌逶, 谢新宇, 曹丽文,李卓明. 生活源污染土电渗加固试验[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(2): 245-254.
[6] 胡亚元. 非饱和多孔岩石的热力学本构理论[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(2): 255-263.
[7] 吴意谦,朱彦鹏. 潜水地区基坑降水诱发地面沉降的一种改进算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(11): 2188-2197.
[8] 陈经浩, 黄建新, 陆胜勇, 李晓东, 严建华. 生活垃圾开放式燃烧炭黑的结构及污染物分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(10): 1849-1854.
[9] 袁炳祥, 吴跃东, 陈锐, 冯仲文, 汪亦显. 侧向受荷桩周土体内部位移场的模型试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(10): 2031-2036.
[10] 徐铨彪,陈刚,贺景峰,龚顺风. 复合配筋混凝土预制方桩抗弯性能试验[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(9): 1768-1776.
[11] 单华峰, 夏唐代, 俞峰, 胡军华, 潘金龙. 地下增层开挖托换桩的屈曲稳定临界荷载分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(8): 1425-1430.
[12] 何奔,王欢,洪义,王立忠,赵长军,秦肖. 竖向荷载对黏土地基中单桩水平受荷性能的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(7): 1221-1229.
[13] 陈仁朋,孟凡衍,李忠超,叶跃鸿,胡琦. 邻近深基坑地铁隧道过大位移及保护措施[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(5): 856-863.
[14] 涂志斌,黄铭枫,楼文娟. 风浪耦合作用下桥塔基础体系的极限荷载效应[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(5): 813-821.
[15] 邱子义,韩同春,豆红强,李智宁. 桩后及桩侧土拱共同作用的抗滑桩桩间距分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(3): 551-558.